Short-Course Radiotherapy (RT) for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) Due to Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Retrospective Multi-Center Study

Prognostic assessment of patients with bone metastatic renal cell cancer treated with palliative radiotherapy

The present study investigated the prognosis of patients who received palliative radiotherapy (RT) for bone metastases (BMs) from renal cell cancer (RCC), and assessed the prognostic factors specific to BMs from RCC. A total of 109 patients with RCC and BMs who underwent RT for the first time were included in the study. Prognostic factors were evaluated using multivariate analysis and a scoring system based on regression coefficients was devised. The median follow-up time was 9 months, and the 0.5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 73.0%. In the multivariate analysis, the significant prognostic factors were higher performance status (≥2), no control of the primary site, disseminated metastasis, lymph node metastasis and multiple BMs. A score of 1 point was assigned to each risk factor. The median OS times were 19.0 and 5.0 months in patients with a total score of ≤1 (n=49) and >1 (n=60), respectively (P<0.01). In conclusion, a comprehensive prognostic assessment using these factors may be useful for predicting the prognoses of patients with BMs from RCC. In addition, this scoring system may be useful in selecting the optimal RT dose.

Dissociated response among multiple metastatic lesions in the patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Metastases from renal cell carcinoma develop in various organs. However, the breadth of discrepancy in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors across tumor sites within the same individual remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 50 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had target lesions at multiple sites and received nivolumab monotherapy (n = 36) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 14). When the best overall response in tumor burden increased at one site but decreased at other sites, the response was defined as a dissociated response. The response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, and patients who met the definition of dissociated response were categorized as dissociated response. The rate of dissociated response and prognosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eight of 36 (22%) and 4 of 14 (29%) patients treated with nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab were categorized as having dissociated response, respectively. The median overall survival of the patients treated with nivolumab was 20.2 months for those with a partial response, 6.8 months for those with stable disease, and 13.2 months for those with progressive disease, while dissociated response was not reached. There was no significant difference in the median overall survival between patients categorized as having progressive disease and those with dissociates response (P = 0.224).

CONCLUSION

A certain proportion of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma show dissociated response when treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The prognosis of patients with dissociated response and progressive disease was not shown to be significantly different.

Outcomes of patients with spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma treated with conventionally-fractionated external beam radiation therapy

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been traditionally thought to be radioresistant. This retrospective cohort study aims to assess the outcomes of patients with spinal metastases from RCC treated with conventionally-fractionated external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) in our institution.Patients diagnosed with histologically or radiologically-proven RCC who received palliative cEBRT to spinal metastases, using 3-dimensional conformal technique between 2009 and 2018 were reviewed. Local progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0-graded toxicity were assessed. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate for predictors associated with survivals.Thirty-five eligible patients with forty spinal segments were identified, with a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 0-47). The median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was 32.5 Gy 10 (range, 12-39). Thirty-seven percent of patients underwent surgical intervention. At the time of last follow-up, all but 1 patient had died. Seven patients developed local progression, with the median time to local progression of 10.2 months. The median local PFS and OS were 3.3 and 4.8 months. There was no grade 3 or higher toxicity. A higher radiation dose (equivalent dose to 2 Gy fraction <32.5 Gy 10 vs ≥32.5Gy 10) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-3.18; P-value (P) = .68) and spinal surgery (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 0.53-10.29; P = .26) were not significantly associated with local PFS on univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis showed that higher Tokuhashi score (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.88; P = .02), lower number of spinal segments irradiated (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.37; P = .04) and use of targeted therapy (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18-0.96; P = .04) were independent predictors for improved OS.For an unselected group of patients with RCC, there is no significant association between higher radiation dose and improved local control following cEBRT. This may be due to their short survivals. With the use of more effective systemic therapy, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, survival will likely be prolonged. A tailored-approach is needed to identify patients with good prognosis who may still benefit from aggressive local treatments.

Comparison of Short-Course Radiotherapy Versus Long-Course Radiotherapy for Treatment of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) versus long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) in the treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched up to April 2015. Relevant data were extracted based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality of randomized controlled trial (RCT) was evaluated using modified Jadad scale; non-RCT was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.Fourteen studies with 2239 patients were included. Results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between SCRT and long-course radiotherapy LCRT in 6-month overall survival rate (risk ratio [RR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88, 1.07, P = 0.55), 1-year overall survival rate (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.85, 1.04, P = 0.22), motor function improvement (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.81, 1.13, P = 0.63), no change on motor function (RR = 0.98, 95% CI (0.88, 1.09), P = 0.74], and deterioration on motor function (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.71, 1.31, P = 0.78). Compared with SCRT, LCRT significantly increased 6-month local control rate (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80, 0.95, P = 0.002), 1-year local control rate (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.71, 0.97, P = 0.02), and 2-year local control rate (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.79, 0.87, P < 0.00001).Both LCRT and SCRT provided similar survival rates and functional outcome, but LCRT showed better local control rates than SCRT. However, considering low cost and good patient's compliance, SCRT may be a better choice.

Stereotactic radiosurgery compared with external radiation therapy as a primary treatment in spine metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter, matched-pair study

The aim of this multicenter, matched- pair study was to compare the outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with that of external radiation therapy (RT) when used as a primary treatment in spine metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). From 2005 to 2012, 13 patients underwent SRS as a primary treatment in spine metastasis from RCC. Thirteen patients who underwent RT as the primary treatment of RCC spine metastasis were paired with the SRS patients based on age, number of spine metastasis, time interval from original tumor diagnosis to spine metastasis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and year of treatment. The primary outcomes of interest were pain relief and progression free survival. Secondary outcomes were treatment toxicities and need for further treatment. The perioperative VAS score decrease was larger in the SRS group than that in the RT group (P = 0.04). More SRS patients had complete or partial pain relief although the difference was not significant. There was a significant difference in progression free survival between the two groups (P = 0.01). The percentage of patients with toxicities was 38.5 % (5/13) in the SRS group and 53.9 % (7/13) in the RT group, but the difference was not significant. There were 2 SRS patients and 3 RT patients who received further intervention at the index segment. This study showed that, when performed as a primary treatment in spine metastasis from RCC, SRS provides relatively better pain relief and better local control than that obtained from RT.

A 2011 updated systematic review and clinical practice guideline for the management of malignant extradural spinal cord compression

PURPOSE

To update the 2005 Cancer Care Ontario practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of extradural malignant spinal cord compression (MESCC).

METHODS

A review and analysis of data published from January 2004 to May 2011. The systematic literature review included published randomized control trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and prospective/retrospective studies.

RESULTS

An RCT of radiation therapy (RT) with or without decompressive surgery showed improvements in pain, ambulatory ability, urinary continence, duration of continence, functional status, and overall survival. Two RCTs of RT (30 Gy in eight fractions vs. 16 Gy in two fractions; 16 Gy in two fractions vs. 8 Gy in one fraction) in patients with a poor prognosis showed no difference in ambulation, duration of ambulation, bladder function, pain response, in-field failure, and overall survival. Retrospective multicenter studies reported that protracted RT schedules in nonsurgical patients with a good prognosis improved local control but had no effect on functional or survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

If not medically contraindicated, steroids are recommended for any patient with neurologic deficits suspected or confirmed to have MESCC. Surgery should be considered for patients with a good prognosis who are medically and surgically operable. RT should be given to nonsurgical patients. For those with a poor prognosis, a single fraction of 8 Gy should be given; for those with a good prognosis, 30 Gy in 10 fractions could be considered. Patients should be followed up clinically and/or radiographically to determine whether a local relapse develops. Salvage therapies should be introduced before significant neurologic deficits occur.

Skeletal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: current and future management options

Metastasis to the skeleton is common in advanced renal cancer and leads to debilitating skeletal complications including severe pain, increased fracture rate and spinal cord compression. The incidence of renal cell carcinoma is increasing by around 2% per year and recent advances in targeted anti-angiogenic therapy for advanced disease are expected to lead to longer survival times. The clinical management of metastatic bone disease in renal cell carcinoma therefore merits greater focus than hitherto. Bone metastases arising from renal cancer are highly osteolytic and particularly destructive. Fortunately, the continuing development of anti-resorptive drugs is revolutionising the medical management of metastatic bone disease across many tumour types and making a major impact on quality of life. The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid is now licensed for use in advanced renal cell carcinoma and appears to yield a greater benefit in terms of reduction in skeletal related events than in bone metastases arising from other tumour types. Drugs which are directed at specific targets in the bone metastasis pathway are in development, including denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, which has recently been licensed in the United States for use in renal cell carcinoma, with European licensing expected soon. This review examines the increasing options for treatment of metastatic bone disease in renal cell carcinoma, with a focus on drug-based advances and progress in the development of existing and new biomarkers to support clinical management.

The role of radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression

Radiotherapy alone is the most common treatment for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy is generally indicated only in 10-15% of MESCC cases. Chemotherapy has an unclear role and may be considered for selected patients with hematological or germ-cell malignancies. If radiotherapy alone is given, it is important to select the appropriate regimen. Similar functional outcomes can be achieved with short-course radiotherapy regimens and longer-course radiotherapy regimens. Longer-course radiotherapy is associated with better local control of MESCC than short-course radiotherapy. Patients with a more favorable survival prognosis (expected survival of ≥6 months) should receive longer-course radiotherapy, as they may live long enough to develop a recurrence of MESCC. Patients with an expected survival of <6 months should be considered for short-course radiotherapy. A recurrence of MESCC in the previously irradiated region after short-course radiotherapy may be treated with another short-course of radiotherapy. After primary administration of longer-course radiotherapy, decompressive surgery should be performed if indicated. Alternatively, re-irradiation can be performed using high-precision techniques to reduce the cumulative dose received by the spinal cord. Larger prospective trials are required to better define the appropriate treatment for the individual patient.

Dose escalation for metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with relatively radioresistant tumors

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy alone is the most common treatment for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) from relatively radioresistant tumors such as renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, and malignant melanoma. However, the results of the "standard" regimen 30 Gy/10 fractions need to be improved with respect to functional outcome. This study investigated whether a dose escalation beyond 30 Gy can improve treatment outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 91 patients receiving 30 Gy/10 fractions were retrospectively compared to 115 patients receiving higher doses (37.5 Gy/15 fractions, 40 Gy/20 fractions) for motor function and local control of MSCC. Ten further potential prognostic factors were evaluated: age, gender, tumor type, performance status, number of involved vertebrae, visceral or other bone metastases, interval from tumor diagnosis to radiotherapy, pretreatment ambulatory status, and time developing motor deficits before radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Motor function improved in 18% of patients after 30 Gy and in 22% after higher doses (p = 0.81). On multivariate analysis, functional outcome was associated with visceral metastases (p = 0.030), interval from tumor diagnosis to radiotherapy (p = 0.010), and time developing motor deficits (p < 0.001). The 1-year local control rates were 76% after 30 Gy and 80% after higher doses, respectively (p = 0.64). On multivariate analysis, local control was significantly associated with visceral metastases (p = 0.029) and number of involved vertebrae (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitations of a retrospective study, escalation of the radiation dose beyond 30 Gy/10 fractions did not significantly improve motor function and local control of MSCC in patients with relatively radioresistant tumors.

A differential response to sunitinib: sustained systemic response paralleled by intra-dural progression in the spine. Should standard response criteria be reviewed?

Orally available tyrosine kinases have revolutionized the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. These agents have impressive response rates compared with interferon and also have a cytostatic effect. We describe a case of a patient treated predominantly with continuous sunitinib who had a good partial response to sunitinib in the lungs, liver, adrenal gland, and lymph nodes but dural progression. We describe prolonged sustained response achieved by continuing sunitinib despite dural progression. This case demonstrates that standard treatment criteria may need reviewing.

Radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease in patients with spinal cord compression (MSCC) from relatively radioresistant tumors

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy alone is the most common treatment for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Patients with relatively radioresistant tumors and oligometastatic disease may benefit from more intensive therapies (surgery, high-precision radiotherapy). If such therapies are not available, one can speculate whether patients benefit from dose escalation beyond the standard regimen 30 Gy in ten fractions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 206 patients with MSCC from relatively radioresistant tumors (renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, malignant melanoma), 51 had oligometastatic disease (no visceral or other bone metastases, involvement of only one to three vertebrae). In this subset, 21 patients receiving 30 Gy in ten fractions were retrospectively compared to 30 patients receiving higher doses. Seven further potential prognostic factors were investigated: age, gender, tumor type, performance status, interval from tumor diagnosis to radiotherapy of MSCC, pretreatment ambulatory status, and time developing motor deficits before radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Motor function improved in 52% of patients after 30 Gy and 40% after higher doses (p = 0.44). On multivariate analysis, functional outcome was associated with interval from tumor diagnosis to radiotherapy (p = 0.020). 1-year local control rates were 84% after 30 Gy and 82% after higher doses (p = 0.75). No factor was associated with local control. 1-year survival rates were 76% after 30 Gy and 63% after higher doses (p = 0.52). On multivariate analysis, survival was associated with performance status (p = 0.022) and interval from tumor diagnosis to radiotherapy (p = 0.039), and almost with pretreatment ambulatory status (p = 0.069).

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation beyond 30 Gy in ten fractions did not improve motor function, local control, and survival in MSCC patients with oligometastatic disease from relatively radioresistant tumors.

Metastatic spinal cord compression: review of the evidence for a radiotherapy dose fractionation schedule

Metastatic spinal cord compression is a frequent medical emergency, and the most common treatment offered is radiotherapy. The routine treatment prescription for spinal cord compression in the UK is 20 Gy in five daily fractions delivered over 1 week. Here, we evaluate the evidence base for the radiotherapy dose for spinal cord compression. Evidence from the four prospective studies conducted so far and retrospective studies does not support a uniform dose of 20 Gy for all patients with spinal cord compression. Available evidence suggests that the radiotherapy dose should be tailored to the individual patient, depending on the subtype of the tumour, the extent of metastatic disease and expected survival. A risk stratification for the optimum dose prescription for patients with spinal cord compression is recommended.

Do Bladder Cancer Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Benefit from Radiotherapy Alone?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of radiotherapy (RT) alone in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients with bladder cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-two MSSC patients with bladder cancer were included in this retrospective review. Potential prognostic factors were investigated for functional outcome, local control of MSCC, and survival: age, gender, performance status, visceral metastases at the time of RT, number of involved vertebrae, ambulatory status, time of developing motor deficits before RT, and radiation schedule (short-course RT [1 week or less] versus long-course RT [2 to 4 weeks]).

RESULTS

Two patients (6%) showed improvement of motor function, 25 (78%) no change, and 5 (16%) deterioration. Better functional outcome was significantly associated with a better performance status (P = 0.035). A trend was observed for absence of visceral metastases (P = 0.054). Five patients developed a recurrence of MSCC in the preirradiated spinal region, which was treated with reirradiation (0 improvement, 4 no change, 1 deterioration). Median survival was 4 months. The 1-year survival rate was only 16%. Better survival was associated with absence of visceral metastases, being ambulatory, involvement of only one to three vertebrae, and better performance status.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement of motor function was rare. For patients not suitable for decompressive surgery, short-course RT seems preferable because it provides a functional outcome similar to that with long-course RT and is more patient convenient. If the patient's prognosis seems extremely poor in terms of functional outcome and survival, single-fraction RT or even best supportive care may be considered.

The role of external beam radiotherapy in the management of bone metastases

External beam radiotherapy is effective in the management of bone metastases for both local and more widespread pain. It is effective in spinal canal compression and pathological fracture where it also may have a prophylactic role. Single dose radiotherapy for bone metastases is a highly cost effective palliative treatment.