Restorative Therapies for Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statement From the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA)

An overview of the Canadian landscape on the use of restorative therapies for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease

INTRODUCTION

Restorative therapies (RTs), including low-intensity shockwave therapy (Li-SWT) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), aim to restore natural erectile function. Many clinics offer these therapies for erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD) with direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing. This study sought to investigate the landscape of RTs within Canadian clinics.

METHODS

Online searches were made to identify clinics offering Li-SWT and/or PRP as an RT for treating ED and PD in Canada. Public websites were analyzed, followed by calling clinics for data on cost, treatment protocols, clinic ownership, success rates, and adjunctive therapies.

RESULTS

A total of 107 clinics were identified online, with a 68.2% call response rate (n=73). Of the respondents, 56 and 40 clinics provided Li-SWT and PRP therapies, respectively, with 23 clinics offering both. All clinics reported using RTs for ED, with 21 clinics offering Li-SWT and 22 clinics providing PRP for PD. Forty-three clinics provided costs and protocols for Li-SWT, while 33 clinics did so for PRP. The average cost ± standard deviation (CAD) of six sessions of Li-SWT was $2167.24±936.11 and one shot of PRP was $1478.68±591.98. Most (60.3%, n=44) clinics reported physician ownership, with a majority (n=28) being family medicine-trained. Seven clinics did not provide data and 22 were non-physician-owned. Ten clinics provided success rates, with an average of 87.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limited data supporting their routine clinical use, many clinics across Canada offer RTs for ED and PD with varying treatment protocols and increased costs. Further research is required to evaluate the efficacy of RT for ED and PD.

A fragility index analysis of clinical trials evaluating low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction is a common sexual dysfunction that affects a significant proportion of men. Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy has been evaluated in multiple clinical trials as a therapeutic option for men with erectile dysfunction. The robustness of these clinical trials is not well defined, as the trials are hindered by inconsistent treatment protocols, small study arm size and short follow-up intervals. The fragility index is a statistical analysis which is used to evaluate the robustness of clinical trials. It is calculated by evaluating the minimum number of patients in a given trial arm that would be required to have an alternative outcome to alter the statistical significance of the results. The lowest fragility index in statistically significant trials is 1, meaning that if just one participant experienced an alternate outcome, the results would no longer achieve statistical significance. The upper limit is determined by the number of participants in a given arm of the trial. Herein, a scoping review of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in erectile dysfunction to determine the fragility index of trials with clinically significant results. We hypothesized that the fragility index would be low, indicating the results are less robust and generalizable.

The Role of Different Modalities of Regenerative Therapies in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Global Survey and Global Andrology Forum Expert Recommendations

PURPOSE

There is increased interest in regenerative therapies (RTs) to treat erectile dysfunction (ED). However, the need for society's guidelines has led to varied practices. This study aims to investigate current global practices, address the heterogeneity in treatment protocols and evaluations, and establish expert recommendations in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Senior experts from the Global Andrology Forum (GAF) created a 32-question survey to evaluate the clinical aspects of various RT modalities and compare them with each other and with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is). The survey was distributed worldwide to ED specialists through online Google Forms, the GAF website, international professional societies, and direct emails. The responses were analyzed and are presented as percentage frequencies. Additionally, an expert consensus on recommendations for RT use was reached at via a modified Delphi method.

RESULTS

Out of 163 respondents from 39 countries, the majority (80.1%) were using low-intensity shockwave therapy (LISWT), followed by platelet-rich plasma (PRP) 61.3% and stem cell therapy (SCT) 17.8%. Efficacy comparisons revealed no perceived significant differences among RT modalities (p=0.124). Compared to PDE5is, the efficacy of LISWT and PRP was considered lower by the respondents, while SCT was rated better by almost half of those who used SCT. The duration of improvement varied (p=0.279), with most improvements lasting 1 to 6 months. The treatment protocols used for LISWT were mainly consistent but varied widely for PRP and SCT. Adverse effects were minimal, particularly for LISWT (p<0.001). The costs varied significantly (p<0.001), with SCT being the most expensive. The evidence for efficacy was rated as primarily moderate to strong for LISWT but poor for PRP and SCT (p=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Most respondents utilized LISWT, followed by PRP, with SCT being the least commonly utilized. The high break heterogeneity in treatment protocols and evaluation of RT underscores the need for further studies and guidelines to establish best practices.

Management of Post-RALP SUI and ED - What are and What Should we be Doing?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although there have been advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy, surgery can still significantly impact continence and erectile function (EF), resulting in considerable quality-of-life impairment. This review critically evaluates existing treatment options for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) post-robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), alongside exploring emerging trends and discussing future directions for managing and preventing both conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patient history is pivotal in guiding surgical decisions, with the intensity of symptoms and their impact on the patient's life being primary influences for deciding the best treatment options for both SUI and ED. Penile rehabilitation strategies (PR) show promise in mitigating the effects of prostate cancer treatments on EF and improving overall health, though consensus is lacking on specific programs or initiation of timing for optimal recovery post-surgery. All patients undergoing RALP should receive preoperative counseling about SUI and early pelvic floor physical therapy. Fixed and adjustable slings effectively treat mild-to-moderate post-RALP SUI, while the artificial urinary sphincter is the gold standard for men with moderate or severe SUI. EF recovery after RALP faces obstacles such as patient characteristics, compliance, and cost, with no standardized PR approach. Future research should prioritize studies aiming to optimize treatment methods and enhance patient compliance.

Safety and efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injection for treatment of erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Affected sexual relationships affect both the quality of life of men and women. Platelet-derived therapies are becoming increasingly popular in various medical and surgical fields because of their ability to aid in tissue healing and vascular remodeling. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in treating patients with erectile dysfunction (ED).

RESULTS

Fifty-two participants with mild to moderate ED were divided into two groups: group A, who received three PRP penile injections, and group B, who received three saline injections (5 ml for each injection site). The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was used to evaluate all participants. A month after the last injection, the PRP group's IIEF was 16.12 ± 1.25, while the placebo group's was 15.99 ± 1.21 (p = 0.683). Following a 3-month period, the IIEF for the PRP group was 16.44 ± 1.17, while the placebo group's was 16.31 ± 1.06 (p value = 0.653). Following a 6-month period, the IIEF for the PRP group was 16.35 ± 1.45, while that for the placebo group's was 16.23 ± 1.19 (p = 0.727). In terms of IIEF, there was no significant difference between the two groups after one, three, and six months of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In brief, our research revealed no data to support the application of PRP injections in the management of mild-to-moderate ED.

An update on the use of stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction

Objective

This systematic review aimed to analyze animal and human trial data to better understand the efficacy of stem cell therapy (SCT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and the obstacles that may hinder its application in this field.

Methods

We searched electronic databases, including PubMed and Scopus, for published studies with the Medical Subject Heading terms of "erectile dysfunction" (AND) "stem cell therapy" (OR) "erectile dysfunction" (AND) "clinical trial of stem cell therapy" (OR) "stem cell therapy" (AND) "sexual dysfunction". The search was limited to English-language journals and full papers only. The initial search resulted in 450 articles, of which 90 relevant to our aims were included in the analysis.

Results

ED is a multifactorial disease. Current treatment options rely on pharmacotherapy as well as surgical options. Patients may have side effects or unsatisfactory results following the use of these treatment options. SCT may restore pathophysiological changes leading to ED rather than treating the symptoms. It has been evaluated in animal models and shown promising results in humans. Results confirm that SCT does improve erectile function in animals with different types of SC use. In humans, evidence showed promising results, but the trials were heterogeneous and limited mainly by a lack of randomization and the small sample size. Many challenges could limit future research in this field, including ethical dilemmas, regulation, patient recruitment, the cost of therapy, and the lack of a standardized SCT regimen. Repairing and possibly replacing diseased cells, tissue, or organs and eventually retrieving normal function should always be the goals of any therapy, and this can only be guaranteed by SCT.

Conclusion

SCT is a potential and successful treatment for ED, particularly in patients who are resistant to the classic therapy. SCT may promote nerve regeneration and vascular cell regeneration, not only symptomatic treatment.

Efficacy and safety of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) combined with tadalafil in the treatment of severe erectile dysfunction: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is an effective and safe treatment for mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (ED). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combining LIPUS with tadalafil in treating severe ED.

Methods

The data from 27 patients treated with LIPUS alone (group A) and 21 patients treated with a combination of LIPUS and daily 10 mg tadalafil (group B) were retrospectively analyzed. The LIPUS regimen consisted of twice-weekly treatments for 4 consecutive weeks. The treatment was considered effective if the change in International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) score after treatment was greater than or equal to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (the MCID for severe ED is 7 points). The effectiveness, IIEF-EF score, erectile hardness score (EHS), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and adverse events were evaluated before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 12 weeks after treatment.

Results

Compared to pre-treatment, both groups showed significant improvement in IIEF-EF score and EHS at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment (P<0.001), with no statistically significant difference between the two time points (P>0.05). The effective rate did not significantly differ between group A (9/27, 33.3%) and group B (10/21, 47.62%) at 4 weeks or between group A (9/27, 33.3%) and group B (12/21, 57.14%) at 12 weeks after treatment (P=0.32, P=0.10). However, in patients without comorbidities, the effective rate of group B (12/18, 66.67%) was higher than that of group A (9/25, 36.00%) at 12 weeks after treatment (P=0.047). After LIPUS treatment, the PSV level significantly increased and the EDV level significantly decreased compared with before treatment (P<0.05). No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

The study suggests that LIPUS has a therapeutic effect on severe ED patients, especially those without comorbidities. It may have a synergistic or overlapping effect with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) on severe ED patients without comorbidities.

Platelet-rich plasma intracavernosal injections for the treatment of primary organic erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary controlled studies

We aim to summarize the latest evidence on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intracavernosal injections efficacy in men affected by primary organic erectile dysfunction (ED). We reviewed the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective and retrospective comparative studies evaluating PRP alone or in combination for ED treatment. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for English language full-text articles or conference abstracts. A qualitative and quantitative data synthesis was provided. Overall, seven records were included: three RCTs evaluated PRP vs. placebo, one study separately tested PRP and low-intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT), three studies compared Li-SWT or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound alone with their combination with PRP. Of 641 included patients, 320 received PRP. Despite the heterogeneity among inclusion criteria, dose and protocol of PRP administration, and outcomes measured, most studies independently reported better sexual outcomes in patients who received PRP, without significant severe side effects. In meta-analysis, where only placebo-controlled studies were included, patients treated with PRP showed higher International Index of Erectile Function (erectile function domain) score compared to patients who received placebo: pooled mean difference (95% Confidence Interval) of 2.99 (1.86, 4.13) after 1 month (209 patients) vs. 2.85 (1.61, 4.09) after 3 months (204 patients) vs. 3.21 (1.82, 4.60) after 6 months (199 patients) of follow-up. In men affected by primary organic ED, PRP intracavernosal injections demonstrated an objective improvement or at least a tendency in erectile function recovery. Patient numbers, and the short-term follow-up may limit the generalizability of these observations. High quality, large-scale, and standardized controlled trials are needed before recommending its definitive use in clinical practice.

Regenerative Therapy in Erectile Dysfunction: A Survey on Current Global Practice Trends and GAF Expert Recommendations

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine current global practices in regenerative therapy (RT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and to establish expert recommendations for its use, addressing the current lack of solid evidence and standardized guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 39-question survey was developed by senior Global Andrology Forum (GAF) experts to comprehensively cover clinical aspects of RT. This was distributed globally via a secure online Google Form to ED specialists through the GAF website, international professional societies, and social media, the responses were analyzed and presented for frequencies as percentages. Consensus on expert recommendations for RT use was achieved using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

Out of 479 respondents from 62 countries, a third reported using RT for ED. The most popular treatment was low-intensity shock wave therapy (54.6%), followed by platelet-rich plasma (24.5%) and their combination (14.7%), with stem cell therapy being the least used (3.7%). The primary indication for RT was the refractory or adverse effects of PDE5 inhibitors, with the best effectiveness reported in middle-aged and mild-to-moderate ED patients. Respondents were confident about its overall safety, with a significant number expressing interest in RT's future use, despite pending guidelines support.

CONCLUSIONS

This inaugural global survey reveals a growing use of RT in ED treatment, showcasing its diverse clinical applications and potential for future widespread adoption. However, the lack of comprehensive evidence and clear guidelines requires further research to standardize RT practices in ED treatment.

Stem cell assisted low-intensity shockwave for erectile dysfunction treatment: Current perspective

Stem cell therapy and low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave (LI-ECSW) are recognized as potential restorative therapies and have been used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Stem cell therapy is well-known due to its attributed regenerative ability and thus can help to improve erectile function in patients with vasculogenic ED. Besides, current evidence also shows that LI-ECSW therapy can help stimulate cell recruitment and proliferation and promote angiogenesis and vascularization in the damaged tissue. Hence, due to the therapeutic and restorative effects of both therapies, the success of ED treatment can be elevated through a combination therapy between stem cell therapy and LI-ECSW. In this review, a detailed description and efficacy discussion of combination therapies between different types of stem cells and LI-ECSW therapy are described. Besides, other potential cell types to use together with LI-ECSW are also listed in this review. Thus, this review provides better insight on the efficacy of combination therapy for ED treatment.

Variations in Low Intensity Shockwave Treatment Protocols for Erectile Dysfunction: A Review of the Literature and Guide to Offering Treatment

Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) continues to gain popularity in both clinical practice and the academic literature. The majority of trials and meta-analysis studies have shown LiSWT to be low risk with a trend toward positive improvements in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores. However, there is still debate over the clinical utility of LiSWT and there is no agreed upon optimal treatment protocol. In this review article we summarize published meta-analysis studies of LiSWT for ED, and review the treatment protocols from randomized sham-control trials published in the last 10 years. We found the most common device settings were an energy of 0.09 mJ/mm² and a frequency of 5 Hz. Shock number and location varied, but the most common protocol was 1,500 shocks per session, with 900 shocks to the penis (shaft, base, or hilum) and 600 shocks to the proximal corpora/crura. Protocols ranged from 4 to 12 treatment sessions. We also describe our institutional experience with LiSWT, including patient counseling and treatment protocol.

Restorative therapy clinical trials for erectile dysfunction: a scoping review of endpoint measures

Given the lack of regulatory approval for restorative therapies for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, we hypothesized that clinical trials would vary in methodology and endpoint measurements. Our objective was to analyze methodological approaches and outcome measures of clinical trials evaluating restorative therapies for erectile dysfunction. Data was extracted from clinicaltrials.gov on trials which contained the keywords "erectile dysfunction". We evaluated trials initiated between 2004 and 2021 which listed a restorative therapy intervention. We identified 95 trials investigating energy-based/shockwave therapies (60/95), stem cell therapies (25/95), platelet-based therapies (6/95), and others (4/95). Only 41.1% of the trials evaluated safety. The most common efficacy endpoint was International Index of Erectile Function and Sexual Health Inventory for Men, and only 29.5% utilized penile Doppler. Thirty (31.6%) trials had been completed yet only 3 (3.2%) have published results. We found substantial heterogeneity in methodological approach in the trials. Subjective measures of erectile function were commonly reported, but definitions of inclusion criteria and objective outcome measures were inconsistent. These results provide a basis for the design of future clinical trials to improve the quality of trial data and aid in the development of standardized criteria for erectile dysfunction clinical trials.

Platelet-rich plasma for erectile dysfunction: a review of the current research landscape

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the inability to achieve or maintain erection for satisfactory sexual performance. ED drastically reduces the quality of life for men and their partners and is commonly linked to comorbid conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. As a result, clinicians and researchers are working to improve treatments for ED. Current guideline-approved ED treatments include oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, intraurethral alprostadil, penile intracavernosal injections, and penile prosthesis surgery. Today, there is increasing interest in restorative therapies such as intracavernosal platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the management of ED.

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review describes the current trials investigating intracavernosal PRP for ED and proposes future directions to increase the strength of evidence to support use of PRP in this population.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus was performed to identify all randomized clinical trials using PRP for the treatment of ED.

RESULTS

We identified 4 randomized clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of PRP for ED. We found significant heterogeneity among study protocols, including collection of PRP, dosing of PRP, and follow-up.

CONCLUSION

While intracavernosal PRP is considered safe, its efficacy for the management of ED remains unknown due to variability among clinical trials.

Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

INTRODUCTION

There has been tremendous growth in regenerative medicine during the last decade. For erectile dysfunction (ED), after the inclusion of low-intensity shockwave therapy as a treatment modality for ED management by the European Association of Urology sexual health guidelines, intracavernosal injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained popularity between urologists and patients as a novel ED therapeutic modality with initial promising results. However, limited clinical data exist regarding efficacy and safety in patients with ED. Furthermore, despite numerous preclinical studies in other tissues and organs, the mechanism of action for restoring erectile function remains undetermined.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to present the current status of preclinical and clinical evidence regarding the use of PRP as treatment option for ED.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases, until February 2023 for studies exploring the effect of PRP on ED.

RESULTS

We identified 517 articles, 23 of which were included in this review. These were 7 preclinical (of which 1 was a comparative trial and 6 were placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials) and 16 clinical studies (of which 1 was a comparative trial, 5 were randomized trials, and 2 were placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials). Preclinical data support the regenerative role of PRP in erectile tissue, in accordance with existing evidence in other tissues. Randomized clinical studies, as well as the first 2 available randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, showed promising efficacy and a lack of any adverse events.

CONCLUSION

As PRP for ED is widely used worldwide, there is an urgent need for high-quality studies with long-term follow-up. Standardization of research protocols, especially on the quality of PRP preparation, is also needed.

Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial

Background

Low intensity shockwave therapy is an emerging treatment option for men with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. Radial wave therapy (rWT), which differs from focused shockwave (fSWT) as it produces lower pressure waves with lower peak energy, is used to treat soft tissue and skin conditions and has some data to support its use in vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. There is limited data for the use of rWT for the treatment of erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomy. We report the first trial of rWT for penile rehabilitation after NS radical prostatectomy.

Methods

We performed a prospective, non-randomized, open-label trial. Men with good pre-operative erectile function who underwent a NS radical prostatectomy at our institution from 2018-2020 were considered for inclusion. We compared post-operative erectile function outcomes between the rWT (6 weekly treatments initiated approximately 2 weeks post-operatively) plus standard of care (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor) arm and the non-sham controlled standard of care arm. The primary end point for our study was the proportion of men who returned to "near normal" erectile function, defined as IIEF-5 score ≥17 and erectile hardness score (EHS) ≥3, by 3 months post-operatively between the intervention and control arm. We also compared mean IIEF-5 scores and median EHSs between the arms.

Results

One hundred and six patients were enrolled, of whom 73 patients had at least one reported survey response between 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. Five (17%) and 11 (26%) patients recovered erectile function in the control and intervention arms, respectively, which was not a statistically significant difference (P=0.37). However, the intervention arm did have a significantly higher median EHS compared to the control arm (1 vs. 2, P=0.03). There were 4 adverse events related to pain during treatment and required only treatment intensity de-escalation.

Conclusions

rWT is safe but did not substantially improve the recovery of early erectile function after NS radical prostatectomy.

Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for diabetic men with erectile dysfunction: A systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a very common complication in men with diabetes mellitus (DM). Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) offers a promising nonsurgical treatment option for ED. A systematic scoping review investigating the outcomes of Li-ESWT in diabetic men with ED has not yet been performed.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review animal and clinical studies related to the use of Li-ESWT for treatment of DM-related ED.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched, unrestricted by dates or study design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included qualitative studies, quantitative studies, primary research studies, meta-analyses, and research letters written in English. Full text reviewing was completed in all animal and human studies discussing Li-ESWT for the treatment of ED in subjects with DM. Data extracted included the journal citation, publication year, country of origin, study design, and a summary of the pertinent findings.

RESULTS

Our search yielded nine clinical studies and 10 animal studies. The results of the clinical studies suggest that Li-ESWT is a safe and effective treatment in men with well-controlled DM and moderate or better ED. However, the benefit is less durable in diabetic men than nondiabetic men. The results of the animal studies suggest that Li-ESWT can significantly improve erectile function in diabetic rat models with ED.

CONCLUSIONS

The examined studies present encouraging results for the use of Li-ESWT to treat diabetic men with ED. Future studies, particularly robust randomized controlled trials, are necessary to confirm these findings and provide long-term follow-up.

A Phase 2 Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma Injections for Peyronie's Disease: Clinical Trial Update

Intralesional injection of platelet-rich plasma for Peyronie's disease appears to be safe according to early observations from an ongoing clinical trial. Efficacy data remain elusive until completion of the trial.

Rationale and Design for the COCKTAIL Trial: A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Study Combining Shockwave Therapy and Platelet-rich Plasma for Erectile Dysfunction

Restorative therapies are a promising option for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Several studies have assessed platelet-rich plasma and shockwave therapy alone. However, COCKTAIL is the first study to evaluate the synergistic effects of these two therapies in combination.

Assessing the quality and readability of online content on shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction

Patients are becoming increasingly reliant on online platforms for obtaining health information. Previous research has shown that the quality of information available on the internet regarding novel medical therapies is generally poor and frequently misleading. Shock wave therapy represents a novel restorative therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED) that has recently gained attention. We hypothesised that online sources regarding shock wave therapy for ED would be fraught with misleading claims and unreliable health information. Our objective was to evaluate the quality and readability of online medical information on shock wave therapy as a treatment for ED. Websites were generated using a Google search of 'shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction' with location filters disabled. Readability was analysed using the Readable software (Readable.com, Horsham, United Kingdom). Quality was assessed independently by three reviewers using the DISCERN tool. Articles were subdivided into those from private clinic websites and those from universities or news media websites. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Student's t test. Nine articles that resulted from the Google search had mean readability scores as follows: Flesch-Kincaid grade level (10.8), Gunning-Fog Index (13.67), Coleman-Liau Index (12.74), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index (13.33), FORCAST Grade Level (11.33), and Automated Readability Index (11.08). The mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 46.4. The articles had a mean DISCERN score of 3.1, suggesting 'moderate quality' content. Articles from universities (n = 2) or news sources (n = 3) had significantly higher DISCERN scores than articles from private medical practices (n = 4). There was no difference in readability scores between the groups. Articles from private clinics are just as readable as those from universities or news media, but they are significantly more biased and misleading. The current online material relating to shock wave therapy for ED may not adequately inform patients in their medical decisions making, thereby necessitating closer collaboration between the sources disseminating information and urologists.

Technological Advancements for Treating Erectile Dysfunction and Peyronie's Disease

Over the past decade, there have been several advancements in the technologies available to treatment erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease. Vacuum erection devices, penile traction devices, low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and penile prosthesis surgery have evolved and are changing the way we treat men's health. Although significant improvements have been made, further work is needed to standardize treatment, create universal algorithms for technological applications, and simply their use.

The use of combination regenerative therapies for erectile dysfunction: rationale and current status

Erectile Dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability to achieve and maintain an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse. Available treatments for ED provide only symptomatic relief, which is for the most part temporary. Regenerative therapies such as Low Intensity Shockwave, Platelet-Rich Plasma, and Stem Cell therapy can potentially provide a "cure" for ED by reversing the underlying pathology of ED rather than just treating the symptoms. Low Intensity Shockwave therapy is the most evidence based at this point and is thought to act by improving penile blood flow, repairing previous nerve damage, and activating stem cells. Stem Cell therapy takes advantage of the self-replicative potential of stem cells to create new corporal tissue, but also to recruit host cells and angiogenic factors to stimulate endogenous repair. Platelet-Rich Plasma therapy uses concentrated growth factors that already exist within the bloodstream to repair damaged nerves and increase penile blood flow. The use of combination restorative therapy may provide an additive or synergistic benefit greater than any one therapy alone because of its overlapping mechanisms of action on the penis but is a topic that remains to be studied.