Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: Their association and relationship

Histologic Subtypes in Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Arising in Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The definition of the association between ovarian cancer and endometriosis was first reported by Sampson in 1925. He identified the following criteria: (a) clear evidence of endometriosis in proximity to the tumour, (b) exclusion of a metastatic tumour to the ovary, (c) presence of tissue resembling endometrial stroma surrounding epithelial glands. The naming of these cancers is "endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer" (EAOC). Scott proposed an additional stringent criterion: evidence of histological transition from endometriosis to cancer is to define "ovarian cancer arising in endometriosis" (OCAE). The aim of this systematic review is to analyse the distribution of different ovarian cancer histotypes in EAOC and OCAE to understand their similarities and differences. A total of 31 studies were included. Four studies added data for both EAOC and OCAE. Twenty-three studies were selected for EAOC, with a total of 800 patients, and 12 studies were selected for OCAE, with a total of 375 patients. The results show no significant differences in the distribution of histotypes in the two populations analysed. Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC) were the most common subtypes and were less frequent in EAOC compared to OCAE; the odd ratios were 0.58 (0.26-1.29) and 0.65 (0.33-1.26) respectively, although the difference was not statistically significant. The other histotypes were present in small proportions. This analysis shows that the histological profiles of EAOC and OCAE are similar, suggesting a similar aetiopathological mechanism, which requires further research to investigate whether EAOC and OCAE may be in the same way but at different points of the process to malignancy or have different pathways of progression to malignancy.

Correlation of clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics between endometriosis-associated and primary ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this study was to establish the clinicopathological and prognostic correlations between endometriosis-associated and non-endometriosis-associated primary ovarian cancer, with a view to providing a reference guide for revision of diagnostic criteria for malignant transformation of endometriosis.

METHODS

Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 174 patients with clear cell and endometrial ovarian cancer were retrospectively extracted. Cases were divided into endometriosis-associated and non-endometriosis-associated primary ovarian cancer for comparative analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis.

RESULTS

Average age and post-menopausal rate in the endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group were lower relative to the primary ovarian cancer group (P < 0.05). Body mass index, age at menopause, operation history, dysmenorrhea, complications, tumor size, tumor side, ascites, CA125, HE4, CA19.9, stage, differentiation, expression of ER, PR, P53, P16, Ki67, MMR, HNF-1β and Napsin A were not significantly different between the groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, rates of resistance to platinum chemotherapy, relapse, progression-free survival and overall survival were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis-associated and primary ovarian cancers of the same pathological type are speculated to be homologous in terms of origin from malignant transformation of endometriosis. It may therefore be necessary to revise the diagnostic criteria for ovarian endometriosis malignancy.

HE4 might be a more useful tumor biomarker to detect malignancy in patients with ovarian endometrioma when malignancy is suspected

Objective

To analyze the utility of carbohydrate antigen (CA)125 and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) to detect malignancy in women with ovarian endometriosis, when ovarian cancer is suspected and ultrasonography results are inconclusive.

Methods

Women who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2019 for ovarian endometriosis or for adnexal masses, with a final diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma (clear cell and endometrioid) were included in this retrospective study. The women were divided into three groups: ovarian endometriosis (OE), ovarian carcinoma without endometriosis (OC), and ovarian carcinoma with endometriosis (OC + E). Adnexal masses were assessed preoperatively by transvaginal ultrasonography according to the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules, and CA125 and HE4 blood levels were obtained.

Results

Of 208 women, 45 had malignancy, 16 in the OC + E group and 29 in the OC group. According to transvaginal ultrasonography, 13 were classified as undetermined risk of malignancy: OC group: 3, OE group: 3, and OC + E group: 7. When we compared the tumor biomarkers, significant differences in HE4 but not in CA125 levels were found between the groups.

Conclusions

When ovarian malignancy is suspected in patients with ovarian endometriosis, HE4 is a more useful tumor biomarker to diagnose OC when ultrasonography results are inconclusive.

HOX cluster and their cofactors showed an altered expression pattern in eutopic and ectopic endometriosis tissues

Endometriosis is major gynecological disease that affects over 10% of women worldwide and 30%-50% of these women have pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding and infertility. The cause of endometriosis is unknown and there is no definite cure mainly because of our limited knowledge about its pathophysiology at the cellular and molecular levels. Therefore, demystifying the molecular mechanisms that underlie endometriosis is essential to develop advanced therapies for this disease. In this regard, HOX genes are remarkable because of their critical role in endometrial development and receptivity during implantation, which is attributed to their ability to mediate some of the sex steroid functions during the reproductive period. Access to the expression profiles of these genes would provide the necessary information to uncover new genes for endometriosis and assist with disease diagnosis and treatment. In this study we demonstrate an altered expression pattern for the HOX clusters (A-D) and their cofactors in both eutopic and ectopic conditions compared to control tissue biopsies. Remarkably, most of the intensive changes occurred in eutopic samples from endometriosis patients compared to control tissue biopsies. Pathway analysis revealed the involvement of differentially expressed genes in cancer that correlate with an association between endometriosis and cancer. Our results suggest critical roles for the HOX cluster and their cofactors in endometriosis pathophysiology.

Is there a relationship in-between ovarian endometriosis and ovarian cancer? Immunohistochemical profile of four cases with coexisting ovarian endometriosis and cancer

Endometriosis (EMs) is a benign disease characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. EMs associated with ovarian cancer (OC) has a relative low incidence (5% to 10%), sometimes with evidence of a transition stage through atypical EMs (1.6% cases). We have assessed 135 consecutive patients with either EMs or OC and, out of them, our study reports on four cases of ovarian EMs and OC: two cases with endometrioid OC and two cases with high-grade serous OC (HGSOC). Cases with EMs and HGSOC are extremely rarely reported in the literature – we could find not more than 30 cases. The main objective of our research was to observe the possible similarities between EMs and OC. Secondly, we analyzed the differences between EMs associated with endometrioid OC and EMs associated with HGSOC. We evaluated them in terms of clinical status (age, stages of EMs and OC) and immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki67, p53, p16, Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1), cluster of differentiation (CD) 34 and CD10 immunomarkers – we could not find in the literature all these markers assessed, in the same time, to such samples. Our results indicated that there are no similarities between EMs and OC and no atypical EMs was identified in our cases. We recorded higher values of ER expression in EMs associated with HGSOC than in EMs associated with endometrioid OC. Higher values of ER expression were also recorded in OC than in endometriotic foci. There were no differences in proliferative rate of endometriotic foci associated with endometrioid OC, compared to EMs associated with HGSOC. An aberrant IHC expression for p53 protein and p16 protein was noted only in HGSOC. Also, a positive immunostaining for Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) was identified only in HGSOC. Higher values of microvessel density were recorded in OC but not in endometriotic foci. We concluded that there were no similarities between EMs and OC for the cases included in our study, but we noticed differences in terms of Ki67 index and also between hormonal receptors expression in EMs associated with HGSOC, comparing with EMs associated with endometrioid OCs. These results may represent a “brick” for future researches on the less understood EMs associated with type II of OCs, especially with HGSOC. Identifying the best marker, which can predict the risk of developing OC for the patients with EMs, may lead to discover new specific therapeutic agents and, therefore, a better, tailored, therapy.

Hospital care of endometriosis in Spain: a retrospective multicenter analysis of patient characteristics and costs

Background: Despite the potential serious outcomes associated with endometriosis, few data is available describing the real clinical practice and costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of patients diagnosed with endometriosis in Spain, to measure incidences within the hospital setting and the associated medical costs.Methods: Admission records of patients with endometriosis registered between 2009 and 2018 were obtained from a Spanish hospital discharge database and analyzed in a retrospective multicenter study.Results: Data corresponded primarily to inpatient admissions, with a median length of stay of 3 days. Length of stay correlated with patients' age. Admissions were mainly associated with surgical procedures, namely local excision or destruction of lesions. The majority of secondary diagnoses registered corresponded to inflammatory disease of female pelvic organs; 9.2% of patients presented neoplasms of uterus and only 0.9% registered ovarian neoplasms. Mean admission cost was €3566 over the study period.Conclusions: The majority of admissions reviewed in this study corresponded to the removal of ovarian lesions, although data suggested a decrease in the number of cases that were treated as hospital inpatient admissions over the study period. Older patients, surgical procedures, and lengthier admissions were associated with higher medical costs.

The relation between endometrioma and ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between endometrioma and ovarian cancer is a topic of discussion in the field of endometriosis and to date it is still debated whether ovarian endometriosis may represent a risk factor for ovarian cancers.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search was carried out using Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline and Google Scholar up to October 2020. Primary outcome of interest was ovarian cancer incidence in patients with endometriosis. Secondary outcome was ovarian cancer prognosis in patients with endometriosis compared to patient without endometriosis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Patients with ovarian endometriosis has a slight increase risk of developing ovarian cancer (merely 1.8%), being the general population risk for ovarian cancer 1.31%. In patient at postmenopausal age, long-lasting endometriosis, early-age diagnosis, infertility and/or infertility treatment the risk of developing ovarian cancer is higher. Endometriosis-related ovarian cancers are generally clear cell and endometrioid and are diagnosed at early stage compared to non-endometriosis related ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The lifetime risk for ovarian cancer is low in endometriosis patients in general and higher in subgroups of patients allowing a tailored management based on patient characteristics. Endometriosis is a chronic disease negatively affecting the quality of life, nonetheless, concerns on ovarian cancer should be avoided in order to reduce the burden of the disease on women's health.

Ovarian Endometriosis with Borderline Serous Tumor- Association or Coincidence – A Case Report and Review of Literature

Endometriosis is the presence of endometrial glands outside the endometrium, and ovary is the common site for endometriosis. Endometriosis can also transform into malignant tumors. When endometriosis is present within the tumors, the term endometriosis-derived tumor applies, whereas when endometriosis is recognized adjacent to the tumor, it is called as endometriosis-associated tumor. Borderline serous tumor is surface epithelial ovarian tumor. The endometriosis-associated ovarian malignancies are clear cell adenocarcinoma and endometrioid adenocarcinoma, whereas serous and mucinous are rare malignancies with endometriosis. Here, we are presenting a case report in which endometriosis was associated with borderline serous tumor.

Association between endometriosis and gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is one of the most common benign gynecological diseases with an occurrence approximately 10% in reproductive age. Endometriosis has been proposed as a possible precursor of certain ovarian carcinomas such as clear cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas. In addition to this pathogenic link, the association with other gynecological tumors and breast cancer has been studied on an epidemiological basis in several studies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to critically present the recent published evidence on the association of endometriosis with gynecological cancer, and with a special emphasis on ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search for eligible studies was conducted in three electronic databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, for original research in humans published in any language.

RESULTS

The present review includes studies examining the association between endometriosis and different types of gynecological cancer (i.e., 25 studies on ovarian cancer, 8 studies on breast cancer, 8 studies on endometrial cancer and 2 studies on cervical cancer).

CONCLUSION

The present literature supports the pre-existing evidence suggesting an association between ovarian cancer and endometriosis and specifically its two histologic subtypes (endometrioid and ovarian clear cell cancer). The most recent population-based epidemiological studies cannot provide a clear association between endometriosis and endometrial, cervical or breast cancer.