Modern Stone Management in Children

Which is better, fluoroscopic-guided or ultrasonic-guided shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal stones? Prospective randomized comparative study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and clinical outcomes of two different stone localization modalities (fluoroscopic or ultrasonic) in SWL treatment of pediatric renal stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in the period between January 2021 and June 2022 and included 100 children aged 2-16 years who presented with radio-opaque renal pelvic stones < 20 mm. The children were divided in two groups: group I, US-guided (50 patients), and group II, FS-guided SWL (50 patients). SWL was applied under general anesthesia. The follow-up of the patients included a visit every two weeks up to three months.

RESULTS

Even though group II's stone-free rate after one month of follow-up was higher than group I's (90% vs. 84%), no statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p = 0.749). While the success rate was higher in group II than in group I (92% vs. 86%), no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (p = 0.338). The complication rate was 28% (14 patients) and 12% (6 patients) in Groups I and II, respectively. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups (p = 0.132).

CONCLUSIONS

SWL is a non-invasive and safe method for treating pediatric renal stones. We recommend the use of the ultrasonic focusing modality in SWL of the pediatric age group, which has similar success rates, avoiding radiation and low complication rate instead of the fluoroscopic focusing modality, which uses ionizing radiation during SWL.

Is laparoscopic pyelolithotomy an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm in pediatric patients?

PURPOSE

The aim was to compare laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of efficacy and safety for the treatment of renal pelvis stones larger than 2.5 cm in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Our study consisted of two groups. Group 1 included 33 patients who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) between January 2013 and March 2022, and group 2 included 39 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The basic clinical parameters of the patients were recorded. Mean operation time, stone size, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative hospital stay, stone-free rate, postoperative analgesia requirements, intraoperative complications, and early and late postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In our study, the mean age of the patients in groups 1 and 2 was 8.89 ± 1.58 years and 9.1 ± 1.85 years, respectively (p = 0.657). The mean stone size was 2.37 ± 0.38 cm in group 1 and 2.55 ± 0.45 cm in group 2 (p = 0.64). The mean operation time was 85.65 ± 20.55 min in group 1, while it was 76.11 ± 13.12 min in group 2 (p = 0.08). The stone-free rate was 100% in both groups. Intraoperative mean blood loss, need for postoperative analgesia, blood transfusion and intraoperative complication rates were significantly higher in the PCNL group (p < 0.01, p = 0.02, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is a safe and effective method for pediatric patients with large kidney stones.

Proximal ureteral access for symptomatic stone removal using ultrathin semirigid ureterorenoscope in preschool-age children: Is it possible?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to point out the ureteral access facility and obstruction removal efficiency of mini-URS in the use of proximal ureteral stone management in children under five-year-old.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 26 children who underwent mini-URS-LL for obstructive stones in proximal ureter between January 2016 and August 2018. The effectiveness of the mini-URS-LL was assessed based on the feasibility, reliability, and success of the technique.

RESULTS

Mean age was 3 ± 1.3 years, and 11 (42.3%) patients were ≤2 years old, remaining 15 (57.7%) were aged 3-5 years. Mean stone size was 9.11 ± 3.02 mm. A stone-free status was obtained at the end of 31 ureteroscopic procedure in 24 (92.3%) patients. The mean age was found significantly higher in patients who had the procedure without pre-stenting than the others who did (P = .027). No perioperative complication was experienced.

CONCLUSION

In preschool-age children, laser lithotripsy with mini-URS may be a safe technique in the hands with advanced endo-urological skills but it has low efficacy with higher rates of prestenting causing additional anesthesia sessions.

Proximal ureteral access for symptomatic stone removal using ultrathin semirigid ureterorenoscope in preschool-age children: Is it possible?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to point out the ureteral access facility and obstruction removal efficiency of mini-URS in the use of proximal ureteral stone management in children under five-year-old.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 26 children who underwent mini-URS-LL for obstructive stones in proximal ureter between January 2016 and August 2018. The effectiveness of the mini-URS-LL was assessed based on the feasibility, reliability, and success of the technique.

RESULTS

Mean age was 3±1.3 years, and 11 (42.3%) patients were≤2 years old, remaining 15 (57.7%) were aged 3-5 years. Mean stone size was 9.11±3.02mm. A stone-free status was obtained at the end of 31 ureteroscopic procedure in 24 (92.3%) patients. The mean age was found significantly higher in patients who had the procedure without pre-stenting than the others who did (P=.027). No perioperative complication was experienced.

CONCLUSION

In preschool-age children, laser lithotripsy with mini-URS may be a safe technique in the hands with advanced endo-urological skills but it has low efficacy with higher rates of prestenting causing additional anesthesia sessions.

Endourologic and Retroperitoneoscopic Combined Mininvasive Management of Cystine Urolithiasis in an Infant of 13 Months of Life

Background: There are limited data about urolithiasis in young infants, especially in class age younger than 2 years. Case presentation: We report the case of a child <2 years old (13 months) affected by metabolic urolithiasis (cystinuria), and renal hypertension. He was admitted to our ward from the pediatric emergency room for fever, lack of appetite, irritability, and abdominal pain crisis. Ultrasonography (US) described a huge stone (15 mm) in dilated left renal pelvis (20 mm) associated with distal ureteral ectasia (7 mm). Urine and blood diagnostic assessments were performed. Hydropenic therapy and urine alkalization were started without success. The child underwent an ureteroscopy (URS) with a 4.5-6.5F rigid ureteroscope aiming to reach the renal pelvis and perform holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser stone disintegration. During the procedure, the ureter presented two unexpected stones in the distal portion (missed on US). A laser ureteral lithotripsy was effectively performed extracting smaller stone fragments. Ureteral kinking, confirmed by ascending pyelography, made it impossible to reach renal pelvis with the ureteroscope. The child was further studied with a CT scan that revealed a massive stone involvement of the left excretory pathway. Metabolic and urine assessment revealed a metabolic disease: cystinuria. To remove renal stones, an operative retroperitoneoscopy (RP) was performed. During the procedure was identified a lesion of the pelvis (secondary to stone decubitus) with urine tearing and massive perirenal inflammation. The stone was removed and pelvis was sutured. Postoperatively, the patient was stone free without major complications. Conclusions: In particular cases (younger patients, ureteral kinking, and renal failure risk), a totally combinated minimally invasive access (URS, laser stone fragmentation, and RP) can be a valid alternative to micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy or to massive open treatment. In fact, rigid URS represents a valid minimally invasive approach either for examination or for laser treatment of pediatric urinary tract stones. With important ureteral kinking, RP must be considered by experienced pediatric urologists.

Management of Pediatric Urolithiasis Using a Combination of Laparoscopic Lithotomy and Pyeloscopy

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive procedures have become the standard option for treatment of urinary stones; the use of more invasive techniques is not a common practice currently. This emergent technology is not always available and laparoscopy is the alternative option. There are few reports of laparoscopic management for urinary lithiasis in pediatric patients. This study is about the use of laparoscopic surgery combined with pyeloscopy as a feasible first-line treatment for pediatric urolithiasis in renal and proximal ureteral locations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of 14 patients with renal and proximal ureteral stones who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and pyeloscopy in a period from January 2011 to July 2016. The outcome measures were needed for auxiliary procedures, treatment success, and complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of 16 procedures were carried out in 14 patients, 15 transperitoneal and 1 retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomies were done. It was necessary to perform upper ureterolithotomies to remove ureteral stones in 2 cases. The holmium laser and/or pneumatic lithotripter were used to fragment staghorn calculi. Some of the complications were blood transfusion in 12.5% and self-limited urinary leak in 18.7% of the patients. The success rate after undergoing one procedure was 92.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal laparoscopic lithotomy is a safe and feasible procedure for the treatment of pediatric urolithiasis. It can be an alternative to shock-wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy when these are not feasible or possible.