1
|
Corrao G, Marvaso G, Mastroleo F, Biffi A, Pellegrini G, Minari S, Vincini MG, Zaffaroni M, Zerini D, Volpe S, Gaito S, Mazzola GC, Bergamaschi L, Cattani F, Petralia G, Musi G, Ceci F, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R, Alterio D, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Photon vs proton hypofractionation in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110264. [PMID: 38561122 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-level evidence on hypofractionated proton therapy (PT) for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients is currently missing. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic literature review to compare the toxicity and effectiveness of curative radiotherapy with photon therapy (XRT) or PT in PCa. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to April 2022. Men with a diagnosis of PCa who underwent curative hypofractionated RT treatment (PT or XRT) were included. Risk of grade (G) ≥ 2 acute and late genitourinary (GU) OR gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were the primary outcomes of interest. Secondary outcomes were five-year biochemical relapse-free survival (b-RFS), clinical relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, and prostate cancer-specific survival. Heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was assessed using Chi-square statistics and measured with the I2 index (heterogeneity measure across studies). RESULTS A total of 230 studies matched inclusion criteria and, due to overlapped populations, 160 were included in the present analysis. Significant lower rates of G ≥ 2 acute GI incidence (2 % vs 7 %) and improved 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (95 % vs 91 %) were observed in the PT arm compared to XRT. PT benefits in 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival were maintained for the moderate hypofractionated arm (p-value 0.0122) and among patients in intermediate and low-risk classes (p-values < 0.0001 and 0.0368, respectively). No statistically relevant differences were found for the other considered outcomes. CONCLUSION The present study supports that PT is safe and effective for localized PCa treatment, however, more data from RCTs are needed to draw solid evidence in this setting and further effort must be made to identify the patient subgroups that could benefit the most from PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Mastroleo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pellegrini
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Minari
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Dario Zerini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kedves A, Akay M, Akay Y, Kisiván K, Glavák C, Miovecz Á, Schiffer Á, Kisander Z, Lőrincz A, Szőke A, Sánta B, Freihat O, Sipos D, Kovács Á, Lakosi F. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging diffusion parameters using artificial intelligence in low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: A pilot study. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:986-994. [PMID: 38678978 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate the predictive value of the pre-treatment diffusion parameters of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) using artificial intelligence (AI) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). METHODS Retrospective evaluation was performed for 30 patients using pre-treatment multi-parametric MR image datasets between 2017 and 2021. MR-based mean- and minimum apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCmean, ADCmin) were calculated for the intraprostatic dominant lesion. Therapeutic response was assessed using PSA levels. Predictive performance was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Statistics performed with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS No biochemical relapse was detected after a median follow-up of twenty-three months (range: 3-50), with a median PSA of 0.01 ng/ml (range: 0.006-2.8) at the last examination. Significant differences were observed between the pre-treatment ADCmean, ADCmin parameters, and the group averages of patients with low and high 1-year-PSA measurements (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). In prediction, the random forest (RF) model outperformed the decision tree (DT) and support vector machine (SVM) models by yielding area under the curves (AUC), with 0.722, 0.685, and 0.5, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that pre-treatment MR diffusion data may predict therapeutic response using the novel approach of machine learning in PCa patients treated with SABR. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Clinicians shall measure and implement the evaluation of the suggested parameters (ADCmin, ADCmean) to provide the most accurate therapy for the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kedves
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - M Akay
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Y Akay
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - K Kisiván
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - C Glavák
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Á Miovecz
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Á Schiffer
- Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Z Kisander
- Department of Electrical Networks, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - A Lőrincz
- Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - A Szőke
- 3D Printing and Visualization Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - B Sánta
- Röntgenpraxis Dr. Thomas Trieb, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - O Freihat
- College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - D Sipos
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Institute of Diagnostics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Á Kovács
- Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Diagnostics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - F Lakosi
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Diagnostics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fredman E, Weinstock-Sabbah M, Icht O, Moore A, Shochet T, Limon D, Bragilovski D. Same-day versus delayed simulation imaging after placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer for prostate radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1236113. [PMID: 37519789 PMCID: PMC10375909 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1236113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of rectal toxicity from prostate radiation. Practices vary regarding the timing of CT simulation after hydrogel placement, and the ideal schedule remains unknown. Methods Thirty patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided placement of an iodinated SpaceOAR™ hydrogel prior to radiotherapy. Per evolving practice, 15 completed same-day simulation and 15 returned for simulation 1-2 weeks later. Hydrogel volume, perirectal distance, air-void volume, and rectal dosimetry per NRG GU005 were compared between CT simulation, 1st fraction Cone-Beam-CT (CBCT), and final CBCT. Results CT simulation occurred 8.8 ± 2.4 days after placement in the delayed group, with no significant difference in the interval between simulation and 1st fraction between groups (p = 0.165). Greater observed de-creases in hydrogel volume (0.57 cc vs. 0.04 cc, p = 0.0002), and perirectal distance at both mid-gland (1.32 mm vs. 0.17 mm) and tallest point (2.40 mm vs. 0.04 mm) were seen on 1st-fraction CBCT in the same-day group (p = 0.0039; p = 0.0002). Per dosimetry recalculated on 1st fraction CBCT, five (D3 cc and D50%) versus one (D50%) rectal dose parameters were exceeded in the same-day and delayed groups, respectively, and 10 versus one parameters had a relative increase of ≥ 20%. Conclusion Due to the evolving anatomic changes in the days following hydrogel placement, same-day simulation scanning may introduce unintended variability in rectal dosimetry at the time of prostate radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisha Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Miriam Weinstock-Sabbah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Oded Icht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Assaf Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Tzippora Shochet
- Department of Biostatistics, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dror Limon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dimitri Bragilovski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taniguchi T, Iinuma K, Nakano M, Kawase M, Takeuchi S, Kato D, Takai M, Nakane K, Ishihara T, Ito M, Kumano T, Matsuo M, Koie T. Chronological changes of lower urinary tract symptoms after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer using SpaceOAR® system. Prostate Int 2022; 10:207-212. [PMID: 36570644 PMCID: PMC9747576 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study is to investigate chronological changes of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) followed by the insertion of SpaceOAR® system (SpaceOAR). Methods In this retrospective study, 483 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent LDR-BT at the Gifu University Hospital between August 2004 and December 2020. SpaceOAR was inserted in 30 patients after LDR-BT (SpaceOAR group), and 453 patients received LDR-BT alone (non-SpaceOAR group). The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), quality of life due to urinary symptoms (IPSS-QOL), and uroflowmetry (UFM), including maximum flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-voided residual urine (PVR), were evaluated before LDR-BT, and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after LDR-BT. The outcomes were chronological changes in IPSS, OABSS, and IPSS-QOL compared to pretreatment values and those of covariates in relation to UFM. Results The IPSS, OABSS, IPSS-QOL, Qmax, and voided volume were not significantly associated with either group. According to the PVR interaction effect, the insertion of SpaceOAR was significantly affected by chronological changes in PVR (P = 0.001). Three months after LDR-BT, PVR in the SpaceOAR group was significantly higher than that in the non-SpaceOAR group (49.8 mL vs. 30.5 mL; P = 0.002). Conclusion SpaceOAR use may temporally increase PVR; however, IPSS, OABSS, IPSS-QOL, Qmax, and voided volume were not significantly associated with LUTS before and after LDR-BT. The combination of LDR-BT and SpaceOAR may be acceptable for treating patients with prostate cancer regarding the chronological changes in LUTS after brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoki Taniguchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Koji Iinuma
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan,Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Nakano
- Department of Urology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, 4-6-1 Noisiki, Gifu, Gifu 500-8717, Japan
| | - Makoto Kawase
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Shinichi Takeuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Daiki Kato
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Manabu Takai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Keita Nakane
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Takuma Ishihara
- Innovative and Clinical Research Promotion Center, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Masaya Ito
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kumano
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Masayuki Matsuo
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mechanisms, mitigation, and management of urinary toxicity from prostate radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e534-e543. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00544-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
6
|
Hadigal SR, Gupta AK. Application of Hydrogel Spacer SpaceOAR Vue for Prostate Radiotherapy. Tomography 2022; 8:2648-2661. [PMID: 36412680 PMCID: PMC9680261 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8060221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Damage in the surrounding structures, including the rectum, due to unintended exposure to radiation is a large burden to bear for patients who undergo radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The use of injectable rectal spacers to distance the anterior rectum from the prostate is a potential strategy to reduce the dose of unintended radiation to the rectum. Hydrogel spacers are gaining increasing popularity in the treatment regimen for prostate cancer. After FDA approval of SpaceOAR, specialists are receiving an increasing number of referrals for hydrogel placements. In this paper, we review hydrogel spacers, the supporting clinical data, the best practices for hydrogel placement, and the risk of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atul K. Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Rochester General Hospital, 1425 Portland Ave, Rochester, NY 14621, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Greco C, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Nunes B, Kociolek J, Stroom J, Vieira S, Mateus D, Cardoso MJ, Soares A, Marques J, Freitas E, Coelho G, Fuks Z. Urethra Sparing With Target Motion Mitigation in Dose-Escalated Extreme Hypofractionated Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: 7-Year Results From a Phase II Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:863655. [PMID: 35433469 PMCID: PMC9012148 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.863655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To explore whether the rectal distension-mediated technique, harnessing human physiology to achieve intrafractional prostate motion mitigation, enables urethra sparing by inverse dose painting, thus promoting dose escalation with extreme hypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Between June 2013 and December 2018, 444 patients received 5 × 9 Gy SABR over 5 consecutive days. Rectal distension-mediated SABR was employed via insertion of a 150-cm3 air-inflated endorectal balloon. A Foley catheter loaded with 3 beacon transponders was used for urethra visualization and online tracking. MRI-based planning using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Image Guided Radiotherapy (VMAT-IGRT) with inverse dose painting was employed in delivering the planning target volume (PTV) dose and in sculpting exposure of organs at risk (OARs). A 2-mm margin was used for PTV expansion, reduced to 0 mm at the interface with critical OARs. All plans fulfilled Dmean ≥45 Gy. Target motion ≥2 mm/5 s motions mandated treatment interruption and target realignment prior to completion of the planned dose delivery. Results Patient compliance to the rectal distension-mediated immobilization protocol was excellent, achieving reproducible daily prostate localization at a patient-specific retropubic niche. Online tracking recorded ≤1-mm intrafractional target deviations in 95% of treatment sessions, while target realignment in ≥2-mm deviations enabled treatment completion as scheduled in all cases. The cumulative incidence rates of late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were 5.3% and 1.1%, respectively. The favorable toxicity profile was corroborated by patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir by 5 years was 0.19 ng/ml. The cumulative incidence rate of biochemical failure using the Phoenix definition was 2%, 16.6%, and 27.2% for the combined low/favorable–intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, and high-risk categories, respectively. Patients with a PSA failure underwent a 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) scan showing a 20.2% cumulative incidence of intraprostatic relapses in biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥3. Conclusion The rectal distension-mediated technique is feasible and well tolerated. Dose escalation to 45 Gy with urethra-sparing results in excellent toxicity profiles and PSA relapse rates similar to those reported by other dose-escalated regimens. The existence of intraprostatic recurrences in patients with high-risk features confirms the notion of a high α/β ratio in these phenotypes resulting in diminished effectiveness with hypofractionated dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Oriol Pares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nuno Pimentel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vasco Louro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Beatriz Nunes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Justyna Kociolek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joep Stroom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sandra Vieira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Dalila Mateus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria Joao Cardoso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Soares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joao Marques
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Elda Freitas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Graça Coelho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Zvi Fuks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Batumalai V, James M. Unwarranted variation in radiation therapy fractionation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:233-241. [PMID: 35243787 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The adoption of hypofractionation across multiple tumour sites has been slow despite robust evidence. There is considerable unwarranted variation in practice, both within and between jurisdictions. This has been attributed to inconsistencies in guidelines, physician preference, lack of technology and differing financial incentives. Unwarranted variation in the use of hypofractionation has a tremendous effect on cost to both patients and the healthcare system. This places an unnecessary burden on patients and poorly utilises scarce healthcare resources. A collaborative effort from clinicians, patients, healthcare providers and policymakers is needed to reduce unwarranted variation in practice. This will improve quality of care both for patients and at broader healthcare system level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikneswary Batumalai
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,GenesisCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melissa James
- Christchurch Oncology Service, Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Centre, Christchurch, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Teyateeti A, Grossman C, Kollmeier MA, Fiasconaro M, Hopkins M, McBride S, Gorovets D, Shasha D, Cohen G, Zhang Z, Lesser DJ, Damato A, Zelefsky MJ. Influence of hydrogel spacer placement with prostate brachytherapy on rectal and urinary toxicity. BJU Int 2022; 129:337-344. [PMID: 34388295 PMCID: PMC9472451 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the influence of rectal hydrogel spacer placement (HSP) on late rectal toxicity outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 224 patients underwent LDR brachytherapy with HSP, as monotherapy or combined with EBRT, between January 2016 and December 2019. Dosimetric variables reflecting the extent of rectal sparing and late rectal toxicity outcomes were evaluated. This spacer cohort was retrospectively compared to a similar patient group (n = 139) in whom HSP was not used. RESULTS Hydrogel spacer placement was associated with significantly reduced rectal doses for all dosimetric variables; the median percentage rectal dose to 1 cc of rectum and rectal dose to 2 cc of rectum of the spacer cohort were all significantly lower compared to the non-spacer cohort. The incidence rates of overall (any grade) and grade ≥2 rectal toxicity were lower in patients with HSP compared to patients who did not undergo HSP: 12% and 1.8% vs 31% and 5.8%, respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of overall rectal toxicity was significantly lower with HSP than without (15% vs 33%; P < 0.001), corresponding to an overall rectal toxicity reduction on univariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.73; P = 0.001). In this patient cohort treated with prostate brachytherapy, none of the urethral dosimetric variables or the presence or absence of HSP was associated with late urinary toxicity. CONCLUSION Hydrogel rectal spacer placement is a safe procedure, associated with significantly reduced rectal dose. HSP translates to a decrease in overall late rectal toxicity in patients receiving dose-escalated brachytherapy-based procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achiraya Teyateeti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Craig Grossman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Marisa A. Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Megan Fiasconaro
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Margaret Hopkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Gorovets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Shasha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Gilad Cohen
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - David J Lesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Antonio Damato
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Payne HA, Pinkawa M, Peedell C, Bhattacharyya SK, Woodward E, Miller LE. SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer injection prior to stereotactic body radiation therapy for men with localized prostate cancer: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28111. [PMID: 34889268 PMCID: PMC8663810 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is a common treatment for men with localized prostate cancer. A growing consensus suggests that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is similarly effective but less costly and more convenient for patients. The SpaceOAR hydrogel rectal spacer placed between the prostate and rectum reduces radiation-induced rectal injury in patients receiving conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, but spacer efficacy with SBRT is unclear. The purpose of this research was to assess the clinical utility of the hydrogel rectal spacer in men receiving SBRT for prostate cancer. METHODS We performed systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies in men who received the SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer prior to SBRT (≥5.0 Gy fractions) for treatment of localized prostate center. Rectal irradiation results were compared to controls without spacer implant; all other outcomes were reported descriptively owing to lack of comparative data incuding perirectal separation distance, rectal irradiation on a dosimetric curve, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and freedom from biochemical failure. GI toxicity was reported as the risk of a grade 2 or 3+ bowel complication in early (≤3 months) and late (>3 months) follow-up. RESULTS In 11 studies with 780 patients, SBRT protocols ranged from 7 to 10 Gy per fraction with total dose ranging from 19 to 45 Gy. Perirectal distance achieved with the rectal spacer ranged from 9.6 to 14.5 mm (median 10.8 mm). Compared to controls receiving no spacer, SpaceOAR placement reduced the radiation delivered to the rectum by 29% to 56% across a dosimetric profile curve. In early follow-up, grade 2 GI complications were reported in 7.0% of patients and no early grade 3+ GI complications were reported. In late follow-up, the corresponding rates were 2.3% for grade 2 and 0.3% for grade 3 GI toxicity. Over 16 months median follow-up, freedom from biochemical failure ranged from 96.4% to 100% (pooled mean 97.4%). CONCLUSIONS SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer placed between the prostate and rectum prior to SBRT is a promising preventative strategy that increases the distance between the prostate and rectum, reduces rectal radiation exposure, and may lower the risk of clinically important GI complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A. Payne
- Oncology Department, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Larry E. Miller
- Department of Biostatistics, Miller Scientific, Johnson City, TN
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lucchini R, Panizza D, Colciago RR, Vernier V, Daniotti MC, Faccenda V, Arcangeli S. Treatment outcome and compliance to dose-intensified linac-based SBRT for unfavorable prostate tumors using a novel real-time organ-motion tracking. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:180. [PMID: 34535168 PMCID: PMC8447697 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01908-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To report preliminary data on treatment outcome and compliance to dose-intensified organ sparing SBRT for prostate cancer using a novel electromagnetic transmitter-based tracking system (RayPilotÒ System) to account for intra-fractional organ motion. MATERIAL/METHODS Thirteen patients with intermediate unfavorable (9) and selected high-risk (4) prostate cancer underwent dose-escalated SBRT in 4 or 5 fractions (BED1.5 = 279 Gy and 253 Gy, respectively). The VMAT treatment consisted in two 6FFF or 10FFF full arcs optimized to have the 95% isodose covering at least 95% of the PTV (2 mm isotropic expansion of the CTV). Whenever the real-time tracking registered a displacement that exceeded 2 mm during the setup and/or the beam delivery, the treatment was interrupted and the prostate motion was promptly corrected. The incidence of treatment-related genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, patient QoL and PSA outcomes were computed from the start of treatment to the last follow-up date. RESULTS All patients completed the treatment in the expected time (10.2 +/- 4.2 minutes) and their compliance to the procedure was excellent. No clinically significant acute Grade 2 or higher GI (rectal) and GU side effects were observed within 90 days from the treatment completion. The median IPSS increased from 8 at baseline to 12 one-month after treatment and settled to 6 at 3 months. EPIC-26 scores in the urinary domain decreased from a median baseline of 86 pre-treatment to 79 at one-month and returned to baseline at a later timepoint (median score of 85 at 3 months). EPIC-26 scores in the bowel domains did not show significant changes within 3 months following RT. The prostate was found within 1 mm from its initial position in 78% of the beam-on time, between 1 and 2 mm in 20%, and exceeded 2 mm only in 2%, after correction for motion which was performed in 45% of the fractions, either during setup or beam delivery. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary findings show that dose intensified SBRT for unfavorable prostate tumors does not come at the cost of an increased toxicity, provided that a reliable technique for real time prostate monitoring is ensured. Fast FFF beams contributed to reduce intra-fractional motion. These observations need to be confirmed on a larger scale and a longer follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella Lucchini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Denis Panizza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ray Colciago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy.
| | - Veronica Vernier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Valeria Faccenda
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
- Department of Physics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Folkert MR, Zelefsky MJ, Hannan R, Desai NB, Lotan Y, Laine AM, Kim DWN, Neufeld SH, Hornberger B, Kollmeier MA, McBride S, Ahn C, Roehrborn C, Timmerman RD. A Multi-Institutional Phase 2 Trial of High-Dose SAbR for Prostate Cancer Using Rectal Spacer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:101-109. [PMID: 33753140 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-dose SABR for prostate cancer offers the radiobiologic potency of the most intensified radiation therapy regimens but was associated with >90% rates of ulceration of the anterior rectal wall on endoscopic assessment; this infrequently progressed to severe rectal toxicity in prior prospective series. A multi-institutional phase 2 prospective trial was conducted to assess whether placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer would reduce acute periprostatic rectal ulcer events after high-dose (>40 Gy) SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients included men with stage ≤T2c localized grade group 1 to 3 prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤15 ng/mL, American Urological Association Symptom Index = AUA-SI scores ≤18, and a gland volume ≤80 cm3. Patients underwent perirectal hydrogel spacer placement, followed by SABR of 45 Gy in 5 fractions every other day to the prostate only. Androgen deprivation was not allowed except for cytoreduction. The rectal wall was directly assessed by serial anoscopy during follow-up to determine whether the spacer would reduce acute periprostatic rectal ulcer events from >90% to <70% within 9 months of treatment. RESULTS Forty-four men were enrolled and 43 were eligible for protocol analysis. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 48 months. Acute periprostatic ulcers were observed in 6 of 42 patients (14.3%; 95% confidence interval, 6.0%-27%; P < .001) at a median of 2.9 months posttreatment (range, 1.7-5.6 months). All ulcers (grade 1, 5 ulcers; grade 2, 1 ulcer) resolved on repeat anoscopy within 8 months of incidence. There were no grade ≥3 late gastrointestinal toxicities; the incidence of late grade-2 gastrointestinal toxicities was 14.3%, with a prevalence at 3 years of 0%. No toxicities greater than grade 3 occurred in any domain. Four-year freedom from biochemical failure was 93.8% (95% CI, 85.2%-100.0%). CONCLUSIONS Temporary hydrogel spacer placement before high-dose SABR treatment for localized prostate cancer and use of strict dose constraints are associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of rectal ulcer events compared with prior phase 1/2 trial results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Neil B Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Aaron M Laine
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Weatherford, Texas
| | - D W Nathan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sarah Hardee Neufeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Brad Hornberger
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Marisa A Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chul Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Claus Roehrborn
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert D Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Farjam R, Mahase SS, Chen SL, Coonce M, Pennell RT, Fecteau R, Chughtai B, Dewyngaert JK, Kang J, Ch Formenti S, Nagar H. Quantifying the impact of SpaceOAR hydrogel on inter-fractional rectal and bladder dose during 0.35 T MR-guided prostate adaptive radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:49-58. [PMID: 34342134 PMCID: PMC8425860 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the impact of rectal spacing on inter-fractional rectal and bladder dose and the need for adaptive planning in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated and compared SBRT plans from prostate cancer patients with and without rectal spacer who underwent treatment on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. Each group consisted of 10 randomly selected patients that received prostate SBRT to a total dose of 36.25 Gy in five fractions. Dosimetric differences in planned and delivered rectal and bladder dose and the number of fractions violating OAR constraints were quantified. We also assessed whether adaptive planning was needed to meet constraints for each fraction. RESULTS On average, rectal spacing reduced the maximum dose delivered to the rectum by more than 8 Gy (p < 0.001). We also found that D3cc received by the rectum could be 12 Gy higher in patients who did not have rectal spacer (p < 9E-7). In addition, the results show that a rectal spacer can reduce the maximum dose and D15cc to the bladder wall by more than 1 (p < 0.004) and 8 (p < 0.009) Gy, respectively. Our study also shows that using a rectal spacer could reduce the necessity for adaptive planning. The incidence of dose constraint violation was observed in almost 91% of the fractions in patients without the rectal spacer and 52% in patients with implanted spacer. CONCLUSION Inter-fractional changes in rectal and bladder dose were quantified in patients who underwent SBRT with/without rectal SpaceOAR hydrogel. Rectal spacer does not eliminate the need for adaptive planning but reduces its necessity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Farjam
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Sean S. Mahase
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Shu Ling Chen
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Madeline Coonce
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Ryan T. Pennell
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Ryan Fecteau
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Bilal Chughtai
- Department of UrologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Josephine Kang
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Silvia Ch Formenti
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fagundes M, Rodrigues MA, Olszewski S, Khan F, McKenzie C, Gutierrez A, Chuong M, Mehta M. Expanding the Utilization of Rectal Spacer Hydrogel for Larger Prostate Glands (>80 cc): Feasibility and Dosimetric Outcomes. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100651. [PMID: 34195489 PMCID: PMC8233470 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Hydrogel Spacer Prospective Randomized Pivotal Trial achieved mean rectoprostatic spacing of 12.6 mm resulting in lowering of rectal V70 from 12.4% (without spacer) to 3.3% (with spacer) in patients with glands up to 80 cm3. The value of this approach in patients with larger glands is inadequately established. This study assesses the feasibility and dosimetric outcomes of perirectal spacing in patients with prostate cancer with larger glands (>80 cm3). Methods and Materials Between January 2017 and December 2019, 33 patients with prostate glands >80 cm3 (mean 108.1 cm3; range, 81.1-186.6 cm3) were treated, 15 with glands >80 to 100 cm3 and 18 >100 cm3. Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 3-26). The median international prostate symptom score was 9 (range, 1-18). Hydrogel was placed under local anesthesia in all cases. Treatment modality included intensity modulated radiation therapy in 15 and proton therapy (PT) in 18 patients. Treatment targeted the prostate plus seminal vesicles in 21 patients and 12 also had elective nodal irradiation. Conventional fractionation (CF) to 78 Gy in 39 fractions was used in 16 and moderate hypofractionation (HF) to 70 Gy in 28 fractions in 17 patients. Results In the CF group, mean rectum (r) V75, 70, 60, 50 was 0.87%, 2.25%, 5.61%, and 10.5%, respectively. For glands >80 to 100 cm3 and >100 cm3, rV70 was 2.55% and 2%, respectively. In HF patients, mean rV65, 63, 60, and 50 was 1.67%, 2.3%, 3.4%, and 8.6%. For glands >80 to 100 cm3 and >100 cm3, rV63 was 2% and 2.56%, respectively. Overall, the mean midgland rectoprostatic hydrogel separation was 9.3 mm (range, 4.7-19.4 mm). All patients tolerated treatment well; no acute grade 2 or higher adverse gastrointestinal events were observed. Conclusions Hydrogel placement is feasible in prostate glands larger than 80 cm3 with favorable dosimetric outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcio Fagundes
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Steve Olszewski
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Fazal Khan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Craig McKenzie
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Alonso Gutierrez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Michael Chuong
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gorovets D, Hopkins M, Goldman DA, Abitbol RL, Zhang Z, Kollmeier M, McBride S, Zelefsky MJ. Urinary Outcomes for Men With High Baseline International Prostate Symptom Scores Treated With Prostate SBRT. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100582. [PMID: 33665486 PMCID: PMC7897767 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There are limited data regarding high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer in patients with poor baseline urinary function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate genitourinary (GU) toxicity and changes in patient-reported symptom severity scores after prostate SBRT in men with a high pretreatment International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Methods and Materials Seven hundred fifty-three patients treated with prostate SBRT at our institution from 2012 to 2019 were identified, of whom 72 consecutive patients with baseline IPSS ≥15 were selected for this study. GU toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 and IPSS were prospectively documented at each follow-up visit. Univariable logistic regression was used to evaluate for potential predictors of GU toxicity. Results Median follow-up in survivors was 26.8 months. The rates of acute grade 2 and 3 GU toxicity were 20.8% and 1.4%, respectively. The rates of late grade 2 and 3 GU toxicity were 37.5% and 5.6%, respectively. The majority of grade 2+ toxicities resolved by last follow-up, and when toxicities were regraded per CTCAE v5.0, there were no longer any grade 3 adverse events. Total IPSS and individual symptom subscores improved over time. Compared with baseline, median total IPSS at 24 ± 6 months was significantly lower (18 vs 12; P < .001) and the proportion of patients with severe scores (IPSS ≥20) decreased from 29.2% to 13.9%. Pretreatment urinary urgency was associated with late grade 2+ GU toxicity (odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-3.31; P = .001). Conclusions In men with baseline IPSS ≥15 managed with prostate SBRT, the rate of severe GU toxicity was low and patient-reported symptoms generally improved over time. Thus, high pretreatment IPSS should not deter clinicians from offering prostate SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gorovets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| | - Margaret Hopkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| | - Debra A Goldman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| | - Ruth Levy Abitbol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| | - Marisa Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Singh S, Moore CM, Punwani S, Mitra AV, Bandula S. Long-term biopsy outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 24:612-622. [PMID: 33558660 PMCID: PMC8384630 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00323-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biopsy after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localised prostate cancer (PCa) is an infrequently used but potentially valuable technique to evaluate local recurrence and predict long-term outcomes. METHODS We performed a meta-analysis of studies until March 2020 where a post-EBRT biopsy was performed on patients with low-to intermediate risk PCa, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The primary outcome was the aggregate post-EBRT positive biopsy rate (≥2 years after EBRT) and the associated odds ratio (OR) of a positive biopsy on biochemical failure (BCF), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). A sensitivity analysis was performed which examined biopsy rate as a function of post-EBRT biopsy protocol, PCa risk, ADT usage and radiation dose. RESULTS A total of 22 studies were included, of which 10 were randomised controlled trials and 12 were cohort studies. Nine out of the 22 studies used dosing regimens consistent with the 2020 NCCN radiotherapy guidelines. The weighted-average positive biopsy rate across all 22 studies was 32% (95%-CI: 25-39%, n = 3017). In studies where post-treatment biopsy was part of the study protocol, the rate was 35% (95%-CI: 21-38%, n = 2450). In the subgroup of studies that conformed to the 2020 NCCN radiotherapy guidelines, this rate was 22% (95% CI: 19-41%, n = 832). Patients with positive biopsy had a 10-fold higher odds of developing BCF (OR of 10.3, 95%-CI: 3.7-28.7, p < 0.00001), 3-fold higher odds of developing distant metastasis (OR 3.1, 95%-CI: 2.1-4.7, p < 0.00001) and 5-fold higher odds of dying from their PCa (OR 5.1, 95%-CI: 2.6-10, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION A positive biopsy after EBRT is associated with a poor prognosis compared to a negative biopsy. The post-EBRT positive biopsy rate is an important measure which provides additional insight when comparing EBRT to other treatment modalities for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Singh
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline M. Moore
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK ,grid.52996.310000 0000 8937 2257Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anita V. Mitra
- grid.52996.310000 0000 8937 2257Cancer Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Steve Bandula
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK ,grid.52996.310000 0000 8937 2257Interventional Oncology Service, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yan M, Gouveia AG, Cury FL, Moideen N, Bratti VF, Patrocinio H, Berlin A, Mendez LC, Moraes FY. Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:669-685. [PMID: 34389825 PMCID: PMC8361822 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00498-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
External beam radiotherapy is an effective curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer, the most common cancer in men worldwide. However, conventionally fractionated courses of curative external beam radiotherapy are usually 8-9 weeks long, resulting in a substantial burden to patients and the health-care system. This problem is exacerbated in low-income and middle-income countries where health-care resources might be scarce and patient funds limited. Trials have shown a clinical equipoise between hypofractionated schedules of radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated treatments, with the advantage of drastically shortening treatment durations with the use of hypofractionation. The hypofractionated schedules are supported by modern consensus guidelines for implementation in clinical practice. Furthermore, several economic evaluations have shown improved cost effectiveness of hypofractionated therapy compared with conventional schedules. However, these techniques demand complex infrastructure and advanced personnel training. Thus, a number of practical considerations must be borne in mind when implementing hypofractionation in low-income and middle-income countries, but the potential gain in the treatment of this patient population is substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Yan
- grid.410356.50000 0004 1936 8331Division of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Andre G. Gouveia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Americas Centro de Oncologia Integrado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fabio L. Cury
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Nikitha Moideen
- grid.410356.50000 0004 1936 8331Division of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Vanessa F. Bratti
- grid.410356.50000 0004 1936 8331Queen’s University School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Kingston, Canada
| | - Horacio Patrocinio
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Department of Medical Physics, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lucas C. Mendez
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Fabio Y. Moraes
- grid.410356.50000 0004 1936 8331Division of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mohajer J, Dunlop A, Mitchell A, Goodwin E, Nill S, Oelfke U, Tree A. Feasibility of MR-guided ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy in 5, 2 or 1 fractions for prostate cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 26:1-7. [PMID: 33241129 PMCID: PMC7674276 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The drive towards hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy is motivated by a low alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer (1 to 3 Gy) compared to surrounding organs at risk, implying an improved therapeutic ratio with increasing dose per fraction. Early evidence from studies of ultrahypofractionated (UHF) prostate HDR brachytherapy has shown good tolerability in terms of normal tissue toxicities and clinical outcomes similar to conventional fractionation schedules. MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with online plan adaptation and real-time tumour imaging may enable UHF doses to be delivered to the prostate safely, without the invasiveness of brachytherapy. The feasibility of UHF prostate treatment planning for the Unity MR-Linac (MRL, Elekta AB, Stockholm) was investigated for target prescriptions and planning constraints derived from the HDR brachytherapy and SBRT literature. Monaco 5.40 (Elekta) was used to generate MRL step-and-shoot IMRT plans for three dose fractionation protocols (5, 2 and 1 fractions), for ten randomly selected previously treated prostate cancer patients. Of the ten plans per UHF scheme, all clinical goals were met in all cases for 5 fractions, and in six cases for both 2 and 1 fraction schemes. PTV D95% was compromised by up to 6.4% and 3.9% of the associated target dose for 2 and 1 fraction plans respectively. There were two cases of PTV D95% compromise greater than a 5% dose decrease for the 2 fraction plans. The study suggests feasibility of the UHF treatment planning approaches if combined with real-time motion mitigation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Mohajer
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Alex Dunlop
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Adam Mitchell
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Edmund Goodwin
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Alison Tree
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Levin-Epstein RG, Jiang NY, Wang X, Upadhyaya SK, Collins SP, Suy S, Aghdam N, Mantz C, Katz AJ, Miszczyk L, Napieralska A, Namysl-Kaletka A, Prionas N, Bagshaw H, Buyyounouski MK, Cao M, Agazaryan N, Dang A, Yuan Y, Kupelian PA, Zaorsky NG, Spratt DE, Mohamad O, Feng FY, Mahal BA, Boutros PC, Kishan AU, Juarez J, Shabsovich D, Jiang T, Kahlon S, Patel A, Patel J, Nickols NG, Steinberg ML, Fuller DB, Kishan AU. Dose-response with stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A multi-institutional analysis of prostate-specific antigen kinetics and biochemical control. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154:207-213. [PMID: 33035622 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The optimal dose for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is still unknown. This study evaluated the dose-response relationships for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decay and biochemical recurrence (BCR) among 4 SBRT dose regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 1908 men with low-risk (50.0%), favorable intermediate-risk (30.9%), and unfavorable intermediate-risk (19.1%) prostate cancer treated with prostate SBRT across 8 institutions from 2003 to 2018, we examined 4 regimens (35 Gy/5 fractions [35/5, n = 265, 13.4%], 36.25 Gy/5 fractions [36.25/5, n = 711, 37.3%], 40 Gy/5 fractions [40/5, n = 684, 35.8%], and 38 Gy/4 fractions [38/4, n = 257, 13.5%]). Between dose groups, we compared PSA decay slope, nadir PSA (nPSA), achievement of nPSA ≤0.2 and ≤0.5 ng/mL, and BCR-free survival (BCRFS). RESULTS Median follow-up was 72.3 months. Median nPSA was 0.01 ng/mL for 38/4, and 0.17-0.20 ng/mL for 5-fraction regimens (p < 0.0001). The 38/4 cohort demonstrated the steepest PSA decay slope and greater odds of nPSA ≤0.2 ng/mL (both p < 0.0001 vs. all other regimens). BCR occurred in 6.25%, 6.75%, 3.95%, and 8.95% of men treated with 35/5, 36.25/5, 40/5, and 38/4, respectively (p = 0.12), with the highest BCRFS after 40/5 (vs. 35/5 hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, p = 0.026; vs. 36.25/5 HR 0.42, p = 0.0005; vs. 38/4 HR 0.55, p = 0.037) including the entirety of follow-up, but not for 5-year BCRFS (≥93% for all regimens, p ≥ 0.21). CONCLUSION Dose-escalation was associated with greater prostate ablation and PSA decay. Dose-escalation to 40/5, but not beyond, was associated with improved BCRFS. Biochemical control remains excellent, and prospective studies will provide clarity on the benefit of dose-escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Naomi Y Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, USA
| | - Shrinivasa K Upadhyaya
- Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, USA
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, USA
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, USA
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, USA
| | | | - Alan J Katz
- FROS Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Flushing, USA
| | - Leszek Miszczyk
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Napieralska
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Poland
| | | | - Nicholas Prionas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, USA
| | - Hilary Bagshaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, USA
| | | | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Nzhde Agazaryan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Audrey Dang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, USA
| | - Ye Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Patrick A Kupelian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | | | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Arun U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jesus Juarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - David Shabsovich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Tommy Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Sartajdeep Kahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Ankur Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jay Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Nicholas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, West Los Angeles Veterans Health Administration, USA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tamihardja J, Schortmann M, Lawrenz I, Weick S, Bratengeier K, Flentje M, Guckenberger M, Polat B. Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: updated long-term outcome and toxicity analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:124-132. [PMID: 32833036 PMCID: PMC7840645 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01678-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluation of long-term outcome and toxicity of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost treatment planning and cone beam CT-based image guidance for localized prostate cancer. METHODS Between 2005 and 2015, 346 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer received primary radiotherapy using cone beam CT-based image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (IG-VMAT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Total doses of 73.9 Gy (n = 44) and 76.2 Gy (n = 302) to the high-dose PTV were delivered in 32 and 33 fractions, respectively. The low-dose PTV received a dose (D95) of 60.06 Gy in single doses of 1.82 Gy. The pelvic lymph nodes were treated in 91 high-risk patients to 45.5 Gy (D95). RESULTS Median follow-up was 61.8 months. The 5‑year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was 85.4% for all patients and 93.3, 87.4, and 79.4% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, respectively. The 5‑year prostate cancer-specific survival (PSS) was 94.8% for all patients and 98.7, 98.9, 89.3% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, respectively. The 5‑year and 10-year overall survival rates were 83.8 and 66.3% and the 5‑year and 10-year freedom from distant metastasis rates were 92.2 and 88.0%, respectively. Cumulative 5‑year late GU toxicity and late GI toxicity grade ≥2 was observed in 26.3 and 12.1% of the patients, respectively. Cumulative 5‑year late grade 3 GU/GI toxicity occurred in 4.0/1.2%. CONCLUSION Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy using SIB treatment planning and cone beam CT image guidance resulted in high biochemical control and survival with low rates of late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Tamihardja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | - Max Schortmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Ingulf Lawrenz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Weick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Bratengeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fuller DB, Naitoh J, Shirazi R, Crabtree T, Mardirossian G. Prostate SBRT: Comparison the Efficacy and Toxicity of Two Different Dose Fractionation Schedules. Front Oncol 2020; 10:936. [PMID: 32670876 PMCID: PMC7331284 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: CyberKnife SBRT is capable of producing dosimetry comparable to that created by HDR brachytherapy. Our original CyberKnife prostate SBRT schedule of 3,800 cGy/4 fractions (“high dose”) was based upon favorable published prostate HDR brachytherapy experience. Subsequently, our trial was modified to allow a lower dose of 3,400 cGy/5 fractions (“moderate dose”) in selected cases. Methods: Two hundred eighty-nine low and intermediate-risk patients were treated to either high dose (178 pts) or moderate dose (111 pts). The dose selection was individualized; high dose more commonly used in younger, intermediate-risk patients, and moderate dose more commonly used in older, low-risk patients. Results: Median PSA reached 5-year nadir levels of 0.034 ng/mL in the high dose, vs. 0.1 ng/mL in the moderate dose groups, respectively (p = 0.044 by year 4), with 62 vs. 44% reaching an ablation PSA nadir (<0.1 ng/mL) by year 5, respectively. Five year biochemical relapse free survival rates measured 98.3% for moderate dose and 94.3% for high dose groups, respectively (p = 0.1946). Five-year actuarial grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity rates measured 11.6 vs. 8.7% for high dose vs. moderate dose groups, respectively, with a far lower incidence of grade ≥3 GU and grade ≥2 GI toxicity rates in both groups. Conclusions: Both regimens are efficacious in their respective, selected groups. Both arms have low grade ≥3 GU toxicity and ≥grade 2 GI toxicity. In favor of the original high dose regimen, it has longer follow-up, produces a lower PSA nadir value and is more likely to eventually produce an ablation PSA nadir (<0.1 ng/mL). In favor of the lower dose regimen, it also produces a low PSA nadir, and does so with a slightly lower grade 2 GU toxicity rate. As a lower PSA nadir could be the initial predictor a lower clinical relapse rate far beyond 5 years, even if no difference is apparent within that time frame, a practical strategy could be to more strongly consider the high dose regimen in those with the greatest potential longevity, while for those with a more limited longevity, particularly if they have minimal negative prognostic factors, the moderate dose regimen could be more attractive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Naitoh
- Genesis Healthcare Partners, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Reza Shirazi
- Genesis Healthcare Partners, San Diego, CA, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tetar SU, Bruynzeel AME, Oei SS, Senan S, Fraikin T, Slotman BJ, Moorselaar RJAV, Lagerwaard FJ. Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Final Results on Patient-reported Outcomes of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 4:628-634. [PMID: 32536573 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent introduction of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) has allowed improved treatment planning and delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in prostate cancer (PC). The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes using this novel approach are important in shared decision making for patients. OBJECTIVE To report HRQoL using both patient- and clinician-reported outcomes at 1 yr following stereotactic MRgRT for patients with localized PC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective phase 2 trial included 101 patients with localized PC. INTERVENTION All patients received 36.25Gy in five fractions of MRgRT delivered within 2 wk. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS HRQoL was prospectively assessed at baseline, at the last fraction, at 6 wk, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo after treatment, by patient-reported outcome measures using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 questionnaires, and International Prostate Symptom Score. At the same time points, clinicians reported on symptomatic adverse events (AEs). Effect sizes for changes in HRQoL were calculated with repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Availability of HRQoL data exceeded 95% at all study time points. From both questionnaires and the recorded AEs, the largest treatment effects on urinary and bowel symptoms were recorded in the first 6 wk of follow-up. Thereafter, all symptoms decreased and returned to baseline values at 12 mo. No grade ≥3 toxicity was reported. No patient reported any relevant limitation due to urinary symptoms, and only 2.2% of patients reported a relevant impact on daily activities due to bowel problems at 1 yr. The majority of patients had intermediate- or high-risk PC for which androgen deprivation therapy (83.2%) was prescribed, thereby precluding study of MRgRT on sexual function. Longer follow-up is awaited in order to evaluate the oncological outcome. CONCLUSIONS Delivery of MRgRT for SBRT resulted in low toxicity at 1 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY All patients completed magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, which was well tolerated with only transient early urinary and bowel symptoms, which resolved 1 yr after treatment, as confirmed by patient-reported outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyama U Tetar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Swie S Oei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tamara Fraikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, Payne HA, Woodward E, Pinkawa M. Association of the Placement of a Perirectal Hydrogel Spacer With the Clinical Outcomes of Men Receiving Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e208221. [PMID: 32585020 PMCID: PMC7301230 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Perirectal spacers are intended to lower the risk of rectal toxic effects associated with prostate radiotherapy. A quantitative synthesis of typical clinical results with specific perirectal spacers is limited. Objective To evaluate the association between perirectal hydrogel spacer placement and clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Data Sources A systematic search was performed of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase for articles published through September 2019. Study Selection Studies comparing men who received a hydrogel spacer vs men who did not receive a spacer (controls) prior to prostate radiotherapy. Data Extraction and Synthesis Via random-effects meta-analysis, group comparisons were reported using the weighted mean difference for continuous measures and the risk ratio for binary measures. Main Outcomes and Measures Procedural results, the percentage volume of rectum receiving at least 70 Gy radiation (v70), early (≤3 months) and late (>3 months) rectal toxic effects, and early and late changes in bowel-related quality of life on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (minimal clinically important difference, 4 points). Results The review included 7 studies (1 randomized clinical trial and 6 cohort studies) involving 1011 men (486 who received a hydrogel spacer and 525 controls), with a median duration of patient follow-up of 26 months (range, 3-63 months). The success rate of hydrogel spacer placement was 97.0% (95% CI, 94.4%-98.8% [5 studies]), and the weighted mean perirectal separation distance was 11.2 mm (95% CI, 10.1-12.3 mm [5 studies]). Procedural complications were mild and transient, occurring in 0% to 10% of patients within the studies. The hydrogel spacer group received 66% less v70 rectal irradiation compared with controls (3.5% vs 10.4%; mean difference, -6.5%; 95% CI, -10.5% to -2.5%; P = .001 [6 studies]). The risk of grade 2 or higher rectal toxic effects was comparable between groups in early follow-up (4.5% in hydrogel spacer group vs 4.1% in control group; risk ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.52-1.28; P = .38 [6 studies]) but was 77% lower in the hydrogel spacer group in late follow-up (1.5% vs 5.7%; risk ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.99; P = .05 [4 studies]). Changes in bowel-related quality of life were comparable between groups in early follow-up (mean difference, 0.2; 95% CI, -3.1 to 3.4; P = .92 [2 studies]) but were greater in the hydrogel spacer group in late follow-up (mean difference, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.8-8.0; P < .001 [2 studies]). Conclusions and Relevance For men receiving prostate radiotherapy, injection of a hydrogel spacer was safe, provided prostate-rectum separation sufficient to reduce v70 rectal irradiation, and was associated with fewer rectal toxic effects and higher bowel-related quality of life in late follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jason A. Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | | | - Heather A. Payne
- Oncology Department, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Woodward
- Health Economics and Market Access, Boston Scientific AG, Ecublens, Switzerland
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|