1
|
Small EJ, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Bevans KB, Bhaumik A, Saad F, Chung BH, Karsh LI, Oudard S, De Porre P, Brookman-May SD, McCarthy SA, Mundle SD, Uemura H, Smith MR, Agarwal N. Post Hoc Analysis of Rapid and Deep Prostate-specific Antigen Decline and Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life in SPARTAN and TITAN Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:844-852. [PMID: 38072759 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adding apalutamide to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) resulted in a rapid (at 3- and 6-mo treatment) and deep prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline (to ≤0.2 ng/ml or ≥90% from baseline), improved overall survival, reduced risk of disease progression, and prolonged health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in SPARTAN and metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC) in TITAN. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of a rapid, deep PSA decline at 3 and 6 mo achieved with the addition of apalutamide to ADT with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in SPARTAN and TITAN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A post hoc analysis of SPARTAN and TITAN PRO data was performed. INTERVENTION Apalutamide versus placebo plus concurrent ADT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PROs were assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P; SPARTAN and TITAN), Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF; TITAN), and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI; TITAN) at baseline, prespecified cycles during treatment, and after progression for ≤1 yr. The association between a deep PSA decline at landmark 3 or 6 mo of apalutamide and the time to worsening of PROs was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox proportional-hazard modeling. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Among 806 SPARTAN and 525 TITAN apalutamide-treated patients, the median treatment duration was 32.9 and 39.3 mo, respectively. Patients achieving a deep PSA decline at 3 mo had longer time to worsening in FACT-P total, FACT-P physical well-being, BPI-SF worst pain intensity, or BFI worst fatigue intensity. The 6-mo PSA decline results were similar. Limitations of patient characteristics in clinical studies should be considered. CONCLUSIONS Attaining a deep and rapid PSA decline at 3 mo with apalutamide plus ADT was associated with longer preservation of overall HRQoL and physical well-being in nmCRPC and mCSPC. PATIENT SUMMARY Quality of life is maintained in individuals with advanced prostate cancer who achieve a deep prostate-specific antigen decline at 3 mo of apalutamide plus drugs that lower male sex hormones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer and Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Simon Chowdhury
- Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' Hospitals and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK
| | | | | | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Byung Ha Chung
- Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Stéphane Oudard
- Georges Pompidou Hospital, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | | | - Sabine D Brookman-May
- Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Matthew R Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Helissey C, Parnot C, Rivière C, Duverger C, Schernberg A, Becherirat S, Picchi H, Le Roy A, Vuagnat P, Pristavu R, Vanquaethem H, Brureau L. Effectiveness of electronic patient reporting outcomes, by a digital telemonitoring platform, for prostate cancer care: the Protecty study. Front Digit Health 2023; 5:1104700. [PMID: 37228301 PMCID: PMC10203955 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1104700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Research aim and purpose The benefits of Electronic Patient -Reported Outcomes (e-PRO) for telemonitoring are well established, allowing early detection of illnesses and continuous monitoring of patients. The primary objective of the PROTECTY study was to assess the compliance with patient use of the telemonitoring platform Cureety. An exploratory objective was to assess if the first-month health status is a prognostic factor of progression free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for prostate cancer patient. Methods This prospective study was conducted at the Military Hospital Bégin on prostate cancer patients. Patients were allowed to respond to a symptomatology questionnaire based on CTCAE v.5.0, personalized to their pathology and treatment. An algorithm evaluates the health status of the patient based on the reported adverse events, with a classification into 2 different states: Good Health Status (GHS) and Poor Health status (PHS). Results Sixty-one patients were enrolled between July 1st, 2020 and September 30th, 2021. The median age was 74.0 (range 58.0-94.0). 78% presented a metastatic stage, and the most represented cancer was mHSPC. Overall, 2,457 questionnaires were completed by the patients, 4.0% resulted in a health classification in to monitor or critical state. 87% of patients were classified in the GHS group. The compliance was 72% in the overall population during the first month, 71% in GHS group and 75% in PHS group. The median follow-up was 8 months. PFS at 6 months was 84% in GHS group vs. 57% in PHS group, p = 0.19. OS at 6 months was 98% in GHS group vs. 83% in PHS group, p = 0.31. Conclusions Our study showed that compliance was satisfactory. The feasibility of remote monitoring for prostate cancer patients means that they should benefit from its implementation. Our study is also the first to assess the correlation between treatment tolerance and survival. The initial results suggest that e-PRO assessment could help identify in the early stages the patients that require further health assessment and potential therapeutic changes. While further follow-up of more patients will be required, our study highlights the importance of e-PRO in cancer patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Helissey
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - C. Parnot
- Clinical Research Department, Cureety, 33 rue de l’Amirauté, Dinan, France
| | - C. Rivière
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - C. Duverger
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - A. Schernberg
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - S. Becherirat
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - H. Picchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - A. Le Roy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - P. Vuagnat
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - R. Pristavu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - H. Vanquaethem
- Department of Internal Medicine, Military Hospital Begin, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - L. Brureau
- CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)—UMR-S 1085, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saad F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Wiechno P, Alekseev B, Sala N, Jones R, Kocak I, Chiuri VE, Jassem J, Fléchon A, Redfern C, Kang J, Burgents J, Gresty C, Degboe A, Clarke NW. Patient-reported outcomes with olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1297-1307. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00498-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
4
|
Kowalchuk RO, Hillman D, Daniels TB, Vargas CE, Rwigema JCM, Wong WW, Stish BJ, Dueck AC, Choo R. Assessing concordance between patient-reported and investigator-reported CTCAE after proton beam therapy for prostate cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:34-41. [PMID: 34604551 PMCID: PMC8463742 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We report acute patient-reported outcomes using CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE) of proton beam radiotherapy for high-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer in a prospective clinical trial. PRO-CTCAE were correlated with investigator reported-CTCAE (IR-CTCAE) to assess the degree of concordance. METHODS AND MATERIALS 11 PRO-CTCAE questions assessed gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), or erectile function side effects. The correlation scheme between PRO-CTCAE and IR-CTCAE was independently developed by two physicians. Analyses of PRO-CTCAE and IR-CTCAE were conducted using both descriptive terms and the converted grade scores. The Kappa statistic described the degree of concordance. RESULTS 55 patients were included. IR-CTCAE underestimated diarrhea compared to PRO-CTCAE at the end of treatment (EOT), with a 28% rate of underestimation (11% by ≥ 2 toxicity grades). Similarly, urinary tract pain was underestimated in 45% of cases (17% by ≥ 2 grades) at EOT. Differences were less pronounced at baseline or 3 months after radiotherapy. The incidence of urinary urgency and frequency tended to be overestimated prior to treatment (36% and 24%, respectively) but underestimated at EOT (35% and 31%, respectively). The degree of interference with daily activities was consistently overestimated by investigators (45%-85%). Finally, erectile dysfunction showed a 36-56% rate of discordance by ≥ 2 toxicity grades. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows a low agreement between IR-CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE in the setting of proton therapy for prostate cancer. Compared to patient-reported outcomes, physicians underestimated the frequency and severity of urinary symptoms and diarrhea at the end of treatment. Continued use of PROs should be strongly encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Hillman
- Department of Statistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas B. Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jean-Claude M. Rwigema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Bradley J. Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA,Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xie W, Regan MM, Buyse M, Halabi S, Kantoff PW, Sartor O, Soule H, Berry D, Clarke N, Collette L, D'Amico A, Lourenco RDA, Dignam J, Eisenberger M, James N, Fizazi K, Gillessen S, Loriot Y, Mottet N, Parulekar W, Sandler H, Spratt DE, Sydes MR, Tombal B, Williams S, Sweeney CJ. Event-Free Survival, a Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Composite End Point, Is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3032-3041. [PMID: 32552276 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.03114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Recently, we have shown that metastasis-free survival is a strong surrogate for overall survival (OS) in men with intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer and can accelerate the evaluation of new (neo)adjuvant therapies. Event-free survival (EFS), an earlier prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based composite end point, may further expedite trial completion. METHODS EFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of first evidence of disease recurrence, including biochemical failure, local or regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death from any cause, or was censored at the date of last PSA assessment. Individual patient data from trials within the Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate-ICECaP-database with evaluable PSA and disease follow-up data were analyzed. We evaluated the surrogacy of EFS for OS using a 2-stage meta-analytic validation model by determining the correlation of EFS with OS (patient level) and the correlation of treatment effects (hazard ratios [HRs]) on both EFS and OS (trial level). A clinically relevant surrogacy was defined a priori as an R2 ≥ 0.7. RESULTS Data for 10,350 patients were analyzed from 15 radiation therapy-based trials enrolled from 1987 to 2011 with a median follow-up of 10 years. At the patient level, the correlation of EFS with OS was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.44) as measured by Kendall's tau from a copula model. At the trial level, the R2 was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.60) from the weighted linear regression of log(HR)-OS on log(HR)-EFS. CONCLUSION EFS is a weak surrogate for OS and is not suitable for use as an intermediate clinical end point to substitute for OS to accelerate phase III (neo)adjuvant trials of prostate cancer therapies for primary radiation therapy-based trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanling Xie
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Meredith M Regan
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Marc Buyse
- International Drug Development Institute, Louvain la Neuve, Belgium
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Philip W Kantoff
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Departments of Medicine & Urology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | | | - Donald Berry
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Noel Clarke
- Urological Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Laurence Collette
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anthony D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James Dignam
- Department of Public Health Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Mario Eisenberger
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nicholas James
- University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Urology Oncology, University Jean Monnet, St Etienne, France
| | - Wendy Parulekar
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Howard Sandler
- Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Matthew R Sydes
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Institut de Recherche Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Scott Williams
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Henkenberens C, Oehus AK, Derlin T, Bengel F, Ross TL, Kuczyk MA, Janssen S, Christiansen H, von Klot CAJ. Efficacy of repeated PSMA PET-directed radiotherapy for oligorecurrent prostate cancer after initial curative therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:1006-1017. [PMID: 32399639 PMCID: PMC7581615 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01629-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the outcome of prostate cancer (PCa) patients diagnosed with oligorecurrent disease and treated with a first and a second PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand) PET(positron-emission tomography)-directed radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-two patients with oligorecurrent relapse after curative therapy received a first PSMA PET-directed RT of all metastases. After biochemical progression, all patients received a second PSMA PET-directed RT of all metastases. The main outcome parameters were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and androgen deprivation therapy-free survival (ADT-FS). The intervals of BPFS were analyzed separately as follows: the interval from the last day of PSMA PET-directed RT to the first biochemical progression was defined as bPFS_1 and the interval from second PSMA PET-directed RT to further biochemical progression was defined as bPFS_2. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 39.5 months (18-60). One out of 32 (3.1%) patients died after 47 months of progressive metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). All patients showed biochemical responses after the first PSMA PET-directed RT and the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before RT was 1.70 ng/mL (0.2-3.8), which decreased significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.39 ng/mL (range <0.07-3.8; p = 0.004). The median PSA level at biochemical progression after the first PSMA PET-directed RT was 2.9 ng/mL (range 0.12-12.80; p = 0.24). Furthermore, the PSA level after the second PSMA PET-directed RT at the last follow-up (0.52 ng/mL, range <0.07-154.0) was not significantly different (p = 0.36) from the median PSA level (1.70 ng/mL, range 0.2-3.8) before the first PSMA PET-directed RT. The median bPFS_1 was 16.0 months after the first PSMA PET-directed RT (95% CI 11.9-19.2) and the median bPFS_2 was significantly shorter at 8.0 months (95% CI 6.3-17.7) after the second PSMA PET-directed RT (p = 0.03; 95% CI 1.9-8.3). Multivariate analysis revealed no significant parameter for bPFS_1, whereas extrapelvic disease was the only significant parameter (p = 0.02, OR 2.3; 95% CI 0.81-4.19) in multivariate analysis for bPFS_2. The median ADT-FS was 31.0 months (95% CI 20.1-41.8) and multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone metastases, compared to patients with only lymph node metastases at first PSMA PET-directed RT, had a significantly higher chance (p = 0.007, OR 4.51; 95% CI 1.8-13.47) of needing ADT at the last follow-up visit. CONCLUSION If patients are followed up closely, including PSMA PET scans, a second PSMA PET-directed RT represents a viable treatment option for well-informed and well-selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Ann-Kathrin Oehus
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias L Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Markus A Kuczyk
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Medical practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Treibesstraße 11, 31134, Hildesheim, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph A J von Klot
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Efficacy of PSMA ligand PET-based radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:362. [PMID: 32349700 PMCID: PMC7191762 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06883-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A substantial number of patients will develop further biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy (RP) and salvage radiotherapy (sRT). Recently published data using prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography (PSMA - PET) for re-staging suggest that those recurrences are often located outside the prostate fossa and most of the patients have a limited number of metastases, making them amenable to metastasis-directed treatment (MDT). METHODS We analyzed 78 patients with biochemical progression after RP and sRT from a retrospective European multicenter database and assessed the biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS; PSA < nadir + 0.2 ng/ml or no PSA decline) as well as the androgen deprivation therapy- free survival (ADT-FS) using Kaplan-Meier curves. Log-rank test and multivariate analysis was performed to determine influencing factors. RESULTS A total of 185 PSMA - PET positive metastases were detected and all lesions were treated with radiotherapy (RT). Concurrent ADT was prescribed in 16.7% (13/78) of patients. The median PSA level before RT was 1.90 ng/mL (range, 0.1-22.1) and decreased statistically significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.26 ng/mL (range, 0.0-12.25; p < 0.001). The median PSA level of 0.88 ng/mL (range, 0.0-25.8) at the last follow-up was also statistically significantly lower (p = 0.008) than the median PSA level of 1.9 ng/mL (range, 0.1-22.1) before RT. The median bRFS was 17.0 months (95% CI, 14.2-19.8). After 12 months, 55.3% of patients were free of biochemical progression. Multivariate analyses showed that concurrent ADT was the most important independent factor for bRFS (p = 0.01). The median ADT-FS was not reached and exploratory statistical analyses estimated a median ADT-FS of 34.0 months (95% CI, 16.3-51.7). Multivariate analyses revealed no significant parameters for ADT-FS. CONCLUSIONS RT as MDT based on PSMA - PET of all metastases of recurrent prostate cancer after RP and sRT represents a viable treatment option for well-informed and well-selected patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Patients' Perspective on Digital Technologies in Advanced Genitourinary Cancers. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 19:76-82.e6. [PMID: 32527682 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Digital technologies allow for the remote monitoring of cancer patients and thereby close an important care gap. Despite a variety of upcoming digital health-tech solutions, there is little knowledge on uro-oncologic patients' perception of digital technologies in clinical care and cancer trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS A questionnaire was developed to evaluate patients' current use, preferences, and expectations of digital health technology. Patients receiving systemic treatment for urothelial, prostate, and renal-cell carcinoma were included during outpatient visits. RESULTS Ninety-seven patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic renal-cell, urothelial, or prostate cancer were included in the final analysis. Internet, smartphone, and wearable user rates were significantly higher in younger patients (100% user rate in age group 40-49 years vs. 38% in age group 80-89 years). Patients were more likely to use wearables in clinical trials when they received the generated data (2.9/5) than when they did not (2.3/5, P < .0001). Interest in activity data (3.7/5) was higher than sleeping data (2.7/5, P < .0001), but desire for sleeping data increases with advancement of treatment lines (3.9, P = .008). Patients prefer a digital follow-up every 2.6 days; younger patients and those receiving advanced therapy lines prefer less frequent follow-up (respectively, every 3.3 days, P = .050, and every 4.0 days, P = .0001). Patients allow a maximum of an average of 2.2 minutes daily for digital follow-up. CONCLUSION We observed high engagement in digital technologies and interest in the data generated by digital devices. However, for the development of future health care applications, aspects such as patient age, gender, and therapy line need to be considered in uro-oncologic patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Health-related quality of life after apalutamide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (TITAN): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:1518-1530. [PMID: 31578173 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30620-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase 3 TITAN study, the addition of apalutamide to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly improved the primary endpoints of overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. We aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in TITAN, including pain and fatigue. METHODS In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (defined as not receiving ADT at the time of metastatic disease progression) aged 18 years and older, receiving continuous ADT (selected at the investigator's discretion), and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1), using an interactive web response system, to receive oral apalutamide (four 60 mg tablets, once daily) or matching placebo. Previous localised disease treatment or previous docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer were allowed. Randomisation was stratified by Gleason score at diagnosis, region, and previous docetaxel treatment. Randomisation was done using randomly permuted blocks (block size of four). Investigators, research staff, sponsor study team, and patients were masked to the identities of test and control treatments. Patient-reported outcomes were prespecified exploratory endpoints and were the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), and EuroQoL 5D questionnaire 5 level (EQ-5D-5L). BPI and BFI were completed for 7 consecutive days (days -6 to 1 inclusive of each cycle visit), then at months 4, 8, and 12 in follow-up. FACT-P and EQ-5D-5L were completed during cycles 1-7, then every other cycle until the end of treatment, and at months 4, 8, and 12 in follow-up. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population. Missing patient-reported outcome assessments were calculated as the expected number of assessments for a visit minus the actual number of assessments received for that visit. For time-to-event endpoints, when median values could not be calculated because less than 50% of patients had degradation, 25th percentiles were compared. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02489318, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between Dec 9, 2015, and July 25, 2017, 1052 eligible patients were enrolled randomly assigned to apalutamide (n=525) or placebo (n=527). Data cutoff for this analysis of patient-reported outcomes was Nov 23, 2018. Median follow-up for time to pain-related endpoints ranged from 19·4 to 22·1 months. Patients were mostly asymptomatic at baseline: on the BPI-SF pain severity scale of 0-10, median pain scores (indicating worst pain in the past 24 h) were 1·14 (IQR 0-3·17) in the apalutamide group and 1·00 (0-2·86) in the placebo group, and median worst fatigue scores on the BFI were 1·29 (IQR 0-3·29) in the apalutamide group and 1·43 (0·14-3·14) in the placebo group. Patient experience of pain and fatigue (intensity and interference) did not differ between the groups for the duration of treatment. Median time to worst pain intensity progression was 19·09 months (95% CI 11·04-not reached) in the apalutamide group versus 11·99 months (8·28-18·46) in the placebo group (HR 0·89 [95% CI 0·75-1·06]; p=0·20). Median time to pain interference progression was not reached in either group (95% CI 28·58-not reached in the apalutamide group; not reached-not reached in the placebo group). 25th percentiles for time to pain interference progression were 9·17 months (5·55-11·96) in the apalutamide group and 6·24 months (4·63-7·43) in the placebo group (HR 0·90 [95% CI 0·73-1·10]; p=0·29). FACT-P total scores and EQ-5D-5L data showed preservation of HRQOL in both groups. The median time to deterioration as determined by FACT-P total score was 8·87 months (95% CI 4·70-11·10) in the apalutamide group and 9·23 months (7·39-12·91) in the placebo group (HR 1·02 [95% CI 0·85-1·22]; p=0·85). INTERPRETATION Apalutamide with ADT is a well-tolerated and effective option for men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. The combination significantly improves survival outcomes compared with ADT alone while maintaining HRQOL despite additive androgen blockade. FUNDING Janssen Research & Development.
Collapse
|
10
|
Marandino L, De Luca E, Zichi C, Lombardi P, Reale ML, Pignataro D, Di Stefano RF, Ghisoni E, Mariniello A, Trevisi E, Leone G, Muratori L, La Salvia A, Sonetto C, Buttigliero C, Tucci M, Aglietta M, Novello S, Scagliotti GV, Perrone F, Di Maio M. Quality-of-Life Assessment and Reporting in Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review of Phase 3 Trials Testing Anticancer Drugs Published Between 2012 and 2018. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:332-347.e2. [PMID: 31416754 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 07/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) is not included among the end points in many studies, and QoL results are underreported in many phase 3 oncology trials. We performed a systematic review to describe QoL prevalence and heterogeneity in QoL reporting in recently published prostate cancer phase 3 trials. A PubMed search was performed to identify primary publications of randomized phase 3 trials testing anticancer drugs in prostate cancer, issued between 2012 and 2018. We analyzed QoL inclusion among end points, presence of QoL results, and methodology of QoL analysis. Seventy-two publications were identified (15 early-stage, 20 advanced hormone-sensitive, and 37 castration-resistant prostate cancer [CRPC]). QoL was not listed among study end points in 23 studies (31.9%) (40.0% early stage, 40.0% advanced hormone sensitive, and 24.3% CRPC). QoL results were absent in 15 (30.6%) of 49 primary publications of trials that included QoL among end points. Overall, as a result of absent end point or unpublished results, QoL data were lacking in 38 (52.8%) primary publications (53.3% early stage, 55.0% in advanced hormone sensitive, and 51.4% in CRPC). The most commonly used QoL tools were Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) (21, 53.8%) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) (14, 35.9%); most common methods of analysis were mean changes or mean scores (28, 71.8%), time to deterioration (14, 35.9%), and proportion of patients with response (10, 25.6%). In conclusion, QoL data are lacking in a not negligible proportion of recently published phase 3 trials in prostate cancer, although the presence of QoL results is better in positive trials, especially in CRPC. The methodology of QoL analysis is heterogeneous for type of instruments, analysis, and presentation of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Marandino
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Emmanuele De Luca
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Clizia Zichi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Pasquale Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Reale
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Daniele Pignataro
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Rosario F Di Stefano
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Eleonora Ghisoni
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Annapaola Mariniello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Elena Trevisi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Gianmarco Leone
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Leonardo Muratori
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Anna La Salvia
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Cristina Sonetto
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Consuelo Buttigliero
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Marcello Tucci
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Massimo Aglietta
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Giorgio V Scagliotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Time for an Integrated Global Strategy to Decrease Deaths from Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:111-113. [PMID: 30898552 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|