Second-generation Androgen Receptor–targeted Therapies in Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Effective Early Intervention or Intervening Too Early?

Direct healthcare costs of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Italy

OBJECTIVES

The management of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is rapidly evolving; however, little is known about the direct healthcare costs of nmCRPC. We aimed to estimate the cost-of-illness (COI) of nmCRPC from the Italian National Health Service perspective.

METHODS

Structured, individual qualitative interviews were carried out with clinical experts to identify what healthcare resources are consumed in clinical practice. To collect quantitative estimates of healthcare resource consumption, a structured expert elicitation was performed with clinical experts using a modified version of a previously validated interactive Excel-based tool, EXPLICIT (EXPert eLICItation Tool). For each parameter, experts were asked to provide the lowest, highest, and most likely value. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were carried out to test the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

Ten clinical experts were interviewed, and six of them participated in the expert elicitation exercise. According to the most likely estimate, the yearly cost per nmCRPC patient is €4,710 (range, €2,243 to €8,243). Diagnostic imaging (i.e., number/type of PET scans performed) had the highest impact on cost. The PSA showed a 50 percent chance for the yearly cost per nmCRPC patient to be within €5,048 using a triangular distribution for parameters, and similar results were found using a beta-PERT distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

This study estimated the direct healthcare costs of nmCRPC in Italy based on a mixed-methods approach. Delaying metastases may be a reasonable goal also from an economic standpoint. These findings can inform decision-making about treatments at the juncture between non-metastatic and metastatic prostate cancer disease.

Prospects of Treating Prostate Cancer through Apalutamide: A Mini-Review

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is considered the second most diagnosed cancer, and one of the most common causes of death from cancer in men. Apalutamide is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated agent used for the treatment of men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer (mHNPC). Androgen receptor signaling is a leading factor that drives these prostate tumors. USFDA has approved apalutamide on 14 February 2018 as an agent that targets androgen receptor signaling through inhibition causing significant improvement in metastasis-free survival in patients with prostate cancer. <P> Objective: In this review, various aspects related to apalutamide have been summarized which involve the mechanism of action, chemistry, synthesis, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adverse reactions, and safety parameters. <P> Methods: The literature was thoroughly searched in the relevant databases to identify studies published in this field during recent years. Special attention has been given to apalutamide clinical trials phases and its promising future as one of the first-line agents for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. <P> Results: Ongoing trials are progressing for apalutamide monotherapy and also for its combinations in other disease settings. The expected results of such trials will shape the future scenario of prostate cancer therapy. <P> Conclusion: This review article has highlighted different aspects of Apalutamide like its mechanism of action, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical trials among others. The contents of this article should make an excellent read for prospective researchers in this field.

Apalutamide: Emerging Therapy for Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the second deadliest cancer in the US and the fourth most common cancer among Saudi males. Patients usually present with non-metastatic disease and treated with localized therapy. However, up to 40% of the patients will experience biochemical recurrence, within 10 years. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used in this setting to delay metastatic disease. Patients with high prostate-specific antigen (PSA), despite appropriate ADT, are diagnosed with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). A subset of those patients will be presented with a shorter PSA doubling time (PSA-DT) ≤10 months. These patients are identified at higher risk for metastatic disease and death from prostate cancer, which represents a challenging dilemma where optimal management is unclear. Apalutamide was the first drug to get approved in the localized setting to delay metastatic disease from occurring. This review article will discuss the development, safety, and efficacy of apalutamide and its current place in therapy.

Robust method for isolation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes with a high vital cell yield from small samples of renal cell carcinomas by a new collagenase-free mechanical procedure

BACKGROUND

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) play an important role in the pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma. Characterization of TIL requires efficient isolation procedures, especially in early stage disease when the tumor is of small in size. Conventional methods for isolating TIL are based on enzymatic tissue digestion, most frequently with collagenase. Collagenase isolation is limited by poor cell recovery, altered expression of cell-surface molecules, and impaired TIL-functionality. To overcome these limitations, we developed and optimized conditions for a robust collagenase-free mechanical procedure for improved isolation of TIL from renal cell carcinoma samples.

METHODS

TIL from tumor samples and T cells from peripheral blood were collected from 12 patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy. Samples were subjected to an enzymatic reference protocol and to a newly established mechanical isolation protocol. After viability staining, TIL-subpopulations were quantified and phenotyped by immunohistochemistry and flow-cytometric analysis, and were compared to characteristics of peripheral blood T cells. As a marker for TIL-functionality, T-cell cytokine induction was quantified after polyclonal stimulation.

RESULTS

We show that this new technique is rapid and allows identification of CD4 and CD8 T-cell subpopulations including CD4, CD8, and regulatory T cells expressing anergy markers such as programmed death-1 (PD-1) or B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator. When compared to the reference protocol involving collagenase digestion, the yield of TIL after mechanical isolation was higher and the expression of cell-surface markers was better preserved. Moreover, although antitumor activity was not assessed, mechanically isolated TIL are at least equally functional as T cells from peripheral blood, as polyclonal stimulation induced cytokines such as interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α in both TIL and T cells from peripheral blood.

CONCLUSION

The mechanical procedure may be applied as a robust and rapid alternative to collagenase digestion for isolation of high amounts of phenotypically and functionally intact TIL from fresh tumor samples.