A contingent model for cell-free DNA testing to detect fetal aneuploidy after first trimester combined screening

Application of expanded noninvasive prenatal test in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficiency of the upgraded noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT-Plus) in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT).

METHODS

Fetuses with an increased NT at or above 2.5 mm were selected for prenatal diagnosis. Amniotic fluid was collected from all cases for karyotype analysis and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq), and cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood was tested using Noninvasive Prenatal Test (NIPT-Plus) before amniocentesis in some cases. The results of amniocentesis with different NT thicknesses were analyzed and compared with those of NIPT-Plus.

RESULTS

A total of 125 eligible patients were divided into group A (2.5 mm ≤ NT < 3.0 mm) and group B (NT ≥ 3.0 mm). In group A, the detection rate of chromosomal aneuploidy and pathogenic copy number variation (CNV) was 10.6% and 6.4%, respectively. The total chromosome abnormality rate in group B (34.7%) was significantly higher than that in group A (17%). In 72 patients who underwent NIPT-Plus and amniocentesis, chromosomal aneuploidy accounted for 80.8% of the total chromosomal abnormalities. Among 21 cases of chromosomal aneuploidy, NIPT-Plus detected 20 cases. The sensitivity and specificity of NIPT-Plus toward aneuploidy detection were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. Among the five cases of pathogenic CNV, only two were detected using NIPT-Plus.

CONCLUSION

NIPT-plus is recommended as the first choice for fetal diagnosis in pregnant women with 2.5 mm ≤ NT < 3.0 mm who do not accept invasive prenatal diagnosis. When NT ≥ 3.0 mm and NIPT-Plus detects chromosomal aneuploidy, a rapid prenatal diagnosis can be performed through amniocentesis. In cases where NIPT-Plus yields negative results, amniocentesis still needs to be performed to detect chromosome microdeletions/duplications in order to avoid a missed diagnosis.

A comparison of first trimester prenatal screening strategies for Down Syndrome with maternal age and preferences considerations

OBJECTIVE

Screening for Down Syndrome (DS) includes traditional ultrasound and serum-based and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing. While cfDNA testing usually has superior performance, it is significantly more costly. As an alternative, a hybrid strategy combining contingent cfDNA with traditional testing is recommended when universal cfDNA screening is not feasible. This study compares the efficacy of traditional, contingent cfDNA, and universal cfDNA screening strategies at various cut-offs based on maternal age and parents' preferences, which may improve testing outcomes and patients' satisfaction.

METHOD

Decision trees were used to analyze a cohort of 3 855 500 pregnancies from 12 to 50 years old. The performance of the strategies was compared using the number of adverse outcomes (undetected DS live births and euploid procedure-related losses).

RESULTS

Universal cfDNA results in the fewest number of adverse outcomes in every scenario. Contingent cfDNA performs better than traditional screening when the cut-offs used to identify high-risk cases for cfDNA testing are relatively low. These cut-offs change depending on the maternal age and parents' preference.

CONCLUSION

Maternal age and parents' preferences should be considered when choosing cut-offs for contingent cfDNA to remain as an effective strategy compared to traditional screening and to improve patient satisfaction.