1
|
Klooster D, Voetterl H, Baeken C, Arns M. Evaluating Robustness of Brain Stimulation Biomarkers for Depression: A Systematic Review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electroencephalography Studies. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 95:553-563. [PMID: 37734515 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) treatments have gained considerable attention as potential therapeutic intervention for psychiatric disorders. The identification of reliable biomarkers for predicting clinical response to NIBS has been a major focus of research in recent years. Neuroimaging techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been used to identify potential biomarkers that could predict response to NIBS. However, identifying clinically actionable brain biomarkers requires robustness. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the current state of brain biomarker research for NIBS in depression, focusing only on well-powered studies (N ≥ 88) and/or studies that aimed at independently replicating previous findings, either successfully or unsuccessfully. A total of 220 studies were initially identified, of which 18 MRI studies and 18 EEG studies met the inclusion criteria. All focused on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in depression. After reviewing the included studies, we found the following MRI and EEG biomarkers to be most robust: 1) functional MRI-based functional connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, 2) functional MRI-based network connectivity, 3) task-induced EEG frontal-midline theta, and 4) EEG individual alpha frequency. Future prospective studies should further investigate the clinical actionability of these specific EEG and MRI biomarkers to bring biomarkers closer to clinical reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debby Klooster
- Ghent Experimental Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; 4BRAIN Team, Department of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Care and Cure, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Helena Voetterl
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Chris Baeken
- Ghent Experimental Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Care and Cure, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Department of Psychiatry, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martijn Arns
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meijs H, Voetterl H, Sack AT, van Dijk H, De Wilde B, Van Hecke J, Niemegeers P, Gordon E, Luykx JJ, Arns M. A posterior-alpha ageing network is differentially associated with antidepressant effects of venlafaxine and rTMS. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2024; 79:7-16. [PMID: 38000196 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder, but chances for remission largely decrease with each failed treatment attempt. It is therefore desirable to assign a given patient to the most promising individual treatment option as early as possible. We used a polygenic score (PGS) informed electroencephalography (EEG) data-driven approach to identify potential predictors for MDD treatment outcome. Post-hoc we conducted exploratory analyses in order to understand the results in depth. First, an EEG independent component analysis produced 54 functional brain networks in a large heterogeneous cohort of psychiatric patients (n = 4,045; 5-84 yrs.). Next, the network that was associated to PGS for antidepressant-response (PRS-AR) in an independent sample (n = 722) was selected: an age-related posterior alpha network that explained >60 % of EEG variance, and was highly stable over recording time. Translational analyses were performed in two other independent datasets to examine if the network was predictive of psychopharmacotherapy (n = 535) and/or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and concomitant psychotherapy (PT; n = 186) outcome. The network predicted remission to venlafaxine (p = 0.015), resulting in a normalized positive predicted value (nPPV) of 138 %, and rTMS + PT - but in opposite direction for women (p = 0.002) relative to men (p = 0.018) - yielding a nPPV of 131 %. Blinded out-of-sample validations for venlafaxine (n = 29) and rTMS + PT (n = 36) confirmed the findings for venlafaxine, while results for rTMS + PT could not be replicated. These data suggest the existence of a relatively stable EEG posterior alpha aging network related to PGS-AR that has potential as MDD treatment predictor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Meijs
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena Voetterl
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander T Sack
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van Dijk
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bieke De Wilde
- Department of Psychiatry, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jan Van Hecke
- Department of Psychiatry, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Niemegeers
- Department of Psychiatry, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Evian Gordon
- Brain Resource Ltd, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Jurjen J Luykx
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Arns
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jensen KHR, Urdanibia-Centelles O, Dam VH, Köhler-Forsberg K, Frokjaer VG, Knudsen GM, Jørgensen MB, Ip CT. EEG abnormalities are not associated with poor antidepressant treatment outcome - A NeuroPharm study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2024; 79:59-65. [PMID: 38128462 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
EEG brain abnormalities, such as slowing and isolated epileptiform discharges (IEDs), has previously been associated with non-response to antidepressant treatment with escitalopram and venlafaxine, suggesting a potential need for treatment with anticonvulsant property in some patients. The current study aims to replicate the reported association of EEG abnormality and treatment outcomes in an open-label trial of escitalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD) and explore its relationship to mood and cognition. Pretreatment, 6 min eyes-closed resting-state 256-channel EEG was recorded in 91 patients with MDD (age 18-57) who were treated with 10-20 mg escitalopram for 12 weeks; patients could switch to duloxetine after four weeks. A certified clinical neurophysiologist rated the EEGs. IED and EEG slowing was seen in 13.2%, and in 6.6% there were findings with unclear significance (i.e., Wicket spikes and theta activity). We saw no group-difference in remission or response rates after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment or switching to duloxetine. Patients with EEG abnormalities had higher pretreatment mood disturbances driven by greater anger (p=.039) and poorer verbal memory (p=.012). However, EEG abnormality was not associated with improved mood or verbal memory after treatment. Our findings should be interpreted in light of the rarity of EEG abnormalities and the sample size. While we cannot confirm that EEG abnormalities are associated with non-response to treatment, including escitalopram, abnormal EEG activity is associated with poor mood and verbal memory. The clinical utility of EEG abnormality in antidepressant treatment selection needs careful evaluation before deciding if useful for clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian H Reveles Jensen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Olalla Urdanibia-Centelles
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke H Dam
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristin Köhler-Forsberg
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibe G Frokjaer
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gitte M Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau SAR, China
| | - Martin B Jørgensen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cheng T Ip
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prentice A, Barreiros AR, van der Vinne N, Stuiver S, van Dijk H, van Waarde JA, Korgaonkar M, Sack AT, Arns M. Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex Oscillatory Power Indexes Treatment-Resistance to Multiple Therapies in Major Depressive Disorder. Neuropsychobiology 2023; 82:373-383. [PMID: 37848013 DOI: 10.1159/000533853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) activity is proposed as a nonspecific prognostic marker for treatment response in major depressive disorder, independent of treatment modality. However, other studies report a negative association between baseline high rACC activation and treatment response. Interestingly, these contradictory findings were also found when focusing on oscillatory markers, specifically rACC-theta power. An explanation could be that rACC-theta activity dynamically changes according to number of previous treatment attempts and thus is mediated by level of treatment-resistance. METHODS Primarily, we analyzed differences in rACC- and frontal-theta activity in large national cross-sectional samples representing various levels of treatment-resistance and resistance to multimodal treatments in depressed patients (psychotherapy [n = 175], antidepressant medication [AD; n = 106], repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS; n = 196], and electroconvulsive therapy [ECT; n = 41]), and the respective difference between remitters and non-remitters. For exploratory purposes, we also investigated other frequency bands (delta, alpha, beta, gamma). RESULTS rACC-theta activity was higher (p < 0.001) in the more resistant rTMS and ECT patients relative to the less resistant psychotherapy and AD patients (psychotherapy-rTMS: d = 0.315; AD-rTMS: d = 0.320; psychotherapy-ECT: d = 1.031; AD-ECT: d = 1.034), with no difference between psychotherapy and AD patients. This association was even more pronounced after controlling for frontal-theta. Post hoc analyses also yielded effects for delta, beta, and gamma bands. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that by factoring in degree of treatment-resistance during interpretation of the rACC-theta biomarker, its usefulness in treatment selection and prognosis could potentially be improved substantially in future real-world practice. Future research should however also investigate specificity of the theta band.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amourie Prentice
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,
- Synaeda Research, Synaeda Psycho Medisch Centrum, Drachten, The Netherlands,
| | - Ana Rita Barreiros
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Brain Dynamics Centre, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nikita van der Vinne
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Synaeda Research, Synaeda Psycho Medisch Centrum, Drachten, The Netherlands
| | - Sven Stuiver
- Department of Psychiatry, Rijnstate Depression Centre, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van Dijk
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mayuresh Korgaonkar
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Brain Dynamics Centre, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander T Sack
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Arns
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shaygan M, Hosseini FA, Shemiran M, Hedayati A. The effect of mobile-based logotherapy on depression, suicidal ideation, and hopelessness in patients with major depressive disorder: a mixed-methods study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:15828. [PMID: 37740006 PMCID: PMC10516998 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43051-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Major depressive disorder is one of the most common psychiatric disorders in the world. It is essential to study and use effective, available, and affordable psychotherapy methods along with drug therapy to manage the symptoms of this disease. Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the effect of mobile phone-based logotherapy on depression, suicidal ideation, and hopelessness in patients with major depressive disorder by using a mixed-methods approach. In the first phase of this mixed-methods study, 70 patients completed the quantitative phase (control group = 35, intervention group = 35). The intervention group received an 8-week mobile-based logotherapy program via WhatsApp (one 180-min module per week) combined with sertraline, while the control group received just sertraline plus education about pharmacotherapy. Data was collected before, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months later using the Beck depression inventory short form items (BDI-13), the Beck hopelessness scale (BHS), and the Beck scale for suicide ideation (BSSI). Then, a qualitative study on the intervention group was conducted to explain the findings of the quantitative phase. The repeated measure MANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect of time and group on the set of dependent variables (F(6,63) = 25.218, P < 0.001). Qualitative analysis confirmed the efficacy of sertraline plus mobile-based logotherapy on depression, suicidal ideation, and hopelessness in the intervention group. Three key themes extracted from the participants' experiences of mobile-based logotherapy were "efficient instruction", "user-friendly intervention" and "constructive change". Mobile-based logotherapy through WhatsApp was an effective psychotherapy method for decreasing depression, hopelessness, and suicidal ideation in patients with major depressive disorder. It is suggested that educational, institutional, and technological infrastructure for providing and using mobile-based logotheapy for patients with major depressive disorder be considered in the mental health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Shaygan
- Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Fahimeh Alsadat Hosseini
- Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Marzieh Shemiran
- Student Research Committee, Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Arvin Hedayati
- Research Center for Psychiatry and Behavior Science, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Karvelis P, Paulus MP, Diaconescu AO. Individual differences in computational psychiatry: a review of current challenges. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2023; 148:105137. [PMID: 36940888 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Bringing precision to the understanding and treatment of mental disorders requires instruments for studying clinically relevant individual differences. One promising approach is the development of computational assays: integrating computational models with cognitive tasks to infer latent patient-specific disease processes in brain computations. While recent years have seen many methodological advancements in computational modelling and many cross-sectional patient studies, much less attention has been paid to basic psychometric properties (reliability and construct validity) of the computational measures provided by the assays. In this review, we assess the extent of this issue by examining emerging empirical evidence. We find that many computational measures suffer from poor psychometric properties, which poses a risk of invalidating previous findings and undermining ongoing research efforts using computational assays to study individual (and even group) differences. We provide recommendations for how to address these problems and, crucially, embed them within a broader perspective on key developments that are needed for translating computational assays to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Povilas Karvelis
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Martin P Paulus
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA; Oxley College of Health Sciences, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Andreea O Diaconescu
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jensen KHR, Dam VH, Ganz M, Fisher PM, Ip CT, Sankar A, Marstrand-Joergensen MR, Ozenne B, Osler M, Penninx BWJH, Pinborg LH, Frokjaer VG, Knudsen GM, Jørgensen MB. Deep phenotyping towards precision psychiatry of first-episode depression - the Brain Drugs-Depression cohort. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:151. [PMID: 36894940 PMCID: PMC9999625 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04618-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a heterogenous brain disorder, with potentially multiple psychosocial and biological disease mechanisms. This is also a plausible explanation for why patients do not respond equally well to treatment with first- or second-line antidepressants, i.e., one-third to one-half of patients do not remit in response to first- or second-line treatment. To map MDD heterogeneity and markers of treatment response to enable a precision medicine approach, we will acquire several possible predictive markers across several domains, e.g., psychosocial, biochemical, and neuroimaging. METHODS All patients are examined before receiving a standardised treatment package for adults aged 18-65 with first-episode depression in six public outpatient clinics in the Capital Region of Denmark. From this population, we will recruit a cohort of 800 patients for whom we will acquire clinical, cognitive, psychometric, and biological data. A subgroup (subcohort I, n = 600) will additionally provide neuroimaging data, i.e., Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Electroencephalogram, and a subgroup of patients from subcohort I unmedicated at inclusion (subcohort II, n = 60) will also undergo a brain Positron Emission Tomography with the [11C]-UCB-J tracer binding to the presynaptic glycoprotein-SV2A. Subcohort allocation is based on eligibility and willingness to participate. The treatment package typically lasts six months. Depression severity is assessed with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) at baseline, and 6, 12 and 18 months after treatment initiation. The primary outcome is remission (QIDS ≤ 5) and clinical improvement (≥ 50% reduction in QIDS) after 6 months. Secondary endpoints include remission at 12 and 18 months and %-change in QIDS, 10-item Symptom Checklist, 5-item WHO Well-Being Index, and modified Disability Scale from baseline through follow-up. We also assess psychotherapy and medication side-effects. We will use machine learning to determine a combination of characteristics that best predict treatment outcomes and statistical models to investigate the association between individual measures and clinical outcomes. We will assess associations between patient characteristics, treatment choices, and clinical outcomes using path analysis, enabling us to estimate the effect of treatment choices and timing on the clinical outcome. DISCUSSION The BrainDrugs-Depression study is a real-world deep-phenotyping clinical cohort study of first-episode MDD patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at clinicaltrials.gov November 15th, 2022 (NCT05616559).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Høj Reveles Jensen
- BrainDrugs, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke H Dam
- BrainDrugs, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melanie Ganz
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patrick MacDonald Fisher
- BrainDrugs, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cheng-Teng Ip
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau SAR, China
| | - Anjali Sankar
- BrainDrugs, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maja Rou Marstrand-Joergensen
- BrainDrugs, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Brice Ozenne
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Osler
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, Section of Epidemiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Brenda W J H Penninx
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lars H Pinborg
- BrainDrugs, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibe Gedsø Frokjaer
- BrainDrugs, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gitte Moos Knudsen
- BrainDrugs, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Balslev Jørgensen
- BrainDrugs, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zangen A, Zibman S, Tendler A, Barnea-Ygael N, Alyagon U, Blumberger DM, Grammer G, Shalev H, Gulevski T, Vapnik T, Bystritsky A, Filipčić I, Feifel D, Stein A, Deutsch F, Roth Y, George MS. Pursuing personalized medicine for depression by targeting the lateral or medial prefrontal cortex with Deep TMS. JCI Insight 2023; 8:165271. [PMID: 36692954 PMCID: PMC9977507 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.165271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDMajor depressive disorder (MDD) can benefit from novel interventions and personalization. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (Deep TMS) targeting the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) using the H1 coil was FDA cleared for treatment of MDD. However, recent preliminary data indicate that targeting the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) using the H7 coil might induce outcomes that are as good or even better. Here, we explored whether Deep TMS targeting the MPFC is noninferior to targeting the LPFC and whether electrophysiological or clinical markers for patient selection can be identified.METHODSThe present prospective, multicenter, randomized study enrolled 169 patients with MDD for whom antidepressants failed in the current episode. Patients were randomized to receive 24 Deep TMS sessions over 6 weeks, using either the H1 coil or the H7 coil. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to week 6 in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores.RESULTSClinical efficacy and safety profiles were similar and not significantly different between groups, with response rates of 60.9% for the H1 coil and 64.2% for the H7 coil. Moreover, brain activity measured by EEG during the first treatment session correlated with clinical outcomes in a coil-specific manner, and a cluster of baseline clinical symptoms was found to potentially distinguish between patients who can benefit from each Deep TMS target.CONCLUSIONThis study provides a treatment option for MDD, using the H7 coil, and initial guidance to differentiate between patients likely to respond to LPFC versus MPFC stimulation targets, which require further validation studies.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03012724.FUNDINGBrainsWay Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samuel Zibman
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Aron Tendler
- Advanced Mental Health Care Inc., Royal Palm Beach, Florida, USA
| | | | - Uri Alyagon
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Hadar Shalev
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Department of Psychiatry, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | | | - Tanya Vapnik
- Pacific Institute of Medical Research, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Igor Filipčić
- Psychiatric Hospital Sveti Ivan and School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - David Feifel
- Kadima Neuropsychiatry Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ahava Stein
- A. Stein - Regulatory Affairs Consulting Ltd, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | | | - Yiftach Roth
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Mark S George
- Medical University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cohen SE, Zantvoord JB, Wezenberg BN, Daams JG, Bockting CLH, Denys D, van Wingen GA. Electroencephalography for predicting antidepressant treatment success: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2023; 321:201-207. [PMID: 36341804 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) regularly experience non-response to treatment for their depressive episode. Personalized clinical decision making could shorten depressive episodes and reduce patient suffering. Although no clinical tools are currently available, machine learning analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) shows promise in treatment response prediction. METHODS With a systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the accuracy of EEG for individual patient response prediction. Importantly, we included only prediction studies that used cross-validation. We used a bivariate model to calculate prediction success, as expressed by area-under the curve, sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, we analyzed prediction success for separate antidepressant interventions. RESULTS 15 studies with 12 individual patient samples and a total of 479 patients were included. Research methods varied considerably between studies. Meta-analysis of results from this heterogeneous set of studies resulted in an area under the curve of 0.91, a sensitivity of 83 % (95 % CI 74-89 %), and a specificity of 86 % (95 % CI 81-90 %). Classification performance did not significantly differ between treatments. Although studies were all internally validated, no externally validated studies have been reported. We found substantial risk of bias caused by methodological shortcomings such as non-independent feature selection, though performance of non-biased studies was comparable. LIMITATIONS Sample sizes were relatively small and no study used external validation, increasing the risk of overestimation of accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Electroencephalography can predict the response to antidepressant treatment with high accuracy. However, future studies with more rigorous validation are needed to produce a clinical tool to guide interventions in MDD. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021268169.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S E Cohen
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J B Zantvoord
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B N Wezenberg
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J G Daams
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C L H Bockting
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Denys
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G A van Wingen
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Voetterl H, van Wingen G, Michelini G, Griffiths KR, Gordon E, DeBeus R, Korgaonkar MS, Loo SK, Palmer D, Breteler R, Denys D, Arnold LE, du Jour P, van Ruth R, Jansen J, van Dijk H, Arns M. Brainmarker-I Differentially Predicts Remission to Various Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treatments: A Discovery, Transfer, and Blinded Validation Study. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2023; 8:52-60. [PMID: 35240343 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by neurobiological heterogeneity, possibly explaining why not all patients benefit from a given treatment. As a means to select the right treatment (stratification), biomarkers may aid in personalizing treatment prescription, thereby increasing remission rates. METHODS The biomarker in this study was developed in a heterogeneous clinical sample (N = 4249) and first applied to two large transfer datasets, a priori stratifying young males (<18 years) with a higher individual alpha peak frequency (iAPF) to methylphenidate (N = 336) and those with a lower iAPF to multimodal neurofeedback complemented with sleep coaching (N = 136). Blinded, out-of-sample validations were conducted in two independent samples. In addition, the association between iAPF and response to guanfacine and atomoxetine was explored. RESULTS Retrospective stratification in the transfer datasets resulted in a predicted gain in normalized remission of 17% to 30%. Blinded out-of-sample validations for methylphenidate (n = 41) and multimodal neurofeedback (n = 71) corroborated these findings, yielding a predicted gain in stratified normalized remission of 36% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study introduces a clinically interpretable and actionable biomarker based on the iAPF assessed during resting-state electroencephalography. Our findings suggest that acknowledging neurobiological heterogeneity can inform stratification of patients to their individual best treatment and enhance remission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Voetterl
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Guido van Wingen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Giorgia Michelini
- Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Biological & Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kristi R Griffiths
- Brain Dynamics Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Roger DeBeus
- Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Asheville, Asheville, North Carolina
| | - Mayuresh S Korgaonkar
- Brain Dynamics Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sandra K Loo
- Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Rien Breteler
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Damiaan Denys
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L Eugene Arnold
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Health, Nisonger Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | - Jeanine Jansen
- Open Mind Neuroscience, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Eindhovens Psychologisch Instituut, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van Dijk
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Arns
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shaygan M, Hosseini FA, Negad SS. Temporal relationships between changes in depression and suicidal ideation: A mediation analysis in a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Psychol Psychother 2022; 96:364-382. [PMID: 36563040 DOI: 10.1111/papt.12444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a considerable debate regarding the possible dependence between depression and suicidal ideation treatments. The present study used a novel mediation approach in a randomized comparison of pharmacotherapy and combined therapy to explore whether depressive symptoms mediate the association between treatment and suicidal ideation and whether it depends on the treatment condition. DESIGN This study is a randomized, controlled, parallel group (1:1), clinical trial using a novel mediation approach for longitudinal data. Latent difference score modelling was utilized to investigate whether changes in depressive symptoms drive subsequent changes in suicide ideation. METHOD Participants were 94 depressive suicidal outpatients who were assessed regarding depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation over the course of an experiment (0-2-7 months). Direct and indirect associations between (change in) depressive symptoms and (change in) suicidal ideation were explored using Pearson's correlations and latent difference score model. RESULTS The results showed that depression treatment affects not only suicidal ideation directly but also its influence on suicidal ideation occurs via improvement in depressive symptoms. It was found a more significant effect of combining pharmacotherapy and PPT (in comparison with the pharmacotherapy alone) on the early and late improvements of suicidal ideation (Δ 0-2 and Δ 2-7) via the early improvement of depressive symptoms (Δ 0-2). CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate that changes in depressive symptoms preceded changes in suicidal ideation. Our results highlighted that improving depressive symptoms could be a primary target in treating patients with depression experiencing suicidal thoughts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Shaygan
- Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Alsadat Hosseini
- Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Karvelis P, Charlton CE, Allohverdi SG, Bedford P, Hauke DJ, Diaconescu AO. Computational approaches to treatment response prediction in major depression using brain activity and behavioral data: A systematic review. Netw Neurosci 2022; 6:1066-1103. [PMID: 38800454 PMCID: PMC11117101 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Major depressive disorder is a heterogeneous diagnostic category with multiple available treatments. With the goal of optimizing treatment selection, researchers are developing computational models that attempt to predict treatment response based on various pretreatment measures. In this paper, we review studies that use brain activity data to predict treatment response. Our aim is to highlight and clarify important methodological differences between various studies that relate to the incorporation of domain knowledge, specifically within two approaches delineated as data-driven and theory-driven. We argue that theory-driven generative modeling, which explicitly models information processing in the brain and thus can capture disease mechanisms, is a promising emerging approach that is only beginning to be utilized in treatment response prediction. The predictors extracted via such models could improve interpretability, which is critical for clinical decision-making. We also identify several methodological limitations across the reviewed studies and provide suggestions for addressing them. Namely, we consider problems with dichotomizing treatment outcomes, the importance of investigating more than one treatment in a given study for differential treatment response predictions, the need for a patient-centered approach for defining treatment outcomes, and finally, the use of internal and external validation methods for improving model generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Povilas Karvelis
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Colleen E. Charlton
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shona G. Allohverdi
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Bedford
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel J. Hauke
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andreea O. Diaconescu
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Department of Psychiatry, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Song Y, Huang C, Zhong Y, Wang X, Tao G. Abnormal Reginal Homogeneity in Left Anterior Cingulum Cortex and Precentral Gyrus as a Potential Neuroimaging Biomarker for First-Episode Major Depressive Disorder. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:924431. [PMID: 35722559 PMCID: PMC9199967 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.924431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective There is no objective method to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). This study explored the neuroimaging biomarkers using the support vector machine (SVM) method for the diagnosis of MDD. Methods 52 MDD patients and 45 healthy controls (HCs) were involved in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scanning. Imaging data were analyzed with the regional homogeneity (ReHo) and SVM methods. Results Compared with HCs, MDD patients showed increased ReHo in the left anterior cingulum cortex (ACC) and decreased ReHo in the left precentral gyrus (PG). No correlations were detected between the ReHo values and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) scores. The SVM results showed a diagnostic accuracy of 98.96% (96/97). Increased ReHo in the left ACC, and decreased ReHo in the left PG were illustrated, along with a sensitivity of 98.07%(51/52) and a specificity of100% (45/45). Conclusion Our results suggest that abnormal regional neural activity in the left ACC and PG may play a key role in the pathophysiological process of first-episode MDD. Moreover, the combination of ReHo values in the left ACC and precentral gyrusmay serve as a neuroimaging biomarker for first-episode MDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Song
- Nanning Fifth People's Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Chunyan Huang
- Department of Cardiology, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan Third Hospital), Wuhan, China
| | - Yi Zhong
- Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), Beijing, China
| | - Xi Wang
- Department of Mental Health, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arns M, van Dijk H, Luykx JJ, van Wingen G, Olbrich S. Stratified psychiatry: Tomorrow's precision psychiatry? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2022; 55:14-19. [PMID: 34768212 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.10.863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Here we review the paradigm-change from one-size-fits-all psychiatry to more personalized-psychiatry, where we distinguish between 'precision psychiatry' and 'stratified psychiatry'. Using examples in Depression and ADHD we argue that stratified psychiatry, using biomarkers to facilitate patients to best 'on-label' treatments, is a more realistic future for implementing biomarkers in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn Arns
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van Dijk
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Luykx
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Translational Neuroscience, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Outpatient second opinion clinic, GGNet Mental Health, Warnsveld, Netherlands
| | - Guido van Wingen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Olbrich
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Automated diagnosis of depression from EEG signals using traditional and deep learning approaches: A comparative analysis. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbe.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
16
|
Zwienenberg L, Iseger TA, Dijkstra E, Rouwhorst R, van Dijk H, Sack AT, Arns M. Neuro-cardiac guided rTMS as a stratifying method between the '5cm' and 'BeamF3' stimulation clusters. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:1070-1072. [PMID: 34298198 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Zwienenberg
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Synaeda Psycho Medisch Centrum, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Tabitha A Iseger
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Dijkstra
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Neurowave, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renée Rouwhorst
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; NeuroCare, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van Dijk
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Location AMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander T Sack
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Arns
- Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Location AMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Prediction of drug response in major depressive disorder using ensemble of transfer learning with convolutional neural network based on EEG. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbe.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|