Success of repeat detrusor injections of botulinum a toxin in patients with severe neurogenic detrusor overactivity and incontinence

Efficacy and safety of intradetrusor abobotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA in women with overactive bladder and the value of local anesthesia: a randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

A non-inferiority clinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA vs. incobotulinumtoxinA intradetrusor injections in women with overactive bladder and urge urinary incontinence. Also, the effect of local anesthesia on the pain level of the procedure was assessed.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive 20 intradetrusor injections of either 300 U abobotulinumtoxinA or 100 U incobotulinumtoxinA. They were further randomized to receive either local anesthesia (40 ml 1% lidocaine solution) or placebo before botulinum toxin injection. Before the procedure and 4 months after the procedure each patient reported urinary incontinence episodes, frequency, nocturia, completed the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) score, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire. Each patient completed a patient satisfaction survey 4 months after the procedure. During the procedure, the patients graded the pain intensity of every injection on a visual analog scale (VAS). The total score of each questionnaire was considered.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients with a mean age of 66 ± 13 (SD) years completed the study. Total scores of UDI‑6, IIQ‑7, I‑QOL, patient satisfaction, urinary incontinence episodes, frequency, nocturia and VAS questionnaires did not show differences between the abobotulinumtoxinA (n = 26) or incobotulinumtoxinA (n = 28) group. Urinary retention requiring catheterization was noted in five patients. The VAS and patient satisfaction questionnaire values did not show significant differences between the group receiving bladder instillation with lidocaine solution (n = 28) or the group receiving placebo (n = 26).

CONCLUSION

In women with overactive bladder and urge urinary incontinence where conservative treatment failed, abobotulinumtoxinA vs. incobotulinumtoxinA intradetrusor injections showed comparable results regarding improved clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. Local anesthesia before the procedure did not reduce the pain level in comparison with the placebo.

Update on Overactive Bladder Therapeutic Options

BACKGROUND

Millions of Americans are burdened by overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome and the psychogenic and economic hardships that accompany it. Several theories attempt to explain OAB as a neurogenic dysfunction, myogenic dysfunction, urothelial dysfunction, or decreased expression of a channel protein secondary to bladder outlet obstruction. Given that the etiology of OAB is a working theory, the management of OAB is also an evolving subject matter in medicine. There are uncertainties surrounding the pathophysiology of OAB, the strength of a clinical diagnosis, and accurate reporting because of the disease's stigma and decreased use of health care.

DATA SOURCES

This is a narrative review that used PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and ScienceDirect to review literature on current and future OAB therapies.

RESULTS

Currently, first-line treatment for OAB is behavioral therapy that uses lifestyle modifications, bladder-control techniques, and psychotherapy. Second-line therapy includes antimuscarinic agents or beta 3 adrenergic agonists, and studies have shown that combination therapy with antimuscarinics and beta 3 adrenergic agonists provides even greater efficacy than monotherapy. Third-line therapies discussed include onabotulinumtoxinA, posterior tibial nerve stimulation, and sacral neuromodulation. OnabotulinumtoxinA has been FDA-approved as a nonpharmaceutical treatment option for refractory OAB with minimal side effects restricted to the urinary tract. Posterior tibial nerve modulation and sacral neuromodulation are successful in treating refractory OAB, but the costs and complication rates make them high-risk procedures. Therefore, surgical intervention should be a last resort. Estrogen therapy is effective in alleviating urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women, consistent with the association between estrogen deficiency and genitourinary syndrome. Potassium channel activators, voltage-gated calcium channel blockers, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors look to be promising options for the future of OAB management. As new therapies are developed, individuals with OAB can better personalize their treatment to maximize their quality of life and cost-effective care.

Summary of the 2024 Update of the European Association of Urology Guidelines on Neurourology

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Most patients with neurourological disorders require lifelong medical care. The European Association of Urology (EAU) regularly updates guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of these patients. The objective of this review is to provide a summary of the 2024 updated EAU guidelines on neurourology.

METHODS

A structured literature review covering the timeframe 2021-2023 was conducted for the guideline update. A level of evidence and a strength rating were assigned for each recommendation on the basis of the literature data.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Neurological conditions significantly affect urinary, sexual, and bowel function, and lifelong management is required for neurourological patients to maintain their quality of life and prevent urinary tract deterioration. Early diagnosis and effective treatment are key, and comprehensive clinical assessments, including urodynamics, are crucial. Management should be customised to individual needs and should involve a multidisciplinary approach and address sexuality and fertility. Lifelong monitoring and follow-up highlight the importance of continuous care for neurourological patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The 2024 EAU guidelines on neurourology provide an up-to-date overview of available evidence on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for neurourological patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Neurological disorders very frequently affect the lower urinary tract and sexual and bowel function and patients need lifelong management. We summarise the updated European Association of Urology guidelines on neurourology to provide patients and caregivers with the latest insights for optimal health care support.

Voiding Phase Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis: Contemporary Review of Terminology, Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are highly prevalent in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, assessment of these symptoms is often hindered by vague definitions or absence of screening in asymptomatic patients. It is crucial to exercise caution when applying the non-neurogenic definition of urinary retention in this population. For men with MS experiencing persistent and treatment-resistant LUTS, urodynamic studies should be used to identify the underlying causes of symptoms. Although numerous therapies are presently accessible for managing LUTS in MS, there is a need for further investigation into emerging treatments such as percutaneous tibial nerve, and noninvasive brain stimulation.

Management of spinal cord injury patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction using minimally invasive and surgical therapies in Taiwan

The main problems of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) consist of impaired urine storage, impaired bladder emptying, or both. The priorities in the management of SCI-NLUTD should be preservation of renal function, followed by freedom from urinary tract infections and improvement of quality of life. Management of NLUTD in patients with SCI must be based on urodynamic findings rather than clinical evaluations. In the hospital without urodynamic equipment, careful measurement of intravesical pressure and safety functional bladder capacity in conjunction with clinical assessment are also feasible. Identification of high-risk patients is important for preventing urological complications in patients with chronic SCI. The management of NLUTD should start with conservative bladder management and medical treatment. Patients with SCI should be regularly followed up, and any NLUTDs and urological complications should be adequately treated. When surgical intervention is necessary, less invasive and reversible procedures should be considered first, and any unnecessary surgery should be avoided. This article reports the current evidence and expert opinions on the patient-centered bladder management of NLUTD in chronic SCI patients in Taiwan. To avoid renal function deterioration and urological complications, annual active surveillance of bladder and renal function is mandatory, especially for high-risk SCI patients.

AbobotulinumtoxinA is effective in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity regardless of spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis etiology: Pooled analysis of two phase III randomized studies (CONTENT1 and CONTENT2)

BACKGROUND

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence (NDOI) is often inadequately managed with oral therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A; Dysport®; Ipsen Ltd.) according to etiology of NDOI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Two phase III, randomized, double-blind studies (CONTENT1 [NCT02660138] conducted in Asia, Europe and North America; CONTENT2 [NCT02660359] conducted in the Americas, Asia, Europe and Oceania) both included patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) or multiple sclerosis (MS), with inadequately managed NDOI, regularly performing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC).

INTERVENTION

Patients in CONTENT1 and CONTENT2 received aboBoNT-A injections 600 U (n = 162)/800 U (n = 161), or placebo (n = 162) into the detrusor muscle.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Primary endpoint: mean change from baseline in number of NDOI episodes/week at Week 6. Secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with no NDOI episodes; incontinence-related quality of life (I-QoL); urodynamic parameters; and time-to-retreatment. Safety was also assessed. Statistical analyses were conducted for pooled populations by etiology (aboBoNT-A doses vs. placebo).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of 485 randomized patients, 341 (70%) and 144 (30%) had SCI and MS etiologies, respectively. A significant reduction was observed in mean NDOI episodes/week at Week 6 with both aboBoNT-A doses versus placebo in the SCI (all p < 0.001) and MS (all p < 0.01) groups, as well as significant improvements in I-QoL and urodynamic parameters. Median time-to-retreatment was longer in patients with MS (48-62 weeks across doses) than those with SCI (39-44 weeks). Safety data were similar between etiologies. Urinary tract infection was the most frequent adverse event; similar numbers were reported across treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

AboBoNT-A was well tolerated and significantly improved continence and bladder function, and QoL, in patients with SCI or MS with NDOI performing regular CIC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

AboBoNT-A injections improved QoL, symptoms, and bladder function in patients with SCI or MS with bladder muscle overactivity that causes incontinence.

Long-Term Surveillance and Management of Urological Complications in Chronic Spinal Cord-Injured Patients

Bladder dysfunction is a common complication after chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Patients may experience renal function loss, urinary tract infection (UTI), urolithiasis, bladder cancer, and even life-threatening events such as severe sepsis or renal failure. Suitable patient care may prevent UTI and urinary incontinence, decrease medication use, and preserve renal function. As the primary goal is to preserve renal function, management should be focused on facilitating bladder drainage, the avoidance of UTI, and the maintenance of a low intravesical pressure for continence and complete bladder emptying. Currently, several bladder management options are available to SCI patients: (1) reflex voiding; (2) clean intermittent catheterization; (3) indwelling catheterization. The target organ may be the bladder or the bladder outlet. The purposes of intervention include the following: (1) increasing bladder capacity and/or decreasing intravesical pressure; (2) increasing bladder outlet resistance; (3) decreasing bladder outlet resistance; (4) producing detrusor contractility; (5) urinary diversion. Different bladder management methods and interventions may have different results depending on the patient's lower urinary tract dysfunction. This review aims to report the current management options for long-term bladder dysfunction in chronic SCI patients. Furthermore, we summarize the most suitable care plans for improving the clinical outcome of SCI patients.

Satisfaction with Urinary Incontinence Treatments in Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Purpose: To investigate the long-term satisfaction and complications in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients after various bladder management strategies and surgical procedures for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Methods: Patients at a single institution with chronic SCI who received bladder management treatment or surgical procedure to improve urinary continence were retrospectively assessed. Thorough urological examinations and videourodynamic studies were performed. Patients were treated either through conservative approaches including medical treatment, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), cystostomy, and indwelling urethral catheter, or through surgical procedures including detrusor botulinum toxin (Botox) injections, augmentation, ileal conduit, Kock pouch diversion, continent cystostomy, suburethral sling, and artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) implantation. The patients’ satisfaction with urinary continence improvement, causes of dissatisfaction, long-term complications, and overall satisfaction with bladder and voiding condition were assessed. Results: A total of 700 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. High satisfaction rates were noted after detrusor Botox injection (81.1%), augmentation enterocystoplasty (91.4%), autoaugmentation (80%), Kock pouch diversion, and continent cystostomy (all 100%). Fair satisfaction rates were noted after ileal conduit diversion (66.7%), suburethral sling (64.3%), and AUS implantation (66.7%). Patients who received conservative treatment with medicines, CIC, cystostomy, or an indwelling urethral catheter all had less-satisfactory outcomes (all < 40%). Conclusion: Overall satisfaction with surgical procedures aimed to improve urinary continence in chronic SCI patients was higher than with conservative bladder management (35.4%). Appropriate surgical procedures for chronic SCI patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) and urological complications yielded satisfaction with both urinary continence improvement and with overall bladder and voiding condition.

Bladder Dysfunction in Older Adults: The Botulinum Toxin Option

Bladder dysfunction, which involves inadequacies of urine storage or emptying, increases with age. Conventional medications may have insufficient efficacy for patients with refractory lower urinary tract symptoms, and their concomitant adverse events (AEs) may be intolerable for the older adult population. For decades, the botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection has been an option for managing urine frequency, urge incontinence, and voiding dysfunction in the general population refractory to conventional management. This review focuses on studies of BoNT-A application in the management of bladder dysfunction in older adult patients aged ≥ 65 years. In this target population, intravesical BoNT-A injections provide similar efficacy in idiopathic overactive bladder to that in younger adults. Good clinical response has also been demonstrated in older adult patients presenting with storage dysfunction and with various concomitant underlying neurological diseases. However, caution must be taken for the AEs that occur after intravesical BoNT-A injection, including increased post-void residual urine, acute urine retention, and urinary tract infection. Most evidence shows that age is not a major determinant of AEs after adjusting for other factors. In contrast to its application in storage dysfunction, evidence for voiding dysfunction in older adults is scarce. In general, BoNT-A may be a reasonable option for older adult patients with refractory storage dysfunction because of its promising clinical response without significant systemic AEs. Overall, clinicians should be aware of the balance between the therapeutic efficacy of BoNT-A and local AEs in vulnerable members of this population.

Interventional management and surgery of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with chronic spinal cord injury: A urologist's perspective

Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) caused by spinal cord injury (SCI) is challenging for urologists. NLUTD not only affects the quality of life but also endangers the upper urinary tract of patients with chronic SCI. Considering that the bladder and urethral function change with time, regular follow-up of NLUTD is necessary, and any complication should be adequately treated. The first priority of bladder management in patients with chronic SCI manifesting NLUTD should be renal function preservation, followed by the normalization of lower urinary tract function. The quality of life should also be assessed. Patients who have a high risk for impaired renal function should be more frequently identified and investigated. Conservative treatment and pharmacological therapy should be started as early as possible. Intravesical or urethral injections of botulinum toxin A is an alternative treatment for refractory NLUTD. When surgical intervention is necessary, less invasive and reversible procedures should be considered first. Improving patients' quality of life and willingness to undergo bladder management is the most important aspect of treatment.

The clinical application of intravesical botulinum toxin A injection in patients with overactive bladder and interstitial cystitis

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) has been widely used in several urological functional disorders including neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO), overactive bladder (OAB), lower urinary tract dysfunction, and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Chronic inflammation is found in a large proportion of patients with OAB and IC/BPS. The chronic inflammation activates sensory afferents which resulting in central sensitization and bladder storage symptoms. Because BoNT-A can inhibit the sensory peptides released from the vesicles in sensory nerve terminals, the inflammation can be reduced and symptom subsided. Previous studies have demonstrated that the quality of life improved after BoNT-A injections, both in neurogenic and non-NDO. Although the use of BoNT-A in treatment of IC/BPS has not been approved by FDA, intravesical BoNT-A injection has been included in the AUA guideline as the fourth line therapy. Generally, intravesical injections of BoNT-A are well tolerated, though transient hematuria and urinary tract infection can occur after the procedure. In order to prevent these adverse events, experimental trials have been conducted to test if BoNT-A can be delivered into the bladder wall without intravesical injection under anesthesia such as using liposomes encapsulated BoNT-A or application of low energy shock wave on the bladder to facilitate BoNT-A penetrating across the urothelium and treat OAB or IC/BPS. This article reviews current clinical and basic researches of BoNT-A on OAB and IC/BPS.

Overactive Bladder Symptoms Within Nervous System: A Focus on Etiology

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common debilitating condition characterized by urgency symptoms with detrimental effects on the quality of life and survival. The exact etiology of OAB is still enigmatic, and none of therapeutic approaches seems curative. OAB is generally regarded as a separate syndrome, whereas in clinic, OAB symptoms could be found in numerous diseases of other non-urogenital systems, particularly nervous system. The OAB symptoms in neurological diseases are often poorly recognized and inadequately treated. This review provided a comprehensive overview of recent findings related to the neurogenic OAB symptoms. Relevant neurological diseases could be mainly divided into seven kinds as follows: multiple sclerosis and related neuroinflammatory disorders, Parkinson’s diseases, multiple system atrophy, spinal cord injury, dementia, peripheral neuropathy, and others. Concurrently, we also summarized the hypothetical reasonings and available animal models to elucidate the underlying mechanism of neurogenic OAB symptoms. This review highlighted the close association between OAB symptoms and neurological diseases and expanded the current knowledge of pathophysiological basis of OAB. This may increase the awareness of urological complaints in neurological disorders and inspire robust therapies with better outcomes.

Will repeated botulinum toxin A improve detrusor overactivity and bladder compliance in patients with chronic spinal cord injury?

Chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) can induce neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO), leading to urinary incontinence and renal damage due to low bladder compliance and high detrusor pressure during the storage and voiding of urine. In 2011, Botox^® (onabotulinumtoxinA, botulinum neurotoxin serotype A [BoNT-A]) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of NDO. Intradetrusor injection of BoNT-A has been shown to have clinical utility for the treatment of urinary incontinence, with consequent improvements in quality of life for patients. In the past 20 years, this treatment has been shown to be an effective treatment for patients with SCI refractory to antimuscarinic medication. The present review focused on publications in MEDLINE/PubMed relating to botulinum toxin to evaluate the treatment outcomes of repeated injection of BoNT-A, the mechanisms of action, results of clinical and urodynamic studies, and adverse effects.

How long does the effect of botulinum toxin in neurogenic patients last? An analysis of the subset of "good responders"

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess long-term efficacity of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective monocentric study in a reference center. We included patients who received intradetrusor BoNT-A for NDO between 2001 and 2015. The focus of our analysis was on patients defined as "good responders" (≥ 5 injections of intradetrusor BoNT-A over a period of ≥5 years). The primary endpoint was the evaluation of long-term efficacity of BoNT-A. Recurrent NDO was monitored by the use of cystomanometry before the first injection and 1 month after each injection. The secondary objective was to assess the influence of NDO's etiology, age, and sex on the long-term efficacity of the treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were included (60.7% with spinal cord injury [SCI] and 36.4% with multiple sclerosis [MS]). The mean follow-up period was 83.7 months (66; 120). The mean number of injections was of 8.9 (5; 21). A total of 67.3% (n = 72) of patients were still controlled by treatment at the end of their follow-up period. Therapeutic failure occurred in 30 patients (26.1%) with a cessation of BoNT-A treatment at 76 months on average (median: 82.5 months). There was no significant impact of age (P = .42), sex (P = .35), or NDO's etiology (MS vs SCI; P = .54) on long-term efficacy of BoNT-A treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that the application of BoNT-A seems to be an effective and durable treatment in a large number of neurogenic patients after more than 10 years of follow-up. However, botulinum toxin tolerance occurred in approximately 25% of patients.

The Therapeutic Effects and Pathophysiology of Botulinum Toxin A on Voiding Dysfunction Due to Urethral Sphincter Dysfunction

Neurogenic and non-neurogenic urethral sphincter dysfunction are common causes of voiding dysfunction. Injections of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) into the urethral sphincter have been used to treat urethral sphincter dysfunction (USD) refractory to conventional treatment. Since its first use for patients with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia in 1988, BoNT-A has been applied to various causes of USD, including dysfunctional voiding, Fowler’s syndrome, and poor relaxation of the external urethral sphincter. BoNT-A is believed to decrease urethral resistance via paralysis of the striated sphincter muscle through inhibition of acetylcholine release in the neuromuscular junction. Recovery of detrusor function in patients with detrusor underactivity combined with a hyperactive sphincter also suggested the potential neuromodulation effect of sphincteric BoNT-A injection. A large proportion of patients with different causes of USD report significant improvement in voiding after sphincteric BoNT-A injections. However, patient satisfaction might not increase with an improvement in the symptoms because of concomitant side effects including exacerbated incontinence, urinary urgency, and over-expectation. Nonetheless, in terms of efficacy and safety, BoNT-A is still a reasonable option for refractory voiding function. To date, studies focusing on urethral sphincter BoNT-A injections have been limited to the heterogeneous etiologies of USD. Further well-designed studies are thus needed.

Generalised muscle weakness after bladder wall injection of Abobotulinum Toxin A: experience of a woman with tetraplegia who required increased caregiver support: importance of doctor-patient communication: duty of candour for spinal cord physician and responsibilities of a patient

INTRODUCTION

Generalised muscle weakness can occur after bladder wall injection of Abobotulinum toxin and the patient may require additional caregiver support.

CASE PRESENTATION

A woman with C-8 AIS A tetraplegia received bladder wall injection of Abobotulinum toxin A 1000 units for detrusor over-activity. After 2.5 weeks, she developed weakness of arms; could not lift herself for pressure relief; could not transfer using sliding board; she regained the original muscle strength in 6 weeks. After 13 months, Abobotulinum toxin A 1000 units were injected into detrusor. Ten days after the second Abobotulinum toxin A injection, she developed generalised muscle weakness. She had not regained full function in her arms and hands 8 months later.Prior to bladder wall injection of Abobotulinum toxin A, this patient was not aware that she could develop muscle weakness albeit very rarely. Therefore, the patient made no association of the muscle weakness, which occurred after the first injection, to Abobotulinum toxin A. For this reason, she did not inform the clinicians that she developed weakness of upper limbs following Abobotulinum toxin A injection. As she was not informed of this side effect before the second bladder wall injection of Abobotulinum toxin A, she consented to undergo the repeat procedure and developed generalised muscle weakness.

DISCUSSION

Patients should inform doctors the adverse effects of medical therapy so that future treatment is amended to ensure patient safety. Professional duty of candour states that doctors should discuss risks which occur often, those that are serious even if very unlikely, and those that are important to the patient.

Another Therapeutic Role for Intravesical Botulinum Toxin: Patients with Long-stay Catheters and Refractory Bladder Pain and Catheter Bypass Leakage

BACKGROUND

Botulinum neurotoxin (BotN) is used to treat detrusor overactivity (DO) refractory to medical treatment. Catheterised patients with symptoms of bladder spasm and catheter bypass leakage are challenging to manage and the efficacy of BotN is not established.

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience using intravesical BotN to treat refractory bladder pain and catheter bypass leakage in patients with long-term indwelling catheters.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We carried out a review of data prospectively collected for patients with indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheters receiving BotN for the treatment of bladder spasms and catheter bypass leakage in a UK tertiary centre. An unvalidated structured questionnaire was used to ascertain quality of life (QoL) outcomes.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Qualitative data were collected for patient-reported symptoms and QoL. Paired Student t tests were applied for statistical analysis.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the 54 catheterised patients who received BotN, 14 (26%) were male and 40 (74%) were female. The mean follow-up was 38mo. Of the patients, 34 (63%) had a neurological aetiology and 94% had experienced failure of medical therapy before BotN administration. The BotN starting dose was 100 or 200U and 17 patients (31%) required dose escalation. All 34 neurogenic and six non-neurogenic patients started on 200U. After treatment, 63% of patients managed their catheter with intermittent drainage and 37% managed on free drainage; 51 patients (94%) reported that their symptoms were controlled and 38% reported being treated for a urinary tract infection following BotN. Patients reported a mean improvement in QoL of 7.7/10 following BotN, while 83% reported a significant reduction in urine leakage (p=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient intravesical BotN is safe and efficacious for patients with long-term catheters suffering from bladder pain and catheter bypass leakage.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Outpatient administration of intravesical botulinum toxin is a safe and effective treatment for patients with a long-term indwelling catheter with bothersome urine storage symptoms. Attention should be paid to urine microbiology results before treatment to ensure appropriate prophylactic antibiotic treatment to reduce the incidence of urinary tract infections.

Botulinum toxin in the treatment of overactive bladder

Clinical effectiveness of botulinum toxin (BTX) in the treatment of both neurogenic and idiopathic detrusor overactivity has been demonstrated in several studies. However, different protocols and techniques have been used by authors.

Methods.

Literature review on intradetrusor injection of BTX for detrusor overactivity.

Results.

The greatest clinical experience reports the use of 200 and 300 U Botox®. Available data suggest that clinical efficacy, duration, and the side effect profile is similar at these doses. Very few data, on the other hand, are available regarding the clinical outcomes using the Dysport® preparation; isolated reports support that efficacy is similar when using a dosing range of 500 to 1000 SU with increased risk of systemic side effects using 1000 SU. A variety of injection volumes was used, demonstrating similar efficacy and tolerability profile. Clinical effect duration extends six to ten months in the majority of studies. Data suggest that a repeated injection scheme proves successful in the vast majority of initial responders.

Conclusions.

Safety, effectiveness, specificity and reversibility make BTX a new attractive treatment modality for overactive bladder syndrome. However, more experience is needed to standardize the injection protocol with respect to therapeutic outcomes and adverse effects.

Long-term response of different Botulinum toxins in refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to spinal cord injury

Purpose

To assess the response in spinal cord injured patients alternatively treated with different types and dosages of Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) over 15 years.

Material and methods

Patients who underwent first BoNT/A from 1999-2001 and practiced intermittent catheterization were included. Baseline 3-day bladder diary (BD) and urodynamics were collected. BoNT/A failure was defined when patients asked for re-injection ≤ 3 months post-treatment. Criteria for re-injection was at least one daily episode of urinary incontinence at BD. Before re-injection, patients were asked if they had reached 6 months of dryness without antimuscarinics (YES response).

Results

Overall, 32/60 (53.4%) “No failure” (NF) group; 16 (26.6%) “occasional failure” (OF) and 12 (20%) “consecutive failure” (CF) were included. A total of 822 BoNT/A infiltrations were performed. The mean interval from previous injection to treatment re-scheduling was 8 months. No significant differences between treatments were found within the three groups (p>0.05). The percentage of YES responses increased from 19% (AboBoNT/A 500IU) to 29 % (OnaBoNT/A 300IU) in NF, and from 18% (AboBoNT/A 500IU) to 25% (OnaBoNT/A 300IU) for OF. Five NF cases (15.6%) maintained 6 months of dryness after each injection. Among the baseline variables, only low compliance (< 20mL/cmH₂O) was found as predictor for failure (p=0.006).

Conclusions

Long term BoNT/A for NDO did not increase failures, independent of the types of treatments and switching. Definition of failure and other criteria for continuing repetitive BoNT/A treatment is mandatory. CF was predictable for no response in earlier follow-up.

Clinical and Urodynamic Results of Repeated Intradetrusor Onabotulinum Toxin A Injections in Refractory Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity: Up to 5 Injections in a Cohort of Children With Myelodysplasia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of repeated intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A (onaBoNT-A) injections in children with neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to myelodysplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 19 children (4 boys and 15 girls) with a mean age of 10.3 ± 3.1 years old, who had received at least 2 injections of 10 U/kg onaBoNT-A for the treatment of urinary incontinence resistant to anticholinergic treatment and clean intermittent catheterization in our clinic, between 2010 and 2015. Controlled urodynamic studies were performed at the baseline and 3 months after each injection.

RESULTS

Eight of the children received 3 injections, 5 children had 4 injections, and 2 children had 5 injections. From the baseline to the fifth injection, the detrusor compliance (1.3, 4.5, 10, 20.7, 18.8, and 16.6 mL/cm H₂O), the maximum bladder capacity (82.0, 157.0, 191.0, 272.0, 299.0, and 210.5 mL), and the maximum detrusor pressure (55.0, 33.0, 22.0, 12.5, 16.0, and 12.5 cm H₂O) were assessed. The findings significantly improved following the first, second, and third injections, when compared with the previous bladder dynamics (P <.05), but the differences with the fourth were not statistically significant (P >.05). The continence periods were similar under clean intermittent catheterization after all of the injections (P <.05), and no severe side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Repeated onaBoNT-A injections are a safe treatment modality and can be offered as an effective alternative choice, instead of more invasive surgery, in children with neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to myelodysplasia.

Botulinum toxin in spinal cord injury patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity

Evidence for the efficacy and safety of intravesical onabotulinum toxin A (onabotA) injections has led to them being licensed in many countries, including Korea, for the treatment of patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) resulting from spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis who are refractory or intolerant to anticholinergic medications. OnabotA injections have an inhibitory effect on acetylcholine release for up to 10 months, with a recommended dose of 200 U. OnabotA treatment has a beneficial effect not only on urinary symptoms, but also on quality of life. Several clinical studies have shown onabotA to have better effects than placebo in achieving continence, reducing incontinence episodes, improving urodynamic parameters, and improving health-related quality of life. Urinary tract infections and postvoid residual volume are the most prevalent side effects. In patients with residual volume, clean intermittent catheterization may be necessary. In patients with spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis, it is recommended to evaluate physical and cognitive function before intravesical onabotA injection to ensure that the patient and caregiver are able to perform catheterization if necessary. Further controlled trials should assess the optimal dose, injection technique, long-term safety of repeated injections, and optimal timing of onabotA treatment in the treatment of NDO.

Testing and Treating Women after Unsuccessful Conservative Treatments for Overactive Bladder or Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Model-Based Economic Evaluation Based on the BUS Study

Objective

To compare the cost-effectiveness of bladder ultrasonography, clinical history, and urodynamic testing in guiding treatment decisions in a secondary care setting for women failing first line conservative treatment for overactive bladder or urgency-predominant mixed urinary incontinence.

Design

Model-based economic evaluation from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective using data from the Bladder Ultrasound Study (BUS) and secondary sources.

Methods

Cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree and a 5-year time horizon based on the outcomes of cost per woman successfully treated and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year (QALY). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and a value of information analysis are also undertaken.

Results

Bladder ultrasonography is more costly and less effective test-treat strategy than clinical history and urodynamics. Treatment on the basis of clinical history alone has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £491,100 per woman successfully treated and an ICER of £60,200 per QALY compared with the treatment of all women on the basis of urodynamics. Restricting the use of urodynamics to women with a clinical history of mixed urinary incontinence only is the optimal test-treat strategy on cost-effectiveness grounds with ICERs of £19,500 per woman successfully treated and £12,700 per QALY compared with the treatment of all women based upon urodynamics. Conclusions remained robust to sensitivity analyses, but subject to large uncertainties.

Conclusions

Treatment based upon urodynamics can be seen as a cost-effective strategy, and particularly when targeted at women with clinical history of mixed urinary incontinence only. Further research is needed to resolve current decision uncertainty.

Botulinum toxin A for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder

The standard treatment for overactive bladder starts with patient education and behavior therapies, followed by antimuscarinic agents. For patients with urgency urinary incontinence refractory to antimuscarinic therapy, currently both American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines suggested that intravesical injection of botulinum toxin A should be offered. The mechanism of botulinum toxin A includes inhibition of vesicular release of neurotransmitters and the axonal expression of capsaicin and purinergic receptors in the suburothelium, as well as attenuation of central sensitization. Multiple randomized, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that botulinum toxin A to be an effective treatment for patients with refractory idiopathic or neurogenic detrusor overactivity. The urinary incontinence episodes, maximum cystometric capacity, and maximum detrusor pressure were improved greater by botulinum toxin A compared to placebo. The adverse effects of botulinum toxin A, such as urinary retention and urinary tract infection, were primarily localized to the lower urinary tract. Therefore, botulinum toxin A offers an effective treatment option for patients with refractory overactive bladder.

The role of botulinum toxin A in treating neurogenic bladder

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) can result in lower and upper urinary tract complications and eventually even in end-stage kidney failure. Since the driving force of this clinical cascade is high bladder pressure, controlling intravesical pressure in NDO patients improves both quality of life and life-expectancy in these patients. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) has proven its efficacy in reducing intravesical pressure and in reducing incontinence episodes. BTX-A also improves quality of life in patients with NDO. Both onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox^®, Allergan, Irvine, USA) and abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport^®, Ipsen, Paris, France) have a level A recommendation for NDO-treatment. The recommended dose for intradetrusor injections in NDO patients is 200 U of onabotulinumtoxinA or 500 U of abobotulinumtoxinA. The drug is generally administered extratrigonal in the detrusor muscle, via cystoscopic guided injection at 20 sites in 1 mL injections. Intradetrusor BTX-A injections are safe, with mostly local complications such as urinary tract infection and high post-void residual or retention. The effect of the toxin lasts for approximately 9 months. Repeat injections can be performed without loss of efficacy. Different injection techniques, novel ways of BTX-A administration, eliminating the need for injection or new BTX-A types with better/longer response rates could change the field in the future.

Efficacy and safety of two administration modes of an intra-detrusor injection of 750 units dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA) in patients suffering from refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO): A randomised placebo-controlled phase IIa study

AIMS

Assess the efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) in adult patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO).

METHODS

This Phase IIa, international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, pilot study enrolled 47 patients with NDO and urinary incontinence resulting from spinal cord injury (SCI) or multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients were treated with 15 intra-detrusor injections of Dysport 750 U or the equivalent placebo (n = 16 and 7) or 30 injections of Dysport 750 U or the equivalent placebo (n = 17 and 7). Primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean number of daily incontinence episode frequency (IEF) at day 84. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in urodynamic parameters and quality of life (QOL). A safety assessment was also conducted.

RESULTS

Adjusted mean changes from baseline in IEF were -3.2 (-76%) and -1.7 (-15%) for 15 injections Dysport and placebo groups, respectively, (P = 0.1103) and -3.2 (-88%) and -2.6 (-73%) for 30 injections Dysport and placebo groups, respectively, (P = 0.0686). Statistically significant improvements in maximum cystometric capacity, maximum detrusor pressure and volume at first contraction were reported in the Dysport groups compared with placebo (P < 0.05). Improvements in QOL were reported. Three muscle weakness episodes were reported as serious adverse events in two tetraplegic and one paraplegic patient, all in the 15 injections Dysport group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 15 and 30 injections administration modes of Dysport decreased daily IEF and resulted in significant improvements in urodynamic parameters in NDO patients with MS or SCI. Reduction to 15 injection sites did not appear to be associated with any impact on efficacy. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:457-462, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Efficacy and safety of the first and repeated intradetrusor injections of abobotulinum toxin A 750 U for treating neurological detrusor overactivity

PURPOSE

To assess clinical and urodynamic efficacy of the first and repeated intradetrusor injections of abobotulinum toxin A (Dysport(®), Ipsen(®), France) in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) refractory to anticholinergic treatment.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted in 81 consecutive patients who had never received any botulinum toxin intradetrusor injections. They were treated with at least one 750 U intradetrusor injection of abobotulinum toxin A. All patients performed clean intermittent self-catheterization (CIC) before injections. Success was defined as a combination of no incontinence episode, a number of catheterization <8 reported in a 3-day bladder diary and the lack of detrusor overactivity.

RESULTS

Six weeks after the first injection, the success rate was 64.2 %. The proportion of continent patients was 80.2 %, the mean number of CIC per 24 h reduced (-3.55, p < 0.0001) and the mean catheterization volume increased (+237.3 ml, p < 0.0001). Regarding urodynamics, mean maximum cystometric capacity and mean volume at the first uninhibited contraction increased (+132.7 ml, p < 0.0001 and +180 ml, p < 0.0001, respectively) and mean maximum bladder pressure decreased significantly (-21.5 cm H2O, p < 0.0001). Mean reinjection number was 3.9 and mean interval between reinjection was 8.8 ± 3 months. The clinical efficacy rate after each reinjection (up to fourteen) was at least 86.7 %. Out of 55 patients who underwent repeated injections, secondary resistance was noted in 2 (3.6 %).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study are in favor of a long-term safety and efficacy of abobotulinum toxin A 750 U for NDO.

Evaluation and Management of Neurogenic Bladder: What Is New in China?

Neurogenic bladder (NB) or neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), a dysfunction of the urinary bladder and urethra due to disease of the central nervous system or peripheral nerves, is a major global medical and social problem. Numerous nervous system abnormalities, such as: stroke, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, traumatic spinal cord injury, spinal cord tumors, congenital spina bifida, and diabetes, can cause NB/NLUTD. There are two major types of bladder control problems associated with NB/NLUTD: the bladder becomes either overactive or underactive depending on the nature, level, and extent of nerve damage. This review specifically focuses on the diagnosis and management of NB/NLUTD in China as well as on recent efforts to treat this disease.

Efficacy and duration of response to botulinum neurotoxin A (onabotulinumA) as a treatment for detrusor overactivity in women

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Overactive bladder syndrome with urinary incontinence has a number of treatment options. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK, the American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommend intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin A (onabotulinumA) injections in women with proven detrusor overactivity (DO) in whom conservative therapies have failed to improve symptoms. However, the effects of individual onabotulinumA treatments are of short duration and patients usually require further treatments. There is little evidence to inform long-term management strategies using onabotulinumA for DO.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients receiving intradetrusor onabotulinumA injections for DO over a 7-year period was conducted. The primary outcome measures included patient's subjective reports of symptom change following injections (efficacy) and the duration of symptomatic relief following each treatment.

RESULTS

The analysis included 136 patients. The mean time between patients receiving intradetrusor onabotulinumA and being added to the surgical waiting list for re-treatment varied between 8.5 and 10.4 months for the first five cycles of treatment with the longest time between the third and fourth cycles. This decreased to 5.5 and 5.25 (ANOVA p = 0.015) between the fifth and sixth cycles and between the sixth and seventh cycles of treatment, respectively. Only 19.9% of patients continued treatment beyond this, with four patients receiving a seventh treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in patients who respond to onabotulinumA treatment, the duration of response declines after the fifth treatment, suggesting a possible tolerance effect and a subsequent decline in efficacy.

Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients

Neurogenic bladder dysfunction due to spinal cord injury poses a significant threat to the well-being of patients. Incontinence, renal impairment, urinary tract infection, stones, and poor quality of life are some complications of this condition. The majority of patients will require management to ensure low pressure reservoir function of the bladder, complete emptying, and dryness. Management typically begins with anticholinergic medications and clean intermittent catheterization. Patients who fail this treatment because of inefficacy or intolerability are candidates for a spectrum of more invasive procedures. Endoscopic managements to relieve the bladder outlet resistance include sphincterotomy, botulinum toxin injection, and stent insertion. In contrast, patients with incompetent sphincters are candidates for transobturator tape insertion, sling surgery, or artificial sphincter implantation. Coordinated bladder emptying is possible with neuromodulation in selected patients. Bladder augmentation, usually with an intestinal segment, and urinary diversion are the last resort. Tissue engineering is promising in experimental settings; however, its role in clinical bladder management is still evolving. In this review, we summarize the current literature pertaining to the pathology and management of neurogenic bladder dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury.

The evaluation and management of refractory neurogenic overactive bladder

Patients with neurologic disease commonly develop overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms of urgency, frequency, and/or urge incontinence that remain bothersome despite oral pharmacologic therapy. Management of refractory OAB in the neurogenic population is a complex issue with no uniform treatment strategy. When treatment fails or patients generally are dissatisfied with the adverse effects of oral therapy, available options include sacral neuromodulation, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), botulinum toxin injections, and lower urinary tract reconstruction such as augmentation cystoplasty. A thorough knowledge and understanding of available and emerging treatment options for neurogenic detrusor overactivity is paramount to assisting clinicians in choosing an appropriate treatment. This article reviews the non-pharmacologic treatment options for neurogenic OAB, mainly botulinum toxin, neuromodulation, and lower urinary tract reconstruction, and discusses important relevant studies.

OnabotulinumtoxinA for neurogenic detrusor overactivity and dose differences: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA for patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, Chinese Bio-medicine database, China Journal Full-text Database, VIP database, Wanfang database for randomized controlled trials (from inception to September 2012). Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological and evidence quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Table and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) respectively. Data analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1 and descriptive analysis was employed if necessary.

RESULTS

Eight studies were selected (n=1879 participants). OnabotulinumtoxinA was more related to urinary tract infection (UTI) (200 U: OR 1.72, CI: 1.18-2.52; 300 U: OR 1.88, CI: 1.31-2.69) versus placebo. Also, OnabotulinumtoxinA was superior to placebo in improving maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) (200 U: OR 138.80, CI: 112.45-165.15; 300 U: OR 152.09, CI: 125.25-178.93) and decreasing maximum detrusor pressure (MDP) (200 U: MD -29.61, CI: -36.52--22.69; 300 U: MD-28.92, CI: -39.59--18.25). However, there were no statistical differences between 200 U and 300 U onabotulinumtoxinA in UTI (OR 0.84, CI: 0.58-1.22), MCC (OR-12.72, CI: -43.36-17.92) and MDP (MD 2.21, CI: -6.80-11.22).

CONCLUSIONS

OnabotulinumtoxinA may provide superior clinical and urodynamic benefit for populations with NDO. High-quality studies are required for evaluating the optimal dose, long-term application and when to perform repeated injections.

Botulinum toxin for symptomatic therapy in multiple sclerosis

Botulinum toxin (BT) is a neurotoxin that paralyzes muscles by inhibiting release of acetylcholine from presynaptic vesicles at the neuromuscular junction. In people with multiple sclerosis (MS), clinical experience and research studies show that local injection of minute quantities of BT can temporarily control skeletal muscle spasticity, bladder detrusor hyperreflexia, and tremor. Specifically, BT injections have been shown to reduce muscle tone and improve passive function, and possibly improve active function, in patients with spasticity. Injection of BT into the bladder wall is a uniquely effective, safe, and durable treatment in patients with neurogenic detrusor hyperreflexia due to MS who have insufficient response or who do not tolerate oral antimuscarinic medications. This procedure has markedly reduced the need for indwelling catheters and bladder surgery. In addition, a recent study suggests BT may be effective for select patients with MS-associated upper extremity tremor. Appropriate use of BT can improve quality of life for many patients with MS.

Experience with botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in clinical practice

Control of the lower urinary tract is a complex, multilevel process that involves both the peripheral and central nervous system. Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) is a widespread chronic illness that impairs millions of people worldwide. Neurogenic LUTD has a major impact on quality of life, affecting emotional, social, sexual, occupational and physical aspects of daily life, and in addition to the debilitating manifestations for patients, it also imposes a substantial economic burden on every healthcare system. First-line treatment for neurogenic LUTD includes antimuscarinics and some form of catheterization, preferably intermittent self-catheterization. However, the treatment effect is often unsatisfactory, so that other options have to be considered. Moreover, neurogenic LUTD is a challenge because all available treatment modalities (i.e. conservative, minimally invasive and invasive therapies) may fail. In recent years, botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) treatment has been shown to be an effective pharmacological therapy option in patients refractory to antimuscarinic and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). Several studies have shown that BoNT/A injection significantly reduces detrusor muscle overactivity. Also BoNT/A treatment of NDO has revealed a significant improvement of lower urinary tract function with regard to reduced urinary incontinence, reduced detrusor pressure, increased bladder capacity and improved quality of life in NDO.

OnabotulinumtoxinA and multiple sclerosis

Lower urinary tract dysfunction is present in two of three patients with multiple sclerosis five years after the diagnosis. Most frequent symptoms are related to neurogenic detrusor overactivity, often associated with detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. From the end of the 1990s, there is growing evidence that neurogenic detrusor overactivity can be effectively managed by intradetrusorial injections of botulinum toxin type A. This treatment has shown, in different randomised placebo-controlled trials, to be safe and effective on clinical and urodynamic parameters with significant improvement in quality of life. The median duration of effect is in mean nine months. The vast majority of studies have been conducted with onabotulinumtoxinA. The dose of onabotulinumtoxinA commonly used to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity in patients with multiple sclerosis is 200 UI, even if in selected patients lower doses can be preferred. To be considered eligible for treatment, all patients should accept and be instructed to perform clean intermittent self-catheterisation, since the risk of increased post-void residual volume and/or urinary retention after injection is high, especially with 200 UI of onabotulinumtoxinA. However, quality of life and patient satisfaction seem not to be affected by the need of intermittent catheterisation. The risk of urinary infection after the procedure is to be kept in mind, mainly in patients with multiple sclerosis, so that adequate antibiotic prophylaxis is highly recommended.

Advances in the management of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in multiple sclerosis

Bladder dysfunction in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be socially disabling, have negative psychological and economic consequences, and impair patients' quality of life. Knowledge of the functional anatomy and physiology of the urinary tract is essential to understand the symptoms associated with central nervous system lesions and the pharmacotherapies used to treat them. Treatments for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) have consisted mainly of administration of anticholinergic drugs, which have been shown to provide suboptimal clinical benefits and be poorly tolerated. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of intravesicular botulinum toxin therapy provides a second-line option for MS patients with NDO not responsive to anticholinergic drugs. We performed a review of key literature pertaining to the intravesicular application of botulinum toxin. In the management of NDO, administration of intravesicular botulinum toxin using clean intermittent catheterization decreases the incidence of urinary tract infections, promotes urinary continence, and improves quality of life for 9 months after a single injection; moreover, those benefits are maintained with repeated injections over time.

Pharmacotherapy of overactive bladder syndrome

Urinary incontinence is a common and distressing condition that is known to adversely affect quality of life. Overactive bladder (OAB) is the term used to describe the symptom complex of urgency with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia. Drug therapy, in addition to behavioral modification, remains integral in the management of women with OAB, and the development of new drugs, treatment regimens and methods of delivery should improve patient compliance and acceptability. Developments over the last 10 years have led to the launch of several new drugs for the treatment of OAB that may offer greater efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. This article critically reviews the current pharmacological treatment of OAB in addition to providing a rationale for treatment.

Repeated injections of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA as adjunctive treatment of children with neurogenic bladder

AIM

To evaluate the effects of repeated injections of onabotulinumtoxinA in children with neurogenic bladders refractory to conventional treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 26 children with neurogenic bladder were prospectively studied. Some patients received up to four repeat injections. Patients were reinjected if they showed improvement in voiding diary, score of urinary incontinence and/or urodynamic studies; otherwise, augmentation cystoplasty was indicated.

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients, 12 were reinjected a second time, 6 patients were reinjected a third time and 2 patients received a repeat injection for the fourth time. Six months after the first, second and third injection, the urinary incontinence score 0 (dry) was 50, 77 and 75 %, respectively. After each injection, the mean bladder capacity in voiding diary and the mean maximum cystometric capacity increased. The mean detrusor pressure at the end of filling decreased. Only compliance after the first injection improved significantly. Detrusor overactivity (n: 4), improved during 3 months and reappeared in three children after the first injection, but at greater cystometric volumes. In the fourth case, it reappeared 11 months after the third injection. Five patients underwent cystoplasty.

CONCLUSION

After treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA, urinary continence achieved was 50-77 %. There were favorable changes in urodynamic variables, but they were insufficient. Detrusor overactivity was attenuated, but did not disappear completely.

Therapeutic outcome and patient adherence to repeated onabotulinumtoxinA detrusor injections in chronic spinal cord-injured patients and neurogenic detrusor overactivity

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To investigate the continuous therapeutic effects and urinary incontinence severity after repeated detrusor injections of 200-U of onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) in chronic spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2010, patients with chronic SCI and refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (DO) were treated with repeated sets of 200-U BoNT-A injected into 20 sites every 6 months. All patients underwent urological examinations and video-urodynamic studies at baseline and after each BoNT-A treatment. The outcomes were measured using Urogenital Distress Inventory 6-item short form (UDI-6) for urinary incontinence. The severity of urinary incontinence and urodynamic parameters were compared after each BoNT-A injection.

RESULTS

A total of 59 SCI patients with a mean age of 42.1 ± 13.1 years were enrolled. The UDI-6 incontinence scores persistently improved for up to three injections. The rate of dryness and mild incontinence reported by patients persistently improved from 25.4% at baseline to 74% at 3 months after the fourth injection, but decreased slightly after the fourth injection. The overall satisfaction rate after single or repeated injections was 59.3% (35 patients), and the failure rate was 33.9% (20 patients), and discontinuation rate owing to adverse events (2 recurrent UTI, 2 autonomic dysreflexia) was 6.8% (4 patients). Among the 20 patients who reported failure to treatment, 10 patients (16.9%) reported no significant improvement after one or repeated injections, eight converted to augmentation enterocystoplasty.

CONCLUSION

Repeated 200-U BoNT-A injections every 6 months for neurogenic DO in chronic SCI patients provided a satisfactory initial outcome. However, only 20% patients continued the repeated treatment.

Efficacy of Onabotulinum Toxin A (Botox) versus Abobotulinum Toxin A (Dysport) Using a Conversion Factor (1 : 2.5) in Treatment of Primary Palmar Hyperhidrosis

Background. Two preparations of botulinum A toxin (BTX-A) are commercially available for the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH): Botox (Allergan; 100 U/vial) and Dysport (Ipsen Limited; 500 U/vial), which are not bioequivalent. Results regarding an appropriate conversion factor between them are controversial. Objectives. This paper aims to compare the efficacy of Botox and Dysport in PPH using a conversion factor of 1 : 2.5. Methods. Eight patients with severe PPH received intradermal injections of Botox in one palm and Dysport in the other in the same session. Clinical assessment was performed at baseline and posttreatment for 8 months using Minor's iodine starch test, Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) test. Results. At 3 weeks, a significant decrease in sweating for both preparations was noted which was more pronounced with Dysport compared with Botox. At 8 weeks, this difference turned insignificant. Continued evaluation showed similar improvement in both palms with a nonsignificant difference. Patients with longer disease duration were more liable to relapse. Conclusion. The efficacy and safety of Botox and Dysport injections were similar using a conversion factor of 1 : 2.5. There was a trend towards a more rapid action after Dysport treatment but without significant importance.

Therapeutic outcome and quality of life between urethral and detrusor botulinum toxin treatment for patients with spinal cord lesions and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia

AIMS

Patients with spinal cord lesions and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) may be treated with urethral sphincter botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection for difficult urination or detrusor BoNT-A injection for incontinence. Although objective data showed improvement, patients might not be satisfied with the result especially in quality of life (QOL) issue. This study investigated the therapeutic results and QOL and patients' satisfaction to these two treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with spinal cord lesion and DSD were treated with urethral sphincter injection of 100 U of BoNT-A for main symptoms of difficult urination and detrusor injection of 200 U of BoNT-A for main symptom of incontinence. The urodynamic parameters, QOL scores using UDI-6 and IIIQ-7 and general satisfaction were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

The overall satisfactory result was perceived in 60.6% and 77.3% in patients who received urethral and detrusor BoNT-A injection, respectively. Urodynamic parameters showed significant improvement in both groups. Urethral injection group had improvement in IIQ-7, but not in UDI-6 scores whereas detrusor injection group had improvement in all scores. The improvement of UDI-6 and IIQ-7 was significantly greater in detrusor than urethral injection group. Increase in incontinence grade was the major cause of dissatisfaction in urethral injection group, whereas increase in difficult urination and needing catheterisation were the main dissatisfaction causes in detrusor injection group.

CONCLUSION

There was discrepancy between the objective urodynamic results and patient satisfaction in treatment of DSD by BoNT-A injection. Patients with DSD and treated with detrusor BoNT-A had greater QOL improvement than those treated with urethral injection.