The Treatment Satisfaction Scale: A Multidimensional Instrument for the Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction for Erectile Dysfunction Patients and Their Partners

Long-term penile prosthesis couple's satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Data supporting successful and satisfactory penile prosthesis (PP) implantation outcomes are mainly based on subjective, rather than objective, analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and objectively analyze, all available data related to patient and partner PP satisfaction.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An extensive search was performed, including the following key-words: ("penile prosthesis" and "satisfaction"). The search, which accrued data from January 1, 1969, up to July 31, 2023, was restricted to English-language articles including human participants.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Out of 663 retrieved articles, 83 were considered including, 12,132 subjects with a mean age and mean follow-up of 58.6 [range 20; 77.1] years and 47.6 [range 6; 374] months, respectively. Overall, a high patient satisfaction rate was observed 83[80; 86]%. The satisfaction rate increased in subjects with three-piece PP and in those with a higher rate of cardiovascular or neurological diseases and was independent of the patient's age. Partner's satisfaction rate was lower when compared to that observed in men and it increased according to the use of inflatable devices and the presence of patient Peyronie's disease. The long-term complication rate was limited ranging from 3% for erosion to 4.6% when mechanical failure was considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and partner satisfaction is excellent and increases with time. The number of complications is limited and is strongly associated with the presence of diabetes mellitus.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We found a high couple satisfaction score that was higher when reported by males compared to females. Patient satisfaction increased with time, and it was independent of age.

Improving Sexual Function through Penis Enlargement: Comparing Silicone Pearls Implantation and Fat Grafting

BACKGROUND

Although current penile enlargement techniques can improve appearance, it remains unclear whether these procedures increase sexual function. We aimed to systematically compare the surgical outcomes, with a particular focus on sexual function, in patients and their partners following silicone pearls implantation and fat grafting for penis enlargement.

METHODS

A single-site, retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent silicone pearls implantation or fat grafting for penis enlargement. In the operation, silicone pears were connected to form a ring-shaped implant, which was then implanted under the dartos fascia. For patients underwent fat grafting, a total of 40-55 ml of fat was injected for penis enlargement. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative data of patients and their partners were collected. The penis diameter, penis appearance score (PAS) and treatment satisfaction scale (TSS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both pearls implantation (n = 28) and fat grafting (n = 27) led to an increase in penis diameter. The TSS scores of patients who underwent pearls implantation increased by 11.96%, and the partners' scores increased by 9.17%. Specifically, Confidence, Pleasure from Sexual Activity, and Satisfaction with Orgasm scores of partners showed significant improvements. Partners' Satisfaction with Orgasm increased most. The total TSS scores of patients with fat grafting increased by 16.7%; meanwhile, scores of their partners had not obvious improvement.

CONCLUSION

Silicone pearls implantation was found to effectively improve the sexual function of men and the sexual satisfaction of their partners compared to fat grafting. Therefore, pearls implantation is possible to enhanced sexual experiences both for man and their partners.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Patient-reported outcome measures for medication treatment satisfaction: a systematic review of measure development and measurement properties

BACKGROUND

Medication Treatment Satisfaction (M-TS) from the patients' perspective is important for comprehensively evaluating the effect of medicines. The extent to which current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for M-TS are valid, reliable, responsive, and interpretable remains unclear. To assess the measurement properties of existing PROMs for M-TS and to highlight research gaps.

METHODS

Using PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane library (Ovid), IPA (Ovid), PsycINFO, Patient-Reported Outcome and Quality of Life Questionnaires biomedical databases, and four Chinese databases, we performed a systematic search for studies addressing the development and validation of PROMs for M-TS. Based on the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guideline, pairs of reviewers independently assessed the measurement properties of the PROMs and rated the quality of evidence on the measurement properties of each PROM. (The Open Science Framework registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8S5ZM ).

RESULTS

This review identified 69 PROMs for M-TS in 114 studies (four generic, 32 disease-specific, and 33 drug-specific) of which 60 were intended for adults. All provided limited or no information regarding interpretability. Most demonstrated appropriate construct validity including convergent validity (39/69) and discriminative or known-groups validity (40/69) (high to moderate quality of evidence). Only a few provided evidence of sufficient content validity (8/69), structural validity (13/69), and internal consistency (11/69). Of 38 PROMs reporting test-retest reliability, results in 24 provided evidence of satisfactory test-retest reliability (18 with high to moderate, 6 with low to very low quality of evidence). Few PROMs reported responsiveness (16/69). Two generic PROMs (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication initial Version 1.4, TSQM-1.4; Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire, SATMED-Q) and one drug-specific PROM (Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, ITSQ) demonstrated both satisfactory validity and reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Most existing PROMs for M-TS require further exploration of measurement properties. Reporting guidelines are needed to enhance the reporting quality of the development and validation of PROMs for M-TS.

Restorative therapy clinical trials for erectile dysfunction: a scoping review of endpoint measures

Given the lack of regulatory approval for restorative therapies for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, we hypothesized that clinical trials would vary in methodology and endpoint measurements. Our objective was to analyze methodological approaches and outcome measures of clinical trials evaluating restorative therapies for erectile dysfunction. Data was extracted from clinicaltrials.gov on trials which contained the keywords "erectile dysfunction". We evaluated trials initiated between 2004 and 2021 which listed a restorative therapy intervention. We identified 95 trials investigating energy-based/shockwave therapies (60/95), stem cell therapies (25/95), platelet-based therapies (6/95), and others (4/95). Only 41.1% of the trials evaluated safety. The most common efficacy endpoint was International Index of Erectile Function and Sexual Health Inventory for Men, and only 29.5% utilized penile Doppler. Thirty (31.6%) trials had been completed yet only 3 (3.2%) have published results. We found substantial heterogeneity in methodological approach in the trials. Subjective measures of erectile function were commonly reported, but definitions of inclusion criteria and objective outcome measures were inconsistent. These results provide a basis for the design of future clinical trials to improve the quality of trial data and aid in the development of standardized criteria for erectile dysfunction clinical trials.

Partner Involvement Reduces Postoperative Care Burden Following Penile Prosthesis Placement

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether preoperative partner involvement at clinic appointments is associated with deviation from a standardized postoperative care pathway for patients undergoing an inflatable penile prosthesis placement.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 170 patients undergoing primary inflatable penile prosthesis placement performed by a single surgeon between 2017 and 2020. A standardized postoperative clinical pathway was used, including planned follow-up visits at 2 weeks (for wound check and device deflation) and 6 weeks (for device teaching). Patient characteristics, including demographics, partner involvement, and the number of follow-up visits were obtained from the medical record. Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine whether partner involvement was associated with unanticipated follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Partners were involved in preoperative visits for 92 patients (54%). Additional unplanned follow-up visits were observed for 58 patients (34%) between 0 and 6 weeks and for 28 patients (16%) after 6 weeks from surgery. Partner involvement was associated with reduced odds of unanticipated follow-up visits, both between 0 and 6 weeks (odds ratios 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.75) and after 6 weeks (odds ratios 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.81) in adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

Having a patient's partner involved during the preoperative period is associated with a significant reduction in unanticipated follow-up. We would recommend that urologists routinely encourage patients considering the insertion of a penile prosthesis to involve their partners in perioperative visits. Further research needed is needed to determine how to best support patients during surgical decision-making and through the postoperative period.

Patient-reported outcome measures for medication-related quality of life: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Medication use is common for the prevention and treatment of many health conditions. Understanding the impact of medication-taking on quality of life is important, as it could contribute to better care plans and improve shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically identify and summarize the extent of literature on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for medication-related quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments databases were searched until May 17, 2021 for peer-reviewed, original research articles that included a PROM for medication-related QoL and reported its psychometric properties. Study selection were completed by pairs with a third reviewer resolving any conflicts. Data were extracted by the study team using a form in Microsoft Excel. Extracted data were summarized descriptively and tabulated numerically.

RESULTS

We screened 8,878 records, including 170 full-text articles, of which 86 met the criteria for inclusion. We identified 80 unique PROMs. Over half (n = 53) described measuring treatment satisfaction and less than one quarter measured medication related-QoL more broadly. Most of the included PROMs were targeted towards populations with specific health conditions including cancer (n = 9) and diabetes (n = 8), as well as individuals taking medication for non-specific conditions (n = 7). The most reported psychometric properties were internal consistency (n = 75) and construct validity (n = 77). All PROMs but one (n = 79) assessed physical health but fewer assessed other QoL dimensions (e.g., autonomy, interactions with providers).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the PROMs were designed for condition-specific or medication-specific populations, with few for general medication-related QoL. Future research should focus on assessing medication-related QoL measures for broader populations such as those with disabilities, multimorbidity, or experiencing polypharmacy. There needs to be more guidance on how to implement the use of PROMs in clinical settings, as well as to ensure consistency around terminology related to QoL.

A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

INTRODUCTION

A penile prosthesis (PP) may be inserted for erectile dysfunction (ED) and/or urinary management in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). This group of patients is considered high risk for complications due to their reduced mobility and sensation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the complication and satisfaction rates following PP insertion in patients with SCI.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA checklist. The Medline/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to July 27th 2021. Studies on men ≥18 years who had a PP inserted for ED secondary to SCI were included. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, assessed for risk of bias and performed data extraction.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 475 men with SCI were included for analysis. The overall complication rate was 4.2-61.1%. Specific complications included infection, 0-16%; erosion, 3.7-11.1% and mechanical failure, 0-16.7%. The explantation rate was 2.1-16.7% and the revision rate was 2.7-44.4%. Overall, 79.2-92.9% of men were satisfied with their PP and, 36-86.1% were having satisfactory sexual intercourse. In those who used the PP for urinary management ± ED, 86.5--92.8%% were satisfied. Men with SCI had higher rates of complications compared to those without SCI (infection, 2.1-9.1% vs non-SCI, 0.8-5.7%; erosion, 2.1-8.3% vs non-SCI, 0%; explanation, 2.1-8.3% vs non-SCI, 0.8-5.7%).

CONCLUSION

PP is an option for SCI patients for the management of end-stage ED or urinary function, but the rate of infection, erosion and implant explantation is higher compared with men without SCI. Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is the preferred PP due to the lower risk of erosion, however, they are prone to mechanical failure and require good hand dexterity. A thorough pre-operative counselling is essential. Pang KH, Muneer A, Alnajjar HM, et al. A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:461-470.

Penile Implant Surgery Satisfaction Assessment

BACKGROUND

Several studies reported high satisfaction rates (> 90%) for patients and their partners after penile prosthesis (PP) implantation.

AIM

To describe and critically discuss the current evidence regarding the assessment of patient and partner satisfaction after penile implant surgery.

METHODS

A critical narrative review of the studies investigating the patient and partner satisfaction after PP implantation was designed. Papers in English-language published until January 2021 were included.

OUTCOMES

The main outcome investigated was patient and partner satisfaction after penile implant surgery.

RESULTS

The International Index of Erectile Function , the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction , the Treatment Satisfaction Scale , and the Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis are the best-known validated tools used to assess satisfaction after PP implantation. Except for Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis , they were not validated in patients undergoing penile implant surgery. The lack of an "ad hoc" tool has led to the widespread of nonvalidated questionnaires. Several tools can be useful in the preimplantation counseling, such as the mnemonic Compulsive/obsessive, Unrealistic, Revision, Surgeon Shopping, Entitled, Denial, and Psychiatric , the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Men , the Attitude towards Penile Implant , and the Attitude Attributed to the Partner towards Penile Implant .

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Improvement of knowledge regarding the available tools to evaluate the satisfaction after penile implant surgery.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

Comprehensive and thorough review of all the main validated questionnaires available to assess satisfaction in patients with PP. Lack of a systematic approach and quantitative data analysis.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high satisfaction rate reported in the literature, most of the studies used suboptimal or non-validated questionnaires to assess patients undergoing penile implant surgery. Future research is needed to develop and validate a specific, complete and easy-to-use questionnaire. Manfredi C, Fortier É, Faix A, et al. Penile Implant Surgery Satisfaction Assessment. J Sex Med 2021;18:868-874.

Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) is not "female erectile dysfunction (ED)": challenges with the characterization of HSDD in women based on a systematic literature review

Objective: Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in women has been viewed inaccurately by some in the medical and payer community as analogous to erectile dysfunction (ED) in men. This literature review aims to highlight the distinctions between HSDD and ED.Methods: Two systematic literature searches were conducted on the epidemiology, symptomatology and biopsychosocial outcomes of HSDD and ED. Studies published since 2007 were considered for HSDD; studies published since 2012 were considered for ED.Results: HSDD in women is primarily a central nervous system condition related to neuroendocrine factors, whereby neural pathways that regulate sexual excitation and/or inhibition appear to be involved. A combination of organic and psychogenic factors often contributes to ED. HSDD and ED are associated with similar psychological and interpersonal consequences, but affect different phases of the sexual response model (desire versus arousal) and have different pathophysiologies, therefore requiring different treatment and outcome paradigms. ED is measured by objective, physiological responses (erection and sexual function), but quantitative assessments for HSDD are more difficult because loss of desire with associated distress has to be assessed. Outcome measures used to assess ED, such as the number of satisfying sexual events, are far less informative as an endpoint for randomized clinical trials of treatments for HSDD.Conclusions: HSDD and ED are distinct conditions affecting different phases of the sexual response model, and thus require clear and unique clinical characterization and adequate communication between the health care professional and patient for appropriate diagnosis, management and treatment.

Effects of e-aid cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (eCBTI) to prevent the transition from acute insomnia to chronic insomnia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Previous evidence suggested that online self-guided sleep intervention is efficacious in improving treatment outcomes in patients with chronic insomnia [corrected]. However, research on online sleep interventions targeting acute insomnia [corrected] has been scarce. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of brief e-aid cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (eCBTI) in preventing transition from acute insomnia to chronic insomnia [corrected].

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a pragmatic two-arm multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing eCBTI with treatment as usual (TAU) in outpatients. Two hundred patients with acute insomnia [corrected] (as defined by DSM-5) will be recruited. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive 1 week eCBTI via a Smartphone application, or to receive TAU. Treatment effects will be assessed at 1 week and 3 months after intervention. The primary outcome of the study, whether the eCBTI program is sufficient in preventing transition from short-term to chronic insomnia [corrected], is measured by the Insomnia Severity Index. Secondary outcome measurements include the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale, Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test, Sleep Hygiene and Practices Scale, Pre-sleep Arousal Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Additionally, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey will be used for measurement of mood symptoms and quality of life.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for the study has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Southern Medical University (reference number: NFEC-2017-131). The results of the investigation will be published in scientific papers. The data from the investigation will be made available online if necessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03302455 (clinicaltrials.gov). Date of registration: October 5, 2017.

Treatment satisfaction instruments for different purposes during a product's lifecycle: keeping the end in mind

This review investigates whether the development and implementation of treatment satisfaction instruments during a product's lifecycle are informed by their purpose. A basic literature review was performed between 2000 and 2010 using electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO®, and EMBASE) and the keywords 'satisfaction' and 'questionnaire' and 'medication' or 'drug'. Relevant articles were reviewed to extract the following information: type of study; study objectives; treatment satisfaction instrument used; clinical condition/indication; purpose of instrument; development of instrument; association of satisfaction with other endpoint measures; and main results and conclusions. Of 875 abstracts, 80 articles were further considered. Treatment satisfaction instruments were most commonly used in observational studies and interventional clinical trials. The review indicated similarities regarding the development and validation of satisfaction instruments, such as using patient input to derive the items and exploring classical measurement properties specific to the target population. Although some differences were apparent between instruments intended for use in clinical trials and clinical practice (e.g. the approaches used to enable the interpretation of satisfaction scores), the specificities of the implementation of treatment satisfaction during a product's lifecycle were rarely considered. By 'keeping the end in mind', data from treatment satisfaction instruments can help at three key stages: (i) product access to market: generating evidence as part of an overall value proposition to facilitate product reimbursement at a national level; (ii) market access to product: making the product available at a local level (e.g. local hospital formularies); and (iii) clinical practice: enhancing market penetration and product expansion after launch, and demonstrating value for prescribers. Furthermore, the development, validation, and interpretation of scores from treatment satisfaction instruments should be sensitive to the intended purpose. By considering the stage in the product lifecycle when an instrument is to be used, treatment satisfaction instruments can be developed with the specific research purpose and target audience in mind - whether it be patients, payers, or prescribers. In the future, treatment satisfaction instruments will become increasingly important for informing decisions at the individual level, giving patients a voice towards their overall management and care, and enhancing the relationship between doctor and patient.

Correlations with satisfaction measures in men treated with phosphodiesterase inhibitors for erectile dysfunction

This literature review examined the relationship of erectile function to patient satisfaction. Published correlation coefficients (r values) were sought between patient-reported outcomes (PROs; i.e., instruments/questionnaires) assessing erection or erectile function and PROs assessing individual sexual satisfaction, satisfaction in the context of the couple or relationship, or satisfaction with erection. The U.S. National Library of Medicine's PubMed database was searched for English-language, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of treatment with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who were not selected for any concomitant disease. Trials that reported correlations between an ED-specific and psychometrically validated PRO for an erection/erectile function concept and for a selected satisfaction concept were included. All correlations were positive, with almost all r values >.50. The positive relationship between results on erection/erectile function PROs and results on satisfaction PROs is probably reinforced bidirectionally such that improved erection/erectile function improves satisfaction, which further improves erection and/or erectile function.

The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty

Introduction. The objective of this study was to develop a short self-report questionnaire for evaluating patient satisfaction with the outcome of hip and knee replacement surgery. Methods. This scale consists of four items focusing on satisfaction with the extent of pain relief, improvement in ability to perform home or yard work, ability to perform recreational activities, and overall satisfaction with joint replacement. This instrument does not measure satisfaction with process of care. The responses are scored on a Likert scale, with the total score ranging from 25 to 100 per question. The instrument was tested on 1700 patients undergoing primary total hip and total knee replacement surgery, evaluated preoperatively, at 12 weeks, and one year postoperatively. Psychometric testing included internal consistency, measured with Cronbach's alpha, and convergent validity, measured by correlation with changes in measures of health status between the preoperative, 12-week, and one-year evaluations. Results. The internal consistency (reliability) of the scale, measured by the Cronbach's alpha, ranged from 0.86 to 0.92. The scale demonstrated substantial ceiling effects at 1 year. The scale scores correlated modestly with the absolute SF-36 PCS and WOMAC scores (ρ = 0.56–0.63 and also with the WOMAC change scores (ρ = 0.38–0.46) at both 12-week and 1-year followups. Conclusions. This instrument is valid and reliable for measuring patient satisfaction following primary hip and knee arthroplasty and could be further evaluated for use with other musculoskeletal interventions.

Standards for clinical trials in male sexual dysfunctions

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials in male sexual dysfunction (MSD) are expanding. Consequently, there is a need for consensus standards in this area.

AIM

To develop an evidence-based, state-of-the-art consensus report on standards for clinical trials in MSD.

METHODS

A literature review was performed examining clinical trials in erectile dysfunction (ED), premature ejaculation (PE), delayed/absent ejaculation, libido disorders/loss of desire, hypogonadism, and Peyronie's disease, focusing on publications published in the last 20 years. This manuscript represents the opinions of eight experts from seven countries developed in a consensus process. This document was presented for peer review and debate in a public forum and revisions were made based on recommendations of chairpersons to the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Expert opinion was based on the grading of evidence-based medical literature, widespread internal committee discussion, public presentation, and debate.

RESULTS

According to experience and recent publications in dealing with clinical trials in sexual dysfunction, recommendations have been made for conducting trials in patients with ED, PE, delayed ejaculation, libido disorders, hypogonadism, and Peyronie's disease.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that future clinical trials are conducted using standards upon which investigators can rely when reading manuscripts or conducting new trials in this field.

Aspects of sexual satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction: a factor analytic and logistic regression approach

INTRODUCTION

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) assess efficacy of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIMS

To determine the degree that multiplicity of satisfaction questions in ED treatment evaluation instruments are congruent, to better understand the concept of sexual "satisfaction," and to identify factors that correlate with improvement.

METHODS

Questionnaire data from 4,174 placebo- or tadalafil-treated patients with ED were analyzed. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on IIEF and SEP satisfaction questions. Spearman correlation coefficients were determined. Data from 431 of the 4,174 patients who completed EDITS questionnaires were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to investigate improvement of each IIEF satisfaction question.

RESULTS

PCA rotated on three factors explained 91% of total variance and separated IIEF Q6 (intercourse frequency) from a SEP and a remaining IIEF factor. All correlations between and among questions were close (rho = 0.62-0.98; P < 0.0001), except for those with IIEF Q6 (rho = 0.28-0.34; P < 0.0001). In a sub-sample, PCA of five IIEF, two SEP, and three EDITS questions identified four factors that explained 90% of all variance: EDITS questions, IIEF questions except Q6, SEP questions, and IIEF Q6. Greater improvement in IIEF-EF domain score was consistently and positively associated with satisfaction measures (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Factor analysis detected close relationships among satisfaction questions in IIEF, SEP, and EDITS instruments, each of which, apart from IIEF Q6 (intercourse frequency), appeared to be an independent measure of satisfaction. Cultural differences may explain different satisfaction correlations with baseline ED severity in different regions. Clinicians may make use of the correlation between intercourse frequency (Q6) and satisfaction when prescribing a PDE5 inhibitor for ED, by explaining that the inhibitor should enable more frequent intercourse.

Erectile dysfunction in end-stage liver disease men

INTRODUCTION

In men, erectile dysfunction (ED) is an important issue. Data concerning ED in men with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is limited, and the risk factors for ED in this population are still unknown.

AIMS

To determine the prevalence, timescale, and risk factors for ED in ESLD patients candidates to liver transplantation.

METHODS

Patients candidates for a liver transplantation were asked to participate in a mailed survey about sexual function. Among the 123 eligible men, 98 (84%) agreed to complete the questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The quality of erection was evaluated using the five-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score, and satisfaction for sexuality, using the patient-baseline Treatment-Satisfaction Scale (TSS) score. Other questions also focused on patient perception of changes over time.

RESULTS

On the overall population, 28 patients (29%) were nonsexually active. Among the 70 patients who were sexually active, 52 patients (74%) had ED. Regarding the development of ED, 50% of the patients perceived that a deterioration of erectile function occurred within the six previous months. The absence of sexual activity was more frequent in hepatitis B or C patients (P = 0.02). The risk factors for ED were alcohol intake (P = 0.03), tobacco use (P = 0.03), and cardiovascular disease (P = 0.004). The significant risk factors for having a low TSS score were having viral hepatitis (P = 0.01), and cardiovascular disease (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Population of men with ESLD who are candidates for a liver transplantation is characterized by a high frequency of lack of sexual activity, and by a high prevalence of ED and should be targeted by interventions to improve sexual functioning. These preliminary data need further validation in prospective trial using more comprehensive questionnaires.

Erectile dysfunction in liver transplant patients

The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of erectile dysfunction (ED) after liver transplantation (LT) and discuss potential risk factors. Of 123 eligible LT men, 98 (79.7%) responded to a questionnaire about sexual function at a mean time posttransplant of 5.4 +/- 4.0 years (1.0-21). Erection was evaluated using the five-question international index for erectile function score, and sexual satisfaction by the patient-baseline treatment-satisfaction status (TSS) score. Questions also focused on patient perception of changes overtime. We found that after LT, the proportion of sexually inactive men decreased from 29% to 15% (p = 0.01), but the proportion of men with ED remained unchanged. The absence of sexual activity was associated with pretransplant sexual inactivity (p = 0.001), age (p = 0.008), cardiovascular disease (p = 0.03), use of diuretics (p = 0.04), anticoagulants (p = 0.001), statins (p = 0.01) and treatment for diabetes (p = 0.03). Cardiovascular disease (p = 0.05), posttransplantation diabetes (p = 0.04), alcohol abuse (p = 0.03), antidepressants (p = 0.05) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (p = 0.05) were associated with having ED after LT. Having a low TSS score was associated with a history of endocrine disease (p = 0.03), antidepressants (p = 0.04) and diuretics (p = 0.03). In conclusion, LT improves sexual activity, but ED is multifactorial and remains a long-term condition in the majority of patients.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH—OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT: Validation of the Erection Hardness Score

INTRODUCTION

Erection hardness is a fundamental component of erectile function, and is a very specific and easily monitored outcome. The Erection Hardness Score (EHS) is a single-item, patient-reported outcome (PRO) for scoring erection hardness.

AIMS

The aim of this article is to report the psychometric validation of the EHS.

METHODS

The dataset (N = 307) was from a multinational sildenafil trial (efficacy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction [ED]) with a 2-week screening phase, a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, and a 6-week open-label extension.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), quality and distribution of responses, known-groups validity (ability to differentiate between ED severity groups defined by the International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] questionnaire), convergent validity (Pearson correlation coefficients with domain scores of the IIEF and the Quality of Erection Questionnaire [QEQ]), treatment responsiveness, and clinically important difference.

RESULTS

The EHS demonstrated good test-retest reliability, acceptable quality and distribution of responses, known-groups validity against the IIEF (including clear differentiation between normal and impaired erectile function), moderate-to-strong convergent validity against the prespecified domains of the IIEF and QEQ, and high treatment responsiveness.

CONCLUSION

The EHS has desirable measurement properties, including being highly responsive to treatment. This one-item PRO is robust and easy to use for evaluating erection hardness. Psychometric analysis supports the use of the EHS as a simple, reliable, and valid tool for the assessment of erection hardness in clinical trials research.

The Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) is a sensitive measure of treatment effectiveness for both patients and partners: results of a randomized controlled trial with vardenafil

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment studies do not routinely measure "treatment effectiveness," a function of treatment response (based on efficacy and tolerability) and treatment satisfaction (both patient and partner satisfaction). The ED Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) is a brief, comprehensive self-report measure of patient and partner satisfaction.

AIM

To measure, for the first time in an ED treatment study, pre- and post-treatment patient and partner satisfaction with the TSS.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-institutional comparison of the efficacy and safety of flexible-dose vardenafil was performed in 229 couples (treated man with ED >6 months and untreated woman partner aged > or =18 years without sexual dysfunction [defined as a total Female Sexual Function Index score >26.55]).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Couples completed the TSS throughout the trial. Couples also completed the modified Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire-Quality of Life domain (mSLQQ-QoL) and men completed the International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function domain (IIEF-EF). Analysis of covariance produced least squares (LS) mean domain scores. Post hoc Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for patient and partner TSS scores, and for TSS scores with other outcomes.

RESULTS

TSS domain scores increased from baseline to last observation carried forward (LOCF) in the vardenafil-treated men and untreated women partners, but exhibited little change for the placebo group (P < 0.0001 vs. placebo). For both patients and partners in the vardenafil group, correlations between TSS domains, the IIEF-EF and the mSLQQ-QoL scores at LOCF were moderate to strong.

CONCLUSIONS

The TSS detected that vardenafil was superior to placebo on treatment satisfaction from both patient and partner perspectives. The TSS holds promise for evaluating "treatment effectiveness" by measuring more general treatment satisfaction.

The COUPLES-project: a pooled analysis of patient and partner treatment satisfaction scale (TSS) outcomes following vardenafil treatment

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of vardenafil on treatment satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and their female partners.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a pooled analysis of three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week studies of flexible-dose vardenafil vs placebo, in men with ED for >/=6 months (n = 788) and their untreated female partners. Measures of efficacy included the Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS), International Index of Erectile Function, Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF), and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) questions 2 and 3 (SEP-2, 'Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?'; and SEP-3, 'Did your erection last long enough for you to have sexual intercourse?'). In addition to the overall analysis, there was a subgroup analysis for potential moderators of response, e.g. whether patients who had undergone previous phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, least-squares (LS) mean scores for all TSS domains were similar in the vardenafil and placebo groups. After 12 weeks of treatment, vardenafil significantly improved the LS mean score for all domains compared with placebo, among both patients and their female partners (P < 0.0001, 'last'-observation-carried- forward analysis). Absolute between- group differences in LS mean TSS scores (vardenafil - placebo) were: ease of erection (patients 23.4, partners 24.9), erectile function satisfaction (36.7 and 32.9), pleasure from sexual activity (23.0, 23.7), satisfaction with orgasm (27.6, 21.8), confidence to complete sexual activity (28.2, 32.5), and satisfaction with medication (37.4, 35.6). The benefits of vardenafil were greater in men who had undergone previous PDE-5-inhibitor treatment and men aged <45 years, while the overall pattern of benefit was similar in all examined subgroups. There were significant benefits with vardenafil in all other variables (IIEF-EF scores and positive response rates to SEP-2 and SEP-3).

CONCLUSIONS

Vardenafil significantly improved treatment satisfaction in men with ED, and in their partners. The results provide further evidence of the validity of the TSS.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH—OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT: Development and Validation of the Quality of Erection Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION

There are no psychometrically validated assessment tools designed to solely and specifically evaluate satisfaction with the quality of erections.

AIM

To develop and psychometrically analyze the Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ), a new patient-reported measure developed to evaluate men's satisfaction with the quality of their erections.

METHODS

The questionnaire was developed through in-depth qualitative interviews of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) in the United States and Australia. An exploratory methodology study was conducted on 65 men with ED. Subsequently, the psychometric properties were confirmed in a larger dataset of 558 men with ED from two combined clinical trials.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Identification of potential redundancy or outliers in items (Pearson inter-item correlations); exploratory factor analysis (unrotated and varimax rotated); internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha); convergent validity (Pearson correlation coefficients between the QEQ total score and domain scores of the International Index of Erectile Function); known-groups validity (ability of the QEQ scores to differentiate between ED severity groups); test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation coefficient).

RESULTS

The QEQ demonstrated excellent convergent and known-groups validity. Additional analysis demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.92). Item analysis demonstrated a unidimensional structure and suggested that satisfaction with hardness may be the key driver for satisfaction with overall quality of erections (r = 0.8). The smaller exploratory study demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The QEQ is a six-item, patient-reported measure with a unidimensional structure, which produces a total score that may be transformed to a 0-100 scale. Psychometric analysis confirmed reliability and validity of the QEQ, which solely and specifically evaluates satisfaction of men with the quality of their erections. The QEQ is a potentially useful measure for monitoring and evaluating treatment in those who are bothered by, or concerned about, their erectile function.

Lower urinary tract disease: what are we trying to treat and in whom?

The diseases of the lower urinary tract are traditionally divided into abnormalities of storage and abnormalities of emptying. The targets for therapy were the organs most responsible for influencing storage and emptying. Modern understanding places the symptomatic status of the patient as the overriding criterion for treatment. It also accommodates a broader understanding of multiple and overlapping systems. Symptoms of voiding dysfunction have been clearly shown to be associated with symptoms of other genitourinary disease, for example, erectile dysfunction (ED). Treatment of voiding dysfunction has also been shown to have effects (adverse or beneficial) in these other domains. Thus, the symptoms of lower urinary tract disease (LUTD) that have to be considered now as targets relevant to these therapies include ED, ejaculatory dysfunction, sexual desire, sexual pain disorders and female sexual dysfunction. The anatomic, neural and endocrine systems that support these symptomatic functions and dysfunctions span the range from the urogenital smooth muscle to the hypothalamus, the bladder sensory output to the micturition centre and growth factors to androgens. Potentially important targets also include vascular and spinal structures, sex hormones and nitric oxide as well as the obvious genes, enzymes and receptors. The epidemiological studies prove the convergence of LUTD when viewed through the lens of the current patient-related outcomes and problem constructs. This convergence serves as a clear guidance to include wide ranging outcome instruments in all future studies with compounds being investigated for the treatment of LUTD. Out of these will come evidence of expected and unexpected collateral effects. The convergence should open the possibility to a different business model for developing therapeutic concepts. The blockbuster drug for a monolithic indication may be supplemented by agents with single or multiple pathway activity with smaller parallel targets. Using an approach based on patient reported outcomes to therapeutic targets not only widens the range of conditions, but also the patient types who can be considered as having LUTD.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH—COUPLES’ SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: Vardenafil Improves Sexual Function and Treatment Satisfaction in Couples Affected by Erectile Dysfunction (ED): A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial in PDE5 Inhibitor‐Naïve Men with ED and Their Partners

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition with diverse sequelae affecting men and their women partners.

AIM

The FINDER study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE5) inhibitor, vardenafil, in a broad population of PDE5-naïve men with ED of different etiologies and severity and included their partners' assessments of treatment with vardenafil.

METHODS

Men with ED (N = 260) were randomized to receive either vardenafil or placebo in a multicenter, flexible-dose study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary efficacy variables were patients' responses to the Global Assessment Question (GAQ), and Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP2 and SEP3).

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, vardenafil significantly improved rates of successful "Yes" responses to SEP3 ("Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?") (49% placebo vs. 78% vardenafil at last period carried forward [LPCF]; P < 0.0001), SEP2 ("Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?") (65% placebo vs. 85% vardenafil at LPCF; P < 0.0001), and GAQ (36% placebo vs. 83% vardenafil at last observation carried forward; P < 0.0001). In addition, patients' and their partners' Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) scores were statistically significantly improved across each of the TSS domains (satisfaction with orgasm, ease with erection, confidence, pleasure, erectile function satisfaction, and satisfaction with medication) in the vardenafil group compared with the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Vardenafil improved sexual function to the extent that both patients and their partners expressed a considerable and agreed level of satisfaction with treatment.

Women's sexual function improves when partners are administered vardenafil for erectile dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data concerning the sexual function of women whose male partners receive pharmacological treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIM

One objective of this research was to prospectively compare the efficacy of vardenafil vs. placebo administered to men with ED in improving men's and women partners' sexual function and satisfaction. Another goal was to assess the relationship of erectile function changes in men with ED receiving treatment with sexual function changes in women partners not directly receiving treatment.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-institutional comparison of vardenafil vs. placebo was performed in 229 couples (treated man with ED>6 months and untreated woman partner). Co-primary outcomes for which this research was statistically powered were Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP3) (treated man with ED) and Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire (mSLQQ-QOL) (untreated woman partner).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Erectile function changes in men with ED receiving vardenafil vs. placebo were compared at last observation carried forward (LOCF) in SEP3, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) and Erection Quality Scale (EQS). Sexual function at LOCF in women partners was determined by mSLQQ-QOL and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).

RESULTS

Compared with placebo at LOCF, vardenafil significantly increased least square (LS) mean scores in: (i) overall per-treated male SEP3 success rate, IIEF-EF, and EQS; and (ii) mSLQQ-QOL, total FSFI and sexual desire, subjective arousal, lubrication, orgasm and satisfaction FSFI domains in untreated women partners. Treatment-related improvement in erectile function as assessed by IIEF-EF and EQS was correlated reliably with improvement in women partners' FSFI total and individual domain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Vardenafil is an effective ED treatment in men that also significantly improves sexual function/satisfaction in untreated women partners. Women partners' sexual function improvements relate significantly and consistently to treatment-related improvements in men's erectile function. ED management should emphasize both members of the couple.