α1-Adenoceptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH): State of the Art

Tamsulosin 0.8 mg daily dose in management of BPH patients with failed tamsulosin 0.4 mg monotherapy and unfit for surgical intervention

AIM

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of administering double-dose tamsulosin (0.8 mg) for treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who have not responded to the standard single dose of tamsulosin (0.4 mg) and are deemed unsuitable for transurethral resection (TUR) intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2022 and July 2023, we prospectively analyzed 111 patients who were experiencing severe BPH symptoms. These patients received a double dose of tamsulosin for one month. We collected baseline characteristics such as age, body mass index, and underlying medical conditions. Various parameters including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-void residual volume were evaluated before and after treatment.

RESULTS

All 111 patients completed the study. The mean age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 63.12 ± 4.83 years, 3.42 ± 0.93 ng/ml, and 50.37 ± 19.23 ml, respectively. Of these patients, 93 showed improvement in Qmax, post-void residual volume, and IPSS score (p-value = 0.001). The total IPSS score and total Qmax improved from 24.03 ± 2.49 and 7.72 ± 1.64 ml/sec to 16.41 ± 3.84 and 12.08 ± 2.37 ml/sec, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Double-dose 0.8mg tamsulosin as an alpha-blocker therapy appears to be a viable temporary management option for BPH patients who have not responded to the standard single dose 0.4mg tamsulosin and are not suitable candidates for TUR intervention.

Medical therapy versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE): a cost minimisation analysis

PURPOSE

A cost minimisation analysis compares the costs of different interventions' to ascertain the least expensive over time. We compared different prostate targeted drug treatments with TURP to identify the optimal cost saving duration of a medical therapy for symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE).

METHODS

The Evolution registry is a prospective, multicentre registry, conducted by the European Association of Urology Research Foundation (EAUrf) for 24 months in 5 European countries. Evolution was designed to register the management of symptomatic BPE in clinical practice settings in 5 European countries. Direct cost evaluation associated with prostate targeted medical therapies and TURP was also recorded and analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 1838 men were enrolled with 1246 evaluable at 24 months. Medical therapies were more cost saving than TURP for treatment durations ranging from 2.9 to 70.4 years. Cost saving depended on both medication class and individual country assessed. Daily tamsulosin monotherapy was more cost saving than TURP for ≤ 13.9 years in Germany compared to ≤ 32.7 years in Italy. Daily finasteride monotherapy was more cost saving for ≤ 5.9 years in France compared to ≤ 36.9 years in Spain. Combination therapy was more cost saving for ≤ 5.9 years for Italian patients versus ≤ 13.8 years in Germany.

CONCLUSIONS

BPE medical management was more cost saving than TURP for different specific treatment durations. Information from this study will allow clinicians to convey medical and surgical costs over time, to both patients and payors alike, when considering BPE treatment.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Tamsulosin 0.4 mg in Patients with Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily in Korean patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and investigate whether tamsulosin 0.4 mg can improve symptoms in patients with refractory lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) who were previously receiving tamsulosin 0.2 mg once daily.

Materials and Methods

A total of 116 patients from 3 urology centers participated. All study subjects entered a nonblind phase consisting of 8 weeks of tamsulosin 0.2 mg monotherapy followed by an additional 8 weeks of tamsulosin 0.2 mg (0.2 mg group) or 8 weeks of tamsulosin 0.4 mg (0.4 mg group). At week 8, we chose the 0.4 mg group on the basis of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), and adverse effects. At week 16, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of tamsulosin between the 0.2 and 0.4 mg groups.

Results

A total of 26 patients (22.4%) were escalated to tamsulosin 0.4 mg at week 8. There were significant differences in IPSS, QoL, and Qmax at week 8 in both groups. There were significant differences in improvement in IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and postvoid residual urine volume from baseline to week 16 in both groups. There were no significant differences in efficacy or tolerability between the groups at week 16.

Conclusions

Our trial demonstrated that tamsulosin 0.4 mg has favorable efficacy and tolerability in Korean patients with symptomatic BPH refractory to tamsulosin 0.2 mg. No patients experienced any serious adverse effects when we escalated the dose of tamsulosin to 0.4 mg.

Terazosin Modifies the Content of Glycosaminoglycans and the Activity of Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 in the Rat Ventral Prostate

OBJECTIVES

We have investigated the effects of terazosin on the content of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), the activity of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9, and the content of tissue inhibitors of MMP (TIMP) in the ventral prostate of Wistar rats.

METHODS

Rats were treated with terazosin (0.12, 1.2mg/kg orally every second day) for 120 d. GAGs were isolated and purified from ventral prostate homogenates by lipid extraction, ethanol precipitation, and extensive digestion with pronase and DNAse, separated by electrophoresis, and characterised using specific enzymes. The activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 was estimated using gelatin zymography and TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Terazosin treatment did not affect the weight of the ventral prostate gland. The prostate contains hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate (CS), dermatan sulfate (DS), and heparan sulfate (HS), MMP-2, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2, but not MMP-9. Terazosin caused a significant increase in the relative content of DS and a significant decrease in the relative content of CS and to a lesser extent of HS. Terazosin evoked a significant increase in the activity of proMMP-2 and MMP-2 but did not affect TIMP.

CONCLUSIONS

The differential effect of terazosin treatment in GAG molecules of the rat prostate may be beneficial because CS is known to induce and DS to inhibit cell proliferation. The effect of terazosin on GAGs and MMP-2 may contribute in the molecular mechanisms of terazosin-induced apoptosis because HS and CS have a proapoptotic effect, whereas DS and MMP-2 are antiapoptotic.

Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: latest update on alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists

An update of a systematic review of alpha1-adrenoceptor (AR) antagonists in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) showed that these agents have comparable efficacy. The total symptom score is improved by 30-45% and maximum urinary flow rate by 15-30% vs baseline. alpha1-AR antagonists that can be started at their therapeutic dose have a more rapid onset of action than alpha1-AR antagonists that have to be titrated. alpha1-AR antagonists can be differentiated according to their tolerability. Alfuzosin (especially the 10 mg once daily dose) and tamsulosin (especially the 0.4 mg once daily dose) are better tolerated than doxazosin and terazosin. However, alfuzosin might induce more cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) in the elderly and/or patients with cardiovascular comorbidity and/or comedication. Tamsulosin tends to interfere less with blood pressure regulation and induce less vasodilatory AEs than alfuzosin, especially in the elderly, and is well tolerated in patients with cardiovascular comorbidity and/or comedication. Cardiovascular AEs might lead to potentially serious complications such as falls, fractures and institutionalization. Abnormal ejaculation has mainly been reported in placebo-controlled trials with tamsulosin but in direct comparative trials its rate with tamsulosin 0.4 mg was similar to, or only slightly higher than, the rate with alfuzosin. In addition, abnormal ejaculation is not reported as bothersome by the patient or associated with serious complications. It can be concluded that an alpha1-AR antagonist with a low potential to interfere with blood pressure regulation and to induce cardiovascular AEs, also in patients with cardiovascular comorbidity and/or comedication, can be considered a first-choice treatment option in LUTS/BPH.