Transoesophageal left ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with permanent right ventricular pacing

Transesophageal left ventricular electrogram-recording and temporary pacing to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BV) is an established therapy for heart failure (HF) patients with inter- and intraventricular conduction delay. The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility of both transesophageal measurement of left ventricular (LV) electrical delay and transesophageal LV pacing prior to implantation, to better select patients for CRT. Esophageal TO8 Osypka catheter was perorally applied in 30 HF patients in position of maximum LV deflection to measure LV electrical delay and to study arterial pulse pressure (PP) during transesophageal bipolar LV pacing. There were 15 responders with a PP increase of a mean 65 ± 24 mmHg to 79 ± 27 mmHg (P < 0.001) and a mean LV electrical delay of 86.8 ± 33 ms. The 15 non-responders with poor PP increase of a mean 63.5 ± 23.5 mmHg to 64.1 ± 23.9 mmHg (P = 0.065) had a significantly smaller LV electrical delay of 36 ± 21 ms (P < 0.001). During a 34 ± 26 month CRT follow-up, the responders New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improved from 3.1 ± 0.35 to 2.1 ± 0.35 (P < 0.001). Determination of left ventricular electrical delay by transesophageal electrogram recording and transesophageal left ventricular pacing may be additional useful techniques to improve patient selection for CRT.

[CRT in atrial fibrillation--methodical and apparatus options in decision-making]

Heart failure and atrial fibrillation often coexist, especially with increasing degree of heart failure severity. Under this constellation, the advantage of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is still under discussion and displayed as an unresolved problem in the guidelines for cardiac stimulation and resynchronization. If ventricular desynchronization can be documented and response to CRT can be expected, the challenge is to interoperatively seek the best left ventricular electrode position and to postoperatively optimize the device in order to achieve the best therapy performance. This situation encourages the development of individualized methods and to utilize innovative apparatus features in order to consolidate individual decisions and to optimize CRT in heart failure with atrial fibrillation.

Transesophageal left ventricular posterior wall potential in heart failure patients with biventricular pacing / Transösophageales linksventrikuläres Potenzial der posterioren Wand bei Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz und biventrikulärer Stimulation

INTRODUCTION

Biventricular (BV) pacing is an established therapy for heart failure (HF) patients with intraventricular conduction delay, but not all patients improved clinically. We investigated the interventricular delay (IVD) by means of the transesophageal left ventricular posterior wall potential (LVPWP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS, AND RESULTS

A total of 18 HF patients (age 62+/-9 years; 15 males) with NYHA class 3.1+/-0.3, LV ejection fraction 22+/-7%, left bundle branch block and a QRS duration (QRSD) of 171+/-27 ms were analyzed using transesophageal LVPWP before implantation of a BV pacing device. The median follow up was 14+/-14 months. In 14 responders, IVD was 81+/-25 ms with a QRSD/IVD ratio of 2.2+/-0.3 with reclassification of NYHA class 3.1+/-0.3 to 2.0+/-0.5 (p<0.001) and an increase in LV ejection fraction from 22+/-7% to 36+/-11% (p=0.001) during long-term BV pacing. In four non-responders, transesophageal IVD was significantly smaller at 30+/-11 ms (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Transesophageal IVD may be a useful method to detect responders to BV pacing. Transesophageal LVPWP may be a simple and useful technique to detect clinical responders to BV pacing in HF patients.

Termination of atrial flutter by directed transesophageal atrial pacing during transesophageal echocardiography

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate termination of atrial flutter (AFL) by directed rapid transesophageal atrial pacing (TAP) with and without simultaneous transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) performed using a novel TEE tube electrode.

MATERIALS AND METHODS, AND RESULTS

A total of 16 AFL patients (age 63+/-12 years; 13 males) with mean AFL cycle length of 224+/-24 ms (n=12) and mean ventricular cycle length of 448+/-47 ms (n=12) were analyzed using either an esophageal TO electrode (n=10) or a novel TEE tube electrode consisting of a tube with four hemispherical electrodes that is pulled over the echo probe (n=6). AFL could be terminated by directed rapid TAP using an esophageal TO electrode, leading to induction of atrial fibrillation (AF) (n=6), induction of AF and spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm (SR) (n=3), and with conversion to SR (n=1). AFL could also be terminated by directed rapid TAP using the TEE tube electrode, with induction of AF (n=3) or induction of AF and spontaneous conversion to SR (n=3).

CONCLUSION

AFL can be terminated by directed rapid TAP with hemispherical electrodes with and without simultaneous TEE. TAP with the directed TEE tube electrode is a safe, simple, and useful method for terminating AFL.