Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison

Urinary stone assessment in a single-phase may replace the unenhanced and multiphase computed tomography protocol in painless visible haematuria

OBJECTIVE

Painless visible haematuria (VH) necessitates a computed tomography (CT) usually consisting of one unenhanced and two to three contrast enhanced acquisitions to detect urinary tract stones and malignancy. Recently, we demonstrated that a single nephrographic phase (NP) CT sufficed in detecting malignancy in patients with painless VH. Now, we aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of single NP CT in stone detection and size measurements in the same cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

"A Prospective Trial for Examining Haematuria using Computed Tomography" (PROTEHCT) was a single-center prospective diagnostic study in patients with painless VH between September 2019 and June 2021. All underwent four-phase CT (reference standard) from which a single NP CT (experimental) was extracted. Two randomised readers independently assessed the experimental CT for urinary stones and size. Statistical analysis included diagnostic accuracies and inter-reader agreement (kappa) of experimental CT, and size correlation (Spearman's ρ) between experimental CT and reference standard.

RESULTS

In 308 included patients (median age: 68 years, 250 males), urinary stones (median size 5 mm) were diagnosed in 21%. The per-patient experimental CT sensitivity was 86% (97% for stones ≥ 5 mm), specificity was 98% and accuracy was 96%. The experimental CT sensitivity for detecting kidney stones was 78% (89% for stones ≥ 5 mm), and 100% for bladder and ureteral stones. No missed stone required active treatment. The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect (96%, k = 0.85). The correlation in stone size was very strong (ρ = 0.91).  Conclusions: A single NP CT is sufficient in detecting and measuring urinary stones in patients with painless VH.

Is the excretory phase necessary to identify upper tract urothelial neoplasms at CT urography? A 10-year population-based study

PURPOSE

To assess the proportion of upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC) that are evident without the excretory phase at CT urography (CTU), and the proportion of potentially avoidable radiation.

METHODS

UTUCs diagnosed between January 2008-December 2017 were retrospectively identified from a population-based cancer registry. For each patient, US, non-urographic CT, and MRI exams were assessed for a primary mass and secondary imaging findings (hydronephrosis, urinary tract thickening, luminal distention, fat stranding, and lymphadenopathy/metastatic disease). CTUs were assessed for primary and secondary findings, and whether the tumor was evident as a filling defect on excretory phase. The dose-length product (DLP) of potentially avoidable excretory phases was calculated as a fraction of total DLP.

RESULTS

288 patients (mean age, 72±11 years, 165 males) and 545 imaging examinations were included. Of 192 patients imaged with 370 non-urographic CTs, a primary mass was evident in 154 (80.2%), secondary findings were evident in 172 (89.6%), and primary or secondary findings were evident in 179 (93.2%). Of 175 CTUs, primary and secondary findings were evident in 157 (89.7%) and 166 (94.9%) examinations, respectively, and primary or secondary findings were evident in 170/175 (97.1%). 131/175 (74.9%) UTUCs were evident as a filling defect, including the 5/175 (2.9%) UTUCs without primary or secondary findings. Of 144 CTUs with available DLP data, the proportion of potentially avoidable radiation was 103.7/235.8 (44.0%) Gy⋅cm.

CONCLUSION

In our population, almost all UTUCs were evident via primary or secondary imaging findings without requiring the excretory phase. These results support streamlining protocols and pathways.

Computed tomography for visible haematuria - a single nephrographic phase is sufficient for detecting renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

No previous studies have compared two computed tomography (CT) protocols in patients presenting with visible haematuria, and most patients undergo a multiphase CT in order to detect upper tract malignancies. We aimed to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of single- and four-phase CT for detecting renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with visible haematuria.

MATERIALS & METHODS

'A Prospective Trial for Examining Hematuria using Computed Tomography' (PROTEHCT) was a single-centre prospective paired diagnostic study in patients referred for CT due to painless visible haematuria between September 2019 and June 2021. All patients underwent four-phase CT (control) from which a single nephrographic phase dual energy CT (experimental) was extracted. Both were independently assessed for RCC by randomised radiologists. Histologically verified RCC defined a positive reference standard. Follow-up ascertainment of RCC diagnosis was completed in May 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the accuracies. Inter-reader agreement was assessed by kappa statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients (median age, 68 years [interquartile range 53-77, range 18-96], 250 males) were included for analysis. RCC was diagnosed in seven (2.3%) patients during a median follow-up time of 19 months (interquartile range: 15-25). For the control and experimental CT, sensitivity was 100% versus 100%, specificity was 97% versus 98% and accuracy 97% versus 97%. The positive predictive value was 44% versus 50%, and the negative predictive value was 100% versus 100%. The agreement between the control and experimental CT was 98% (k = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

A single nephrographic phase dual energy CT is sufficient for detecting RCC in patients with visible haematuria.