1
|
Massari M, O'Malley P, Benidir T, Su LM, Gao H, Crispen PL. Efficacy of BCG for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer following nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:289.e7-289.e12. [PMID: 38802293 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of intravesical (IVe) Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) to treat non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrences in patients who have previously undergone nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for UTUC from 2009 to 2021. Patients who subsequently developed NMIBC treated with transurethral resection followed by IVe BCG were included in the study group. A control cohort was formed by retrospective review of patents with primary NMIBC treated with BCG during the same period. Patients in the control cohort were matched by stage of bladder cancer at a 2:1 ratio of control to study subjects. Demographic data, pathology of bladder tumors prior to and following BCG, use of maintenance BCG (mBCG), time to recurrence, time to progression, progression to cystectomy, and progression to metastatic disease were collected on all patients. Descriptive statistics were utilized to compare the 2 groups. The primary outcome was progression to muscle invasive disease. Secondary outcomes included intravesical recurrence free survival, disease free survival, and progression to metastatic disease. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to elucidate independent variables associated with bladder tumor recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of prior UTUC on time to bladder tumor recurrence. RESULTS One-hundred and ninety-one patients underwent nephroureterectomy at our institution from 2009 to 2021 for UTUC. Twenty-five patients were identified to have subsequently developed NMIBC recurrences treated with inductions BCG. The control group was comprised of 50 patients with primary NMIBC matched by stage of bladder cancer for which BCG was indicated in the study group. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was significantly longer in the control group relative to the study group (64.8 [50.1-85.6] vs 25 months [17-35]; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in demographics between the study and control groups. The rate of progression to muscle invasive disease was 17% vs 0% in the study group and control group respectively (P = 0.0521). History of UTUC was associated with increased risk of intravesical bladder tumor recurrence post BCG on multivariable analysis (HR 2.5; P = 0.017) and Kaplan Meier survival analysis (P = 0.039). The mean time to bladder tumor recurrence after treatment with BCG was significantly worse in the study group at (7.9 vs. 23.9 months; P = 0.0322). Similarly, the rate of progression to metastatic disease was worse in the study group (24% vs 2%; P = 0.0047). Overall disease-free survival was also noted to be significantly worse on Kaplan Meier survival analysis in the study group (P = 0.0074). No statistically significant differences in the stage grade of bladder tumor recurrence, grade of bladder tumor recurrence, or rate of progression to cystectomy were identified. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests reduced efficacy of BCG for NMIBC in patients with a history of UTUC. Patients in this population should be counseled accordingly. Research into alternative treatments for bladder tumor recurrence and more aggressive prophylactic regimens after nephroureterectomy for prevention of bladder tumor recurrence in this population is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Massari
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610.
| | - Padraic O'Malley
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| | - Tarik Benidir
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| | - Li-Ming Su
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| | - Hanzhi Gao
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| | - Paul L Crispen
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Wu Q, Warrick JI, DeGraff DJ, Raman JD, Truong H, Chen G. Clinicopathological risk factors associated with tumor relapse of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: A single institution 20-year experience. Ann Diagn Pathol 2024; 73:152357. [PMID: 38941945 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2024.152357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare yet aggressive malignancy. While radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the cornerstone treatment, UTUC has high local and metastatic relapse rates, leading to a dismal prognosis. To identify the clinicopathological factors associated with an increased risk of local and metastatic relapse in UTUC, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 133 consecutive UTUC patients who underwent RNU from 1998 to 2018. Patients lost to follow-up or with a history of bladder cancer were excluded from the study. The remaining 87 patients were categorized into two subgroups: those with tumor recurrence/relapse (40 cases) and those without recurrence/relapse (47 cases). Clinical and pathological characteristics were compared across the two groups. Multiple factors are associated with UTUC recurrence/relapse including larger tumor size, histology divergent differentiations/subtypes, high tumor grade, advanced pathologic T stage, positive margin, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), positive lymph node status, and preoperative hydronephrosis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that squamous differentiation predicted recurrence/relapse (p = 0.012), independent of tumor stage. Moreover, compared to the conventional histology type, UTUC with squamous differentiation had a significantly higher relapse rate (p = 0.0001) and poorer survival (p = 0.0039). This observation was further validated in invasive high-grade UTUC cases. Our findings suggest that many pathological factors contribute to UTUC recurrence/relapse, particularly, squamous differentiation may serve as an independent risk predictor for relapse and a potent prognosticator for adverse cancer-specific survival in UTUC patients. Recognizing and thoroughly assessing the pathological factors is essential for better oncologic management of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Qingqing Wu
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Joshua I Warrick
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America; Department of Urology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - David J DeGraff
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America; Department of Urology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Hong Truong
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Guoli Chen
- Department of Pathology, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chou SF, Lin WC, Chang H, Huang CP. Safety and oncological outcome of early intraoperative intravesicle mitomycin C vs. deferred instillation in patients receiving robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy. Front Surg 2024; 11:1366982. [PMID: 38726470 PMCID: PMC11079113 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1366982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radical nephroureterectomy with concurrent bladder cuff excision (RNUBCE) is the gold standard surgical approach for high-risk primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Given the notably high incidence of bladder tumor recurrence following this procedure, this study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of intraoperative mitomycin-C (MMC) instillation vs. deferred instillation on overall oncological outcomes following robot-assisted RNUBCE. Methods This is a retrospective chart review study. Patients with non-invasive (N0, not T3/T4) UTUC who underwent robotic RNUBCE combined an intraoperative MMC instillation or a deferred MMC instillation after surgery at a medical center in Taiwan between November 2013 and June 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with prior bladder UC, carcinomas of other origins, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and had undergone kidney transplantation were excluded. All surgeries were executed by a single surgical team under the guidance of the same surgeon. The primary outcomes was the risk of bladder tumor recurrence between patients received intraoperative (IO) vs. deferred MMC instillation postoperatively (PO) during one-year follow-up. The secondary outcome was postoperative adverse events assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between study variables and the outcomes. Results A total of 54 patients were included in the analysis. 12 (22.2%) patients experienced a bladder tumor recurrence during follow-up (IO: 7.7%, PO: 35.7%, p < 0.021). After adjustment in the multivariable, intraoperative MMC instillation was significantly associated with lower risk of bladder recurrence [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.81, p = 0.028]. No MMC-related Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV adverse events were found in either group. Conclusion IIntraoperative MMC instillation is safe and associated with a lower bladder tumor recurrence risk in patients undergoing robotic RNUBCE for UTUC than deferred instillation. Future large, prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng-Feng Chou
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ching Lin
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Han Chang
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li C, Lu B, Zhao Q, Lu Q, Wang J, Sun P, Xu H, Huang B. Development and validation of a clinical and ultrasound features-based nomogram for preoperative differentiation of renal urothelial carcinoma and central renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 2024; 42:227. [PMID: 38598055 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04935-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to develop and validate an ultrasound (US)-based nomogram for the preoperative differentiation of renal urothelial carcinoma (rUC) from central renal cell carcinoma (c-RCC). METHODS Clinical data and US images of 655 patients with 655 histologically confirmed malignant renal tumors (521 c-RCCs and 134 rUCs) were collected and divided into training (n = 455) and validation (n = 200) cohorts according to examination dates. Conventional US and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) tumor features were analyzed to determine those that could discriminate rUC from c-RCC. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied to screen clinical and US features for the differentiation of rUC from c-RCC. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, a diagnostic model of rUC was constructed and visualized as a nomogram. The diagnostic model's performance was assessed in the training and validation cohorts by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plot. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical usefulness of the US-based nomogram. RESULTS Seven features of both clinical features and ultrasound imaging were selected to build the diagnostic model. The nomogram achieved favorable discrimination in the training (AUC = 0.996, 95% CI: 0.993-0.999) and validation (AUC = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.974, 1.000) cohorts, and good calibration (Brier scores: 0.019 and 0.016, respectively). DCA demonstrated the clinical usefulness of the US-based nomogram. CONCLUSION A noninvasive clinical and US-based nomogram combining conventional US and CEUS features possesses good predictive value for differentiating rUC from c-RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuixian Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, No. 180 of Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Beilei Lu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qing Zhao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qing Lu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jingjing Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Pei Sun
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Huixiong Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, No. 180 of Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Beijian Huang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, No. 180 of Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen CY, Chang CH, Yang CR, Hsieh KL, Tsing WH, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Huang CY, Hong JH, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Tsai YC, Wu SY, Shen CH, Cheong IS, Chen CS, Yang CK, Jiang YH, Tsai CY, Hsueh TY, Chen YT, Wu CC, Lo SH, Chiang BJ, Lin WY, Lin PH, Tai TY, Li WM, Lee HY. Prognostic factors of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2024; 42:22. [PMID: 38197890 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04700-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate predictive factors of increasing intravesical recurrence (IVR) rate in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after receiving radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) with bladder cuff excision (BCE). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 2114 patients were included from the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group. It was divided into two groups: IVR-free and IVR after RNUx, with 1527 and 587 patients, respectively. To determine the factors affecting IVR, TNM stage, the usage of pre-operative ureteroscopy, and pathological outcomes were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate the rates of prognostic outcomes in overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), and the survival curves were compared using the stratified log-rank test. RESULTS Based on our research, ureter tumor, female, smoking history, age (< 70 years old), multifocal tumor, history of bladder cancer were determined to increase the risk of IVR after univariate analysis. The multivariable analysis revealed that female (BRFS for male: HR 0.566, 95% CI 0.469-0.681, p < 0.001), ureter tumor (BRFS: HR 1.359, 95% CI 1.133-1.631, p = 0.001), multifocal (BRFS: HR 1.200, 95% CI 1.001-1.439, p = 0.049), history of bladder cancer (BRFS: HR 1.480, 95% CI 1.118-1.959, p = 0.006) were the prognostic factors for IVR. Patients who ever received ureterorenoscopy (URS) did not increase the risk of IVR. CONCLUSION Patients with ureter tumor and previous bladder UC history are important factors to increase the risk of IVR after RNUx. Pre-operative URS manipulation is not associated with higher risk of IVR and diagnostic URS is feasible especially for insufficient information of image study. More frequent surveillance regimen may be needed for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Ya Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Rei Yang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Lin Hsieh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsin Tsing
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Science, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Hua Hong
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Yu Wu
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Huang Shen
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
- Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Kuang Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Divisions of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hsiu Lo
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hung Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Yao Tai
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ortner G, Somani BK, Güven S, Kitzbichler G, Traxer O, Giusti G, Proietti S, Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P, Ulvik Ø, Goumas IK, Duvdevani M, Baard J, Kamphuis GM, Ferretti S, Dragos L, Villa L, Miernik A, Tailly T, Pietropaolo A, Hamri SB, Papatsoris A, Gözen AS, Herrmann TRW, Nagele U, Tokas T. Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) group. World J Urol 2023; 41:3367-3376. [PMID: 37777981 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04632-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To highlight and compare experts' laser settings during endoscopic laser treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), to identify measures to reduce complications, and to propose guidance for endourologists. METHODS Following a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, a survey was sent to laser experts. We asked participants for typical settings during specific scenarios (ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous treatment). These settings were compared among the reported laser types to find common settings and limits. Additionally, we identified preventive measures commonly applied during surgery. RESULTS Twenty experts completed the survey, needing a mean time of 12.7 min. Overall, most common laser type was Holmium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (70%, 14/20) followed by Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (45%, 9/20), pulsed Thulium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (3/20, 15%), and continuous wave (cw)Tm:YAG (1/20, 5%). Pulse energy for the treatment of distal ureteral tumors was significantly different with median settings of 0.9 J, 1 J and 0.45 J for Ho:YAG, TFL and pulsed Tm:YAG, respectively (p = 0.048). During URS and RIRS, pulse shapes were significantly different, with Ho:YAG being used in long pulse and TFL in short pulse mode (all p < 0.05). We did not find further disparities. CONCLUSION Ho:YAG is used by most experts, while TFL is the most promising alternative. Laser settings largely do not vary significantly. However, further research with novel lasers is necessary to define the optimal approach. With the recent introduction of small caliber and more flexible scopes, minimal-invasive UTUC treatment is further undergoing an extension of applicability in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gernot Ortner
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
| | - Bhaskar Kumar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England
| | - Selcuk Güven
- Department of Urology, Meram School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Gerhard Kitzbichler
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Olivier Traxer
- Sorbonne University, GRC n°20 Lithiase Renale, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Mordechai Duvdevani
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Ein-Kerem University Hospital, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guido M Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefania Ferretti
- Department of Urology, Hospital and University of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Laurian Dragos
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luca Villa
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Arkadiusz Miernik
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tailly
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Amelia Pietropaolo
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England
| | - Saeed Bin Hamri
- Urology Department at Specialized Medical Center SMC2, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ali Serdar Gözen
- Department of Urology, Medius Kliniken, Ruit, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Thomas R W Herrmann
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Department of Urology, Kantonspital Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Udo Nagele
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gottlieb J, Linehan J, Murray KS. Advances in chemoablation in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: overview of indications and treatment patterns. Transl Androl Urol 2023; 12:1449-1455. [PMID: 37814691 PMCID: PMC10560338 DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a difficult disease for clinicians to treat, due to the multitude of oncological and patient factors to consider. Despite the challenges of diagnostic staging, endoscopic management, and disease recurrence, there is still a need for local therapeutic options that do not subject patients to the morbidities of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Intraluminal chemotherapies have allowed for improved oncological control in patients with low-grade disease receiving renal-sparing treatment approaches. This narrative review discusses the treatment modalities available for localized low-grade UTUC, with a focus on the current status of chemoablation. The OLYMPUS trial was a pivotal study that lead to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of UGN-101 (mitomycin-C) in April 2020 for the treatment of low-grade UTUC, and intraluminal chemotherapy is now a widely used modality for managing this disease. The trial reported a complete response (CR) rate of 59%, and an estimated treatment durability of 82% at 1 year. However, a concern was the reported 44% ureteral stricture rate using the retrograde approach. More research is currently underway to determine the ideal instillation method for intraluminal therapies (e.g., retrograde vs. antegrade). Lastly, we discuss upcoming treatment options. Newer novel agents like padeliporfin vascular targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy (brand name TOOKAD) are currently being studied, which will in hope provide additional treatment options for UTUC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Gottlieb
- Department of Urologic Oncology, St. John’s Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Linehan
- Department of Urologic Oncology, St. John’s Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Katie S. Murray
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|