Vasectomy in Male Contraception and its Reversal

RISUG® as a male contraceptive: journey from bench to bedside

Even after decades of research men still lack reliable and reversible contraceptive methods comparable to female methods of contraception. Traditional methods of male contraception present a high failure rate and also involve high risk both when used for contraception and for protection against sexually transmitted diseases. Various chemical, hormonal, immunological, vas based and herbal methods of contraception have been examined by scientists world over during the past four decades. Among the possible lead approaches, exogenous hormonal contraception, either alone or in combination with progesterone or antiandrogen, is being viewed at low profile because of their insufficiency in inducing uniform suppression of spermatogenesis and steroid related long term complications. As an alternative to vasectomy, among various intravasal devices being examined, RISUG® (Reversible Inhibition of Sperm Under Guidance), a co-polymer of styrene and maleic anhydride offers long term contraception with safety, efficacy and it can be delivered by no-scalpel injection. Thus it is the only male contraceptive procedure currently under Phase- III Clinical Trial. The non-invasive reversal technique, successfully demonstrated in langur monkeys and functional reversal achieved with dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) in rats and rabbits with safety at F1 generation (first filial generation) have projected RISUG® as a better alternative to vasectomy. In this narrative review we revisit the long journey of RISUG® beginning with formulation on a bench towards reaching the market as a safe and effective contraceptive method, discussing various milestones and roadblocks of this expedition awaiting the mandatory regulatory clearance from the Government of India. Successful completion of ongoing phase III clinical trials with demonstration of reversal in human volunteers will give an indigenously developed male contraceptive to the world.

Application of a laparoscopic technique for vasectomy in standing horses

This report describes a technique for standing laparoscopic vasectomy in stallions through a prospective descriptive study. A preliminary study was carried out with two experimental intact male horses and subsequently the procedure was performed in two clinical cases. These horse owners want to keep their animals in the most possible natural way, preserving its stallion behaviour in a herd without generating offspring. The horses were sedated and restrained in stocks and laparoscopic vasectomy was performed using three portal sites in both paralumbar fossae recording surgical times. A 4-cm segment of each ductus deferens (DD) was occluded with laparoscopic vessel sealing devices and subsequently excised. Semen collection was performed using an artificial vagina before the laparoscopic procedure and at 15 and 60 days postoperatively. Sexual behaviour and spermiogram were analysed. Two months after vasectomy, control laparoscopy was performed in experimental horses to assess the surgical site. Bilateral vasectomy could be performed without intraoperative complications in a mean surgical time of 20 min per DD. Success of the procedure was confirmed in all cases by azoospermic ejaculates 60 days after vasectomy. This is the first time that the technique for laparoscopic vasectomy is described in horses.

Toxicity and Mutagenicity Evaluation Following RISUG Contraception Reversal in Rats

Reestablishment of fertility, after a male contraceptive method, is of great concern. In this context, RISUG (Reversible Inhibition of Sperm Under Guidance) has been evaluated for its mutagenicity following reversibility with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) in Wistar albino rats. Animals were divided into 7 groups, namely, sham-operated control, vas occlusion with RISUG for 90 and 360 days, reversal with DMSO and NaHCO3 after 90 and 360 days, respectively. The testis, cauda epididymis, cauda epididymal spermatozoa, and serum were evaluated for apoptosis and hormonal status through various assays. RISUG was subjected to Ames test at dose levels of 10, 50, and 100 µL. Results of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase nick end labeling and caspase-3 assays in testes and cauda epididymis revealed that the percentage of positive cells in the experimental groups was comparable to sham-operated control. Annexin V assay in cauda epididymal spermatozoa showed slight elevation in group II ( P < 0.05), whereas in the remaining groups, minimum numbers of positive sperms were found. Hormone profile, namely, testosterone, prolactin, cortisol, prostate-specific antigen, and sperm antibody concentration, remained unchanged. In Ames test, no significant increase was observed in the number of revertant colonies on plates containing RISUG in the presence and absence of S9 mix in all 3 strains. Therefore, the reversal of RISUG-induced contraception by solvent vehicle DMSO/NaHCO3 was successful without any toxicity at the cellular levels.