Systemic treatment of advanced clear cell sarcoma: results from a retrospective international series from the World Sarcoma Network

Malignant melanoma: An important differential diagnosis for clear cell sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract

A case report by Liu et al describes the characteristics of metastatic clear cell sarcoma (CCS) of the pancreas and provides valuable therapeutic insights for this rare malignancy. This case is interesting because of its rarity, suggesting that the pancreas may be a potential target organ for CCS, either primary or metastatic. At the same time, the authors also emphasize the importance of regular postoperative follow-up for timely detection of recurrent lesions, as CCS is characterized by a high degree of malignancy and a high rate of recurrent metastases. Considering that CCS of the gastrointestinal tract is easily confused with malignant melanoma (MM) of the gastrointestinal tract, here we compare the clinical features, histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of CCS and MM of the gastrointestinal tract, hoping to provide a reference for clinical work.

Essential role of postoperative follow-up in the management of clear cell sarcoma

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare melanocytic soft tissue sarcoma known for its propensity to metastasize to the lymph nodes and typically has an unfavorable prognosis. Currently, surgical resection is the primary treatment for localized CCS, while radiotherapy and chemotherapy are preferred for metastatic cases. The roles of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and lymph node dissection are controversial. Although immunotherapy has emerged as a promising avenue in CCS treatment research, there are no established clinical standards for postoperative follow-up. This editorial discusses a recent article by Liu et al, with a focus on current diagnostic modalities, treatment approaches, and the challenging prognosis associated with CCS. Our aim is to underscore the importance of long-term patient follow-up in CCS management.

Real-world outcomes of metastatic clear cell sarcoma sequential chemotherapy

Clear cell sarcoma is an ultra-rare chemoresistant subtype of soft tissue sarcoma. This retrospective analysis aimed to clarify the efficacy of palliative chemotherapy in CCS by assessing response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) at a referral center. A retrospective analysis of palliative treatment was conducted on patients with CCS treated at the sarcoma unit from 1997 to 2023. Treatment responses were assessed using RECIST criteria, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate PFS and OS. The analysis covered 23 CCS chemotherapy-treated patients with 11 (47.8%) men. The median age at the palliative treatment start was 32 years (range 18-59). The median follow-up was 8.2 months. Four patients were referred to our centre for M1 disease, and 6 received perioperative chemotherapy and progressed during follow-up. In the first line, 14 patients received anthracycline-based chemotherapy (60.9%), five were treated with ifosfamide (HD-IFO), and four received other regimens. One patient (4.3%) achieved partial response (PR), and 12 patients (52.2%) achieved stable disease (SD) as the best response. Median PFS in 1 line was 2.79 months (95% CI: 2.04-8.38), and 1.76 months (95% CI: 0.72-6.97) in the second line. The median OS from first-line palliative chemotherapy was 8.2 months (95% CI: 6.2-14), and the second-line palliative chemotherapy mOS was 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.9-NA). Perioperatively anthracycline-pretreated worsened patients' median PFS in the M1 setting. Poor responses to conventional chemotherapy were observed in CCS, indicating a need for further clinical trials in this indication.

Metastatic clear cell sarcoma of the pancreas: A rare case report

BACKGROUND

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma. The most common metastatic sites for CCS are the lungs, bones and brain. CCS is highly invasive and mainly metastasizes to the lung, followed by the bone and brain; however, pancreatic metastasis is relatively rare.

CASE SUMMARY

We report on a rare case of CCS with pancreatic metastasis in a 47-year-old man. The patient had a relevant medical history 3 years ago, with abdominal pain as the main clinical manifestation. No abnormalities were observed on physical examination and the tumor was found on abdominal computed tomography. Based on the medical history and postoperative pathology, the patient was diagnosed with CCS with pancreatic metastasis. The patient was successfully treated with surgical interventions, including distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy.

CONCLUSION

This report summarizes the available treatment modalities for CCS and the importance of regular postoperative follow-up for patients with CCS.

A Rare Clinical Presentation With a Difficult Imaging Diagnosis of an Intra-articular Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Knee

ABSTRACT

Clear cell sarcoma, a highly aggressive cell sarcoma with melanotic differentiation, typically occurs in the tendon and aponeuroses of the lower extremities and rarely develops in the intra-articular region. Herein, we present an extremely rare case of clear cell sarcoma originating from the intra-articular knee and suspected as benign tumors due to the benign-looking findings on MRI and PET/CT. The image results in our case were completely consistent with a tenosynovial giant cell tumor, resulting in the misdiagnosis. For differential diagnosis, especially malignant melanoma, histopathology, including IHC and FISH, was indispensable.

Factors associated with survival in patients with clear cell sarcoma

Aims

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) of soft-tissue is a rare melanocytic subtype of mesenchymal malignancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and therapeutic factors associated with increased survival, stratified by clinical stage, in order to determine the optimal treatment.

Methods

The study was a retrospective analysis involving 117 patients with histologically confirmed CCS, between July 2016 and November 2017, who were enrolled in the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Registry in Japan.

Results

The five- and ten-year survival rates were 41% (95% confidence interval (CI) 29 to 52) and 37% (95% CI 25 to 49), respectively. On multivariable analysis, the size of the tumour of > 10 cm (p = 0.006), lymph node metastasis at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), distant metastases at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), and no surgery for the primary tumour (p = 0.019) were independently associated with a poor survival. For N0M0 CCS (n = 68), the development of distant metastases was an independent prognostic factor for survival (early (< 12 months), hazard ratio (HR) 116.78 (95% CI 11.69 to 1,166.50); p < 0.001; late (> 12 months), HR 14.79 (95% CI 1.66 to 131.63); p = 0.016); neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.895) and/or radiotherapy (p = 0.216) were not significantly associated with survival. The five-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 19% (95% CI 8 to 35) and the size of the tumour was significantly associated with an increased rate of local recurrence (p = 0.012). For N1M0 CCS (n = 18), the risk of mortality was significantly lower in patients who underwent surgery for both the primary tumour and lymph node metastases (HR 0.03 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.56); p = 0.020). For M1 CCS (n = 31), excision of the primary tumour was independently associated with better survival (HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.76); p = 0.013). There was no significant difference in survival between the different types of systemic treatment (p = 0.523).

Conclusion

Complete excision of the primary tumour and lymph nodes is associated with a better survival in patients with CCS. Systemic treatment appears to provide limited benefits, demonstrating a pressing need for novel systemic agents.

Systemic Therapy in Advanced Pleomorphic Liposarcoma: a Comprehensive Review

OPINION STATEMENT

The therapeutic approach of pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS), a rare high-grade subgroup of soft tissue sarcoma, is commonly extrapolated from the management of other LPS subtypes. Only published retrospective data on PLPS currently serve as a guide for oncologists without clear recommendations or specific guidelines. In the advanced setting, specific systemic therapy such as eribulin and trabectedin showed promising activity in comparison to conventional therapy (doxorubicin- and gemcitabine-based protocols), which currently remains the current standard of care at initial stages of the disease. The better understanding of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) pathophysiology and disease course has led to the development of adapted clinical trial designs for rare STS histotypes with specific treatment approach.

The current management of clear cell sarcoma

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare melanocytic soft tissue sarcoma with a high propensity for lymphatic metastasis and poor prognosis. It is characterized by the translocation of t (12;22), resulting in the rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene and overexpression of MET. Despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue sarcomas, the management of CCSs remains challenging owing to their rarity, unique biological behaviour and limited understanding of their molecular pathogenesis. The standard treatment for localized CCSs is surgical excision with negative margins. However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy in the management of this disease. CCSs are usually resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Targeted therapies, such as sunitinib and MET inhibitors, may provide promising results. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, is currently under investigation as a potential treatment option for CCSs. Further research is needed to better understand the biology of CCSs and develop effective therapeutic strategies. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of CCSs.

Practical Management of Adult Ultra-Rare Primary Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Focus on Perivascular Epithelioid Tumours and Extraosseous Ewing Sarcoma

With the exception of well-differentiated liposarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumour, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, the majority of the ≈70 histologic subtypes of retroperitoneal sarcoma are defined as 'ultra-rare' sarcomas, with an incidence of ≤1-5/1,000,000 persons/year. For most of these ultra-rare RPS subtypes, diagnosis and treatment follows international guidelines for the management of more common RPS histologies, with en bloc surgical resection as the mainstay of curative treatment, and enrolment in clinical trials where possible. Because the treatment of RPS is heavily driven by histology, the surgeon must be familiar with specific issues related to the diagnosis and management of ultra-rare sarcoma subtypes. Expert radiological and surgeon reviews are required to differentiate similarly presenting tumours where surgery can be avoided (e.g., angiomyolipoma), or where upfront systemic therapy is indicated (e.g., extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma). Thus, the management of all retroperitoneal sarcomas should occur at a sarcoma referral centre, with a multidisciplinary team of experts dedicated to the surgical and medical management of these rare tumours. In this focused review, we highlight how diagnosis and management of the ultra-rare primary RPS histologies of malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa), extraosseous Ewing sarcoma (EES), extraosseous osteosarcoma (EOS), and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) critically diverge from the management of more common RPS subtypes.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Sunitinib or Cediranib in Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, highly vascular tumor with few treatment options. We designed a phase II randomized trial to determine the activity and tolerability of single-agent cediranib or sunitinib in patients with advanced metastatic ASPS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 16 years of age and older were randomized to receive cediranib (30 mg) or sunitinib (37.5 mg) in 28-day cycles. Patients could cross over to the other treatment arm at disease progression. The primary endpoint was to measure the objective response rate (ORR) for each agent. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the two arms was also determined.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 34 enrolled patients were evaluable for response. One patient on each of the initial two treatment arms had a partial response (ORR: 6.7% and 7.1% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). Twenty-four patients had a best response of stable disease (86.7% and 78.6% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). There were no significant differences in mPFS for the two treatment arms. Clinical benefit (i.e., objective response or stable disease for a minimum of four or six cycles of therapy) on the first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy did not predict benefit on the second-line TKI. Both drugs were well tolerated. As of August 2021, 1 patient (unevaluable for ORR) remains on study.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not meet its endpoints for ORR. Although both TKIs provided clinical benefit, the outcomes may have been attenuated in patients who had progressed ≤6 months before enrollment, potentially accounting for the low response rates. See related commentary by Wilky and Maleddu, p. 1163.

Clear cell sarcoma: state-of-the art and perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is an ultrarare soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with a poor prognosis due to its propensity to metastasize and its low chemosensitivity. The standard treatment of localized CCS consists of wide surgical excision with or without additive radiotherapy. However, unresectable CCS is generally treated with conventional systemic therapies available for treatment of STS despite the weak scientific evidence to support its use.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the clinicopathologic characteristics of CSS, as well as the current treatment landscape and future therapeutic approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

The current treatment strategy of advanced CCSs, based on STSs regimens, shows a lack of effective options. Combination therapiesin particular, the association of immunotherapy and TKIs, represent a promising approach. Translational studies are needed in order to decipher the regulatory mechanisms involved in the oncogenesis of this ultrarare sarcoma and identify potential molecular targets.

A Clear Cell Sarcoma Case: A Diagnostic and Treatment Challenge, with a Promising Response to Trabectedin

INTRODUCTION

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare and aggressive soft tissue sarcoma. CCS is characterized by the translocation t(12;22) (q13;q12), involving the fusion of EWSR1 and ATF1 genes, and less frequently the fusion gene EWSR1-CREB1. Usually, CCSs are considered poorly responsive to conventional chemotherapy. However, trabectedin has shown activity against translocation-related sarcomas. Furthermore, preclinical results suggest that trabectedin is a promising antitumor agent for CCS, potentially inducing melanocytic differentiation.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a challenging anatomopathological diagnosis in a patient with an aggressive metastatic CCS. Following the diagnosis of CCS, the patient experienced a clinical and radiological tumor response to trabectedin after four lines of treatment.

CONCLUSION

This is a novel report of CCS treated with trabectedin that resulted in a partial response and suggests the need for further research on trabectedin as a therapeutic option for CCS.

Retrospective observational studies in ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS) community of experts on the minimum requirements for the evaluation of activity of systemic treatments

BACKGROUND

In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS.

METHODS

Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021).

RESULTS

Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.

Case report: Robust response of metastatic clear cell sarcoma treated with cabozantinib and immunotherapy

Clear Cell Sarcoma (CCS), also referred to as malignant melanoma of soft parts, is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor. It comprises 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas and is known to be radio- and chemotherapy resistant. CCS shares morphological and immunohistochemical features with malignant melanoma, including melanin biosynthesis and melanocytic markers. However, it is distinct for the presence of EWSR1-ATF1 translocation which activates MITF transcription factor. We report here of an aggressive case of CCS in a 9-year-old patient, which demonstrates the critical role of molecular analysis in the diagnosis and treatment of uncommon cancer variants in the era of personalized medicine. The EWSR1-ATF1 translocation induces pathological c-Met activation, and so, following unsuccessful CTLA4 and PD-1 blockade immunotherapy, the child received cabozantinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with the intent to block c-Met oncogenic effect. In parallel, active immunization, using hapten di-nitrophenyl modified autologous tumor cells was administered with monotherapy PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab. Under this "triplet" therapy, the patient attained an initial partial response and was progression-free for 2 years, in good performance status and resumed schooling. Based on our observation, cabozantinib can be used as an effective and potentially life-prolonging treatment in CCS. We suggest that priming the child's immune system using her autologous tumor and combating T cell exhaustion with PD-1 blockade may have synergized with the targeted therapy. Combining targeted and immunotherapy is a rapidly growing practice in solid tumors and provides a glimpse of hope in situations that previously lacked any treatment option.