1
|
Xie J, Guo H, Dong B, Chen W, Jin C, Xu Q, Ding L, Liu W, Dong S, Zhao T, Yu Y, Guo C, Yao X, Peng B, Yang B. Olaparib Combined with Abiraterone versus Olaparib Monotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Progressing after Abiraterone and Harboring DNA Damage Repair Deficiency: A Multicenter Real-world Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00050-6. [PMID: 38458891 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Olaparib + abiraterone has a combined antitumor effect in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but the efficacy of this combination in patients with DNA damage repair (DDR)-deficient mCRPC progressing after abiraterone is unknown. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of olaparib + abiraterone versus olaparib monotherapy for patients with DDR-deficient mCRPC progressing after abiraterone. METHODS The study included 86 consecutive patients with DDR-deficient mCRPC progressing after abiraterone: 34 received olaparib + abiraterone, and 52 received olaparib monotherapy. DDR-deficient status was defined as the presence of a DDR gene with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (DDR-PV), or with a variant of unknown significance (DDR-VUS). We assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential factors influencing PFS and OS were compared between the treatment arms using Cox proportional-hazards models. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, the treatment effect across subgroups, and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Median follow-up was 9 mo. In the overall cohort, median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the combination arm than in the monotherapy arm (PFS: 6.0 vs 3.0 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.67; p < 0.01; OS: 25.0 vs 12.0 mo; HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.67; p < 0.01). PSA responses were significantly higher following combination therapy versus monotherapy. Combination therapy had significantly better efficacy in the DDR-PV and DDR-VUS subgroups, and was an independent predictor of better PFS and OS. AE rates were acceptable. The retrospective nature, small sample size, and short follow-up are limitations. CONCLUSIONS Olaparib + abiraterone resulted in better PFS and OS than olaparib alone for patients with DDR-deficient mCRPC progressing after abiraterone. These results need to be confirmed by a large-scale prospective randomized controlled trial. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study shows that the drug combination of olaparib plus abiraterone improved survival over abiraterone alone for patients who have mutations in genes affecting DNA repair and metastatic prostate cancer resistant to hormone therapy. The results provide evidence of a synergistic effect of the two drugs in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Xie
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai Clinical College, Fifth Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hanxu Guo
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Baijun Dong
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Chengqi Jin
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, China
| | - Qiufan Xu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wujianhong Liu
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengrong Dong
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tingting Zhao
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China; Research Institute, GloriousMed Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Changcheng Guo
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xudong Yao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai Clinical College, Fifth Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, China; Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, China.
| | - Bo Peng
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai Clinical College, Fifth Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, China; Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Bin Yang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Calabrese M, Saporita I, Turco F, Gillessen S, Castro E, Vogl UM, Di Stefano RF, Carfì FM, Poletto S, Farinea G, Tucci M, Buttigliero C. Synthetic Lethality by Co-Inhibition of Androgen Receptor and Polyadenosine Diphosphate-Ribose in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 25:78. [PMID: 38203248 PMCID: PMC10779404 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) and polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose inhibitors (PARPi) are part of the standard of care in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). There is biological evidence that the association of ARPI and PARPi could have a synergistic effect; therefore, several ongoing clinical trials are investigating the efficacy of this combination with preliminary results that are not perfectly concordant in identifying patients who can obtain the most benefit from this therapeutic option. The purpose of this review is to describe the PARPi mechanisms of action and to analyze the biological mechanisms behind the interplay between the androgen receptor and the PARPi system to better understand the rationale of the ARPI + PARPi combinations. Furthermore, we will summarize the preliminary results of the ongoing studies on these combinations, trying to understand in which patients to apply. Finally, we will discuss the clinical implications of this combination and its possible future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariangela Calabrese
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (M.C.); (I.S.); (F.T.); (R.F.D.S.); (F.M.C.); (S.P.); (G.F.)
| | - Isabella Saporita
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (M.C.); (I.S.); (F.T.); (R.F.D.S.); (F.M.C.); (S.P.); (G.F.)
| | - Fabio Turco
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (M.C.); (I.S.); (F.T.); (R.F.D.S.); (F.M.C.); (S.P.); (G.F.)
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale—Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland; (S.G.); (U.M.V.)
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale—Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland; (S.G.); (U.M.V.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Elena Castro
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Ursula Maria Vogl
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale—Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland; (S.G.); (U.M.V.)
| | - Rosario Francesco Di Stefano
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (M.C.); (I.S.); (F.T.); (R.F.D.S.); (F.M.C.); (S.P.); (G.F.)
| | - Federica Maria Carfì
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (M.C.); (I.S.); (F.T.); (R.F.D.S.); (F.M.C.); (S.P.); (G.F.)
| | - Stefano Poletto
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (M.C.); (I.S.); (F.T.); (R.F.D.S.); (F.M.C.); (S.P.); (G.F.)
| | - Giovanni Farinea
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (M.C.); (I.S.); (F.T.); (R.F.D.S.); (F.M.C.); (S.P.); (G.F.)
| | - Marcello Tucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, 14100 Asti, Italy;
| | - Consuelo Buttigliero
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (M.C.); (I.S.); (F.T.); (R.F.D.S.); (F.M.C.); (S.P.); (G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chao Z, Wang Z, Li L, Jiang Y, Tang Y, Wang Y, Hao X, Zhang C, Guo X, Yu W, Cheng F, Wang Z. Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:2198. [PMID: 38138301 PMCID: PMC10744677 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59122198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Context: Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported on the survival benefits of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) compared to standard-of-care (SOC) treatment (enzalutamide, abiraterone, or docetaxel) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is a limited integrated analysis of high-quality evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of PARPi and SOC treatments in this context. Objective: This study aims to comprehensively analyze the survival benefits and adverse events associated with PARPi and SOC treatments through a head-to-head meta-analysis in mCRPC. Evidence acquisition: A systematic review search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Clinical trials, and the Central Cochrane Registry in July 2023. RCTs were assessed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023441034). Evidence synthesis: A total of 8 studies, encompassing 2341 cases in the PARPi treatment arm and 1810 cases in the controlled arm, were included in the qualitative synthesis. The hazard ratio (HR) for radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.61-0.90) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80-0.99), respectively, in the intention-to-treatment patients. For subgroup analysis, HRs for rPFS and OS in the BRCA-mutated subgroup were 0.39 (95% CI, 0.28-0.55) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.38-0.99), while in the HRR-mutated subgroup, HR for rPFS was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.48-0.69) and for OS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64-0.93). The odds ratio (OR) for all grades of adverse events (AEs) and AEs with severity of at least grade 3 were 3.86 (95% CI, 2.53-5.90) and 2.30 (95% CI, 1.63-3.26), respectively. Conclusions: PARP inhibitors demonstrate greater effectiveness than SOC treatments in HRR/BRCA-positive patients with mCRPC. Further research is required to explore ways to reduce adverse event rates and investigate the efficacy of HRR/BRCA-negative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Chao
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; (Z.C.)
| | - Zefeng Wang
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Le Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; (Z.C.)
| | - Yi Jiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Yunxing Tang
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Yanan Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; (Z.C.)
| | - Xiaodong Hao
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; (Z.C.)
| | - Chunyu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; (Z.C.)
| | - Xiangdong Guo
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; (Z.C.)
| | - Weimin Yu
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Fan Cheng
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Zhihua Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; (Z.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Giesen A, Baekelandt L, Devlies W, Devos G, Dumez H, Everaerts W, Claessens F, Joniau S. Double trouble for prostate cancer: synergistic action of AR blockade and PARPi in non-HRR mutated patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1265812. [PMID: 37810962 PMCID: PMC10551452 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men worldwide. Despite better and more intensive treatment options in earlier disease stages, a large subset of patients still progress to metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Recently, poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors have been introduced in this setting. The TALAPRO-2 and PROpel trials both showed a marked benefit of PARPi in combination with an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI), compared with an ARSI alone in both the homologous recombination repair (HRR)-mutated, as well as in the HRR-non-mutated subgroup. In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of how maximal AR-blockade via an ARSI in combination with a PARPi has a synergistic effect at the molecular level, leading to synthetic lethality in both HRR-mutated and HRR-non-mutated PCa patients. PARP2 is known to be a cofactor of the AR complex, needed for decompacting the chromatin and start of transcription of AR target genes (including HRR genes). The inhibition of PARP thus reinforces the effect of an ARSI. The deep androgen deprivation caused by combining androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with an ARSI, induces an HRR-like deficient state, often referred to as "BRCA-ness". Further, PARPi will prevent the repair of single-strand DNA breaks, leading to the accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Due to the induced HRR-deficient state, DSBs cannot be repaired, leading to apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Giesen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Loïc Baekelandt
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wout Devlies
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Departments of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Catholic University Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gaëtan Devos
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Herlinde Dumez
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frank Claessens
- Departments of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Catholic University Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Departments of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Catholic University Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|