RNA-seq analysis of palatal transcriptome changes in all-trans retinoic acid-induced cleft palate of mice

Single-cell Transcriptomics Reveals Activation of Macrophages in All-trans Retinoic Acid (atRA)-induced Cleft Palate

Cleft palate is among the most common birth defects with an impact on swallowing and speaking and is difficult to diagnose with ultrasound during pregnancy. In this study, we systematically capture the cellular composition of all-trans retinoic acid (atRA)-exposed and normal embryonic gestation 16.5 days mouse palate by the single-cell RNA sequencing technique. The authors identified 14 major cell types with the largest proportion of fibroblasts. The proportion of myeloid cells in atRA-exposed palate was markedly higher than those in the normal palate tissue, especially M1-like macrophages and monocytes. The upregulated genes of the different expression genes between atRA-exposed palate and normal palate tissue were linked to the biological processes of leukocyte chemotaxis and migration. Protein TLR2, CXCR4, THBS1, MRC1, transcription factor encoding genes Cebpb, Fos, Jun, Rela, and signaling pathway IL-17 and phagosome were found to be significantly involved in these processes. Subsequently, cellular communication network analysis suggested that myeloid-centered cell interactions SELL, SELPLG, MIF, CXCL, ANNEXIN, THBS, and NECTIN were significantly more activated in atRA-exposed palate. Overall, we delineate the single-cell landscape of atRA-induced cleft palate, revealing the effects of overexposure to atRA during palate tissue development and providing insights for the diagnosis of cleft palate.

Retinoic acid delays murine palatal shelf elevation by inhibiting Wnt5a-mediated noncanonical Wnt signaling and downstream Cdc-42/F-actin remodeling in mesenchymal cells

BACKGROUND

Mammalian palatal shelves erupted from maxillary prominences undergo vertical extention, transient elevation, and horizontal growth to fuse. Previous studies in mice reported that the retinoic acid (RA) contributed to cleft palate in high incidence by delaying the elevating procedure, but little was known about the underlying biological mechanisms.

METHODS

In this study, hematoxylin-eosin and immunofluorescence staining were employed to evaluate the phenotypes and the expression of related markers in the RA-treated mice model. In situ hybridization and RT-qPCR were used to detect the expression of genes involved in Wnt signaling pathway. The palatal mesenchymal cells were cultured in vitro, and stimulated with RA or CASIN, and co-treated with Foxy5. Wnt5a and Ccd42 expression were evaluated by immunofluorescence staining. Phalloidin was used to label the microfilament cytoskeleton (F-actin) in cultured cells.

RESULTS

We revealed that RA resulted in 100% incidence of cleft palate in mouse embryos, and the expression of genes responsible for Wnt5a-mediated noncanonical Wnt signal transduction were specifically downregulated in mesenchymal palatal shelves. The in vitro study of palatal mesenchymal cells indicated that RA treatment disrupted the organized remodeling of cytoskeleton, an indicative structure of cell migration regulated by the small Rho GTPase Cdc42. Moreover, we showed that the suppression of cytoskeleton and cell migration induced by RA was partially restored using the small molecule Foxy-5-mediated activation of Wnt5A, and this restoration was attenuated by CASIN (a selective GTPase Cdc42 inhibitor) again.

CONCLUSIONS

These data identified a crucial mechanism for Wnt5a-mediated noncanonical Wnt signaling in acting downstream of Rho GTPase Cdc42 to regulate cytoskeletal remodeling and cell migration during the process of palate elevation. Our study provided a new explanation for the cause of cleft palate induced by RA.

Novel investigations in retinoic-acid-induced cleft palate about the gut microbiome of pregnant mice

Introduction

Cleft palate (CP) is one of the most common congenital birth defects in the craniofacial region, retinoic acid (RA) gavage is the most common method for inducing cleft palate model. Although several mechanisms have been proposed to illuminate RA-induced cleft palate during embryonic development, these findings are far from enough. Many efforts remain to be devoted to studying the etiology and pathogenesis of cleft palate. Recent research is gradually shifting the focus to the effect of retinoic acid on gut microbiota. However, few reports focus on the relationship between the occurrence of CP in embryos and gut microbiota.

Methods

In our research, we used RA to induce cleft palate model for E10.5 the feces of 5 RA-treated pregnant mice and 5 control pregnant mice were respectively metagenomics analysis.

Results

Compared with the control group, Lactobacillus in the gut microbiome the RA group was significantly increased. GO, KEGG and CAZy analysis of differentially unigenes demonstrated the most abundant metabolic pathway in different groups, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, and histidine metabolism.

Discussion

Our findings indicated that changes in the maternal gut microbiome palatal development, which might be related to changes in Lactobacillus and These results provide a new direction in the pathogenesis of CP induced by RA.

Time-series expression profiles of mRNAs and lncRNAs during mammalian palatogenesis

OBJECTIVES

Mammalian palatogenesis is a highly regulated morphogenetic process to form the intact roof of the oral cavity. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and mRNAs participate in numerous biological and pathological processes, but their roles in palatal development and causing orofacial clefts (OFC) remain to be clarified.

METHODS

Palatal tissues were separated from ICR mouse embryos at four stages (E10.5, E13.5, E15, and E17). Then, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was used. Various analyses were performed to explore the results. Finally, hub genes were validated via qPCR and in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Starting from E10.5, the expression of cell adhesion genes escalated in the following stages. Cilium assembly and ossification genes were both upregulated at E15 compared with E13.5. Besides, the expression of cilium assembly genes was also increased at E17 compared with E15. Expression patterns of three lncRNAs (H19, Malat1, and Miat) and four mRNAs (Cdh1, Irf6, Grhl3, Efnb1) detected in RNA-seq were validated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a time-series expression landscape of mRNAs and lncRNAs during palatogenesis, which highlights the importance of processes such as cell adhesion and ossification. Our results will facilitate a deeper understanding of the complexity of gene expression and regulation during palatogenesis.

Osteogenic and angiogenic profiles of the palatal process of the maxilla and the palatal process of the palatine bone

Hard palate consists anteriorly of the palatal process of the maxilla (ppmx) and posteriorly of the palatal process of the palatine (ppp). Currently, palatal osteogenesis is receiving increasing attention. This is the first study to provide an overview of the osteogenesis process of the mouse hard palate. We found that the period in which avascular mesenchymal condensation becomes a vascularized bone structure corresponds to embryonic day (E) 14.5 to E16.5 in the hard palate. The ppmx and ppp differ remarkably in morphology and molecular respects during osteogenesis. Osteoclasts in the ppmx and ppp are heterogeneous. There was a multinucleated giant osteoclast on the bone surface at the lateral-nasal side of the ppmx, while osteoclasts in the ppp were more abundant and adjacent to blood vessels but were smaller and had fewer nuclei. In addition, bone remodeling in the hard palate was asymmetric and exclusively occurred on the nasal side of the hard palate at E18.5. During angiogenesis, CD31-positive endothelial cells were initially localized in the surrounding of palatal mesenchymal condensation and then invaded the condensation in a sprouting fashion. At the transcriptome level, we found 78 differentially expressed genes related to osteogenesis and angiogenesis between the ppmx and ppp. Fifty-five related genes were up/downregulated from E14.5 to E16.5. Here, we described the morphogenesis and the heterogeneity in the osteogenic and angiogenic genes profiles of the ppmx and ppp, which are significant for subsequent studies of normal and abnormal subjects.