Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: is the dust settling?

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: An update on functional and oncologic outcomes, techniques, and advancements in technology

The robotic platform has revolutionized the management of prostate cancer over the last 15 years. Several techniques have been developed to improve functional and oncologic outcomes, including meticulous apical and posterior dissection, nerve sparing techniques, bladder neck and urethral length sparing, and anastomotic reconstruction. Future developments involving novel single-site, robotic technology will undoubtedly further the field of minimally invasive urology. These topics are reviewed within this article.

Robotic-assisted surgery for excision of an enlarged prostatic utricle

•

Prostatic utricle is a rare malformation originating from incomplete regression of Mullerian ducts.

•

Mini invasive approach is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment.

•

Few cases of robot-assisted excision have been reported in the literature.

•

We report a case treated with robotic-assisted surgery.

Introduction

Prostatic utricle is a rare malformation arising from incomplete regression of the Müllerian ducts. Diagnosis is easily made but management may be challenging. The minimally invasive approach has so far been considered the gold standard for surgical treatment. Many endoscopic and surgical procedures have been described for removal, but to date only few cases of robot-assisted procedures have been mentioned in the literature and there are no reports of redos.

Presentation of the case

We report the case of a giant prostatic utricle cyst successfully treated with robotic-assisted surgery two years after an unsuccessful first attempt at laparoscopic excision. No relapse was found at one year follow up.

Discussion

We were able to excise a retro-vescical structure in spite of adhesions caused by the previous surgery and the very large size of the diverticulum thanks to the high magnification and 3-D visualization available in robotic assisted laparoscopy.

Conclusion

Robot assisted laparoscopy should be considered an advantageous technique for the treatment of prostatic utricle.

Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison with transperitoneal technique

AIM: To determine peri-operative, oncological, functional and safety profiles of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eRARP) vs transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (tRARP) in a single centre.

METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients underwent 50 eRARP and 70 eRARP operations respectively by the same surgical team. Peri-operative and post-operative outcomes including blood loss, hospitalization, complications (Clavien grade), positive surgical margin (PSM) rates, continence and erectile function were compared. The performance of eRARP required several technical modifications. These included development of Retzius’ space by balloon insufflation, laparoscopic dissection of lateral extensions of this area; caudal port positioning; cranial digital stripping of peritoneum for sucker port and lodging the bagged prostate specimen adjacent to the lateral assistant port to permit space for urethro-vesical anastomosis.

RESULTS: Robotic console times were shorter with eRARP vs tRARP (145.1 min vs 198.3 min, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in blood loss, PSM rates (eRARP 17.7% vs tRARP 22%) or complications (eRARP 8.5% vs tRARP 8%). A drain was used in all patients after tRARP and in 25/70 eRARP cases. Length of hospital stay was shorter after eRARP (mean 1.94 d vs 3.6 d, P < 0.0002). There were no differences between techniques in continence or potency at 6 mo. eRARP required several technical modifications: development of Retzius’ space by balloon insufflation, laparoscopic dissection of lateral extensions of this area; caudal port positioning; and lodging the bagged prostate specimen adjacent to the lateral assistant port to permit space for urethro-vesical anastomosis.

CONCLUSION: eRARP demonstrated advantages in surgical times, hospital stay and equivalence in PSM rates, complications and functional outcomes. eRARP is a useful alternative to tRARP especially in patients with adhesions, pre-existing inguinal hernias, or those unable to withstand steep Trendelenburg position.

Computer assisted robotic surgery in urooncology

Robotic surgery is a significant advance in the realm of urologic surgery esp. for uro genital cancers and reconstructive procedures. Robotic surgery is associated with precision and ease in dissection, incision and suturing with less steep learning curve in comparison to laparoscopy. It provides all benefits of minimally invasive surgery. At present, cost is a prohibitive factor. Robotic surgery is going to stay and is going to open new avenues for, image guided and telepresence surgery.

[Radical prostatectomy - pro robotic]

Anatomical radical prostatectomy was introduced in the early 1980s by Walsh and Donker. Elucidation of key anatomical structures led to a significant reduction in the morbidity of this procedure. The strive to achieve similar oncological and functional results to this gold standard open procedure but with further reduction of morbidity through a minimally invasive access led to the establishment of laparoscopic prostatectomy. However, this procedure is complex and difficult and is associated with a long learning curve. The technical advantages of robotically assisted surgery coupled with the intuitive handling of the device led to increased precision and shortening of the learning curve. These main advantages, together with a massive internet presence and aggressive marketing, have resulted in a rapid dissemination of robotic radical prostatectomy and an increasing patient demand. However, superiority of robotic radical prostatectomy in comparison to the other surgical therapeutic options has not yet been proven on a scientific basis. Currently robotic-assisted surgery is an established technique and future technical improvements will certainly further define its role in urological surgery. In the end this technical innovation will have to be balanced against the very high purchase and running costs, which remain the main limitation of this technology.

The emergence of surgeon-controlled robotic surgery in urologic oncology

The rise of robotic surgery is transforming medicine. In many ways, urology has taken charge in pioneering a new era of minimally invasive surgery with the emergence of the robot. The unprecedented dissecting precision and the dynamic three-dimensional, high definition view of the surgical field are undoubtedly revolutionizing the field of urology. These unique attributes of robotic surgery confer enormous advantages in dealing with uro-oncological surgery. The robotic revolution began nearly a decade ago with surgeon-controlled robotic radical prostatectomy and has since expanded to include radical cystectomies and partial nephrectomies. There have been numerous landmark studies published showing that robotic surgery provides comparable oncological and functional outcomes against traditional open or laparoscopic surgery. As a result, it becomes exceedingly imperative that urologists and the oncological community remain up-to-date regarding these developments and appreciate the oncological outcomes of surgeon-controlled robotic surgery. This review will assess the impact surgeon-controlled robotic surgery has had in the field of urologic oncology.

Robot-assisted urologic surgery in 2010 - Advancements and future outlook

Robotic surgery is a cutting edge and minimally invasive procedure, which has generated a great deal of excitement in the urologic community. While there has been much advancement in this emerging technology, it is safe to say that robotic urologic surgery holds tremendous potential for progress in the near future. Hence, it is paramount that urologists stay up-to-date regarding new developments in the realm of robotics with respect to novel applications, limitations and opportunities for incorporation into their practice. Robot-assisted surgery provides an enhanced 3D view, increased magnification of the surgical field, better manual dexterity, relatively bloodless field, elimination of surgeon's tremor, reduction in a surgeon's fatigue and mitigation of scattered light. All these factors translate into greater precision of surgical dissection, which is imperative in providing better intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Pioneering work assessing the feasibility of robotic surgery in urology began in the early 2000's with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and has since expanded to procedures such as robot-assisted radical cystectomy, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, robot-assisted nephroureterectomy and robot-assisted pyeloplasty. A MEDLINE search was used to identify recent articles (within the last two years) and publications of specific importance, which highlighted the recent developments and future direction of robotics. This review will use the aforementioned urologic surgeries as vehicles to evaluate the current status and future role of robotics in the advancement of the field of urology.