1
|
Logullo P, van Zuuren EJ, Winchester CC, Tovey D, Gattrell WT, Price A, Harrison N, Goldman K, Chisholm A, Walters K, Blazey P. ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) explanation and elaboration: Guidance and examples to support reporting consensus methods. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004390. [PMID: 38709851 PMCID: PMC11198995 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When research evidence is limited, inconsistent, or absent, healthcare decisions and policies need to be based on consensus amongst interested stakeholders. In these processes, the knowledge, experience, and expertise of health professionals, researchers, policymakers, and the public are systematically collected and synthesised to reach agreed clinical recommendations and/or priorities. However, despite the influence of consensus exercises, the methods used to achieve agreement are often poorly reported. The ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) guideline was developed to help report any consensus methods used in biomedical research, regardless of the health field, techniques used, or application. This explanatory document facilitates the use of the ACCORD checklist. METHODS AND FINDINGS This paper was built collaboratively based on classic and contemporary literature on consensus methods and publications reporting their use. For each ACCORD checklist item, this explanation and elaboration document unpacks the pieces of information that should be reported and provides a rationale on why it is essential to describe them in detail. Furthermore, this document offers a glossary of terms used in consensus exercises to clarify the meaning of common terms used across consensus methods, to promote uniformity, and to support understanding for consumers who read consensus statements, position statements, or clinical practice guidelines. The items are followed by examples of reporting items from the ACCORD guideline, in text, tables and figures. CONCLUSIONS The ACCORD materials - including the reporting guideline and this explanation and elaboration document - can be used by anyone reporting a consensus exercise used in the context of health research. As a reporting guideline, ACCORD helps researchers to be transparent about the materials, resources (both human and financial), and procedures used in their investigations so readers can judge the trustworthiness and applicability of their results/recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Logullo
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, and EQUATOR Network UK Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Christopher C. Winchester
- Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David Tovey
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Amy Price
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice (TDI), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA, previously at Stanford Anesthesia, Informatics and Media Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | | | - Keith Goldman
- Global Medical Affairs, AbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | | | | | - Paul Blazey
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vandekerkhove G, Giri VN, Halabi S, McNair C, Hamade K, Bitting RL, Wyatt AW. Toward Informed Selection and Interpretation of Clinical Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300654. [PMID: 38547422 PMCID: PMC10994438 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical genomic testing of patient germline, tumor tissue, or plasma cell-free DNA can enable a personalized approach to cancer management and treatment. In prostate cancer (PCa), broad genotyping tests are now widely used to identify germline and/or somatic alterations in BRCA2 and other DNA damage repair genes. Alterations in these genes can confer cancer sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, are linked with poor prognosis, and can have potential hereditary cancer implications for family members. However, there is huge variability in genomic tests and reporting standards, meaning that for successful implementation of testing in clinical practice, end users must carefully select the most appropriate test for a given patient and critically interpret the results. In this white paper, we outline key pre- and post-test considerations for choosing a genomic test and evaluating reported variants, specifically for patients with advanced PCa. Test choice must be based on clinical context and disease state, availability and suitability of tumor tissue, and the genes and regions that are covered by the test. We describe strategies to recognize false positives or negatives in test results, including frameworks to assess low tumor fraction, subclonal alterations, clonal hematopoiesis, and pathogenic versus nonpathogenic variants. We assume that improved understanding among health care professionals and researchers of the nuances associated with genomic testing will ultimately lead to optimal patient care and clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Veda N. Giri
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalampokis N, Zabaftis C, Spinos T, Karavitakis M, Leotsakos I, Katafigiotis I, van der Poel H, Grivas N, Mitropoulos D. Review on the Role of BRCA Mutations in Genomic Screening and Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1162-1169. [PMID: 38534919 PMCID: PMC10969585 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Somatic and germline alterations can be commonly found in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The aim of our present study was to perform a comprehensive review of the current literature in order to examine the impact of BRCA mutations in the context of PCa as well as their significance as genetic biomarkers. (2) Methods: A narrative review of all the available literature was performed. Only "landmark" publications were included. (3) Results: Overall, the number of PCa patients who harbor a BRCA2 mutation range between 1.2% and 3.2%. However, BRCA2 and BRCA1 mutations are responsible for most cases of hereditary PCa, increasing the risk by 3-8.6 times and up to 4 times, respectively. These mutations are correlated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. Gene testing should be offered to patients with metastatic PCa, those with 2-3 first-degree relatives with PCa, or those aged < 55 and with one close relative with breast (age ≤ 50 years) or invasive ovarian cancer. (4) Conclusions: The individualized assessment of BRCA mutations is an important tool for the risk stratification of PCa patients. It is also a population screening tool which can guide our risk assessment strategies and achieve better results for our patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Kalampokis
- Department of Urology, G. Hatzikosta General Hospital, 45001 Ioannina, Greece;
| | - Christos Zabaftis
- Department of Laparoscopy and Endourology, Central Urology, Lefkos Stavros the Athens Clinic, PC 11528 Athens, Greece; (C.Z.); (M.K.); (I.L.); (I.K.)
| | - Theodoros Spinos
- Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece;
| | - Markos Karavitakis
- Department of Laparoscopy and Endourology, Central Urology, Lefkos Stavros the Athens Clinic, PC 11528 Athens, Greece; (C.Z.); (M.K.); (I.L.); (I.K.)
| | - Ioannis Leotsakos
- Department of Laparoscopy and Endourology, Central Urology, Lefkos Stavros the Athens Clinic, PC 11528 Athens, Greece; (C.Z.); (M.K.); (I.L.); (I.K.)
| | - Ioannis Katafigiotis
- Department of Laparoscopy and Endourology, Central Urology, Lefkos Stavros the Athens Clinic, PC 11528 Athens, Greece; (C.Z.); (M.K.); (I.L.); (I.K.)
| | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Nikolaos Grivas
- Department of Laparoscopy and Endourology, Central Urology, Lefkos Stavros the Athens Clinic, PC 11528 Athens, Greece; (C.Z.); (M.K.); (I.L.); (I.K.)
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Dionysios Mitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 14122 Athens, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bataba E, Babcock K, Isensee KA, Eldhose B, Kohaar I, Chesnut GT, Dobi A. Germline Mutations and Ancestry in Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:175-180. [PMID: 38265515 PMCID: PMC10891190 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01493-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed non-cutaneous malignancy of men in the USA; notably, the incidence is higher among men of African, followed by European and Asian ancestry. Germline mutations and, in particular, mutations in DNA damage repair genes (DDRGs) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. This review intends to discuss the implication of ancestry on prostate cancer, specifically in regard to lack of diversity in genomic and genetic databases and the ability of providers to properly counsel patients on the significance of cancer genetic results. RECENT FINDINGS Ancestral differences in prostate cancer-associated DDRG germline mutations are increasingly recognized. Guidelines for treatment by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) support germline testing in certain patients, and a myriad of genetic testing panels for DDRG mutations are now available in clinical practice. However, the consensus among providers on what genes and mutations to include in the genetic tests has evolved from experience from men of European ancestry (EA). Gaps in ancestry-informed clinical practice exist in genetic risk assessment, implementation of screening, counseling, guiding recommendations, treatment, and clinical trial enrollment. The lack of diversity in tumor genomic and genetic databases may hinder ancestry-specific disease-predisposing alterations from being discovered and targeted in prostate cancer and, therefore, impede the ability of providers to accurately counsel patients on the significance of cancer genetic test results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eudoxie Bataba
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA
| | - Kevin Babcock
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA
| | - Kathryn A Isensee
- School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
| | - Binil Eldhose
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 6720A Rockledge Drive Suite 300, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA
- Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA
| | - Indu Kohaar
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 6720A Rockledge Drive Suite 300, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA
- Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA
- Cancer Biomarkers Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Gregory T Chesnut
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 6720A Rockledge Drive Suite 300, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA
| | - Albert Dobi
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 6720A Rockledge Drive Suite 300, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA.
- Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA.
| |
Collapse
|