Evaluation of peripheral nerve injury ⋆

The outcomes of peripheral nerve surgeries in Africa: Narrative synthesis from existing literature

BACKGROUND

In Africa, peripheral nerve pathologies are a major source of disability, and the results of surgical therapies differ greatly among countries. The goal of this narrative review is to compile the most recent data on peripheral nerve surgery results in Africa, pinpoint critical variables that affect surgical outcomes, and offer suggestions for enhancing patient care.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies published over the past four decades. The sources included peer-reviewed journals, hospital records, and reports from healthcare organizations. The review examined outcomes related to functional recovery, quality of life, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The outcomes of peripheral nerve surgeries in Africa are influenced by the availability of medical infrastructure, the level of surgeon expertise, and the timeliness of the intervention. Urban centers with better resources tend to report more favorable outcomes, whereas rural areas face significant challenges. Common barriers include limited access to advanced surgical tools, a shortage of specialized surgeons, and inadequate postoperative care and rehabilitation services. Despite these challenges, successful interventions have been reported, particularly in settings where targeted training programs and international collaborations are in place.

CONCLUSION

Enhancing surgeon training programs, building comprehensive postoperative care and rehabilitation facilities, and investing in healthcare infrastructure are critical to improving peripheral nerve surgery results in Africa. International and regional collaborations can be extremely helpful in advancing these initiatives by enabling the sharing of knowledge and granting access to cutting-edge methods. Patients with peripheral nerve injuries across the continent may experience improved functional recovery and overall quality of life if these criteria are met.

Role of nerve ultrasound versus electrophysiological studies in the evaluation of nerve injuries

Background

High-resolution ultrasonography (US) is a non-invasive, readily applicable imaging modality capable of depicting real-time static and dynamic information concerning the peripheral nerves and their surrounding tissues. Although electrophysiological studies are the gold standard in the evaluation of nerve injuries, US can be used also to evaluate the morphological changes of nerve injuries.

Objectives

To evaluate the role of the high-resolution US in the assessment of nerve injuries and to compare it to the role of electrodiagnostic studies.

Subjects and methods

A total of 30 nerves from 22 consecutive patients with clinically definite nerve injury were considered. Two independent and blinded clinicians perform electrodiagnosis and US. The clinical, neurophysiological, and US findings were collected, and the contribution of US was then classified as “ contributive” or “non-contributive”, according to whether US confirmed the clinical and neurophysiological diagnosis or not.

Results

US was “contributive” (confirming the electrophysiological diagnosis) in 66.67% of cases (n = 20), providing information about continuity of the nerve, morphological changes after injury as swelling, scar tissue formation, or neuroma formation with sensitivity of 75% compared to the electrodiagnostic studies and accuracy of 66.67%.

Conclusion

Ultrasound can be used, when available, as a complementary tool for electrodiagnostic studies to provide anatomical information about the injured nerves in case of complete axonal lesion.

Crush injuries and crush syndrome - a review. Part 2: the local injury

Crush injuries can occur in considerable numbers following natural disasters or acts of war and terrorism. They can also occur sporadically after industrial accidents or following periods of unconsciousness from drug intoxication, anaesthesia, trauma or cerebral events. A common pathophysiological pathway has been elucidated over the last century describing traumatic rhabdomyolysis leading to myoglobinuric acute renal failure and a systemic ‘crush syndrome’ affecting many organ systems. If left unrecognised or untreated then mortality rates are high. If treatment is commenced early and the systemic effects are minimised then patients are often faced with significant morbidity from the crushed limbs themselves. We have performed a thorough review of the English language literature from 1940—2009 investigating crush injuries and crush syndrome and present a comprehensive, two-part summary. Part 1: The systemic injury, we concentrate on the systemic crush syndrome. We determine the pathophysiology, clinical and prognostic indicators and treatment options such as forced alkaline diuresis, mannitol therapy, dialysis and haemofiltration. We discuss more controversial treatment options such as allopurinol, potassium binders, calcium therapy and other diuretics. We also discuss the specific management issues of the secondary ‘renal disaster’ that can occur following earthquakes and other mass disasters. Part 2: The local injury, we look in more detail at the pathophysiology of skeletal muscle damage following crush injuries and discuss how to minimise morbidity by salvaging limb function. In particular we discuss the controversies surrounding fasciotomy of crushed limbs and compare surgical management with conservative techniques such as mannitol therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, topical negative pressure therapy and a novel topical treatment called gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157.