1
|
Kaneko M, Lenon MSL, Storino Ramacciotti L, Medina LG, Sayegh AS, La Riva A, Perez LC, Ghoreifi A, Lizana M, Jadvar DS, Lebastchi AH, Cacciamani GE, Abreu AL. Multiparametric ultrasound of prostate: role in prostate cancer diagnosis. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221145625. [PMID: 36601020 PMCID: PMC9806443 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221145625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in ultrasonography (US) technology established modalities, such as Doppler-US, HistoScanning, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), elastography, and micro-ultrasound. The early results of these US modalities have been promising, although there are limitations including the need for specialized equipment, inconsistent results, lack of standardizations, and external validation. In this review, we identified studies evaluating multiparametric ultrasonography (mpUS), the combination of multiple US modalities, for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. In the past 5 years, a growing number of studies have shown that use of mpUS resulted in high PCa and clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) detection performance using radical prostatectomy histology as the reference standard. Recent studies have demonstrated the role mpUS in improving detection of CSPCa and guidance for prostate biopsy and therapy. Furthermore, some aspects including lower costs, real-time imaging, applicability for some patients who have contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and availability in the office setting are clear advantages of mpUS. Interobserver agreement of mpUS was overall low; however, this limitation can be improved using standardized and objective evaluation systems such as the machine learning model. Whether mpUS outperforms MRI is unclear. Multicenter randomized controlled trials directly comparing mpUS and multiparametric MRI are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masatomo Kaneko
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Maria Sarah L. Lenon
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Luis G. Medina
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aref S. Sayegh
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anibal La Riva
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laura C. Perez
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maria Lizana
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Donya S. Jadvar
- Dornsife School of Letters and Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amir H. Lebastchi
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni E. Cacciamani
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andre Luis Abreu
- Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy, and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology and Catherine & Joseph Aresty
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USADepartment of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Devetzis K, Kum F, Popert R. Recent Advances in Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies. Res Rep Urol 2021; 13:799-809. [PMID: 34805013 PMCID: PMC8598205 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s291963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate biopsy is the definitive investigation to diagnose prostate cancer. The ideal procedure would be one that offers fast and efficient results safely as an outpatient procedure. Historically, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy is considered the gold standard but transrectal biopsy can under-sample the anterior and apical regions of the prostate and is associated with a risk of prostate biopsy-related sepsis, which may require intensive care admission. Transperineal (TP) biopsy addresses the inefficient sampling of TRUS biopsy but historically has been done under general anaesthetic, which makes it difficult to incorporate into timed diagnostic pathways such as the National Health Service (NHS) 2-week cancer pathway. TRUS biopsy has remained the mainstay of clinical diagnosis because of its simplicity; however, the recent development of simpler local anaesthetic transperineal techniques has transformed outpatient biopsy practice. These techniques practically eliminate prostate biopsy-related sepsis, have a shallow learning curve and offer effective sampling of all areas of the prostate in an outpatient setting. The effectiveness of TP biopsy has been enhanced by the introduction of multiparametric MRI prior to biopsy, the use of PSA density for risk stratification in equivocal cases and combined with more efficient targeted and systematic biopsies techniques, such as the Ginsburg Protocol, has improved the tolerability and diagnostic yield of local anaesthetic TP biopsies, reducing the risk of complications from the oversampling associated with transperineal template mapping biopsies. Areas where the literature remains unclear is the optimum number of cores needed to detect clinically significant disease (CSD) in patients with a definable lesion on MRI, in particular, whether there is a need for systematic biopsy in the face of equivocal MRI findings to ensure no CSD is missed. The Covid-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on prostate cancer referrals and prostate biopsy techniques within the UK; prior to the pandemic 65% of all prostate biopsies were TRUS, since the pandemic the proportions have reversed such that now over 65% of all prostate biopsies in the NHS are transperineal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francesca Kum
- King's College School of Medicine, London, UK.,Department of Urology, 1st Floor Southwark Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Richard Popert
- Department of Urology, 1st Floor Southwark Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A systematic review and meta-analysis of Histoscanning™ in prostate cancer diagnostics. World J Urol 2021; 39:3733-3740. [PMID: 33825986 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03684-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT The value of Histoscanning™ (HS) in prostate cancer (PCa) imaging is much debated, although it has been used in clinical practice for more than 10 years now. OBJECTIVE To summarize the data on HS from various PCa diagnostic perspectives to determine its potential. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a systematic search using 2 databases (Medline and Scopus) on the query "Histoscan*". The primary endpoint was HS accuracy. The secondary endpoints were: correlation of lesion volume by HS and histology, ability of HS to predict extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. RESULTS HS improved cancer detection rate "per core", OR = 16.37 (95% CI 13.2; 20.3), p < 0.0001, I2 = 98% and "per patient", OR = 1.83 (95% CI 1.51; 2.21), p < 0.0001, I2 = 95%. The pooled accuracy was markedly low: sensitivity - 0.2 (95% CI 0.19-0.21), specificity - 0.12 (0.11-0.13), AUC 0.12. 8 of 10 studiers showed no additional value for HS. The pooled accuracy with histology after RP was relatively better, yet still very low: sensitivity - 0.56 (95% CI 0.5-0.63), specificity - 0.23 (0.18-0.28), AUC 0.4. 9 of 12 studies did not show any benefit of HS. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis does not see the incremental value in comparing prostate Histoscanning with conventional TRUS in prostate cancer screening and targeted biopsy. HS proved to be slightly more accurate in predicting extracapsular extension on RP, but the available data does not allow us to draw any conclusions on its effectiveness in practice. Histoscanning is a modification of ultrasound for prostate cancer visualization. The available data suggest its low accuracy in screening and detecting of prostate cancer.
Collapse
|