1
|
Xu MY, Zeng N, Ma S, Hua ZJ, Zhang SH, Xiang JC, Xiong YF, Xia ZY, Sun JX, Liu CQ, Xu JZ, An Y, Wang SG, Xia QD. A clinical evaluation of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in located prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 204:104514. [PMID: 39332749 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignant tumor affecting the male reproductive system and there are mainly three widely accepted PCa surgery types in current clinical treatment: open radical prostatectomy (ORP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Here, we aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of RARP for PCa patients compared with ORP and LRP based on the context of PCa encompass two dimensions: oncological outcomes (biochemical recurrence (BCR) and positive surgical margin (PSM)) and functional outcomes (urinary continence and recovery of erectile function) in this network meta-analysis (NMA). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched in January 7, 2024. 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 72 non-RCTs were included. RARP displayed significant positive effect on lower BCR and better recovery of erectile function but no significant differences existed among three surgery types for PSM and urinary continence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng-Yao Xu
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Na Zeng
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Sheng Ma
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Zi-Jin Hua
- Department of Urology, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Kunming 650032, China
| | - Si-Han Zhang
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Ji-Cheng Xiang
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Yi-Fan Xiong
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Zhi-Yu Xia
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Jian-Xuan Sun
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Chen-Qian Liu
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Jin-Zhou Xu
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Ye An
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Shao-Gang Wang
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Qi Dong Xia
- Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Devlies W, Silversmit G, Ameye F, Dekuyper P, Quackels T, Roumeguère T, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Van Damme N, Claessens F, Everaerts W, Joniau S. Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated by Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with or Without Adjuvant Treatments. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00107-X. [PMID: 38755093 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is used frequently to treat prostate cancer; yet, prospective data on the quality of life and functional outcomes are lacking. OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of life and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in different risk groups with or without adjuvant treatments. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Be-RALP database is a prospective multicentre database that covers 9235 RALP cases from 2009 until 2016. Of these 9235 patients, 2336 high-risk prostate cancer patients were matched with low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. INTERVENTION Patients were treated with RALP only or followed by radiotherapy and/or hormone treatment. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We used a mixed-model analysis to longitudinally analyse quality of life, urinary function, and erectile function between risk groups with or without additional treatments. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Risk group was not significant in predicting quality of life, erectile function, or urinary function after RALP. Postoperative treatment (hormone and/or radiotherapy treatment) was significant in predicting International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), sexual activity, and sexual functioning. CONCLUSIONS Risk group was not linked with clinically relevant declines in functional outcomes after RALP. The observed functional outcomes and quality of life are in favour of considering RALP for high-risk prostate cancer. Postoperative treatment resulted in lower erectile function measures without clinically relevant changes in quality of life and urinary functions. Hormone therapy seems to have the most prominent negative effects on these outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY This study investigated the quality of life, and urinary and erectile function in patients with aggressive and less aggressive prostate cancer after surgery only or in combination with hormones or radiation. We found that quality of life recovers completely, while erectile and urinary function recovers only partially after surgery. Aggressiveness of the disease had a minimal effect on the outcomes; yet, postoperative treatments lowered erectile function further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wout Devlies
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Filip Ameye
- Department of Urology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Dekuyper
- Department of Urology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thierry Quackels
- Department of Urology, Université Libre De Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Frank Claessens
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wagner C, Witt JH, Nolte S, van der Poel HG, Aaronson NK, Kolvatzis M, Tian Z, Mendrek M, Liakos N, Gratzke C, Leyh-Bannurah SR. Differences in Quality of Life between German and Dutch Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:454-460. [PMID: 36863963 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As a local treatment for prostate cancer (PCa), robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may have a quality of life (QoL) benefit over open surgery. Recent analyses revealed substantial between-country differences in the function and symptom scale scores for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), which is typically used to assess patient-reported QoL. Such differences could have implications for multinational studies in PCa. OBJECTIVE To examine whether nationality is significantly associated with patient-reported QoL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The study cohort comprised Dutch and German patients with PCa treated with RARP in a single high-volume prostate center from 2006 to 2018. Analyses were restricted to patients who were preoperatively continent with at least one follow-up time point. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS QoL was measured in terms of the global Quality of Life (QL) scale score and the overall summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Linear mixed models for repeated-measures multivariable analyses (MVAs) were used to examine the association between nationality and both the global QL score and the summary score. MVAs were further adjusted for QLQ-C30 baseline values, age, Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, surgical expertise, pathological tumor and nodal stage, Gleason grade, degree of nerve-sparing, surgical margin status, 30-d Clavien-Dindo grade complications, urinary continence recovery, and biochemical recurrence/postoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS For Dutch (n = 1938) versus German (n = 6410) men, the mean baseline scores were 82.8 versus 71.9 for the global QL scale score and 93.4 versus 89.7 for the QLQ-C30 summary score. Urinary continence recovery (QL: +8.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1-9.8; p < 0001) and Dutch nationality (QL: +6.9, 95% CI 6.1-7.6; p < 0001) were the strongest positive contributors to the global QL and summary scores, respectively. The main limitation is the retrospective study design. In addition, our Dutch cohort may not be representative of the general Dutch population and reporting bias cannot be ruled out. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide observational evidence under specific conditions involving the same setting for patients of two different nationalities suggesting that cross-national patient-reported QoL differences appear to be real and may need to be taken into consideration in multinational studies. PATIENT SUMMARY We observed differences in the quality-of-life scores reported by Dutch and German patients with prostate cancer after they underwent robot-assisted removal of the prostate. These findings should be taken into consideration in cross-national studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Wagner
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Paediatric Urology and Urooncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Jorn H Witt
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Paediatric Urology and Urooncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Sandra Nolte
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merkourios Kolvatzis
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Paediatric Urology and Urooncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany; Second Department of Urology Clinic, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mikolaj Mendrek
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Paediatric Urology and Urooncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Liakos
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Paediatric Urology and Urooncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martins RS, Fatimi AS, Mahmud O, Mahar MU, Jahangir A, Jawed K, Golani S, Siddiqui A, Aamir SR, Ahmad A. Quality of life after robotic versus conventional minimally invasive cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:171. [PMID: 38598102 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01916-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
Optimizing postoperative quality of life (QoL) is an essential aspect of surgical oncology. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) decreases surgical morbidity and improves QoL outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare post-operative QoL after oncologic resections using different MIS modalities. The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases were searched for articles that compared post-operative QoL in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) or laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus robotic surgery (RS) for malignancy. Quality assessment was performed using the ROBINS-I and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) tools. Meta-analysis was performed using an inverse-variance random effects model. 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). 15 studies had a low risk of bias, while 11 had a moderate risk of bias and 1 had serious risk of bias. 8330 patients (RS: 5090, LS/VATS: 3240) from across 25 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Global QoL was significantly better after robotic surgery in the pooled analysis overall (SMD: - 0.28 [95% CI: - 0.49, - 0.08]), as well as in the prostatectomy and gastrectomy subgroups. GRADE certainty of evidence was low. Analysis of EPIC-26 subdomains also suggested greater sexual function after robotic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy. Robotic and conventional MIS approaches produce similar postoperative QoL after oncologic surgery for various tumor types, although advantages may emerge in some patient populations. Our results may assist surgeons in counseling patients who are undergoing oncologic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell Seth Martins
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack Meridian Health Network, Edison, NJ, USA
| | | | - Omar Mahmud
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
| | | | - Arshia Jahangir
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
| | - Kinza Jawed
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
| | - Shalni Golani
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
| | - Ayra Siddiqui
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
| | | | - Ali Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine-Wichita, University of Kansas, Wichita, KS, 67214, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Su X, Dai Z, Zhao H, Ji M, Liu Z. A meta-analysis of postoperative wound complications at the surgical site in prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic surgery. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14560. [PMID: 38130091 PMCID: PMC10961857 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
This meta-analysis critically evaluates the role of robotic surgery in reducing postoperative wound complications in prostate cancer patients, comparing it with traditional open and laparoscopic approaches. Our extensive literature search resulted in 9 studies comprising 2063 patients. The results highlighted a significant reduction in the incidence of wound complications, with an 84% heterogeneity index and a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.49 (95% Confidence Intervals: 0.42 to 0.58, p < 0.01) in favour of robotic surgery. Additionally, a notable decrease in wound infection rates was observed, marked by a 94% heterogeneity index and a SMD of 0.26 (95% CIs: 0.19 to 0.35, p < 0.01). A considerable reduction in wound dehiscence events was also noted, particularly in a subset of studies, reflecting a 70% heterogeneity index and a SMD of 0.23 (95% CIs: 0.12 to 0.45, p < 0.01). These findings suggest that robotic surgery may offer significant advantages in managing wound-related outcomes in prostate cancer surgeries. However, the variability among the studies warrants cautious interpretation of the results and underscores the need for more targeted research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyuan Su
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University resident doctorDalianChina
| | - Zhihong Dai
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University resident doctorDalianChina
| | - Haolin Zhao
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University resident doctorDalianChina
| | - Mingfeng Ji
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University resident doctorDalianChina
| | - Zhiyu Liu
- Department of UrologyThe Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University resident doctorDalianChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Devine M, Morris M, Kavanagh D. Transferability of Technical Skills Across Robotic Surgery Platforms: A Scoping Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e56429. [PMID: 38638798 PMCID: PMC11024662 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
As the application of robotic approaches to surgery continues to broaden, new consoles have been introduced to the market. Due to the global utilization of a single platform, previously validated curricula have not been assessed on new robotic systems. Surgery by its nature occurs in a high-stakes environment, potentially exacerbated by non-standardized robotic systems. The aim of this review is to critique the evidence available regarding the transferability of technical skills across robotic platforms. A scoping review utilizing the Medline (Pubmed) and Cochrane Databases was conducted. Full texts were reviewed and appraised. Selected articles were eligible for inclusion if they investigated the ability or implications of the transfer of skill across robotic platforms. Data was extracted, coded inductively, and themes synthesized. NVIVO software was used as an adjunct for this qualitative analysis. Following the removal of duplicates a total of 278 papers were screened according to the eligibility criteria. Fifty full-text articles were reviewed and four met the criterion for inclusion. Novices' performance across platforms was comparable. Increasing levels of prior robotic experience revealed an improvement in technical performance on a novel robotic platform. Safety metrics appear comparable across systems. Quantifying learning curves across robotic platforms and their implications for the robotic surgeon in training remains to be determined. Future research needs to address the gaps in the literature by clearly defining the extent of technical skills transfer between robotic platforms. These factors will guide the next iteration of surgical training curriculums and regulations for robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Devine
- Department of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland/Hermitage Medical Clinic, Dublin, IRL
| | - Marie Morris
- Department of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, IRL
| | - Dara Kavanagh
- Department of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, IRL
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Haney CM, Holze S, Liatsikos E, Dietel A, Kallidonis P, Tatanis V, Katsakiori P, Spinos T, Imkamp F, Stolzenburg JU. IDEAL-D Phase 0 Evaluation of the Avatera System in Robot-Assisted Prostate, Bladder and Renal Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34:239-245. [PMID: 38252556 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the utilization of novel Avatera system in urological operations according to the IDEAL-D framework recommendations for high-risk invasive surgical devices. Materials and Methods: Three surgeons attempted to perform 23 upper and lower urinary tract operations on human cadavers and in live porcine models using the Avatera system. Total operative time and the duration of the substeps were evaluated. Surgical performance was assessed with the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) score. Suturing was rated using the technical checklist for the assessment of suturing in robotic surgery. Attending surgeons rated their satisfaction with the Avatera system on a scale of 1-5. Results and Limitation: Seventeen out of 18 operations performed on cadavers were completed, while one pyeloplasty was discontinued. All five operations performed in porcine models were completed. Although 1 pig was euthanized on the fifth postoperative day, its symptoms were unrelated to surgery. Mean GEARS and Suturing scores in the upper urinary tract were 29 ± 0.7 and 29.5 ± 0.95, respectively, and in the lower urinary 28.5 ± 1.2 and 29.5 ± 0.5, respectively. Surgeons' satisfaction was high or very high for all procedures. Conclusions: The Avatera system was associated with good surgical performance and high surgeons' satisfaction rates. All urological procedures performed were shown to be feasible, with comparable risks to other robot-assisted surgery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caelan-Max Haney
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sigrun Holze
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Anja Dietel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Florian Imkamp
- Department of Urology, Clinic for Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bishara S. Adapting power calculations to include a superiority margin: what are the implications? Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2024; 34:010101. [PMID: 38361735 PMCID: PMC10864028 DOI: 10.11613/bm.2024.010101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
This paper examines the application of super-superiority margins in study power calculations. Unlike traditional power calculations, which primarily aim to reject the null hypothesis by any margin, a super-superiority margin establishes a clinically significant threshold. Despite potential benefits, this approach, akin to a non-inferiority calculation but in an opposing direction, is rarely used. Implementing a super-superiority margin separates the notion of the likely difference between two groups (the effect size) from the minimum clinically significant difference, without which inconsistent positions could be held. However, these are often used interchangeably. In an audit of 30 recent randomized controlled trial power calculations, four studies utilized the minimal acceptable difference, and nine utilized the expected difference. In the other studies, this was unclarified. In the post hoc scenario, this approach can shed light on the value of undertaking further studies, which is not apparent from the standard power calculation. The acceptance and rejection of the alternate hypothesis for super-superiority, non-inferiority, equivalence, and standard superiority studies have been compared. When a fixed minimal acceptable difference is applied, a study result will be in one of seven logical positions with regards to the simultaneous application of these hypotheses. The trend for increased trial size and the mirror approach of non-inferiority studies implies that newer interventions may be becoming less effective. Powering for superiority could counter this and ensure that a pre-trial evaluation of clinical significance has taken place, which is necessary to confirm that interventions are beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Bishara
- Division of surgery, West Middlesex Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hays SB, Corvino G, Lorié BD, McMichael WV, Mehdi SA, Rieser C, Rojas AE, Hogg ME. Prince and princesses: The current status of robotic surgery in surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:164-182. [PMID: 38031870 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Robotic surgery has experienced a dramatic increase in utilization across general surgery over the last two decades, including in surgical oncology. Although urologists and gynecologists were the first to show that this technology could be utilized in cancer surgery, the robot is now a powerful tool in the treatment of gastrointestinal, hepato-pancreatico-biliary, colorectal, endocrine, and soft tissue malignancies. While long-term outcomes are still pending, short-term outcomes have showed promise for this technologic advancement of cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Hays
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Gaetano Corvino
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin D Lorié
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - William V McMichael
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Syed A Mehdi
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Caroline Rieser
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Aram E Rojas
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hayashi MC, Sarri AJ, Pereira PASV, Rocha MM, Zequi SDC, Machado MT, de Souza AH, Magno LAV, Faria EF. Ergonomic risk assessment of surgeon's position during radical prostatectomy: Laparoscopic versus robotic approach. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:1453-1458. [PMID: 37602508 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a definitive surgical therapy for localized prostate cancer. Evidence suggests that the poor ergonomics of surgeons during RP may lead to work-related musculoskeletal disorders and loss of productivity. Since each surgery modality has its physical demands, we compared the ergonomic risk between laparoscopic (LRP) and robotic-assisted (RARP) radical prostatectomy. METHODS The study assessed the posture of 10 urological surgeons during LRP and RARP surgeries with the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) scale. RESULTS We found that the RARP approach resulted in lower REBA scores over the LRP procedure. CONCLUSIONS Robotic surgery improves body posture for the urological surgeon like in other medical specialties. However, the surgeons display harmful postures in both surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Calegari Hayashi
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Oncologia (PPGO), Fundação Pio XII, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Almir J Sarri
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Oncologia (PPGO), Fundação Pio XII, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Luiz Alexandre Viana Magno
- INCT em Neurotecnologia Responsável (INCT-NeurotecR), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde (PPGCS), Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Eliney Ferreira Faria
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde (PPGCS), Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Haney CM, Kowalewski KF, Westhoff N, Holze S, Checcuci E, Neuberger M, Haapiainen H, Egen L, Antti K, Porpiglia F, Stolzenburg JU. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:930-937. [PMID: 37353415 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has largely replaced conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) even though the costs are significantly higher. Justification for this change is the hope for better postoperative functional results because of better dissection of the neurovascular bundle. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RARP and LRP for the primary outcome of continence (use of 0 pads or 1 safety pad) at 12 mo after surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases for RCTs comparing RARP versus LRP for adults with localised prostate cancer (PC). Where possible, individual-patient data were obtained. Secondary outcomes were potency for patients potent at baseline; a trifecta of patients continent and potent and no recurrence/further treatment; positive surgical margins; biochemical recurrence; and further treatment for PC. The systematic review was registered prospectively (reviewregistry1190 on www.researchregistry.com/). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Five RCTs were identified. Three trial teams provided data. For another trial, only published data were available. The fifth trial was terminated prematurely because of insufficient recruitment and thus could not be included. Overall, data for 1205 randomised patients were available. At 12 mo, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding continence (odds ratio [OR] 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-5.62). However, at 3 mo and 6 mo there were significant differences in favour of RARP. Significantly more patients who were potent at baseline and underwent a robot-assisted nerve-sparing approach were potent at 12 mo (OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.63-10.09). CONCLUSION At 12 mo after surgery there are no differences in continence between RARP and LRP. Short-term continence benefits of RARP were observed. Potent patients undergoing RARP consistently show better potency postoperatively. PATIENT SUMMARY We analysed differences between robot-assisted removal of the prostate and conventional keyhole surgery for removal of the prostate. At 12 mo after surgery, there were no differences in continence outcomes between the two approaches. However, patients who were potent at baseline and underwent robot-assisted surgery were more likely to be potent at 12 mo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caelán Max Haney
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Niklas Westhoff
- Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sigrun Holze
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Enrico Checcuci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Manuel Neuberger
- Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Henry Haapiainen
- Department of Urology, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland
| | - Luisa Egen
- Department of Urology and Urologic Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Kaipia Antti
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Haapiainen H, Murtola TJ, Koskimäki J, Riikonen J, Pakarainen T, Haney CM, Raitanen M, Kaipia A. Robot-assisted versus three-dimensional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 12-month outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int 2023; 132:505-511. [PMID: 37461186 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) to three-dimensional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (3D-LRP) at 12 months after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospective randomised single-centre study of 145 consecutive men referred to radical prostatectomy in a tertiary referral centre in Finland. Patients were randomised 1:1 to the RALP (N = 75) and 3D-LRP (N = 70) groups. The primary outcome was urinary continence evaluated with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26-item version (EPIC-26) incontinence domain score at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the use of protective pads at 12 months after surgery, EPIC-26 domain scores of irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual and hormonal symptoms, positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Complication frequency within the 3-month period after surgery was evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Statistical significance between groups was analysed using Mann-Whitney, chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. The trial was terminated after interim analysis based on no statistically significant difference in EPIC-26 urinary incontinence domain scores. Altogether 145 patients of the target accrual of 280 patients were recruited. RESULTS Postoperative continence at 12 months after surgery according to the EPIC-26 incontinence domain was 79.25 in both groups (P = 0.4). Between group difference was -5.8 (95% confidence interval -15.2 to 3.6). There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of PSM or BCR between the two surgical modality groups. CONCLUSION We were unable to demonstrate a difference between the RALP and 3D-LRP groups for functional and oncological outcomes at 12 months after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Haapiainen
- Department of Urology, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland
| | - Teemu J Murtola
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Juha Koskimäki
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jarno Riikonen
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Caelán M Haney
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mika Raitanen
- Department of Urology, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Kaipia
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang MX, Zhang X, Chang XP, Zeng JX, Bian HQ, Cao GQ, Li S, Chi SQ, Zhou Y, Rong LY, Wan L, Tang ST. Robotic-assisted proctosigmoidectomy for Hirschsprung’s disease: A multicenter prospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:3715-3732. [PMID: 37398887 PMCID: PMC10311611 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery is a cutting-edge minimally invasive technique that overcomes many shortcomings of laparoscopic techniques, yet few studies have evaluated the use of robotic surgery to treat Hirschsprung’s disease (HSCR).
AIM To analyze the feasibility and medium-term outcomes of robotic-assisted proctosigmoidectomy (RAPS) with sphincter- and nerve-sparing surgery in HSCR patients.
METHODS From July 2015 to January 2022, 156 rectosigmoid HSCR patients were enrolled in this multicenter prospective study. Their sphincters and nerves were spared by dissecting the rectum completely from the pelvic cavity outside the longitudinal muscle of the rectum and then performing transanal Soave pull-through procedures. Surgical outcomes and continence function were analyzed.
RESULTS No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. The median age at surgery was 9.50 months, and the length of the removed bowel was 15.50 ± 5.23 cm. The total operation time, console time, and anal traction time were 155.22 ± 16.77, 58.01 ± 7.71, and 45.28 ± 8.15 min. There were 25 complications within 30 d and 48 post-30-d complications. For children aged ≥ 4 years, the bowel function score (BFS) was 17.32 ± 2.63, and 90.91% of patients showed moderate-to-good bowel function. The postoperative fecal continence (POFC) score was 10.95 ± 1.04 at 4 years of age, 11.48 ± 0.72 at 5 years of age, and 11.94 ± 0.81 at 6 years of age, showing a promising annual trend. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, BFS, and POFC scores related to age at surgery being ≤ 3 mo or > 3 mo.
CONCLUSION RAPS is a safe and effective alternative for treating HSCR in children of all ages; it offers the advantage of further minimizing damage to sphincters and perirectal nerves and thus providing better continence function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng-Xin Zhang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
| | - Xi Zhang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
| | - Xiao-Pan Chang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510623, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ji-Xiao Zeng
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510623, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hong-Qiang Bian
- Department of General Surgery, Wuhan Children’s Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430019, Hubei Province, China
| | - Guo-Qing Cao
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
| | - Shuai Li
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
| | - Shui-Qing Chi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
| | - Ying Zhou
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
| | - Li-Ying Rong
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
| | - Li Wan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
| | - Shao-Tao Tang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
R-LESS-RP versus C-LESS-RP: a single-institution retrospective comparative study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:3844. [PMID: 36890206 PMCID: PMC9995310 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31021-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the peri- and postoperative outcomes of patients treated with conventional versus robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy (C-LESS-RP vs. R-LESS-RP). Data of patients with prostate cancer (106 who underwent C-LESS-RP, 124 underwent R-LESS-RP) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All operations were performed by the same surgeon from January 8, 2018, to January 6, 2021, in the same institution. Information on clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes was obtained from records at the medical institution. Postoperative outcomes were acquired from follow-up. Intergroup differences were retrospectively analyzed and compared. All patients had similar clinical characteristics in meaningful aspects. The perioperative outcomes were better with R-LESS-RP than with C-LESS-RP in terms of operation time (120 min vs. 150 min, p < 0.05), estimated blood loss (17.68 ml vs. 33.68 ml, p < 0.05), and analgesic duration (0 days vs. 1 days, p < 0.05). The drainage tube duration and postoperative stay did not differ significantly between groups. However, R-LESS-RP was more expensive than C-LESS-RP (56559.510 CNY vs. 44818.27 CNY, p < 0.05). The patients who underwent R-LESS-RP had better urinary incontinence recovery and higher European quality of life visual analog scale scores than those who underwent C-LESS-RP. However, no significant intergroup difference was noted in biochemical recurrence. In conclusion, R-LESS-RP could achieve better perioperative outcomes, especially for those skilled surgeons who have mastered C-LESS-RP. Additionally, R-LESS-RP accelerated the recovery from urinary incontinence effectively and presented some benefits in health-related quality of life with additional costs.
Collapse
|
15
|
The Efficacy of Urinary Continence in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Bladder-Prostatic Muscle Reconstruction and Bladder Neck Eversion Anastomosis. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58121821. [PMID: 36557023 PMCID: PMC9781535 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of bladder-prostatic muscle reconstruction and bladder neck eversion anastomosis in the recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and Methods: From January 2020 to May 2022, 69 patients who underwent RARP in our hospital were recruited. Thirty-seven patients underwent RARP with the Veil of Aphrodite technique (control group). On the basis of the control group, 32 patients underwent bladder-prostatic muscle reconstruction and bladder neck eversion anastomosis during RARP (observation group). The recovery of urinary continence was followed up at 24 h and 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after catheter removal. Results: There were no significant differences in operative time (127.76 ± 21.23 min vs. 118.85 ± 24.71 min), blood loss (118.27 ± 16.75 mL vs. 110.77 ± 19.63 mL), rate of leakage (3.13% vs. 2.70%), rate of positive surgical margin (6.25% vs. 10.81%), or postoperative Gleason score [7 (6−8) vs. 7 (7−8)] between the observation group and the control group (p > 0.05). After catheter removal, the rates of urinary continence at 24 h, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks were 46.88%, 68.75%, 84.38%, 90.63%, and 93.75% in the observation group, respectively. Meanwhile, the rates of urinary continence in the control group were 21.62%, 37.84%, 62.16%, 86.49%, and 91.89%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.034), especially at 24 h, 1 week, and 4 weeks after catheter removal (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Bladder-prostatic muscle reconstruction and bladder neck eversion anastomosis were beneficial to the recovery of urinary continence after RARP, especially early urinary continence.
Collapse
|
16
|
Tan WS, Ta A, Kelly JD. Robotic surgery: getting the evidence right. Med J Aust 2022; 217:391-393. [PMID: 36183333 PMCID: PMC9828009 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shen Tan
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Anthony Ta
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - John D Kelly
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|