1
|
Mari A, Cadenar A, Giudici S, Cianchi G, Albisinni S, Autorino R, Di Maida F, Gandaglia G, Mir MC, Valerio M, Marra G, Zattoni F, Bianchi L, Lombardo R, Shariat SF, Roupret M, Bauckneht M, Vaggelli L, De Nunzio C, Minervini A. A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in the initial staging of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00850-y. [PMID: 38822051 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00850-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography using Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA PET/CT) is notable for its superior sensitivity and specificity in detecting recurrent PCa and is under investigation for its potential in pre-treatment staging. Despite its established efficacy in nodal and metastasis staging in trial setting, its role in primary staging awaits fuller validation due to limited evidence on oncologic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT compared to CI for comprehensive PCa staging. METHODS Medline, Scopus and Web of science databases were searched till March 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Primary outcomes were specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA PET/CT for local, nodal and metastatic staging in PCa patients. Due to the unavailability of data, a meta-analysis was feasible only for detection of seminal vesicles invasion (SVI) and LNI. RESULTS A total of 49 studies, comprising 3876 patients, were included. Of these, 6 investigated accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in detection of SVI. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 42.29% (95%CI: 29.85-55.78%), 87.59% (95%CI: 77.10%-93.67%), 93.39% (95%CI: 74.95%-98.52%) and 86.60% (95%CI: 58.83%-96.69%), respectively. Heterogeneity analysis revealed significant variability for PPV and NPV. 18 studies investigated PSMA PET/CT accuracy in detection of LNI. Aggregate sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 43.63% (95%CI: 34.19-53.56%), 85.55% (95%CI: 75.95%-91.74%), 67.47% (95%CI: 52.42%-79.6%) and 83.61% (95%CI: 79.19%-87.24%). No significant heterogeneity was found between studies. CONCLUSIONS The present systematic review and meta-analysis highlights PSMA PET-CT effectiveness in detecting SVI and its good accuracy in LNI compared to CI. Nonetheless, it also reveals a lack of high-quality research on its performance in clinical T staging, extraprostatic extension and distant metastasis evaluation, emphasizing the need for further rigorous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Mari
- Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121, Florence, Italy.
| | - Anna Cadenar
- Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121, Florence, Italy
| | - Sofia Giudici
- Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121, Florence, Italy
| | - Gemma Cianchi
- Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121, Florence, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Ribera, Valencia, Spain
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Lombardo
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordanien
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Urology, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Urology Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Vaggelli
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
An C, Qiu X, Liu B, Song X, Yang Y, Shu J, Fu Y, Wang F, Zhao X, Guo H. A PSMA PET/CT-based risk model for prediction of concordance between targeted biopsy and combined biopsy in detecting prostate cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:285. [PMID: 38695883 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04947-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study is to investigate the diagnostic value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in improving the concordance between mpMRI-TB and combined biopsy (CB) in detecting PCa. METHODS 115 consecutive men with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT prior to prostate biopsy were included for analysis. PSMA intensity, quantified as maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) and other clinical characteristics were evaluated relative to biopsy concordance using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A prediction model was developed based on the identified parameters, and a dynamic online diagnostic nomogram was constructed, with its discrimination evaluated through the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and consistency assessed using calibration plots. To assess its clinical applicability, a decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed, while internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping methods. RESULTS Concordance between mpMRI-TB and CB occurred in 76.5% (88/115) of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression analyses performed that SUVmax (OR= 0.952; 95% CI 0.917-0.988; P= 0.010) and ADCmin (OR= 1.006; 95% CI 1.003-1.010; P= 0.001) were independent risk factors for biopsy concordance. The developed model showed a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of 0.67, 0.78, 0.81 and 0.78 in the full sample. The calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram's predicted outcomes closely resembled the ideal curve, indicating consistency between predicted and actual outcomes. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis (DCA) highlighted the clinical net benefit achievable across various risk thresholds. These findings were reinforced by internal validation. CONCLUSIONS The developed prediction model based on SUVmax and ADCmin showed practical value in guiding the optimization of prostate biopsy pattern. Lower SUVmax and Higher ADCmin values are associated with greater confidence in implementing mono-TB and safely avoiding SB, effectively balancing benefits and risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoli An
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, China
- Department of Andrology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Xuefeng Qiu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Beibei Liu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Xiang Song
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Yu Yang
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Jiaxin Shu
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Yao Fu
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210003, China.
| | - Xiaozhi Zhao
- Department of Andrology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang Z, Guo J, Hu L, Yang S, Meng B, Tang Q. Diagnostic performance of 18F‑DCFPyL PET vs. 68Ga‑PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected prostate cancer: A systemic review and meta‑analysis. Oncol Lett 2024; 27:188. [PMID: 38486944 PMCID: PMC10938285 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT was compared with that of 18F-DCFPyL PET for patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Up to September 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched for relevant papers. Studies examining the diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected PCa were included in the present review. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 tool was used to rate the diagnostic performance of each study. The diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary PCa was examined by 13 studies included, comprising 1,178 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-DCFPyL PET were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.08-0.96), respectively. For 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82), respectively. 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT both had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). In addition, the Fagan nomogram revealed that the post-test probabilities for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT could rise to 69 and 77% when the pre-test probability was set at 50%. In conclusion, a comparable diagnostic performance for patients with suspected PCa was determined for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. However, it is crucial to keep in mind that the findings of the present meta-analysis come from investigations with modest sample sizes. Therefore, more extensive research is required to obtain more solid data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhibing Jiang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, P.R. China
| | - Jinjing Guo
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, P.R. China
| | - Liang Hu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, P.R. China
| | - Siyu Yang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, P.R. China
| | - Bin Meng
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, P.R. China
| | - Qun Tang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bagheri H, Mahdavi SR, Geramifar P, Neshasteh-Riz A, Sajadi Rad M, Dadgar H, Arabi H, Zaidi H. An Update on the Role of mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET Imaging in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102076. [PMID: 38593599 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
The objective of this work was to review comparisons of the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (prostate-specific membrane antigen) PET/CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of prostate cancer among patients undergoing initial staging prior to radical prostatectomy or experiencing recurrent prostate cancer, based on histopathological data. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science, and relevant articles were analyzed with various parameters, including year of publication, study design, patient count, age, PSA (prostate-specific antigen) value, Gleason score, standardized uptake value (SUVmax), detection rate, treatment history, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and PI-RADS (prostate imaging reporting and data system) scores. Only studies directly comparing PSMA-PET and mpMRI were considered, while those examining combined accuracy or focusing on either modality alone were excluded. In total, 24 studies comprising 1717 patients were analyzed, with the most common indication for screening being staging, followed by relapse. The findings indicated that 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT effectively diagnosed prostate cancer in patients with suspected or confirmed disease, and both methods exhibited comparable efficacy in identifying lesion-specific information. However, notable heterogeneity was observed, highlighting the necessity for standardization of imaging and histopathology systems to mitigate inter-study variability. Future research should prioritize evaluating the combined diagnostic performance of both modalities to enhance sensitivity and reduce unnecessary biopsies. Overall, the utilization of PSMA-PET and mpMRI in combination holds substantial potential for significantly advancing the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Bagheri
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Science (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Rabi Mahdavi
- Radiation Biology Research Center and Department of Medical Physics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Parham Geramifar
- Department Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine Shariati Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Neshasteh-Riz
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Science (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Masoumeh Sajadi Rad
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Science (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Habibollah Dadgar
- Imam Reza research Center, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular imaging department, RAZAVI Hospital, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Hossein Arabi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Habib Zaidi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University 6Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ditonno F, Franco A, Manfredi C, Veccia A, Valerio M, Bukavina L, Zukowski LB, Vourganti S, Stenzl A, Andriole GL, Antonelli A, De Nunzio C, Autorino R. Novel non-MRI imaging techniques for primary diagnosis of prostate cancer: micro-ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, elastography, multiparametric ultrasound, and PSMA PET/CT. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:29-36. [PMID: 37543656 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00708-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy in the detection of prostate cancer, but is not devoid of limitations. Given the recent evolution of non-MRI imaging techniques, this critical review of the literature aimed at summarizing the available evidence on ultrasound-based and nuclear medicine imaging technologies in the initial diagnosis of PCa. METHODS Three databases (PubMed®, Web of Science™, and Scopus®) were queried for studies examining their diagnostic performance in the primary diagnosis of PCa, weighted against a histological confirmation of PCa diagnosis, using a free-text protocol. Retrospective and prospective studies, both comparative and non-comparative, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) were included. Based on authors' expert opinion, studies were selected, data extracted, and results qualitatively described. RESULTS Micro-ultrasound (micro-US) appears as an appealing diagnostic strategy given its high accuracy in detection of PCa, apparently non-inferior to mpMRI. The use of multiparametric US (mpUS) likely gives an advantage in terms of effectiveness coming from the combination of different modalities, especially when certain modalities are combined. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT may represent a whole-body, one-step approach for appropriate diagnosis and staging of PCa. The direct relationship between lesions avidity of radiotracers and histopathologic and prognostic features, and its valid diagnostic performance represents appealing characteristics. However, intrinsic limits of each of these techniques exist and further research is needed before definitively considering them reliable tools for accurate PCa diagnosis. Other novel technologies, such as elastography and multiparametric US, currently relies on a limited number of studies, and therefore evidence about them remains preliminary. CONCLUSION Evidence on the role of non-MRI imaging options in the primary diagnosis of PCa is steadily building up. This testifies a growing interest towards novel technologies that might allow overcoming some of the limitations of current gold standard MRI imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, "Luigi Vanvitelli" University, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Valerio
- Urology Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laura Bukavina
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lucas B Zukowski
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Arnuf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Gerald L Andriole
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Caracciolo M, Castello A, Lopci E. PSMA PET/CT Versus mpMRI for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An Updated Overview. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:30-38. [PMID: 37951766 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
In the last years, PSMA-PET imaging and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) have improved the clinical management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Currently, mpMRI is recommended by the EAU (European Association of Urology) guidelines for the primary diagnosis of PCa, whereas PSMA-PET is reserved for disease staging, particularly in high risk localized or locally advanced disease, as well as for biochemical recurrence after surgery. Nevertheless, several studies have explored the added value of PSMA-PET in other clinical scenarios, including primary diagnosis and especially for the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa). In the present contribution, we will provide an overview and an update on the current literature on imaging detection of csPCa, with a particular focus on mpMRI, PSMA-PET and their comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Caracciolo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Angelo Castello
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lawal IO, Ndlovu H, Kgatle M, Mokoala KMG, Sathekge MM. Prognostic Value of PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:46-59. [PMID: 37482489 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in the majority of prostate cancer (PCa). PSMA has an enzymatic function that makes metabolic substrates such as folate available for utilization by PCa cells. Intracellular folate availability drives aggressive tumor phenotype. PSMA expression is, therefore, a marker of aggressive tumor biology. The large extracellular domain of PSMA is available for targeting by diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclides, making it a suitable cellular epitope for theranostics. PET imaging of radiolabeled PSMA ligands has several prognostic utilities. In the prebiopsy setting, intense PSMA avidity in a prostate lesion correlate well with clinically significant PCa (csPCa) on histology. When used for staging, PSMA PET imaging outperforms conventional imaging for the accurate staging of primary PCa, and findings on imaging predict post-treatment outcomes. The biggest contribution of PSMA PET imaging to PCa management is in the biochemical recurrence setting, where it has emerged as the most sensitive imaging modality for the localization of PCa recurrence by helping to guide salvage therapy. PSMA PET obtained for localizing the site of recurrence is prognostic, such that a higher lesion number predicts a less favorable outcome to salvage radiotherapy or surgical intervention. Systemic therapy is given to patients with advanced PCa with distant metastasis. PSMA PET is useful for predicting response to treatments with chemotherapy, first- and second-line androgen deprivation therapies, and PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy. Artificial intelligence using machine learning algorithms allows for the mining of information from clinical images not visible to the human eyes. Artificial intelligence applied to PSMA PET images, therefore, holds great promise for prognostication in PCa management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismaheel O Lawal
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Honest Ndlovu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Mankgopo Kgatle
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Kgomotso M G Mokoala
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Mike M Sathekge
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fasulo V, Buffi N, Chiarelli G, Lughezzani G, Zuradelli M, Ripamonti CB, Barile M, Bianchi P, Benetti A, Paciotti M, Uleri A, Avolio PP, Saita A, Hurle R, Maura F, Germagnoli L, Asselta R, Soldà G, Casale P, Lazzeri M. Male awareness of prostate cancer risk remains poor in relatives of women with germline variants in DNA-repair genes. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:738-745. [PMID: 37818031 PMCID: PMC10560622 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate male awareness of developing prostate cancer (PCa) in families with germline DNA-repair genes (DRG) variants. Materials and methods Data were collected from a prospective, monocentric cohort study. The study was conducted in a university hospital with a multidisciplinary approach to the patient (collaboration of the Departments of Oncology, Urology, Pathology, Radiology, and Medical Genetics Laboratory). We recruited healthy males, relatives of families of women with breast or ovarian cancer who tested positive for pathogenic variants (PVs) or likely pathogenic variants (LPVs) in DRGs. A dedicated PCa screening was designed and offered to men aged 35 to 69 years, based on early visits with digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate health index (PHI) measurement, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and, if necessary, targeted/systematic prostate biopsies. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the willingness of healthy men from families with a DRG variants detected in female relatives affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer to be tested for the presence of familial PVs. The secondary endpoints were the acceptance to participate if resulted positive and compliance with the screening programme. Results Over 1256 families, of which 139 resulted positive for PVs in DRGs, we identified 378 'healthy' men aged between 35 and 69 years old. Two hundred sixty-one (69.0%) refused to be tested for DRG variants, 66 (17.5%) declared to have been previously tested, and 51 (13.5%) males were interested to be tested. Between those previously tested and those who accepted to be tested, 62 (53.0%) were positive for a DRG variant, and all of them accepted to participate in the subsequent surveillance steps. The main limitation is that is a single-centre study and a short follow-up. Conclusions All men tested positive for a DRG variants agreed to go under the surveillance scheme. However, only 31% of 'men at risk' (i.e., relative of a DRG variant carrier) expressed their willingness to be tested for the familial DRG variant. This observation strongly supports the urgent need to implement awareness of genetic risk for PCa within the male population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Fasulo
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - NicolòMaria Buffi
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Giuseppe Chiarelli
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Monica Zuradelli
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- Medical Oncology and Hematology UnitIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | | | - Monica Barile
- Laboratory Analysis UnitIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Paolo Bianchi
- Laboratory Analysis UnitIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Alessio Benetti
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Pier Paolo Avolio
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Alberto Saita
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Federica Maura
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- Laboratory Analysis UnitIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Luca Germagnoli
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- IRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Rosanna Asselta
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- IRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Giulia Soldà
- Department of Biomedical SciencesHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleMIItaly
- IRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Paolo Casale
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of UrologyIRCCS‐Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoMIItaly
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Handke AE, Ritter M, Albers P, Noldus J, Radtke JP, Krausewitz P. [Prostate cancer-multiparametric MRI and alternative approaches in intervention and therapy planning]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 62:1160-1168. [PMID: 37666944 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02190-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has gained importance and plays a crucial role in both personalized diagnostics and increasingly in the treatment planning for patients with prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to present established and innovative applications of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, it will explore alternative approaches and compare them in a comprehensive manner. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature review on the application of mpMRI for biopsy and therapy planning was conducted. RESULTS The integration of modern imaging techniques, especially mpMRI, into the diagnostic algorithm has revolutionized prostate cancer diagnosis. MRI and MRI-guided biopsy detect more significant prostate cancer, with the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies and the diagnosis of clinically insignificant carcinomas. In addition, MRI provides crucial information for risk stratification and treatment planning in prostate cancer patients, both before radical prostatectomy and during active surveillance. CONCLUSION Multiparametric MRI offers significant added value for the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer. The advancement of MRI analysis, such as the implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms, holds the potential for further enhancing imaging diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Analena Elisa Handke
- Marienhospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Deutschland
| | - Manuel Ritter
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Peter Albers
- Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
- Abteilung für Personalisierte Früherkennung des Prostatakarzinoms, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Marienhospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Deutschland
| | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
- Abteilung für Personalisierte Früherkennung des Prostatakarzinoms, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Abteilung Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Philipp Krausewitz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang YF, Lo CY, Chen LY, Chang CW, Huang YT, Huang YY, Huang YH. Comparing the Detection Performance Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:e321-e331. [PMID: 37145456 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been promoted as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) including 68 Ga-PSMA-11, 18 F-DCFPyL, and 18 F-PSMA-1007 applied PET/CT imaging was an emerging diagnostic tool in prostate cancer patients for staging or posttreatment follow-up, even early detecting. Many studies have used PSMA PET for comparison with mpMRI to test the diagnostic ability for early prostate cancer. Unfortunately, these studies have shown conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in diagnostic performance between PSMA PET and mpMRI for detecting and T staging localized prostatic tumors. METHODS This meta-analysis involved a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. The pooling sensitivity and specificity of PSMA and mpMRI verified by pathological analysis were calculated and used to compare the differences between the 2 imaging tools. RESULTS Overall, 39 studies were included (3630 patients in total) from 2016 to 2022 in the current meta-analysis and found that the pooling sensitivity values for localized prostatic tumors and T staging T3a and T3b of PSMA PET were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.86), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39-0.79), and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76), respectively, whereas those of mpMRI were found to be 0.84 (95% 0.78-0.89), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.80), and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73), respectively, without significant differences ( P > 0.05). However, in a subgroup analysis of radiotracer, the pooling sensitivity of 18 F-DCFPyL PET was higher than mpMRI (relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis found that whereas 18 F-DCFPyL PET was superior to mpMRI at detecting localized prostatic tumors, the detection performance of PSMA PET for localized prostatic tumors and T staging was comparable to that of mpMRI.
Collapse
|
11
|
Donswijk ML, Piek MW, Cheung Z, Wondergem M, Stokkel MPM, de Boer JP, van der Ploeg IMC. Incidence of PSMA PET thyroid incidentaloma depends on analysis method and tracer. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:3377-3385. [PMID: 36892644 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09492-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the incidences of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) thyroid incidentaloma (PTI) using different methods to define PTI, to compare the incidence of PTI among different PSMA PET tracers, and to evaluate the clinical consequences of PTI. METHODS PSMA PET/CT scans in consecutive patients with primary prostate cancer were analyzed for the presence of PTI using a structured visual (SV) analysis reporting any elevated thyroidal uptake; a semi-quantitative (SQ) analysis using a SUVmax thyroid/bloodpool (t/b) ratio ≥ 2.0 as cutoff; and an analysis of PTI incidence in the clinical reports (RV analysis). RESULTS A total of 502 patients were included. The incidence of PTIs was 22% in the SV analysis, 7% in the SQ analysis, and 2% in the RV analysis. PTI incidences differed significantly from 29 to 64% (SQ, resp. SV analysis) for [18F]PSMA-1007, 7 to 23% for [68Ga]PSMA-11, 2 to 8% for [18F]DCFPyL, and to 0% for [18F]PSMA-JK-7. The majority of PTI in the SV and SQ analyses consisted of diffuse (72-83%) and/or only slightly elevated thyroidal uptake (70%). Inter-observer agreement in the SV analysis was substantial (kappa = 0.76-0.78). During follow-up (median 16.8 months), there were no thyroid-related adverse events except in three patients. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of PTI varies greatly among different PSMA PET tracers and is strongly dependent on the analysis method applied. PTI may safely be restricted to focal thyroidal uptake with a SUVmax t/b ratio ≥ 2.0. The clinical pursuit of a PTI must be weighed up to the expected outcome of the underlying disease. KEY POINTS • Thyroid incidentalomas (PTIs) are recognized in PSMA PET/CT. • Incidence of PTI varies greatly among PET tracers and analysis methods. • Incidence of thyroid-related adverse events in PTI cases is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marceline W Piek
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zing Cheung
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits Wondergem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul de Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris M C van der Ploeg
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:23-47. [PMID: 36473945 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed applications in modern prostate cancer management has evolved rapidly over the past few years, helping to establish new treatment pathways and provide further insights into prostate cancer biology. However, the prognostic implications of PSMA-PET have not been studied systematically, owing to rapid clinical implementation without long follow-up periods to determine intermediate-term and long-term oncological outcomes. Currently available data suggest that traditional prognostic factors and survival outcomes are associated with high PSMA expression (both according to immunohistochemistry and PET uptake) in men with localized and biochemically recurrent disease. Treatment with curative intent (primary and/or salvage) often fails when PSMA-positive metastases are present; however, the sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting all metastases is poor. Low PSMA-PET uptake in recurrent disease is a favourable prognostic factor; however, it can be associated with poor prognosis in conjunction with high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials embedding PSMA-PET for guiding management with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to support ongoing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Assessing the Role of High-resolution Microultrasound Among Naïve Patients with Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Persistently High Suspicion of Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 47:73-79. [PMID: 36601049 PMCID: PMC9806704 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an invaluable diagnostic tool in the decision-making for prostate biopsies (PBx). However, a non-negligible proportion of patients with negative MRI (nMRI) may still harbour prostate cancer (PCa). Objective To assess whether microultrasound (micro-US) can help in substratifying the presence of PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa; ie, any Gleason score ≥7 PCa) in patients with nMRI despite a persistently high clinical suspicion of PCa. Design setting and participants A total of 125 biopsy-naïve patients who underwent micro-US-guided PBx with the ExactVu system for a persistently high suspicion of PCa despite nMRI were prospectively enrolled. Intervention The Prostate Risk Identification using micro-US (PRI-MUS) protocol was used to identify suspicious areas; PBx included targeted sampling of PRI-MUS ≥3 areas and systematic sampling. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary endpoint was the assessment of micro-US diagnostic accuracy in detecting csPCa. Secondary endpoints included determining the proportion of patients with nMRI who may avoid PBx after micro-US or transrectal US, presence of cribriform and intraductal patterns on biopsy core examination, predictors of csPCa in patients presenting with nMRI, and comparing micro-US-targeted and systematic PBx in identifying csPCa. Results and limitations Considering csPCa detection rate, micro-US showed optimal sensitivity and negative predictive value (respectively, 97.1% and 96.4%), while specificity and positive predictive value were 29.7% and 34.0%, respectively. Twenty-eight (22.4%) patients with a negative micro-US examination could have avoided PBx with one (2.9%) missed csPCa. Cribriform and intraductal patterns were found in 14 (41.2%) and four (11.8%) of csPCa patients, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression models, positive micro-US, age, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen density ≥0.15 emerged as independent predictors of PCa. Targeted and systematic sampling identified 33 (97.1%) and 26 (76.5%) csPCa cases, respectively. The main limitation of the current study is represented by its retrospective single-centre nature on an operator-dependent technology. Conclusions Micro-US represents a valuable tool to rule out the presence of csPCa among patients with a persistent clinical suspicion despite nMRI. Patient summary According to our results, microultrasound (micro-US) may represent an effective tool for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with negative magnetic resonance imaging (nMRI), providing high sensitivity and negative predictive value. Further randomised studies are needed to confirm the potential role of micro-US in the diagnostic pathway of patients with a persistent suspicion of prostate cancer despite nMRI.
Collapse
|
14
|
The Role of [ 68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer in Patients with or without Previous Negative Biopsy: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205036. [PMID: 36291820 PMCID: PMC9600353 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this paper we systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. A critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in the analysis. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, its use combined with MRI improved sensitivity for csPCa detection, thus potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies. Overall, [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI. Abstract The purpose of the study is to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. We performed a critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in this analysis. QUADAS-2 evaluation was adopted for quality analyses. [68Ga]PSMA-11 was the radiotracer of choice in 15 studies, while [68Ga]PSMA-617 was used in another 3. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. The total number of patients included was 1379, ranging from 15 to 291, with a median age of 64 years (range: 42–90). The median baseline PSA value was 12.9 ng/mL, ranging from 0.85 to 4156 ng/mL. Some studies evaluated the PSMA uptake comparing the SUVmax of suspicious lesions with the SUVmax of the normal biodistribution to find out optimal cut-off points. In addition, some studies suggested a significant association between PSA levels, PSA density, and [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT finding. [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT seems to be more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, in some trials, the combination of PSMA PET/CT and MRI improved the NPV in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than MRI alone. Our findings are limited by the small numbers of studies and patient heterogeneity. [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT is a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI. Furthermore, its use combined with MRI improves sensitivity for csPCa detection and can avoid unnecessary biopsies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lazzeri M, Fasulo V, Lughezzani G, Benetti A, Soldà G, Asselta R, De Simone I, Paciotti M, Avolio PP, Contieri R, Saitta C, Saita A, Hurle R, Guazzoni G, Buffi NM, Casale P. Prospective evaluation of the role of imaging techniques and TMPRSS2:ERG mutation for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:968384. [PMID: 36147926 PMCID: PMC9487838 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.968384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To test the hypothesis of a relationship between a specific genetic lesion (T2:ERG) and imaging scores, such as PI-RADS and PRI-MUS, and to test the effectiveness of these parameters for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Materials and methods This is a prospective study of men with suspected PCa enrolled between 2016 and 2019 at a high-volume tertiary hospital. Patients underwent systematic US-guided biopsy, plus targeted biopsy if they were presenting with >=1 suspicious lesion (PI-RADS>2) at mpMRI or PR-IMUS >2 at micro-ultrasound assessment. For each patient, one core from the highest PI-RADS or PRI-MUS lesion was collected for T2:ERG analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models (LRMs) were fitted for csPCa with a clinical model (age, total PSA, previous biopsy, family history for PCa), a clinical plus PI-RADS, clinical plus T2:ERG, clinical plus PI-RADS plus T2:ERG, and T2:ERG plus PI-RADS alone. Results The cohort consists of 158 patients: 83.5% and 66.2% had respectively a diagnosis of PCa and csPCa after biopsy. A T2:ERG fusion was found in 37 men and 97.3% of these patients harbored PCa, while 81.1% were diagnosed with csPCa. SE of T2:ERG assay for csPCa was 28.8%, SP 87.0%, NPV 38.8%, and PPV 81.1%. Of 105 patients who performed mpMRI 93.% had PIRADS ≥3. SE of mpMRI for csPCa was 98.5%, SP was 12.8%, NPV was 83.3%, and PPV was 65.7%. Among 67 patients who were subjected to micro-US, 90% had a PRI-MUS ≥3. SE of micro-US for csPCa was 89.1%, SP was 9.52%, NPV was 28.6%, and PPV was 68.3%. At univariable LRM T2:ERG was confirmed as independent of mpMRI and micro-US result (OR 1.49, p=0.133 and OR 1.82, p=0.592, respectively). At multivariable LRM the clinical model alone had an AUC for csPCa of 0.74 while the clinical model including PI-RADS and T2:ERG achieved an AUC of 0.83. Conclusions T2:ERG translocation and imaging results are independent of each other, but both are related csPCa. To evaluate the best diagnostic work-up for PCa and csPCa detection, all available tools (T2:ERG detection and imaging techniques) should be employed together as they appear to have a complementary role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Vittorio Fasulo
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giovanni Lughezzani,
| | - Alessio Benetti
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Soldà
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Asselta
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria De Simone
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pier Paolo Avolio
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Saitta
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Saita
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Guazzoni
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolò Maria Buffi
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Casale
- Department of Urology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Re: Stefano Fanti, Alberto Briganti, Louise Emmett, et al. EAU-EANM Consensus Statements on the Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Prostate Cancer and with Respect to [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2022.05.003: Extended Use of PSMA PET/CT in Candidates for Focal Therapy. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:601-602. [PMID: 35835637 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
17
|
Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Ceci F, Baltzer PAT, Hacker M, Rasul S, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-targeted biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:390-400. [PMID: 35715320 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has gained acceptance as a staging tool for prostate cancer (PCa). Recent reports suggest an association between PSMA PET and detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) on prostate biopsy. OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET-targeted biopsy (PSMA-PET-TB) for csPCa detection. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in December 2021 to identify studies assessing the accuracy of PSMA-PET-TB for csPCa detection. A diagnostic meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA-PET-TB alone and in combination with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TB for detecting csPCa. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, five prospective studies involving 497 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. For csPCa detection, PSMA-PET-TB had pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.93), 0.56 (95% CI 0.29-0.80), 0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.79), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.50-0.93), respectively. Among the three studies assessing the PSMA-PET + MRI-TB strategy, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for csPCa detection were 0.91 (95% CI 0.77-0.97), 0.64 (95% CI 0.40-0.82), 0.75 (95% CI 0.56-0.87), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.62-0.95), respectively. For lesions with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.69, 0.73, 0.48, and 0.86, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET-TB appears to have favorable diagnostic accuracy for csPCa detection and combination with MRI seems to improve this. According to our meta-analysis, PSMA-PET has promising clinical application for detection of csPCa, namely in the case of PI-RADS 3 lesions. Further prospective studies are needed to explore the true clinical utility of a PSMA-PET-based diagnostic pathway. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is a promising imaging method for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer and seems to have additional value to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sazan Rasul
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Galgano SJ, West JT, Rais-Bahrami S. Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221105018. [PMID: 35755177 PMCID: PMC9218890 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221105018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging of prostate cancer continues to grow, with recent inclusion of several positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers into the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the US Food and Drug Administration approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracers. While much of the work for many of these radiotracers is focused on systemic staging and restaging in both newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer and biochemically recurrent disease patients, the potential role of molecular imaging for the detection of localized prostate cancer has not yet been fully established. The primary aim of this article will be to present the potential role for molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer and discuss potential advantages and disadvantages to utilization of both PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this clinical indication of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, JT J779, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Janelle T West
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Qiu DX, Li J, Zhang JW, Chen MF, Gao XM, Tang YX, Zhang Y, Yi XP, Yin HL, Gan Y, Wang GL, Zu XB, Hu S, Cai Y. Dual-tracer PET/CT-targeted, mpMRI-targeted, systematic biopsy, and combined biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:2821-2832. [PMID: 34860277 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05636-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Growing evidence proved the efficacy of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-guided targeted biopsy (TB) in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, but there is no direct comparison between mpMRI-TB and PSMA PET/CT-TB. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is highly expressed in PCa, which can compensate for the unstable expression of PSMA in PCa. Therefore, we designed a study to compare the efficiency of mpMRI-TB, dual-tracer (GRPR and PSMA) PET/CT-TB, systematic biopsy, and combined biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS One hundred twelve suspicious PCa patients were enrolled from September 2020 to June 2021. Patients with anyone of positive dual-tracer PET/CT or mpMRI underwent TB, and all enrolled patients underwent systematic biopsy (SB) after TB. The primary outcome was the detection rates of PCa in different biopsy strategies. Secondary outcomes were the performance of three imaging methods, omission diagnostic rates, and upgrading and downgrading of biopsy samples relative to those of prostatectomy specimens in different biopsy strategies. McNemar's tests and Bonferroni correction in multiple comparisons were used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS In 112 men, clinically significant PCa (grade group[GG] ≥ 2) accounted for 34.82% (39/112), and nonclinically significant PCa (GG = 1) accounted for 4.46% (5/112). 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT-TB achieved higher PCa detection rate (69.77%) and positive ratio of biopsy cores (0.44) compared with SB (39.29% and 0.12) and mpMRI-TB (36.14% and 0.23), respectively (P < 0.005). Dual-tracer PET/CT screen out patients for avoiding 52.67% (59/112) unnecessary biopsy, whereas dual-tracer PET/CT-TB plus SB achieved high detection rate (77.36%) without misdiagnosis of csPCa. CONCLUSION Dual-tracer PET/CT might screen patients for avoiding unnecessary biopsy. Dual-tracer PET/CT-TB plus SB might be a more effective and promising strategy for the definite diagnosis of clinically significant PCa than mpMRI-TB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Xu Qiu
- Department of Urology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of PET Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin-Wei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Min-Feng Chen
- Department of Urology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Mei Gao
- Department of Pathology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong-Xiang Tang
- Department of PET Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Oncology, NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Ping Yi
- Department of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong-Ling Yin
- Department of Pathology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Gan
- Department of Urology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Gui-Lin Wang
- Department of Urology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiong-Bing Zu
- Department of Urology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuo Hu
- Department of PET Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yi Cai
- Department of Urology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jain H, Sood R, Faridi MS, Goel H, Sharma U. Role of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for the detection of primary prostate cancer prior to biopsy: a prospective study. Cent European J Urol 2021; 74:315-320. [PMID: 34729219 PMCID: PMC8552950 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0084.r3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET-CT) is widely used as a staging tool for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). The objective of the study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for PCa, which may help us avoid unnecessary biopsies in patients with intermediate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Material and methods In this prospective study, 81 patients suspected of PCa, with either raised PSA between 4-20 ng/ml or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) findings were included. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT was performed for all patients followed by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value) was measured and correlated with biopsy results. Results Out of 81 patients, 31 (38.3%) patients were found to have malignancy on biopsy. Median SUVmax of biopsy positive patients was 10.4 (IQR 6.5-16.1) and biopsy negative patients (n=50) was 3.5 (IQR 1-4.9), (p <0.001). At a cut-off of 6.15, 68GA-PSMA-PET/CT demonstrated sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 72.2%, negative predictive value of 88.9% and accuracy of 81.5% with an AUC of 0.876 (95% CI: 0.799-0.953, p <0.001). Conclusions The 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT helps to localize suspicious lesions and improving the detection of primary prostate cancer. Our findings indicate a significant correlation of SUVmax values with biopsy results. We were also able to determine a cut-off value of SUVmax below which prostate biopsy can be avoided in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsh Jain
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplant, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences & Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajeev Sood
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplant, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences & Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Mohammad Shazib Faridi
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplant, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences & Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Hemant Goel
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplant, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences & Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Umesh Sharma
- Department of Urology & Renal Transplant, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences & Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ferraro DA, Becker AS, Kranzbühler B, Mebert I, Baltensperger A, Zeimpekis KG, Grünig H, Messerli M, Rupp NJ, Rueschoff JH, Mortezavi A, Donati OF, Sapienza MT, Eberli D, Burger IA. Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI-guided biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer: a prospective single-center study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:3315-3324. [PMID: 33620559 PMCID: PMC8426229 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05261-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultrasound-guided biopsy (US biopsy) with 10-12 cores has a suboptimal sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (sigPCa). If US biopsy is negative, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy is recommended, despite a low specificity for lesions with score 3-5 on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS). Screening and biopsy guidance using an imaging modality with high accuracy could reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, reducing side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of positron emission tomography/MRI with 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET/MRI) to detect and localize primary sigPCa (ISUP grade group 3 and/or cancer core length ≥ 6 mm) and guide biopsy. METHODS Prospective, open-label, single-center, non-randomized, diagnostic accuracy study including patients with suspected PCa by elevation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and a suspicious lesion (PIRADS ≥3) on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Forty-two patients underwent PSMA-PET/MRI followed by both PSMA-PET/MRI-guided and section-based saturation template biopsy between May 2017 and February 2019. Primary outcome was the accuracy of PSMA-PET/MRI for biopsy guidance using section-based saturation template biopsy as the reference standard. RESULTS SigPCa was found in 62% of the patients. Patient-based sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, and accuracy for sigPCa were 96%, 81%, 93%, 89%, and 90%, respectively. One patient had PSMA-negative sigPCa. Eight of nine false-positive lesions corresponded to cancer on prostatectomy and one in six false-negative lesions was negative on prostatectomy. CONCLUSION PSMA-PET/MRI has a high accuracy for detecting sigPCa and is a promising tool to select patients with suspicion of PCa for biopsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was retrospectively registered under the name "Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI) Guided Biopsy in Men with Elevated PSA" (NCT03187990) on 06/15/2017 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03187990 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela A Ferraro
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Anton S Becker
- Institute of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Benedikt Kranzbühler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Iliana Mebert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anka Baltensperger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Konstantinos G Zeimpekis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hannes Grünig
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Messerli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Niels J Rupp
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan H Rueschoff
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ashkan Mortezavi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivio F Donati
- Institute of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marcelo T Sapienza
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irene A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lopci E, Colombo P, Lazzeri M. Mismatched Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT vs mpMRI. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 55:199-202. [PMID: 34422131 PMCID: PMC8322193 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-021-00701-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is the modality of choice for initial diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), including biopsy-naïve patients. Nevertheless, clinicians must be aware of the possibility that up to one-fourth of clinically significant cancers might be missed by the modality. Acknowledgment of this occurrence and the increased availability of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in clinical routine, open the door to new, fascinating, indications for this functional modality in the context of PCa detection. With the case herein illustrated, we report a paradigmatic example of mismatch findings between PET/CT and mpMRI better elucidating the potential indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, CAP 20089 Rozzano, MI Italy
| | | | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Urology, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:832.e1-832.e7. [PMID: 34183255 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has emerged as the most accurate diagnostic tool, showing a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP). However only a minority of patients with a PI-RADS 3 lesion at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are diagnosed with csCaP. The aim of the current study was to assess whether high resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) could help in sub-stratifying the risk of csCaP in this specific population. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the records of 111 consecutive patients scheduled for a prostate biopsy with at least 1 PI-RADS 3 lesions at MRI. We excluded patients with a PIRADS >3 lesion, even if they had a coexisting PIRADS 3 lesions. MicroUS was performed in all patients before prostate biopsy by an operator blind to MRI results. The Prostate Risk Identification using MicroUS (PRI-MUS) protocol was used to assess the risk of CaP and csCaP. All patients received both targeted and systematic biopsies. The primary endpoint was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of microUS in detection of csCaP in patients with a PI-RADS 3 lesion at MRI. Specifically, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of microUS were determined. Multivariable logistic regression models (MLRMs) were fitted to identify predictors of CaP. The diagnostic accuracy was reported as area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS Overall, 43 patients (38.7%) harboured CaP and 22 (20%) csCaP. MicroUS showed a high sensitivity and negative predictive value (100%), while its specificity and positive predictive value were 33.7% and 27.2%, respectively. Among patients without lesions at microUS, 25 (83.3%) did not harbour CaP, while 5 (16.7%) patients were diagnosed with a Gleason score 6 CaP, with no patients harbouring csCaP. Using microUS, the csCaP detection would have remained 100%, while reducing the detection of insignificant CaP of a 23.8% extent (n = 5). In MLRMs, lesion identified at microUS and continuously-coded PSAd were independent predictors of CaP. The accuracy of a model including PRI-MUS score, digital rectal examination (DRE), PSA density, age and family history was 0.744 (95% CI: 0.645 - 0.843). CONCLUSION In our single-institutional retrospective study, microUS was potentially capable to stratify the presence of CaP in patients with an equivocal MRI. Further prospective studies on larger populations are needed to validate our results.
Collapse
|
24
|
Van Poppel H, Hogenhout R, Albers P, van den Bergh RCN, Barentsz JO, Roobol MJ. Reply to Laura Evangelista and Egesta Lopci's Letter to the Editor re: Hendrik Van Poppel, Renée Hogenhout, Peter Albers, et al. Early Detection of Prostate Cancer in 2020 and Beyond: Facts and Recommendations for the European Union and the European Commission. Eur Urol 2021;79:327-9: Early Detection of Prostate Cancer in High-risk Patients with Negative Fusion Biopsy. Eur Urol 2021; 80:e28-e29. [PMID: 33965287 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik Van Poppel
- Department of Development and Regeneration, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Renée Hogenhout
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine University Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany; Division of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jelle O Barentsz
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique J Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Evangelista L, Lopci E. Re: Hendrik Van Poppel, Renée Hogenhout, Peter Albers, et al. Early Detection of Prostate Cancer in 2020 and Beyond: Facts and Recommendations for the European Union and the European Commission. Eur Urol 2021;79:327-9: Early Detection of Prostate Cancer in High-risk Patients with Negative Fusion Biopsy. Eur Urol 2021; 80:e24-e27. [PMID: 33947593 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Can 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT predict pathological upgrading of prostate cancer from MRI-targeted biopsy to radical prostatectomy? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:3693-3701. [PMID: 33813594 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05217-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is an ideal tool for staging and restaging of prostate cancer (PCa). This study was designed to investigate the prognostic role of preoperative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in predicting pathological upgrading from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy (mpMRI-TB) to final radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens in patients with localized PCa. METHODS A total of 67 biopsy-confirmed localized PCa patients with mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT prior to RP were included. Clinical and imaging characteristics derived from mpMRI and PET/CT were compared in patients with or without pathological upgrading. Predictors for pathological upgrading were evaluated by using univariate and multivariable analyses. A prediction model was developed based on the identified parameters and validated using internal validation. RESULTS Pathological upgrading from mpMRI-TB to final RP specimens occurred in 38.8% (26/67) of the patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed SUVmax (OR: 1.223, 95% CI 1.068-1.399, p = 0.003); highest tumor grade at mpMRI-TB, ISUP grade group (ISUP GG) 1 vs. 4 (OR: 0.11, 95% CI 0.000-0.452, p = 0.018) and ISUP GG 2 vs. 4 (OR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.001-0.252, p = 0.003); and multifocality on PET/CT (OR: 9.821, 95% CI 1.438-67.085, p = 0.02) were independent risk factors for pathological upgrading. Our developed prediction model based on the identified parameter showed good calibration at internal validation (mean absolute error = 0.033). CONCLUSION 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was found to be an ideal biomarker for the prediction of pathological upgrading from mpMRI-TB to RP, especially for patients with lower tumor grade at mpMRI-TB.
Collapse
|
27
|
Hernes E, Revheim ME, Hole KH, Tulipan AJ, Strømme H, Lilleby W, Seierstad T. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET for Assessment of Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer with Histopathology as Reference Standard: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PET Clin 2021; 16:147-165. [PMID: 33648661 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET is a promising diagnostic tool in prostate cancer. The gold standard for the detection of prostate tumor and lymph node metastases is histopathology. The aim of the present review was to investigate accuracy measures of 68Ga/18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen PET tracers in primary and recurrent prostate cancer with systematic sector-based histopathology as the reference standard. A systematic literature search was performed and 34 studies were included. Overall, prostate-specific membrane antigen PET showed high specificity, but variable sensitivity to localize known prostate cancer and detect pelvic lymph node metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eivor Hernes
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Mona-Elisabeth Revheim
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1171 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Håkon Hole
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1171 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Julius Tulipan
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1171 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Strømme
- Library of Medicine and Science, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Wolfgang Lilleby
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Therese Seierstad
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lopci E, Lazzeri M. Re: Michael S. Hofman, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Roslyn J. Francis, et al. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET-CT in Patients with High-risk Prostate Cancer Before Curative-intent Surgery or Radiotherapy (proPSMA): A Prospective, Randomised, Multi-centre Study. Lancet 2020;395:1208-16: PSMA Positron Emission Tomography: One Tracer Fixes Them All! Eur Urol 2020; 78:e131-e132. [PMID: 32653324 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Urology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
PSMA-PET and micro-ultrasound potential in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 23:172-178. [PMID: 32447644 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02384-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/TC with PRI-MUS (prostate risk identification using micro-ultrasound) in the primary diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS From September till December 2018, we prospectively enrolled 25 candidates to 68Ga-PSMA PET/TRUS (transrectal ultrasound) fusion biopsy and compared them with PRI-MUS. This included patients with persistently elevated PSA and/or PHI (prostate health index) suspicious for PCa, negative digital rectal examination, with either negative or contraindication to mpMRI, and at least one negative biopsy. The diagnostic performance of the two modalities was calculated based on pathology results. RESULTS Overall, 20 patients were addressed to 68Ga-PSMA PET/TRUS fusion biopsy. Mean SUVmax and SUVratio for PCa lesions resulted significantly higher than in benign lesions (p = 0.041 and 0.011, respectively). Using optimal cut-off points, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT demonstrated an overall accuracy of 83% for SUVmax ≥ 5.4 and 94% for SUVratio ≥ 2.2 in the detection of clinically significant PCa (GS ≥ 7). On counterpart, PRI-MUS results were: score 3 in nine patients (45%), score 4 in ten patients (50%), and one patient with score 5. PRI-MUS score 4 and 5 demonstrated an overall accuracy of 61% in detecting clinically significant PCa. CONCLUSION In this highly-selected patient population, in comparison to PRI-MUS, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT shows a higher diagnostic performance.
Collapse
|