Facilitate Stent Removal: Magnetic DJ Stent

Bladder stone formation due to neglected double J stent: a case report

Introduction and importance

Double J (DJ) stents are commonly used in genitourinary procedures, but they can lead to complications including infection, hematuria, encrustation, and stone formation. The longer the duration of encrustation, the greater the risk of complications and renal dysfunction. Forgotten stents pose challenges for patients and can require endourological or open surgical procedures.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old man with hypertension and coronary artery disease had a forgotten DJ stent for 3 years, causing suprapubic pain and dysuria. Kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) revealed a coiled DJ stent with a large bladder stone and encrustation, and an open cystolithotomy was successfully performed. Recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged without complication.

Clinical discussion

Ureteral stents, including the DJ stent, are commonly used for urological conditions but can cause complications if retained beyond the intended timeframe. Optimal timing for stent removal is crucial, and patients' healthcare knowledge and adherence are critical to preventing retention. KUB X-ray can evaluate stent encrustation and bladder stones. Cystoscopy is the typical approach for stent removal, but supplementary interventions may be necessary. Open surgery was recommended for removing a large bladder stone and encrusted stent in this case.

Conclusion

Timely removal of DJ stents is crucial to avoid complications. Extended retention can cause problems such as encrustation and stone formation. Patient education and adherence are essential to prevent retention and forgetfulness. This case report highlights the importance of careful management of patients with DJ stents for optimal outcomes and prevention of complications.

The "ins and outs" of the magnetic ureteral stent: A novel innovation in Endourology

Background

Ureteral stents play a major role in maintaining ureteral patency. Various innovations are advocated in the design and subsequent removal of traditional double-J ureteral stents, such as the magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent (MEDJUS). This stent facilitates outpatient removal using a magnetic stent removal device. This systematic review was conducted to analyze the published role, efficacy, and outcomes of MEDJUS.

Materials and methods

After PROSPERO registration (CRD42021235739), an electronic database search (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science) was performed on December 31, 2020. The search terms were as follows: "magnetic," "ureteric," "stent," "double-J," "urotech," and "Black-Star."

Results

Nine studies with a total of 685 patients were included in the systematic review. The total number of MEDJUS procedures used was 498 (73%) compared to the 187 (27%) traditional double-J stent method. Magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent extraction failure was reported in 8 cases (1.61%). Compared with traditional stents, MEDJUS showed a cost benefit in 5/5 studies. Better pain scores (during stent in situ) and (at stent removal) were observed in 2/3 and 3/4 of the studies, respectively.

Conclusions

Magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent may serve as a viable alternative to traditional double-J stents, offering cost and pain benefits with similar rates of complications. Magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent also offers relative ease of extraction and a reduced need for inpatient removal. This ambulatory stent removal technique has forged its use in modern urological practice.

Double J stent removal in paediatric patients by Vellore Catheter Snare technique: a randomised control trial

BACKGROUND

Double J (DJ) stents placed at the end of paediatric urological procedures require another cystoscopy under general anaesthesia for removal. The second author developed a reproducible technique for snaring the DJ stent using an infant feeding tube (6-Fr or 8-Fr) and a 3-0 polypropylene suture per urethra. Having demonstrated the proof of concept, ethical clearance was obtained for an institutional randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was (1) to describe the Vellore Catheter Snare (VeCS) technique for DJ stent removal, (2) to study the efficacy of the technique and (3) to compare the costs of VeCS technique with cystoscopy on an intention-to-treat basis.

STUDY DESIGN

The study design was that of a randomised control trial with parallel groups as a non-inferiority study.

RESULTS

Forty children with unilateral indwelling DJ stents were enrolled from January to August 2018. They were randomised by unequal allocation (1:3) to cystoscopic and VeCS technique removal arms. The VeCS technique and cystoscopy were successful in 86.67% (26/30) and in 100% (10/10) cases, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in the outcome (p = 0.223). The average cost for cystoscopic removal of the stent was INR 14,579 and was INR 5636.5 for the VeCS technique (on an intention-to-treat basis).

DISCUSSION

While per-urethral catheterisation is an outpatient/ward procedure in children, cystoscopy is not. Other techniques such as extraction strings and magnetic stents with their extraction device were found to have certain disadvantages. The VeCS technique, using common disposables, circumvented the need for inpatient admission, disinfected equipment usage and operation theatre time in 87% children, thereby reducing the costs incurred by the patient.

CONCLUSION

The VeCS technique for DJ stent removal is a practical low-cost safe alternative to cystoscopic removal of DJ stents in children. Although the technique has a high success rate, it still needs the backup option of cystoscopy under general anaesthesia.

Magnetic Ureteral Stents Are Feasible in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Insertion of ureteral catheters is a common procedure in kidney transplantation. The stent is usually removed by cystoscope. Magnetic ureteral stents may be an alternative to conventional stents.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the functional efficacy and feasibility of magnetic double J (DJ) stents in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We used 6 Fr (diameter), 22 cm (length) magnetic DJs. We examined 7 cases of exclusively AB0-identical living donations. Stent were removed 10-12 days after transplantation. Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to determine quality of life and pain of the recipients. The total removal time was recorded and cost reduction was calculated.

RESULTS

Removal of the magnetic DJ was successful in all cases. The mean±SD duration of the removal was 3.4±1.6 min. The mean±SD overall pain score on the VAS during the procedure was 2.6±1.1. Using this technique was associated with a cost reduction of € 130.

CONCLUSION

Using magnetic ureteral stents is a feasible option for living donation AB0-identical kidney transplant recipients.