Measuring What Matters: Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures for Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Racial differences in patient-reported outcomes among men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Real-world data on racial differences in the side effects of radical prostatectomy on quality of life (QoL) are lacking. We aimed to evaluate differences in patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) men using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) questionnaire to measure health-related QoL after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed prospectively collected PROMs using EPIC-CP scores at a tertiary care center between 2015 and 2021 for men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. The primary endpoint was the overall QoL score for NHB and NHW men, with a total score of 60 and higher scores indicating worse QoL. An imputed mixed linear regression model was used to examine the effect of covariates on the change in overall QoL score following surgery. A pairwise comparison was used to estimate the mean QoL scores before surgery as well as up to 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 2229 men who answered at least one EPIC-CP questionnaire before or after surgery, of which 110 (4.94%) were NHB and 2119 (95.07%) were NHW men. The QoL scores differed for NHB and NHW at baseline (2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-4.31, p = 0.02), 3 months (4.36, 95% CI 2.29-6.42, p < 0.01), 6 months (3.26, 95% CI 1.10-5.43, p < 0.01), and 12 months after surgery (2.48, 95% CI 0.19-4.77, p = 0.03) with NHB having worse scores. There was no difference in QoL between NHB and NHW men 24 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant difference in QoL between NHB and NHW men was reported before surgery, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, with NHB having worse QoL scores. However, there was no long-term difference in reported QoL. Our findings inform strategies that can be implemented to mitigate racial differences in short-term outcomes.

Association of Urinary Incontinence and Depression: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between urinary incontinence and depression. An estimated 21 million adults in the United States (U.S.) reported at least one major depressive episode. Urinary incontinence has a well-described negative impact on quality of life.

METHODS

We included respondents aged ≥20 who participated in the 2017 - March 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles. Our dichotomous outcomes were depression and clinical depression. The predictor variable urinary incontinence was assessed using the validated incontinence severity index. We fitted an adjusted multivariable logistic regression and performed interaction analysis for urinary incontinence and our variable of interest.

RESULTS

Among a weighted sample of 233.5 million people (unweighted 8256), 19.9 million (8.5%) reported depression (P < .001). The weighted population was 48.6% male, 55.2% married, and 63.4% non-Hispanic White (all P < .001). Moderate and severe urinary incontinence was associated with depression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.3; 95%CI [1.5-3.3]; aOR 3.8; 95%CI [2.5-3.3]; P < .001). No association was observed between urinary incontinence and clinical depression. Interaction analysis showed that men (aOR 3.62; 95%CI [2.13-6.15]; Pint<.001) and participants at the lowest socioeconomic status (aOR 2.2; 95%CI [1.3-3.71]; Pint=.005) with moderate/severe urinary incontinence had higher odds of depression than their continent counterparts.

CONCLUSION

We report that urinary incontinence is an independent predictor of depression in a nationally representative survey for men and those in the lowest socioeconomic tier. The association is most prominent among men and the socioeconomically disadvantaged population. This suggests that treatment for urinary incontinence may be important tool to reduce depression in the general population.

Institutional trends and safety profile of same-day discharge for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

To report the trends, predictors, and patient outcomes of same-day discharge (SDD) versus non-SDD for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried our centralized data warehouse to identify men with prostate cancer who underwent RALP between January 2020 and May 2022. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between SDD and non-SDD. Then, we examined the utilization of SDD in a univariable logistic regression. Then, we fitted a logistic regression model to identify the predictors of SDD. To examine the safety profile of SDD, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted logistic regression was fitted to examine the effect of SDD on 30-day postoperative complications and readmissions.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,153 patients underwent RALP, of which 224 (19.4%) were SDD. The proportion of SDD increased from 4.4% in the fourth quarter of 2020 to 45% in the second quarter of 2022 (p < 0.01). The predictors of SDD were the facility where the surgery was performed (OR: 1.57; 95%CI [1.08-2.28]; p = 0.02) and whether a high-volume surgeon performed it (OR: 1.96; 95%CI [1.09-3.54]; p = 0.03). After IPTW, SDD compared to non-SDD was not associated with a difference in complications (OR: 1.07; 95%CI [0.38-2.95]; p = 0.90) or readmissions (OR: 1.22; 95%CI [0.40-3.74]; p = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

In our health system, the use of SDD is safe and currently composes of half of our RALP volume. With the advent of the hospital-at-home services, we anticipate that almost all our RALP cases will be SDD.

Contemporary patterns of local ablative therapies for prostate cancer at United States cancer centers: results from a national registry

PURPOSE

To describe the national-level patterns of care for local ablative therapy among men with PCa and identify patient- and hospital-level factors associated with the receipt of these techniques.

METHODS

We retrospectively interrogated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for men with clinically localized PCa between 2010 and 2017. The main outcome was receipt of local tumor ablation with either cryo- or laser-ablation, and "other method of local tumor destruction including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)". Patient level, hospital level, and demographic variables were collected. Mixed effect logistic regression models were fitted to identify separately patient- and hospital-level predictors of receipt of local ablative therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 11,278 patients received ablative therapy, of whom 78.8% had cryotherapy, 15.6% had laser, and 5.7% had another method including HIFU. At the patient level, men with intermediate-risk PCa were more likely to be treated with local ablative therapy (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.11; p = 0.05), as were men with Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1 (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.29-1.43; p < 0.01), men between 71 and 80 years (OR 3.70; 95% CI 3.43-3.99; p < 0.01), men with Medicare insurance (OR 1.38; 95% 1.31-1.46; p < 0.01), and an income < $47,999 (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.06-1.21; p < 0.01). At the hospital-level, local ablative therapy was less likely to be performed in academic/research facilities (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.32-0.64; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Local ablative therapy for PCa treatment is more commonly offered among older and comorbid patients. Future studies should investigate the uptake of these technologies in non-hospital-based settings and in light of recent changes in insurance coverage.

Optimal assessment of quality of life for patients with prostate cancer

The burden of cancer and oncologic treatment is reflected not only through morbidity and mortality, but also through impacts on patient quality of life (QoL). However, QoL has not been historically measured or addressed with the same rigorous methodology as traditional disease-related outcomes such as overall survival and progression, as these are driven by objective measurements and events. Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent non-cutaneous cancers in men around the world. Both the cancer and its treatment significantly impact patients' physical, emotional, sexual, social, and overall QoL. Ensuring assessment and integration of QoL in research and clinical care enables improvement in treatment outcomes that matter most to patients while also facilitating alignment of healthcare priorities with reimbursements. Great strides toward this end have been made over the last decade, but significant room for improvement remains. To ensure high quality, reliable data collection, QoL assessment tools must be psychometrically validated, standardized, widely implemented across trials, and regularly assessed to allow internal and external validity, longitudinal comparative effectiveness research, and quality control. Additional consideration should be taken for instruments used to measure the aspects of QoL specific to minority, caregiver, and elderly populations. Open clinical questions include how providers should weight changes in different QoL subscales and how clinically meaningful difference thresholds should be defined. Review of ongoing clinical trials encouragingly reveals an increased focus on measuring and improving QoL for men with PCa which will inform the way we utilize QoL assessments. However, additional efforts herein described are needed to fully optimize these processes. In summary, this review will explain the rationale for QoL assessments in PCa populations, discuss requirements for effective implementation, describe considerations for vulnerable and under-evaluated populations, and summarize ongoing clinical trials assessing patient QoL.

Patient characteristics predicting prolonged length of hospital stay following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Objective:

The objective of this study is to determine the preoperative patient characteristics predicting prolonged length of hospital stay (pLOS) following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods:

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to select patients who underwent RARP without other concomitant surgeries between 2008 and 2016. Patients’ demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory markers were collected to evaluate their role in predicting pLOS. The pLOS was defined as length of stay (LOS) >2 days. A multinomial logistic regression was constructed adjusting for postoperative surgical complications to assess for the predictors of pLOS.

Results:

We obtained data for 31,253 patients of which 20,774 (66.5%) patients stayed ⩽1 day, 6993 (22.4%) patients stayed for 2 days, and 3486 (11.2%) patients stayed for >2 days. Demographic variables – including body mass index (BMI) <18.5: odds ratio (OR) = 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.7–4.8]; smoking: OR = 1.2, 95% CI = [1.1–1.4]; and dependent functional status: OR = 3.1, 95% CI = [1.6–6.0] – were predictors of pLOS. Comorbidities – such as heart failure: OR = 4.6, 95% CI = [2.0–10.8]; being dialysis dependent: OR = 2.7, 95% CI = [1.4–5.0]; and predisposition to bleeding: OR = 2.0, 95% CI =  [1.5–2.7] – were the strongest predictors of extended hospitalization. In addition, pLOS was more likely to be associated with postoperative bleeding, renal, or pulmonary complications.

Conclusion:

Preoperative patient characteristics and comorbidities can predict pLOS. These findings can be used preoperatively for risk assessment and patient counseling.