1
|
Gudenkauf LM, Gray S, Gonzalez BD, Sachdeva A, Autio K. Balancing Hormone Therapy: Mitigating Adverse Effects of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy and Exploring Alternatives in Prostate Cancer Management. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e433126. [PMID: 38788186 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_433126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is well established as the standard of care in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) management; however, ADT has significant adverse effects (AEs) that must be addressed. This review aims to highlight opportunities to mitigate AEs of ADT and explore alternatives in PCa management. Specifically, we discuss behavioral and pharmacologic strategies for mitigating ADT AEs as well as ADT-sparing approaches for hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant PCa. Equipped with effective mitigation strategies and possible alternatives, clinicians and researchers can optimize health-related quality of life for patients currently receiving ADT for PCa and consider treatments that spare patients from AEs of ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Gudenkauf
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Struan Gray
- Salford Royal and The Christie NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Genito-urinary Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Brian D Gonzalez
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Ashwin Sachdeva
- Genito-urinary Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Autio
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shore ND, Moul JW, Pienta KJ, Czernin J, King MT, Freedland SJ. Biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after primary definitive therapy: treatment based on risk stratification. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:192-201. [PMID: 37679602 PMCID: PMC11096125 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00712-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nearly one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary definitive treatment. BCR increases the risk of distant metastasis and mortality in patients with prognostically unfavorable features. These patients are best managed with a tailored treatment strategy incorporating risk stratification using clinicopathological factors, next-generation imaging, and genomic testing. OBJECTIVE This narrative review examines the utility of risk stratification for the management of patients with BCR in the context of clinical trial data, referencing the latest recommendations by European and US medical societies. METHODS PubMed was searched for relevant studies published through May 21 2023 on treatment of patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). RESULTS European and US guidelines support the risk-stratified management of BCR. Post-RP, salvage EBRT (with or without androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) is an accepted treatment option for patients with BCR. Post-EBRT, local salvage therapies (RP, cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy) have demonstrated comparable relapse-free survival rates but differing adverse event profiles, short and long term. Local salvage therapies should be used for local-only relapses while ADT should be considered for regional or distant relapses. In practice, patients often receive ADT, with varying guidance for intermittent ADT vs. continuous ADT, due to consideration of quality-of-life effects. CONCLUSIONS Despite a lack of consensus for BCR treatment among guideline associations and medical societies, risk stratification of patients is essential for personalized treatment approaches, as it allows for an informed selection of therapeutic strategies and estimation of adverse events. In lower-risk disease, observation is recommended while in higher-risk disease, after failed repeat local therapy, ADT and/or clinical trial enrollment may be appropriate. Results from ongoing clinical studies of patients with BCR should provide consensus for management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Judd W Moul
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Johannes Czernin
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martin T King
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moul JW, Shore ND, Pienta KJ, Czernin J, King MT, Freedland SJ. Application of next-generation imaging in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:202-211. [PMID: 37679601 PMCID: PMC11096127 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00711-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following primary interventional treatment occurs in approximately one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Next-generation imaging (NGI) can identify local and metastatic recurrence with greater sensitivity than conventional imaging, potentially allowing for more effective interventions. This narrative review examines the current clinical evidence on the utility of NGI for patients with BCR. METHODS A search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications on NGI applied to BCR. Given other relevant recent reviews on the topic, this review focused on papers published between January 2018 to May 2023. RESULTS NGI technologies, including positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, have demonstrated increased sensitivity and selectivity for diagnosing BCR at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations <2.0 ng/ml. Detection rates range between 46% and 50%, with decreasing PSA levels for choline (1-3 ng/ml), fluciclovine (0.5-1 ng/ml), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (0.2-0.49 ng/ml) PET radiotracers. Expert working groups and European and US medical societies recommend NGI for patients with BCR. CONCLUSIONS Available data support the improved detection performance and selectivity of NGI modalities versus conventional imaging techniques; however, limited clinical evidence exists demonstrating the application of NGI to treatment decision-making and its impact on patient outcomes. The emergence of NGI and displacement of conventional imaging may require a reexamination of the current definitions of BCR, altering our understanding of early recurrence. Redefining the BCR disease state by formalizing the role of NGI in patient management decisions will facilitate greater alignment across research efforts and better reflect the published literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judd W Moul
- Duke Cancer Institute and Division of Urology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | | | - Johannes Czernin
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martin T King
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borkowetz A, Hölscher T. [Metastasis-directed therapy in prostate cancer]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 63:225-233. [PMID: 38388789 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02281-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (omHSPC) is playing an increasingly important role in therapy with the aim of delaying disease progression, the start of systemic treatment or switching systemic treatment to improve the patient's overall prognosis. Molecular imaging as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) imaging allows metastases to be detected with a higher sensitivity and specificity. This means that they can be detected early and made accessible for treatment. RESULTS The standard therapy for oligo-mHSPC is androgen deprivation (ADT), which is supplemented by novel hormonal therapeutics (NHT). A few small prospective trials have shown an extension of the ADT-free interval and progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in metachronous oligo-mHSPC, by MDT, usually radiotherapy. Additional ADT can further extend the PFS in particular. There are hardly any prospective data for synchronous oligo-mHSPC. CONCLUSION Despite the currently still poor evidence, MDT is playing an increasingly important role. The still unclear definition of oligometastasis and the large number of influencing factors make it difficult to compare current data. Large multicenter prospective data are still pending. It is also important to clarify the effect of limited ADT in combination with NHT in the treatment of synchronous and metachronous oligo-mHSPC with MDT. In synchronous oligo-mHSPC in particular, further benefit of additional local therapy of the primary in combination with MDT should also be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelika Borkowetz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307.
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laudicella R, Bauckneht M, Maurer A, Heimer J, Gennari AG, Di Raimondo T, Paone G, Cuzzocrea M, Messerli M, Eberli D, Burger IA. Can We Predict Skeletal Lesion on Bone Scan Based on Quantitative PSMA PET/CT Features? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5471. [PMID: 38001731 PMCID: PMC10670186 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The increasing use of PSMA-PET/CT for restaging prostate cancer (PCa) leads to a patient shift from a non-metastatic situation based on conventional imaging (CI) to a metastatic situation. Since established therapeutic pathways have been designed according to CI, it is unclear how this should be translated to the PSMA-PET/CT results. This study aimed to investigate whether PSMA-PET/CT and clinical parameters could predict the visibility of PSMA-positive lesions on a bone scan (BS). METHODS In four different centers, all PCa patients with BS and PSMA-PET/CT within 6 months without any change in therapy or significant disease progression were retrospectively selected. Up to 10 non-confluent clear bone metastases were selected per PSMA-PET/CT and SUVmax, SUVmean, PSMAtot, PSMAvol, density, diameter on CT, and presence of cortical erosion were collected. Clinical variables (age, PSA, Gleason Score) were also considered. Two experienced double-board physicians decided whether a bone metastasis was visible on the BS, with a consensus readout for discordant findings. For predictive performance, a random forest was fit on all available predictors, and its accuracy was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation performed 10 times. RESULTS A total of 43 patients were identified with 222 bone lesions on PSMA-PET/CT. A total of 129 (58.1%) lesions were visible on the BS. In the univariate analysis, all PSMA-PET/CT parameters were significantly associated with the visibility on the BS (p < 0.001). The random forest reached a mean accuracy of 77.6% in a 10-fold cross-validation. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary results indicate that there might be a way to predict the BS results based on PSMA-PET/CT, potentially improving the comparability between both examinations and supporting decisions for therapy selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Laudicella
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, 5404 Baden, Switzerland; (R.L.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
| | - Alexander Maurer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Heimer
- Department of Mathematics, Seminar for Statistics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Antonio G. Gennari
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tania Di Raimondo
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
| | - Gaetano Paone
- Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Marco Cuzzocrea
- Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Michael Messerli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irene A. Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, 5404 Baden, Switzerland; (R.L.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xie X, Zhang P, Ran C, Liu L, Hu J, Lei P, Liang P. Global research status and hotspots of radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science from 2010-2022. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1135052. [PMID: 37637069 PMCID: PMC10450940 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1135052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the important treatments for various cancer types and its application to prostate cancer (PCa) has also gradually gained increasing attention. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and objective studies on the overall status of research on RT for PCa. This article aims to summarize and quantify the dynamic trends of RT in PCa by using bibliometrics. Methods Studies on RT for PCa were screened from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database between 1 January 2010 and 21 November 2022 to collate and quantify information characteristics by analyzing parameters including annual publications, countries/regions, institutions and authors with the aid of the bibliometric software CiteSpace and VOSviewer. In addition, research trends and hotspots were explored by analyzing keywords and co-cited references. Results A total of 21338 documents were retrieved. The United States of America (USA) ranked first and maintained the leading position among all countries in the number of publications (8489) and total citations (266342). The University of Toronto was the most active institution in total publications (n=587). Paul L Nguyen enjoyed the most publications (n=179), and Michael J Zelefsky enjoyed the most co-citations (n=3376). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS published the most papers (n=1026), and was the most frequently co-cited journal (n=78550). The largest and closest cluster in the reference cluster analysis was "oligorecurrent prostate cancer". The timeline view of keywords reveals that cluster "biochemical recurrence(BCR)" is ongoing. Moreover, keywords burstness analysis showed that "radiation dosimetry", "dose rate brachytherapy(BT)", "salvage radiotherapy", "stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)", "guideline", and "multicenter" were the terms with great bursts in the past a few years. Conclusion The application of RT targeting oligometastatic prostate cancer(OMPC) has garnered considerable attention among researchers. SBRT and BT have become hot topics in the field. Additionally, the BCR of PCa has long been a critical issue requiring extensive research and resolution, and salvage radiotherapy has currently emerged as a closely related research focus. Related large-scale multicenter studies have been conducted over the past few years, providing valuable insights. More high-quality research is expected to be employed to guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodu Xie
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Chongjun Ran
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Lumiao Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jian Hu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Pan Lei
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Peihe Liang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Metz R, Rauscher A, Vaugier L, Supiot S, Drouet F, Campion L, Rousseau C. Comparison of Hormone-Sensitive Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Routine Use of Choline and/or PSMA PET/CT to Guide Metastasis-Directed Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061898. [PMID: 36980784 PMCID: PMC10047404 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In hormone-sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PC), the literature showed [68Ga]Ga-PSMA (PSMA) and [18F]F-choline (FCH) PET/CT can successfully guide metastasis-directed therapies (MDT). This observational retrospective study aimed to explore, in routine use, the impact of FCH or PSMA PET/CT in guiding MDT for hormone-sensitive oligometastatic PC at different recurrences. METHODS In 2017-2020, patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy but, in biochemical recurrence (with PSA ≤ 2 ng/mL), diagnosed as oligometastatic based on FCH or PSMA PET/CT, were identified. MDT was stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), elective nodal or prostate bed radiotherapy ± boost and ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BR-FS), defined as a PSA increase ≥ 0.2 ng/mL above the nadir and increasing over two successive samples and the secondaries were ADT-free survival (ADT-FS). RESULTS 123 patients (70 PSMA and 53 FCH) were included. The median follow-up was 42.2 months. The median BR-FS was 24.7 months in the PSMA group versus 13.0 months in the FCH group (p = 0.008). Similarly, ADT-FS (p = 0.001) was longer in patients in the PSMA group. In multivariate analysis, a short PSA doubling time before imaging (p = 0.005) and MDT with SBRT (p = 0.001) were poor prognostic factors for BR-FS. CONCLUSIONS Routine use of FCH or PSMA PET/CT in hormone-sensitive PC showed an advantage for using PSMA PET/CT to guide MDT in terms of BR-FS and ADT-FS in patients with low PSA value. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Metz
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
| | - Aurore Rauscher
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
| | - Loïg Vaugier
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
- Laboratoire US2B, Unité en Sciences Biologiques et Biotechnologies, UMR CNRS 6286, UFR SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES, 2, Rue de la Houssinière, F-44322 Nantes, France
| | - Franck Drouet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire, F-44600 Saint-Nazaire, France
| | - Loic Campion
- Biostatistics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
- Nantes Université, Univ Angers, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Caroline Rousseau
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
- Nantes Université, Univ Angers, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, F-44000 Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tamihardja J, Zehner L, Hartrampf P, Lisowski D, Kneitz S, Cirsi S, Razinskas G, Flentje M, Polat B. Salvage Nodal Radiotherapy as Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Detected by Positron Emission Tomography Shows Favorable Outcome in Long-Term Follow-Up. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153766. [PMID: 35954430 PMCID: PMC9367596 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients, who suffer from oligorecurrent prostate cancer with limited nodal involvement, may be offered positron emission tomography (PET)-directed salvage nodal radiotherapy to delay disease progression. This current analysis aimed to access salvage radiotherapy for nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer with simultaneous integrated boost to PET-involved lymph nodes as metastasis-directed therapy. A long-term oncological outcome was favorable after salvage nodal radiotherapy and severe toxicity rates were low. Androgen deprivation therapy plays a major role in recurrent prostate cancer management and demonstrates a positive influence on the rate of biochemical progression in patients receiving salvage nodal radiotherapy. The present long-term analysis may help clinicians identify patients who would benefit from salvage nodal radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy, as a multimodal treatment strategy for oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Abstract Background: The study aimed to access the long-term outcome of salvage nodal radiotherapy (SNRT) in oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 95 consecutive patients received SNRT for pelvic and/or extrapelvic nodal recurrence after prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) or choline PET from 2010 to 2021. SNRT was applied as external beam radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost up to a median total dose of 62.9 Gy (EQD21.5Gy) to the recurrent lymph node metastases. The outcome was analyzed by cumulative incidence functions with death as the competing risk. Fine–Gray regression analyses were performed to estimate the relative hazards of the outcome parameters. Genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity evaluation utilized Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). The results are as follows: the median follow-up was 47.1 months. The five-year biochemical progression rate (95% CI) was 50.1% (35.7–62.9%). Concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was adminstered in 60.0% of the patients. The five-year biochemical progression rate was 75.0% (42.0–90.9%) without ADT versus 35.3% (19.6–51.4%) with ADT (p = 0.003). The cumulative five-year late grade 3 GU toxicity rate was 2.1%. No late grade 3 GI toxicity occured. Conclusions: Metastasis-directed therapy through SNRT for PET-staged oligorecurrent prostate cancer demonstrated a favorable long-term oncologic outcome. Omittance of ADT led to an increased biochemical progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Tamihardja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Leonie Zehner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Philipp Hartrampf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany;
| | - Dominik Lisowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Susanne Kneitz
- Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, 97074 Wuerzburg, Germany;
| | - Sinan Cirsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Gary Razinskas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; (L.Z.); (D.L.); (S.C.); (G.R.); (M.F.); (B.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Local Control after Locally Ablative, Image-Guided Radiotherapy of Oligometastases Identified by Gallium-68-PSMA-Positron Emission Tomography in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients (OLI-P). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092073. [PMID: 35565207 PMCID: PMC9100669 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this clinical trial, 63 patients with a total of 89 prostate cancer metastases identified on PSMA-PET were included, none of them undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. We showed that local ablative radiotherapy controls >90% of the metastases, but progression at other sites is common after two years. Local ablative radiotherapy may be an option to at least temporarily avoid systemic therapy in selected patients. Abstract Progression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values after curative treatment of prostate cancer patients is common. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-) PET imaging can identify patients with metachronous oligometastatic disease even at low PSA levels. Metastases-directed local ablative radiotherapy (aRT) has been shown to be a safe treatment option. In this prospective clinical trial, we evaluated local control and the pattern of tumor progression. Between 2014 and 2018, 63 patients received aRT of 89 metastases (MET) (68 lymph node (LN-)MET and 21 bony (OSS-)MET) with one of two radiation treatment schedules: 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions in 34 MET or 30 Gy in 10 Gy fractions in 55 MET. The mean gross tumor volume and planning target volume were 2.2 and 14.9 mL, respectively. The median follow-up time was 40.7 months. Local progression occurred in seven MET, resulting in a local control rate of 93.5% after three years. Neither treatment schedule, target volume, nor type of lesion was associated with local progression. Regional progression in the proximity to the LN-MET was observed in 19 of 47 patients with at least one LN-MET (actuarial 59.3% free of regional progression after 3 years). In 33 patients (52%), a distant progression was reported. The median time to first tumor-related clinical event was 16.6 months, and 22.2% of patients had no tumor-related clinical event after three years. A total of 14 patients (22%) had another aRT. In conclusion, local ablative radiotherapy in patients with PSMA-PET staged oligometastatic prostate cancer may achieve local control, but regional or distant progression is common. Further studies are warranted, e.g., to define the optimal target volume coverage in LN-MET and OSS-MET.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pozdnyakov A, Kulanthaivelu R, Bauman G, Ortega C, Veit-Haibach P, Metser U. The impact of PSMA PET on the treatment and outcomes of men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022:10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3. [PMID: 35440642 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is highly sensitive in identifying disease recurrence in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BCR) after primary therapy and is rapidly being adopted in clinical practice. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the documented impact of PSMA-PET on patient management and outcomes, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and intermediate and long-term outcome measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS MBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and OVID databases were searched for studies reporting on the impact of PSMA-PET on the management and outcomes of patients with BCR after definitive primary therapy. Outcome measures assessed included biochemical response to therapy after PET and BCR-free survival (BRFS). The proportions of patients in whom management changed, and the proportion of patients in whom each outcome measure was obtained were tabulated and pooled into meta-analysis using DerSimonian-Laird method. RESULTS A total of 34 studies with 3680 men reported change in management after PSMA-PET and 27 studies with 2639 men reported on at least one outcome measure and had follow-up data. PSMA-PET was positive in 2508/3680 (68.2%). The pooled proportion of change in management after PSMA-PET was 56.4% (95% CI, 48.0-63.9%). A decrease in serum PSA was documented in 72.4% of men (95% CI, 63.4-81.5%), and complete biochemical response in 23.3% (95% CI, 14.6-32.0%) at a median follow-up of 8.1 and 11 months, respectively. The pooled BRFS rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 49.1-71.4%) at a median follow-up of 20 months. CONCLUSION In conclusion, PSMA PET is positive in more than 2/3 of men with BCR and impacts patient management in more than half of the men. BRFS after PET-directed management is 60% at a median of 20 months after salvage therapy, and complete biochemical response may be achieved in up to a quarter of men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Pozdnyakov
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Roshini Kulanthaivelu
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claudia Ortega
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gandaglia G, Montorsi F. Metastases-directed Therapies in the Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Era: Not All That Glitters Is Curable. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:52-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
12
|
Nicholls L, Chapman E, Khoo V, Suh YE, Tunariu N, Wang Y, van As N. Metastasis-directed Therapy in Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Significance of the ESTRO/EORTC Classification in Oligometastatic Bone Disease. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:63-69. [PMID: 34756755 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Oligometastatic disease (OMD) represents a spectrum of clinical scenarios and various classification systems have been proposed. Bone-only OMD can occur in patients with advanced prostate cancer and validated decision-making tools are needed to assist patient selection for metastasis-directed therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic utility of a classification system for OMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) since November 2011. SBRT was delivered using CyberKnife® and gantry-based linear accelerator platforms. All patients were classified into oligometastatic states based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (ESTRO/EORTC) classification system. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were carried out to determine the prognostic utility of this classification system. RESULTS In total, 105 patients with 145 osseous metastases were treated over 119 sessions. The median follow-up after SBRT was 23 months (interquartile range 10-39.8). Twelve patients had died after a median time of 31 months. The 3-year metastatic progression-free survival was 23% (95% confidence interval 13-32) and the 3-year overall survival was 88% (95% confidence interval 80-96). Patients in a metachronous oligometastatic state were 4.50 (95% confidence interval 1.19-17.10, P = 0.03) times more likely to experience metastatic progression compared with those with synchronous oligometastases, and 6.69 (95% confidence interval 1.05-42.50, P = 0.04) times more likely to experience any failure. Hazard ratio magnitudes increased for patients in a repeat oligometastatic state. The multivariate model for both metastatic progression-free survival and failure-free survival found prostate-specific antigen doubling time <4 months (P = 0.002; P = 0.05) to independently predict for progression. CONCLUSION The ESTRO/EORTC classification of OMD predicts for progression in patients treated with SBRT for bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer at our institution. Further validation in prospective series over multiple tumour sites is needed. These characterisation factors should be assessed in patients considered for metastasis-directed therapy together with established prognostic features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Nicholls
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - E Chapman
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - Y-E Suh
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Tunariu
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - Y Wang
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N van As
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hoberück S, Löck S, Borkowetz A, Sommer U, Winzer R, Zöphel K, Fedders D, Michler E, Kotzerke J, Kopka K, Hölscher T, Braune A. Intraindividual comparison of [ 68 Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 and [ 18F]-F-PSMA-1007 in prostate cancer patients: a retrospective single-center analysis. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:109. [PMID: 34665337 PMCID: PMC8526666 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00845-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The analysis aimed to compare the radiotracers [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 intraindividually in terms of malignant lesions, mi(molecular-imaging)TNM staging and presumable unspecific lesions retrospectively as used in routine clinical practice. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 46 prostate cancer patients (median age: 71 years) who underwent consecutive [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11- and [18F]-F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT or PET/MRI within a mean of 12 ± 8.0 days was performed. MiTNM staging was performed in both studies by two nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to the results of the other tracer. After intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary consensus with two radiologists was reached, differences in both malignant and presumable nonspecific tracer accumulation were analyzed. RESULTS Differences in terms of miTNM stages in both studies occurred in nine of the 46 patients (19.6%). The miT stages differed in five patients (10.9%), the miN stages differed in three patients (6.5%), and different miM stages occurred only in one patient who was upstaged in [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 PET. Concordant miTNM stages were obtained in 37 patients (80.4%). There was no significant difference between [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 in the SUVmax locally (31.5 vs. 32.7; p = 0.658), in lymph node metastases (28.9 vs. 24.9; p = 0.30) or in bone metastases (22.9 vs. 27.6; p = 0.286). In [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 PET, more patients featured presumable unspecific uptake in the lymph nodes (52.2% vs. 28.3%; p: < 0.001), bones (71.7% vs. 23.9%; p < 0.001) and ganglia (71.7% vs. 43.5%; p < 0.001). Probable unspecific, exclusively [18F]-F-PSMA-1007-positive lesions mainly occurred in the ribs (58.7%), axillary lymph nodes (39.1%) and cervical ganglia (28.3%). CONCLUSION In terms of miTNM staging, both tracers appeared widely exchangeable, as no tracer relevantly outperformed the other. The differences between the two tracers were far more common in presumable unspecific lesions than in malignant spots. A routinely performed two-tracer study could not be shown to be superior. Since it seems at least challenging for most nuclear medicine departments to provide both [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11, it appears reasonable to choose the PSMA radiotracer depending on local availability with attention to the greater occurrence of nonspecific bone findings with [18F]-F-PSMA-1007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Hoberück
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrich Sommer
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Robert Winzer
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Dieter Fedders
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Enrico Michler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anja Braune
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Werensteijn-Honingh AM, Wevers AFJ, Peters M, Kroon PS, Intven M, Eppinga WSC, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM. Progression-free survival in patients with 68Ga-PSMA-PET-directed SBRT for lymph node oligometastases. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1342-1351. [PMID: 34323648 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1955970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer oligometastatic disease can be treated using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in order to postpone start of systemic treatments such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT imaging allows for diagnosis of oligometastases at lower PSA values. We analysed a cohort of patients with prostate cancer lymph node oligometastases detected on PSMA-PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety patients with metachronous oligometastatic prostate cancer received SBRT for 1-3 lymph node metastases diagnosed on 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS), with disease progression defined as occurrence of either target lesion progression, new metastatic lesion or biochemical progression. Secondary outcomes were biochemical PFS (BPFS), ADT-free survival (ADT-FS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Baseline patient characteristics were tested for association with PFS and a preliminary risk score was created. RESULTS Median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range 10-31 months). Median PFS and BPFS were 16 and 21 months, respectively. Median ADT-FS was not reached (73% (95%-CI 62-86%) at 24 months). In multivariable analysis, younger age, higher PSA prior to SBRT and extrapelvic location were associated with shorter PFS. Grade 1 fatigue was the most predominant acute toxicity (34%). Highest grade toxicity was grade 2 for acute and late events. QoL analysis showed mild, transient increase in fatigue at 1-4 weeks after SBRT. CONCLUSION A median PFS of 16 months was attained after SBRT for patients with PSMA-PET positive oligometastatic lymph nodes from prostate cancer. Higher pre-SBRT PSA, younger age and extrapelvic location were found to be predictors of shorter PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne F. J. Wevers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Max Peters
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Petra S. Kroon
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Intven
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wietse S. C. Eppinga
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fassbind S, Ferraro DA, Stelmes JJ, Fankhauser CD, Guckenberger M, Kaufmann PA, Eberli D, Burger IA, Kranzbühler B. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging in patients with ongoing androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2021; 35:1109-1116. [PMID: 34185262 PMCID: PMC8408087 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01646-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted positron emission tomography (PET) imaging significantly improved the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). However, the value of PSMA PET imaging in patients with advanced hormone-sensitive or hormone-resistant PCa is still largely unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the detection rate and distribution of lesions using PSMA PET imaging in patients with advanced PCa and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS A total of 84 patients diagnosed with hormone-sensitive or hormone-resistant PCa who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computer tomography (CT) under ongoing ADT were retrospectively analyzed. We assessed the detection of PSMA-positive lesions overall and for three PSA subgroups (0 to < 1 ng/mL, 1 to < 20 ng/mL and > 20 ng/mL). In addition, PSMA-positive findings were stratified by localization (prostatic fossa, pelvic, para-aortic, mediastinal/supraclavicular and axillary lymph nodes, bone lesions and visceral lesions) and hormone status (hormone-sensitive vs. hormone-resistant). Furthermore, we assessed how many patients would be classified as having oligometastatic disease (≤ 3 lesions) and theoretically qualify for metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDRT) in a personalized patient management. RESULTS We detected PSMA-positive lesions in 94.0% (79 of 84) of all patients. In the three PSA subgroups detection rates of 85.2% (0 to < 1 ng/mL, n = 27), 97.3% (1 to < 20 ng/mL, n = 37) and 100% (> 20 ng/mL, n = 20) were observed, respectively. PSMA-positive visceral metastases were observed only in patients with a PSA > 1 ng/mL. Detection of PSMA-positive lesions did not significantly differ between patients with hormone-sensitive and hormone-resistant PCa. Oligometastatic PCa was detected in 19 of 84 patients (22.6%). Almost all patients, 94.7% (n = 18) would have been eligible for MDRT. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed an overall very high detection rate of 94% using PSMA PET imaging in patients with advanced PCa and ongoing ADT. Even in a majority of patients with very low PSA values < 1 ng/ml PSMA-positive lesions were found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Fassbind
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniela A Ferraro
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Jacques Stelmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian D Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp A Kaufmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irene A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Benedikt Kranzbühler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vogel MME, Dewes S, Sage EK, Devecka M, Eitz KA, Gschwend JE, Eiber M, Combs SE, Schiller K. Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:715020. [PMID: 34395288 PMCID: PMC8362325 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.715020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography-(PSMA-PET) imaging facilitates dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy (DE-SRT) with simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) for PET-positive lesions in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we aimed to compare toxicity rates of DE-SRT with SIB to conventional SRT (C-SRT) without SIB and to report outcome. Materials and Methods We evaluated 199 patients who were treated with SRT between June 2014 and June 2020. 101 patients received DE-SRT with SIB for PET-positive local recurrence and/or PET-positive lymph nodes. 98 patients were treated with C-SRT to the prostate bed +/− elective pelvic lymphatic pathways without SIB. All patients received PSMA-PET imaging prior to DE-SRT ([68Ga]PSMA-11: 45.5%; [18F]-labeled PSMA: 54.5%). Toxicity rates for early (<6 months) and late (>6 months) gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities rectal bleeding, proctitis, stool incontinence, and genitourinary (GU) toxicities hematuria, cystitis, urine incontinence, urinary obstruction, and erectile dysfunction were assessed. Further, we analyzed the outcome with disease-free survival (DFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Results The overall toxicity rates for early GI (C-SRT: 2.1%, DE-SRT: 1.0%) and late GI (C-SRT: 1.4%, DE-SRT: 5.3%) toxicities ≥ grade 2 were similar. Early GU (C-SRT: 2.1%, DE-SRT: 3.0%) and late GU (C-SRT: 11.0%, DE-SRT: 14.7%) toxicities ≥ grade 2 were comparable, as well. Early and late toxicity rates did not differ significantly between DE-SRT versus C-SRT in all subcategories (p>0.05). PSA response (PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml) in the overall group of patients with DE-SRT was 75.0% and 86.4% at first and last follow-up, respectively. Conclusion DE-SRT showed no significantly increased toxicity rates compared with C-SRT and thus is feasible. The outcome of DE-SRT showed good results. Therefore, DE-SRT with a PSMA-PET-based SIB can be considered for the personalized treatment in patients with recurrent PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Sabrina Dewes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Eva K Sage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Devecka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Eitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Giraud N, Buy X, Vuong NS, Gaston R, Cazeau AL, Catena V, Palussiere J, Roubaud G, Sargos P. Single-Center Experience of Focal Thermo-Ablative Therapy After Pelvic Radiotherapy for In-Field Prostate Cancer Oligo-Recurrence. Front Oncol 2021; 11:709779. [PMID: 34381730 PMCID: PMC8350731 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.709779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In-field prostate cancer (PCa) oligo-recurrence after pelvic radiotherapy is a challenging situation for which metastasis-directed treatments may be beneficial, but options for focal therapies are scarce. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data for patients with three or less in-field oligo-recurrent nodal, bone and/or locally recurrent (prostate, seminal vesicles, or prostatic bed) PCa lesions after radiation therapy, identified with molecular imaging (PET and/or MRI) and treated by focal ablative therapy (cryotherapy or radiofrequency) at the Institut Bergonié between 2012 and 2020. Chosen endpoints were the post-procedure PSA response (partially defined as a >50% reduction, complete as a PSA <0.05 ng/ml), progression-free survival (PFS) defined as either a biochemical relapse (defined as a rise >25% of the Nadir and above 2 ng/ml), radiological relapse (on any imaging technique), decision of treatment modification (hormonotherapy initiation or line change) or death, and tolerance. RESULTS Forty-three patients were included. Diagnostic imaging was mostly 18F-Choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) (75.0%), prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT (9.1%) or a combination of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT, and 99 mTc-bone scintigraphy (11.4%). PSA response was observed in 41.9% patients (partial in 30.3%, complete in 11.6%). In the hormone-sensitive exclusive focal ablation group (n = 31), partial and complete PSA responses were 32.3 and 12.9% respectively. Early local control (absence of visible residual active target) on the post-procedure imaging was achieved with 87.5% success. After a median follow-up of 30 months (IQR 13.3-56.8), the median PFS was 9 months overall (95% CI, 6-17), and 17 months (95% CI, 11-NA) for PSA responders. Complications occurred in 11.4% patients, with only one grade IIIb Dindo-Clavien event (uretral stenosis requiring endoscopic uretrotomy). CONCLUSION In PCa patients showing in-field oligo-recurrence after pelvic radiotherapy, focal ablative treatment is a feasible option, possibly delaying a systemic treatment initiation or modification. These invasive strategies should preferably be performed in expert centers and discussed along other available focal strategies in multi-disciplinary meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Giraud
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Xavier Buy
- Oncologic Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nam-Son Vuong
- Urology Department, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Richard Gaston
- Urology Department, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Vittorio Catena
- Oncologic Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean Palussiere
- Oncologic Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Triggiani L, Mazzola R, Tomasini D, Bruni A, Alicino G, Matrone F, Bortolus R, Francolini G, Detti B, Magli A, Bonù ML, Ingrosso G, Lancia A, Trippa F, Maranzano E, Franzese C, Ghirardelli P, Vavassori V, Scorsetti M, Alongi F, Magrini SM. Upfront metastasis-directed therapy in oligorecurrent prostate cancer does not decrease the time from initiation of androgen deprivation therapy to castration resistance. Med Oncol 2021; 38:72. [PMID: 34008151 PMCID: PMC8131275 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-021-01518-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to explore the potential impact of upfront metastases-directed therapy (MDT) in terms of prolongation of castration-sensitive phase in a series of oligorecurrent castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PC) patients. The present article is a multicenter retrospective study. The population of interest was castrate-sensitive oligorecurrent PC, defined as the presence of 1–3 uptakes in non-visceral sites such as bones or nodes detected by means of 18F-Choline PET/CT or 68-Gallium PSMA PET/CT. Primary endpoint was the time to castration resistance. Secondary endpoints were ADT-free survival, local progression-free survival, and overall survival. Eighty-two patients and 118 lesions were analyzed. The median time to castration resistance for the entire population of the study was 49 months (95% CI 43.6–54.4 months). The 1- and 2-year TTCR-free survival rates were 94% and 82%, respectively. At the time of analysis, 52 patients were still in the castration-sensitive phase of the disease. In this cohort of patients, the median ADT-free survival was 20 months (range 3–69 months). On the other hand, during follow-up 30 patients switched to the castration-resistant phase of disease. In this last group of patients, the median ADT-free survival was 20 months (range 4–50 months). After the ADT administration, the median castration-sensitive phase was 29 months (range 5–71 months). Castration resistance generally occurs at a median follow-up of 24–36 months following ADT. In the current study, upfront MDT does not decrease the time from initiation of ADT to castration resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Tomasini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Giulia Alicino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Matrone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Di Riferimento, Oncologico Di Aviano CRO-IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Roberto Bortolus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Di Riferimento, Oncologico Di Aviano CRO-IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, A.O.U Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, A.O.U Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, ASUIUD, Udine, Italy
| | - Marco Lorenzo Bonù
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche E Biomediche, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Fabio Trippa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 'S. Maria' Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | | - Ciro Franzese
- IRCCS, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas University Hospital, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | | | | | - Marta Scorsetti
- IRCCS, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas University Hospital, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kirste S, Kroeze SGC, Henkenberens C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Vogel MME, Becker J, Zamboglou C, Burger I, Derlin T, Bartenstein P, Ruf J, la Fougère C, Eiber M, Christiansen H, Combs SE, Müller AC, Belka C, Guckenberger M, Grosu AL. Combining 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-Directed and Elective Radiation Therapy Improves Outcome in Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:640467. [PMID: 34041020 PMCID: PMC8141738 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.640467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In case of oligo-recurrent prostate cancer (PC) following prostatectomy, 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT can be used to detect a specific site of recurrence and to initiate metastasis-directed radiation therapy (MDT). However, large heterogeneities exist concerning doses, treatment fields and radiation techniques, with some studies reporting focal radiotherapy (RT) to PSMA-PET/CT positive lesions only and other studies using elective RT strategies. We aimed to compare oncological outcomes and toxicity between PET/CT-directed RT (PDRT) and PDRT plus elective RT (eRT; i.e. prostate bed, pelvic or paraaortal nodes) in a large retrospective multicenter study. Methods Data of 394 patients with oligo-recurrent 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-positive PC treated between 04/2013 and 01/2018 in six different academic institutions were evaluated. Primary endpoint was biochemical-recurrence-free survival (bRFS). bRFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log rank testing. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to determine influence of treatment parameters. Results In 204 patients (51.8%) RT was directed only to lesions seen on 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT (PDRT), 190 patients (48.2%) received PDRT plus eRT. PDRT plus eRT was associated with a significantly improved 3-year bRFS compared to PDRT alone (53 vs. 37%; p = 0.001) and remained an independent factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.006, HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.68). This effect was more pronounced in the subgroup of patients who were treated with PDRT and elective prostate bed radiotherapy (ePBRT) with a 3-year bRFS of 61% versus 22% (p <0.001). Acute and late toxicity grade ≥3 was 0.8% and 3% after PDRT plus eRT versus no toxicity grade ≥3 after PDRT alone. Conclusions In this large cohort of patients with oligo-recurrent prostate cancer, elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics and the prostatic bed significantly improved bRFS when added to 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-guided focal radiotherapy. These findings need to be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Jessica Becker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Irene Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian la Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Arndt-Christian Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vogel MME, Dewes S, Sage EK, Devecka M, Gschwend JE, Eiber M, Combs SE, Schiller K. A survey among German-speaking radiation oncologists on PET-based radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:82. [PMID: 33933111 PMCID: PMC8088662 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01811-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Positron emission tomography-(PET) has evolved as a powerful tool to guide treatment for prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this survey was to evaluate the acceptance and use of PET—especially with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting tracers—in clinical routine for radiotherapy (RT) and the impact on target volume definition and dose prescription. Methods We developed an online survey, which we distributed via e-mail to members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). The survey included questions on patterns of care of RT for PC with/without PET. For evaluation of doses we used the equivalent dose at fractionation of 2 Gy with α/β = 1.5 Gy [EQD2(1.5 Gy)].
Results From 109 participants, 78.9% have the possibility to use PET for RT planning. Most centers use PSMA-targeting tracers (98.8%). In 39.5%, PSMA-PET for biochemical relapse after prior surgery is initiated at PSA ≥ 0.5 ng/mL, while 30.2% will perform PET at ≥ 0.2 ng/mL (≥ 1.0 ng/mL: 16.3%, ≥ 2.0 ng/mL: 2.3%, regardless of PSA: 11.7%). In case of PET-positive local recurrence (LR) and pelvic lymph nodes (LNs), 97.7% and 96.5% of the participants will apply an escalated dose. The median total dose in EQD2(1.5 Gy) was 70.00 Gy (range: 56.89–85.71) for LR and 62.00 Gy (range: 52.61–80.00) for LNs. A total number of ≤ 3 (22.0%) or ≤ 5 (20.2%) distant lesions was most often described as applicable for the definition as oligometastatic PC. Conclusion PSMA-PET is widely used among German radiation oncologists. However, specific implications on treatment planning differ among physicians. Therefore, further trials and guidelines for PET-based RT are warranted. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01811-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Sabrina Dewes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva K Sage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Devecka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:575-580. [PMID: 33914101 PMCID: PMC8219546 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01778-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective The current article encompasses a literature review and recommendations for radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Materials and methods A literature review focused on studies comparing metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) vs. external elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) and studies analyzing recurrence patterns after local nodal treatment was performed. The DEGRO Prostate Cancer Expert Panel discussed the results and developed treatment recommendations. Results Metastasis-directed radiotherapy results in high local control (often > 90% within a follow-up of 1–2 years) and can be used to improve progression-free survival or defer androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) according to prospective randomized phase II data. Distant progression after involved-node SABR only occurs within a few months in the majority of patients. ENRT improves metastases-free survival rates with increased toxicity in comparison to SABR according to retrospective comparative studies. The majority of nodal recurrences after initial local treatment of pelvic nodal metastasis are detected within the true pelvis and common iliac vessels. Conclusion ENRT with or without a boost should be preferred to SABR in pelvic nodal recurrences. In oligometastatic prostate cancer with distant (extrapelvic) nodal recurrences, SABR alone can be performed in selected cases. Application of additional systemic treatments should be based on current guidelines, with ADT as first-line treatment for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Only in carefully selected patients can radiotherapy be initially used without additional ADT outside of the current standard recommendations. Results of (randomized) prospective studies are needed for definitive recommendations.
Collapse
|
22
|
Henkenberens C, Derlin T, Bengel F, Ross TL, Kuczyk MA, Giordano FA, Sarria GR, Schmeel LC, Christiansen H, von Klot CAJ. Efficacy of PSMA PET-Guided Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:664225. [PMID: 33954116 PMCID: PMC8089391 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.664225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the outcome of radiotherapy (RT) to all PSMA ligand positive metastases for patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients and methods A total of 42 patients developed oligometastatic mCRPC and received PSMA PET-guided RT of all metastases. The main outcome parameters were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and second-line systemic treatment free survival (SST-FS). Results A total of 141 PSMA ligand-positive metastases were irradiated. The median follow-up time was 39.0 months (12-58 months). During the follow-up five out of 42 (11.9%) patients died of progressive mPCa. Five out of 42 (11.9%) patients showed no biochemical responses and presented with a PSA level ≥10% of the baseline PSA at first PSA level measurement after RT and were classified as non-responders. The median PSA level before RT was 4.79 ng/mL (range, 0.4-46.1), which decreased significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.39 ng/mL (range, <0.07-32.8; p=0.002). The median PSA level at biochemical progression after PSMA ligand-based RT was 2.75 ng/mL (range, 0.27-53.0; p=0.24) and was not significantly different (p=0.29) from the median PSA level (4.79 ng/mL, range, 0.4-46.1) before the PSMA ligand-based RT. The median bPFS was 12.0 months after PSMA ligand PET-based RT (95% CI, 11.2-15.8) and the median SST-FS was 15.0 months (95% CI, 14.0-21.5). Conclusion In well-informed and closely followed-up patients, PSMA PET-guided RT represents a viable treatment option for patients with oligometastatic mCRPC to delay further systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias L Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Markus A Kuczyk
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gravis G, Autret A, Guibert-Broudic M, Dubergé T, Zemmour C, Carrier P, Salem N, Badinand D, Cartier L, Gross E, Walz J, Pignot G, Brenot-Rossi I. Prognostic Risk Classification for Biochemical Relapse-Free Survival in Oligometastatic Recurrent Prostate Cancer Determined by Choline PET. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:346-353. [PMID: 33849812 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a new imaging technique for the detection of oligometastatic (OM) prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after initial OM diagnoses; treatment, particularly metastasis-directed therapy (MDT); and determine risk groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multi-center, retrospective study included patients with hormone-sensitive biological relapse after local treatment with curative intent and with fewer than six choline PET/CT metastases. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). Risk groups were based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.8 ng/mL and metastatic sites at OM cancer diagnosis. RESULTS Between October 2012 and December 2016, 177 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 49.02 months. The median bRFS was 39.74 months. In multivariate analyses, bone metastases and PSA ≥ 0.8 ng/mL were associated with worse bRFS. Four risk groups (I to IV; hazard ratio [HR], 5.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-26.61) were observed, with median bRFS not reached for group I (PSA < 0.8 ng/mL; node metastasis [M1a]), a 40.00-month bRFS for group II (PSA ≥ 0.8 ng/mL; M1a), 29.97-month bRFS for group III (bone metastasis [M1b], whatever the PSA level); and 22.70-month bRFS for group IV (PSA > 0.8 ng/mL and visceral metastasis [M1c]). MDT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improved bRFS over MDT alone (48.36 vs. 34.16 months; HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.38-3.26), particularly for group II (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.09-4.00), and reached a limit of significance for group III (HR, ;3.79 95% CI, 0.88- 16.38). CONCLUSION Prognostic group classifications were confirmed: PSA < 0.8 ng/mL and M1a showed a better outcome than patients with M1c and PSA ≥ 0.8 ng/mL. These results could facilitate patient selection for prospective clinical trials in OM prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
| | - Aurélie Autret
- Biostatistical Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Morgane Guibert-Broudic
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Center of Radiation Oncology, La Croix-Rouge Française, Toulon, France
| | - Thomas Dubergé
- Center of Radiation Oncology, La Croix-Rouge Française, Toulon, France
| | | | - Patricia Carrier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Sainte-Musse, Toulon, France
| | - Naji Salem
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Delphine Badinand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Lysian Cartier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - Emmanuel Gross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Clairval, Marseille, France
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Géraldine Pignot
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rogowski P, Roach M, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Shi R, Buchner A, Stief C, Belka C, Li M. Radiotherapy of oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:50. [PMID: 33750437 PMCID: PMC7941976 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01776-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to improved imaging sensitivity, the term "oligometastatic" prostate cancer disease is diagnosed more often, leading to an increasing interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). There are two types of radiation based MDT applied when treating oligometastatic disease: (1) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) generally used for bone metastases; or (2) SBRT for isolated nodal oligometastases combined with prophylactic elective nodal radiotherapy. This review aims to summarize current evidence data, which may shed light on the optimal management of this heterogeneous group of patients. METHODS A systematic review of the Medline database through PubMed was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All relevant studies published up to November 2020 were identified and screened. Fifty-six titles were included. Besides outcome parameters, different prognostic and predictive factors were assessed, including site of metastases, time between primary treatment and MDT, use of systemic therapies, hormone sensitivity, as well as pattern of recurrence. FINDINGS Evidence consists largely of retrospective case series and no consistent precise definition of oligometastasis exists, however, most investigators seem to acknowledge the need to distinguish between patients presenting with what is frequently called "synchronous" versus "metachronous" oligometastatic disease. Available data on radiotherapy as MDT demonstrate high local control rates and a small but relevant proportion of patients without progressive disease after 2 years. This holds true for both hormone sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer diseases. The use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging increased dramatically. Radiation doses and field sizes varied considerably among the studies. The search for relevant prognostic and predictive factors is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS To our best knowledge this review on oligometastatic prostate cancer included the largest number of original articles. It demonstrates the therapeutic potential and challenges of MDT for oligometastatic prostate cancer. Prospective studies are under way and will provide further high-level evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero Street, Suite H 1031, San Francisco, CA 94143-1708 USA
| | | | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Run Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Klusa D, Lohaus F, Furesi G, Rauner M, Benešová M, Krause M, Kurth I, Peitzsch C. Metastatic Spread in Prostate Cancer Patients Influencing Radiotherapy Response. Front Oncol 2021; 10:627379. [PMID: 33747899 PMCID: PMC7971112 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.627379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and surgery are curative treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa) with a 5-year survival rate of nearly 100%. Once PCa cells spread into distant organs, such as bone, the overall survival rate of patients drops dramatically. The metastatic cascade and organotropism of PCa cells are regulated by different cellular subtypes, organ microenvironment, and their interactions. This cross-talk leads to pre-metastatic niche formation that releases chemo-attractive factors enforcing the formation of distant metastasis. Biological characteristics of PCa metastasis impacting on metastatic sites, burden, and latency is of clinical relevance. Therefore, the implementation of modern hybrid imaging technologies into clinical routine increased the sensitivity to detect metastases at earlier stages. This enlarged the number of PCa patients diagnosed with a limited number of metastases, summarized as oligometastatic disease. These patients can be treated with androgen deprivation in combination with local-ablative radiotherapy or radiopharmaceuticals directed to metastatic sites. Unfortunately, the number of patients with disease recurrence is high due to the enormous heterogeneity within the oligometastatic patient population and the lack of available biomarkers with predictive potential for metastasis-directed radiotherapy. Another, so far unmet clinical need is the diagnosis of minimal residual disease before onset of clinical manifestation and/or early relapse after initial therapy. Here, monitoring of circulating and disseminating tumor cells in PCa patients during the course of radiotherapy may give us novel insight into how metastatic spread is influenced by radiotherapy and vice versa. In summary, this review critically compares current clinical concepts for metastatic PCa patients and discuss the implementation of recent preclinical findings improving our understanding of metastatic dissemination and radiotherapy resistance into standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Klusa
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Giulia Furesi
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden,Germany
| | - Martina Rauner
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden,Germany
| | | | - Mechthild Krause
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ina Kurth
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Peitzsch
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schmidt Hegemann NS, Rogowski P, Eze C, Schäfer C, Stief C, Lang S, Spohn S, Steffens R, Li M, Gratzke C, Schultze-Seemann W, Ilhan H, Fendler WP, Bartenstein P, Ganswindt U, Buchner A, Grosu AL, Belka C, Meyer PT, Kirste S, Zamboglou C. Outcome After 68Ga-PSMA-11 versus Choline PET-Based Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113395. [PMID: 33207785 PMCID: PMC7698293 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this analysis was primarily to analyze biochemical-recurrence free survival (BRFS) after positron emission tomography (PET)-guided salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in a large cohort, and to further compare BRFS after PSMA vs. choline PET/ computer tomography (CT)-based sRT. This retrospective analysis is based on 421 patients referred for PSMA or choline PET/CT after radical prostatectomy due to biochemically recurrent or persistent disease. BRFS (PSA: 0.2 ng/mL) was defined as the study endpoint. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of different clinical parameters on BRFS. Additionally, propensity score matching was performed to adjust patient cohorts (PSMA vs. choline PET/CT-based sRT). The median follow-up time was 30 months. BRFS at three years after sRT was 58%. In the multivariate analysis, only PSA before PET imaging and PSA before sRT were significantly associated with BRFS (p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, 272 patients were further analyzed; there was no significant difference in three-year BRFS between patients with PSMA PET-based vs. choline PET-based sRT (55% vs. 63%, p = 0.197). The present analysis confirmed the overall high BRFS rates after PET-based sRT and the strong prognostic effect of PSA level prior to sRT. PSMA PET-based sRT did not have superior BRFS rates when compared with choline PET-based sRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina-Sophie Schmidt Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Christian Schäfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (C.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Sebastian Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
| | - Simon Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
| | - Rieke Steffens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.G.); (W.S.-S.)
| | - Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann
- Department of Urology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.G.); (W.S.-S.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (H.I.); (P.B.)
| | - Wolfgang Peter Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Essen, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (H.I.); (P.B.)
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (C.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, 81377 LMU Munich, Germany; (N.-S.S.H.); (P.R.); (C.E.); (C.S.); (R.S.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Tobias Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (S.L.); (S.S.); (A.-L.G.); (S.K.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Bertha-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-761-2709-4610; Fax: +49-761-2709-4720
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Achard V, Bottero M, Rouzaud M, Lancia A, Scorsetti M, Filippi AR, Franzese C, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Ingrosso G, Ost P, Zilli T. Radiotherapy treatment volumes for oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer: a systematic review. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1224-1234. [PMID: 32536241 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1775291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is an emerging treatment strategy for nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, large heterogeneities exist in the RT regimens used, with series reporting the use of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) strategies and others the delivery of focal treatments to the relapsing nodes with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT). In this systematic review of the literature we compared the oncological outcomes and toxicity of the different RT regimens for nodal oligorecurrent PCa patients, with the aim of defining the optimal RT target volume in this setting. METHODS We performed a systemic search on the Pubmed database to identify articles reporting on the use of ENRT or SBRT for oligometastatic PCa with nodal recurrence. RESULTS Twenty-two articles were analyzed, including four prospective phase II trials (3 with SBRT and 1 with ENRT). Focal SBRT, delivered with an involved node, involved site, and involved field modality, was the most commonly used strategy with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 16 to 58% and a very low toxicity profile. Improved PFS rates were observed with ENRT strategies (52-80% at 3 years) compared to focal SBRT, despite a slightly higher toxicity rate. One ongoing randomized phase II trial is comparing both modalities in patients with nodal oligorecurrent PCa. CONCLUSIONS With a large variability in patterns of practice, the optimal RT strategy remains to be determined in the setting of nodal oligorecurrent PCa. Ongoing randomized trials and advances in translational research will help to shed light on the best management for these patients. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marta Bottero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tor Vergata General Hospital, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Michel Rouzaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Miura N, Pradere B, Mori K, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Misrai V, D'Andrea D, Albisinni S, Papalia R, Saika T, Scarpa RM, Shariat SF, Esperto F. Metastasis-directed therapy and prostate-targeted therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2020; 72:531-542. [PMID: 32550632 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.20.03779-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence on the role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and/or prostate-targeted therapy (PTT) in the setting of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PubMed, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. The following keywords were used: ("prostate cancer" OR "prostate carcinoma" OR "prostate neoplasm" OR "prostate tumor") AND ("oligometastatic" OR "oligometastasis" OR "PSMA") AND ("surgery" OR "prostatectomy" OR "radical prostatectomy" OR "cytoreductive" OR "local treatment" OR "radiotherapy" OR "stereotactic" OR "stereotaxic") AND ("survival" OR "mortality"). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS After evaluating the selection criteria, 81 studies were evaluated for our endpoints. We included 22 studies for PTT of synchronous mPCa. There have been no randomized studies on cytoreductive prostatectomy (cRP). Four prospective studies showed that cRP was feasible but did not contribute to a positive effect on overall survival (OS). Regarding PTT-radiotherapy, two randomized controlled phase 3 trials showed that OS was improved in men with a low metastatic burden. Regarding MDT of metachronous lymph node recurrence, we included 29 retrospective studies. For MDT of oligometastases, we included 30 studies. One randomized phase 2 trial showed that androgen deprivation therapy-free survival improved with stereotactic body radiation therapy compared to that with surveillance; however, benefits on OS remain unclear. CONCLUSIONS We performed a comprehensive overview of the current literature on MDT and PTT. The feasibility of MDT and PTT is supported by several retrospective studies. Nevertheless, there remains a lack of high-quality trials to prove its survival benefits. Results from ongoing prospective trials data are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyoshi Miura
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria -
- Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan -
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
- EAU Young Urologist Office (YOU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Vincent Misrai
- Department of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Takashi Saika
- Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Roberto M Scarpa
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Francesco Esperto
- EAU Young Urologist Office (YOU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Barbosa FG, Queiroz MA, Ferraro DA, Nunes RF, Dreyer PR, Zaniboni EC, Costa LB, Bastos DA, Marin JFG, Buchpiguel CA. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET: Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 2020; 40:1412-1430. [PMID: 32762625 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Therapy response assessment is a critical step in cancer management, leading clinicians to optimize the use of therapeutic options during the course of the disease. Imaging is a pivotal biomarker for therapy response evaluation in oncology and has gained wider use through the development of reproducible data-based guidelines, of which the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors is the most successful example. Disease-specific criteria have also been proposed, and the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria are the mainstay for prostate cancer (PC). However, conventional imaging evaluation in metastatic PC has several limitations, including (a) the inability to detect small-volume disease, (b) the high prevalence of bone (nonmeasurable) lesions at imaging, and (c) the established role of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as the biomarker of choice for response assessment and disease progression. In addition, there are an increasing number of newer treatment options with various effects on imaging features. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has improved patient selection for newer treatments, such as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or radionuclide therapy. The role of PSMA PET in response assessment for many metastatic PC therapeutic options (MDT, androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, radionuclide therapy, and immunotherapy) is an evolving issue, with emerging data showing good correlation with PSA levels and clinical outcome. However, there are specific implications of each therapy (especially androgen deprivation therapy and immunotherapy) on PSMA expression by PC cells, leading to potential pitfalls and inaccuracies that must be known by radiologists. Despite some limitations, PSMA PET is addressing gaps left by conventional imaging methods (eg, CT and bone scanning) and nonimaging biomarkers (PSA levels) in metastatic PC therapy response assessment, a role that can be improved with advances like refinement of interpretation criteria and whole-body tumor burden quantification.© RSNA, 2020See discussion on this article by Barwick and Castellucci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe G Barbosa
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Marcelo A Queiroz
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Daniela A Ferraro
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Rafael F Nunes
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Priscilla R Dreyer
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Elaine C Zaniboni
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Larissa B Costa
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Diogo A Bastos
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - José Flávio G Marin
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Carlos A Buchpiguel
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Clinical outcome of PSMA-guided radiotherapy for patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:143-151. [PMID: 32405735 PMCID: PMC7835298 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04777-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose First-line treatment of patients with recurrent, metastatic prostate cancer involves hormone therapy with or without additional systemic therapies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) allows the detection of oligometastatic disease that may be amenable to image-guided radiotherapy. The current study classifies the type and localization of metastases and the clinical outcome of PSMA-PET/CT-guided radiotherapy to selected metastases. Materials and methods Between 2011 and 2019, 86 patients with recurrent, oligometastatic prostate carcinoma were identified by PSMA-PET/CT and were treated with image-guided radiotherapy of their metastases. Sites of relapse were characterized, and the primary endpoint overall survival (OS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival were tabulated. Results In total, 37% of the metastases were bone metastases, 48% were pelvic nodal metastases, and 15% were nodal metastases outside of the pelvis. After PSMA-guided radiotherapy, a biochemical response was detected in 83% of the cohort. A statistically significant decrease in the standard uptake value (SUV) was seen in irradiated metastases. After a median follow-up of 26 months, the 3-year OS and bPFS were 84% and 55%, respectively. The median time of ADT-free survival was 13.5 months. A better clinical outcome was observed for patients receiving concomitant ADT or more than 24 fractions of radiation. Conclusion PSMA-guided radiotherapy is a promising therapeutic approach with excellent infield control for men with oligorecurrent prostate carcinoma. However, prospective, randomized trials are necessary to determine if this approach confers a survival advantage.
Collapse
|
31
|
Henkenberens C, Oehus AK, Derlin T, Bengel F, Ross TL, Kuczyk MA, Janssen S, Christiansen H, von Klot CAJ. Efficacy of repeated PSMA PET-directed radiotherapy for oligorecurrent prostate cancer after initial curative therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:1006-1017. [PMID: 32399639 PMCID: PMC7581615 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01629-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the outcome of prostate cancer (PCa) patients diagnosed with oligorecurrent disease and treated with a first and a second PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand) PET(positron-emission tomography)-directed radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-two patients with oligorecurrent relapse after curative therapy received a first PSMA PET-directed RT of all metastases. After biochemical progression, all patients received a second PSMA PET-directed RT of all metastases. The main outcome parameters were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and androgen deprivation therapy-free survival (ADT-FS). The intervals of BPFS were analyzed separately as follows: the interval from the last day of PSMA PET-directed RT to the first biochemical progression was defined as bPFS_1 and the interval from second PSMA PET-directed RT to further biochemical progression was defined as bPFS_2. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 39.5 months (18-60). One out of 32 (3.1%) patients died after 47 months of progressive metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). All patients showed biochemical responses after the first PSMA PET-directed RT and the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before RT was 1.70 ng/mL (0.2-3.8), which decreased significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.39 ng/mL (range <0.07-3.8; p = 0.004). The median PSA level at biochemical progression after the first PSMA PET-directed RT was 2.9 ng/mL (range 0.12-12.80; p = 0.24). Furthermore, the PSA level after the second PSMA PET-directed RT at the last follow-up (0.52 ng/mL, range <0.07-154.0) was not significantly different (p = 0.36) from the median PSA level (1.70 ng/mL, range 0.2-3.8) before the first PSMA PET-directed RT. The median bPFS_1 was 16.0 months after the first PSMA PET-directed RT (95% CI 11.9-19.2) and the median bPFS_2 was significantly shorter at 8.0 months (95% CI 6.3-17.7) after the second PSMA PET-directed RT (p = 0.03; 95% CI 1.9-8.3). Multivariate analysis revealed no significant parameter for bPFS_1, whereas extrapelvic disease was the only significant parameter (p = 0.02, OR 2.3; 95% CI 0.81-4.19) in multivariate analysis for bPFS_2. The median ADT-FS was 31.0 months (95% CI 20.1-41.8) and multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone metastases, compared to patients with only lymph node metastases at first PSMA PET-directed RT, had a significantly higher chance (p = 0.007, OR 4.51; 95% CI 1.8-13.47) of needing ADT at the last follow-up visit. CONCLUSION If patients are followed up closely, including PSMA PET scans, a second PSMA PET-directed RT represents a viable treatment option for well-informed and well-selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Ann-Kathrin Oehus
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias L Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Markus A Kuczyk
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Medical practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Treibesstraße 11, 31134, Hildesheim, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph A J von Klot
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Efficacy of PSMA ligand PET-based radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:362. [PMID: 32349700 PMCID: PMC7191762 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06883-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A substantial number of patients will develop further biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy (RP) and salvage radiotherapy (sRT). Recently published data using prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography (PSMA - PET) for re-staging suggest that those recurrences are often located outside the prostate fossa and most of the patients have a limited number of metastases, making them amenable to metastasis-directed treatment (MDT). METHODS We analyzed 78 patients with biochemical progression after RP and sRT from a retrospective European multicenter database and assessed the biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS; PSA < nadir + 0.2 ng/ml or no PSA decline) as well as the androgen deprivation therapy- free survival (ADT-FS) using Kaplan-Meier curves. Log-rank test and multivariate analysis was performed to determine influencing factors. RESULTS A total of 185 PSMA - PET positive metastases were detected and all lesions were treated with radiotherapy (RT). Concurrent ADT was prescribed in 16.7% (13/78) of patients. The median PSA level before RT was 1.90 ng/mL (range, 0.1-22.1) and decreased statistically significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.26 ng/mL (range, 0.0-12.25; p < 0.001). The median PSA level of 0.88 ng/mL (range, 0.0-25.8) at the last follow-up was also statistically significantly lower (p = 0.008) than the median PSA level of 1.9 ng/mL (range, 0.1-22.1) before RT. The median bRFS was 17.0 months (95% CI, 14.2-19.8). After 12 months, 55.3% of patients were free of biochemical progression. Multivariate analyses showed that concurrent ADT was the most important independent factor for bRFS (p = 0.01). The median ADT-FS was not reached and exploratory statistical analyses estimated a median ADT-FS of 34.0 months (95% CI, 16.3-51.7). Multivariate analyses revealed no significant parameters for ADT-FS. CONCLUSIONS RT as MDT based on PSMA - PET of all metastases of recurrent prostate cancer after RP and sRT represents a viable treatment option for well-informed and well-selected patients.
Collapse
|
33
|
Vogel MME, Kroeze SGC, Henkenberens C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Kirste S, Becker J, Burger IA, Derlin T, Bartenstein P, Mix M, la Fougère C, Eiber M, Christiansen H, Belka C, Grosu AL, Müller AC, Guckenberger M, Combs SE. Prognostic risk classification for biochemical relapse-free survival in patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer after [ 68Ga]PSMA-PET-guided metastasis-directed therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:2328-2338. [PMID: 32179961 PMCID: PMC7396407 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04760-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Since the success of prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) imaging for patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (ORPC), it is increasingly used for radiotherapy as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). Therefore, we developed a prognostic risk classification for biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) for patients after PSMA-PET-guided MDT after radical prostatectomy. METHODS We analyzed 292 patients with local recurrence (LR) and/or pelvic lymph node (LN) lesions and/or up to five distant LN, bone (BM), or visceral metastases (VM) detected with [68Ga]PSMA-PET imaging. Median follow-up was 16 months (range 0-57). The primary endpoint was bRFS after MDT. Cox regression analysis for risk factors was incorporated into a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) with classification and regression tree method. RESULTS PSA at recurrence ≥ 0.8 ng/mL, BM, and VM was significantly associated with biochemical relapse. RPA showed five groups with tenfold cross-validation of 0.294 (SE 0.032). After building risk classes I to IV (p < 0.0001), mean bRFS was 36.3 months (95% CI 32.4-40.1) in class I (PSA < 0.8 ng/mL, no BM) and 25.8 months (95% CI 22.5-29.1) in class II (PSA ≥ 0.8 ng/mL, no BM, no VM). LR and/or pelvic LNs caused relapse in classes I and II. Mean bRFS was 16.0 months (95% CI 12.4-19.6) in class III (PSA irrelevant, present BM) and 5.7 months (95% CI 2.7-8.7) in class IV (PSA ≥ 0.8 ng/mL, no BM, present VM). CONCLUSION We developed and internally validated a risk classification for bRFS after PSMA-PET-guided MDT. Patients with PSA < 0.8 ng/mL and local relapse only (LR and/or pelvic LNs) had the most promising bRFS. PSA ≥ 0.8 ng/mL and local relapse only (LR and/or pelvic LNs) indicated intermediate risk for failure. Patients with BM were at higher risk regardless of the PSA. However, those patients still show satisfactory bRFS. In patients with VM, bRFS is heavily decreased. MDT in such cases should be discussed individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jessica Becker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Irene A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian la Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arndt-Christian Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Kroeze SGC, Henkenberens C, Vogel MME, Kirste S, Becker J, Burger IA, Derlin T, Bartenstein P, Eiber M, Mix M, la Fougère C, Müller AC, Grosu AL, Combs SE, Christiansen H, Guckenberger M, Belka C. Influence of localization of PSMA-positive oligo-metastases on efficacy of metastasis-directed external-beam radiotherapy-a multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:1852-1863. [PMID: 32002591 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04708-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Approximately 40-70% of biochemically persistent or recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RPE) are oligo-metastatic in 68gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET). Those lesions are frequently located outside the prostate bed, and therefore not cured by the current standards of care like external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) of the prostatic fossa. This retrospective study analyzes the influence of oligo-metastases' site on outcome after metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDR). METHODS Retrospectively, 359 patients with PET-positive PCa recurrences after RPE were analyzed. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < post-radiotherapy nadir + 0.2 ng/mL) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS All patients were initially clinically without distant metastases (cM0). Seventy-five patients had local recurrence within the prostatic fossa, 32 patients had pelvic nodal plus local recurrence, 117 patients had pelvic nodal recurrence, 51 patients had paraaortic lymph node metastases with/without locoregional recurrence, and 84 patients had bone or visceral metastases with/without locoregional recurrence. Median PSA before MDR was 1.2 ng/mL (range, 0.04-47.5). Additive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given in 35% (125/359) of patients. Median PSA nadir after MDR was 0.23 ng/mL (range, < 0.03-18.30). After a median follow-up of 16 months (1-57), 239/351 (68%) patients had no biochemical recurrence. Patients with distant lymph node and/or distant metastases, the so-called oligo-body cohort, had an overall in-field control of 90/98 (91%) but at the same time, an ex-field progress of 44/96 (46%). In comparison, an ex-field progress was detected in 28/154 (18%) patients with local and/or pelvic nodal recurrence (oligo-pelvis group). Compared with the oligo-pelvis group, there was a significantly lower BRFS in oligo-body patients at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION Overall, BRFS was dependent on patterns of metastatic disease. Thus, MDR of PSMA PET-positive oligo-metastases can be offered considering that about one-third of the patients progressed within a median follow-up of 16 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N-S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - S G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - M M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Unterschleissheim, Munich, Germany
| | - S Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - J Becker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - I A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - T Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Ch la Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - S E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Unterschleissheim, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|