Intraprostatic and Bladder-Neck Injection of Botulinum A Toxin in Treatment of Males with Bladder-Neck Dyssynergia: A Pilot Study

Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection

The objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In the 32 patients clinically diagnosed with BPH, 200 IU BTX-A was injected into five points at the lateral and middle lobes of the prostate under the guidance of ultrasound using a balloon dilatational device. The international prostate symptom score, quality of life score, maximum flow rate, post-void residual urine volume, prostate-specific antigen, and prostate volume were determined before treatment and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. All clinical symptoms and indicators were remarkably improved 1 month after the treatment and reached the optimal levels at 6 months post-treatment. This improvement of clinical parameters was maintained for a period of at least 1 year. Ultrasound-guided BTX-A injection was found to be safe and effective in the management of BPH.

Current and potential urological applications of botulinum toxin A

Botulinum toxin subtype A (BoNT-A) is a potent neurotoxin that can selectively modulate neurotransmitter release from nerve endings, resulting in muscular paralysis. BoNT-A might also act on sensory nerves, and have an anti-inflammatory effect. In the first urological use of BoNT-A, injection into the urethral sphincters of patients with detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia resulted in a reduction of urethral resistance and improved voiding efficiency. Subsequently, intravesical BoNT-A injections have received regulatory approval for treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity owing to spinal cord lesions or multiple sclerosis, and idiopathic overactive bladder in adults. BoNT-A has also been widely used to treat patients with the off-label indications of neurogenic or non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction and male lower urinary tract symptoms owing to BPH and bladder-neck dysfunction. Other indications for which urologists have applied BoNT-A injections include interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, bladder oversensitivity and chronic pelvic pain syndrome. BoNT-A is currently delivered as an intravesical injection; however, use of liposome encapsulated formulations is also beginning to show some therapeutic potential.

OnabotulinumtoxinA injection therapy in men with LUTS due to primary bladder-neck dysfunction: objective and patient-reported outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To determine efficacy and safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) injection therapy in medically refractory patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to primary bladder-neck dysfunction (PBND).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive ambulatory males diagnosed with PBND and refractory to medical therapy, with IPSS > 15, Qmax < 15 ml/sec, and total prostate volume < 30 cm(3), were screened from January 2010 to December 2011. Eligible patients underwent transurethral bladder-neck injection of BoNT-A (200 U, 50 U/ml × 4 sites) and were assessed at baseline, 2-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month postprocedure and until duration of clinical response. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in total IPSS, and secondary outcome were storage- and voiding-IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, and postvoiding residual volume (PVR), patient-reported outcomes. Adverse effects were also recorded, including ejaculatory dysfunctions.

RESULTS

Of 30 enrolled patients (mean age 33.8 years), 29 (96.7%) completed the study. A statistically significant improvement of total IPSS was observed from 21.9 at baseline, to 7.8, 10.3, and 16.6 at 2, 6, and 9 months, respectively (P < 0.000). Statistically significant improvements from baseline of storage- and voiding-IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, and PVR were also observed until 9-month postprocedure. The proportion of patients with overall satisfaction was favorable although decreasing from 80% at 2 months, to 44.8% at 12 months. No significant adverse effects or ejaculatory dysfunctions were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

BoNT-A injection therapy appears effective and safe in medically refractory men with PBND, although repeated procedures are required for long-term sustained benefit. Randomized controlled trials are warranted in order to corroborate these results.

Botulinum neurotoxin type A for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized study comparing two doses

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of intraprostatic injection of two botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) doses for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men with symptomatic BPH who failed medical treatment were randomized to receive 100 U or 200 U of BoNT-A into the prostate. The International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Q(max)), post-void residual volume (PVR), PSA levels and prostate volume before injection and after 3 and 6 months were evaluated. Adverse events were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Thirty four patients were evaluated, including 17 in the BoNT-A 100 U group and 17 in the BoNT-A 200 U group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Both doses produced significant improvements in IPSS, Q(max) and PVR after 3 and 6 months and both doses promoted comparable effects. Prostate volume was affected by 200 U BoNT-A injection only after 6 months of treatment. PSA levels were significantly affected in the 100 U group only after 6 months of treatment. In the 200 U group, PSA levels were significantly decreased after 3 and 6 months. The complication rate was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy and safety of both BoNT-A doses are similar for BPH treatment in the short term followup.

Accurate targeting of botulinum toxin injections: how to and why

Botulinum toxin (BTX), the exotoxin of the obligate anaerobe, Clostridium botulinum, is used to ameliorate pain and treat conditions associated with glandular, smooth and skeletal muscle overactivity. The benefits derived from the injection of BTX may be negated by unintended weakness of uninjected muscles. Performance of BTX injections may be facile, requiring only surface marking or clinical-localisation techniques but may be more technically demanding, necessitating the use of equipment, such as electromyography (EMG) or ultrasonography (U/S). Less often, endoscopic, fluoroscopic or computed tomographic (CT) guidance may be required. Despite evidence to support the efficacy of BTX injections in treating many conditions, there is no evidence to support the superiority of any one injection technique over needle localisation using surface anatomy. This is possibly due to the lack of well-designed controlled studies, that is, current studies are hampered by small patient numbers, lack of consistency of injection technique and the application of different rating scales. Intuitively, certain injection techniques are more suited to injection of specific muscles or conditions, for example, U/S or passive-monitoring EMG should be used to treat cervical dystonia, active-monitoring EMG applied for strabismus injections, whereas either active-monitoring EMG or endoscopy is indicated when giving BTX for spasmodic dysphonia. Finally, electrical-stimulation EMG or U/S (or a combination of both) would be most suitable when injecting the forearm muscles for spasticity or writer's cramps.

Intra-prostatic injection of botulinum toxin type A in treatment of dogs with spontaneous benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common, naturally developing, age-related condition in dogs. The pathogenesis of BPH is not completely known; however, DHT is a hormone involved in enlargement of the prostate. Recently, the effect of botulinum toxin A (BT-A) was investigated in the rat and human prostate and has shown to induce atrophy of the gland on the canine prostate. This study investigated the effect of BT-A in the canine prostate and on the semen. Eight sexually intact male dogs with BPH (detected radiographically and ultrasonographically), and with clinical signs of BPH (e.g. hematuria or tenesmus) were used. Each lobe of the prostate received an injection of 125 U of BT-A with one-needle pass under transabdominal ultrasound guidance. The clinical results were evaluated at baseline and after treatment. No local complications or systemic adverse effects were reported. At 4 weeks, the mean prostate volume (PV) was not significantly changed after BT-A (from 17.70 ± 6.34 to 16.48 ± 5.98 cm(3)). At 8 weeks the PV had further decreased to 16.04 ± 5.80 cm(3), reaching its maximum effect, but that change was not significant. The results were maintained at 16 weeks. All dogs had normal libido, erection, and ejaculation during semen collection. No significant difference was observed in all seminal parameters. Results suggest that the administration of 250 U of BT-A do not contribute to PV reduction and do not adversely affect the semen quality of dogs with BPH.

Botulinum toxin injection for lower urinary tract dysfunction

Botulinum toxin has been recently accepted as a novel treatment for lower urinary tract dysfunctions refractory to conventional treatment. Review of the clinical trials in recent years, botulinum toxin type A has been widely used in the urethra or urinary bladder to treat voiding dysfunction due to detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, incontinence due to neurogenic or idiopathic detrusor overactivity, sensory disorders such as bladder hypersensitivity, overactive bladder, and interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Intravesical botulinum toxin type A injection is effective in treatment of urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity in men and women, as well as in children. Currently botulinum toxin type A has also been applied to treat lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients not suitable for surgery. This article reviewed the recent advances of botulinum toxin type A on lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Botulinum neurotoxin A for benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The injection of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) into the prostate represents an alternative, minimal invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which gained the interest of urologists during the last years, although it is not yet licensed. The purpose of this review is to summarize the mechanisms through which BoNT-A could inhibit the progression of BPH and eliminate the lower urinary tract symptoms according to the findings of animal studies. Furthermore, we review clinical studies to report the efficacy and safety of intraprostatic BoNT-A injection according to various injection protocols.

RECENT FINDINGS

The experimental studies report induced relaxation of the prostate, atrophy, and reduction in its size through inhibition of the trophic effect of the autonomic system on the prostate gland. Also, a possible mechanism of reduction in lower urinary tract symptoms might take place through inhibition of sensory afferents from the prostate to the spinal cord. Clinical studies report symptomatic relief and improvement in the measured parameters during the follow-up period, whereas local or systematic side-effects are rare.

SUMMARY

We should recognize that, at present, this therapy is still experimental. Although the results of the clinical studies are encouraging, the level of evidence is low. Clearly, we need large-scale, clinical, placebo-controlled, randomized studies, including long-term surveillance to document the evidence of this therapy and, eventually, to register BoNT-A for this indication.

Intravesical botulinum toxin for lower urinary tract dysfunction

Botulinum neurotoxin has achieved substantial clinical benefits in neurogenic detrusor overactivity. More contentious has been its extension to management of refractory idiopathic detrusor overactivity, in which risk of impaired voiding function and consequent need for intermittent catheterisation may counteract the quality-of-life benefits of improved storage function. Several issues remain uncertain for this unlicensed treatment, and clear insights into long-term consequences are needed before it can be regarded as an established mainstream treatment.