Reply to Christian Seitz's Letter to the Editor re: Zhangqun Ye, Guohua Zeng, Huan Yang, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin in Medical Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones with Renal Colic: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2018;73:385-91

Urological issues in pregnancy: A review for urologists

Urological issues in the pregnant patient present a unique clinical dilemma. These patients may be challenging to treat due to risks associated with medications and surgical procedures. This review aims to provide an update on the physiological changes and surgical risks in pregnancy. In addition, we review the approach for management of urolithiasis and urinary tract infections in pregnancy. Lastly, we highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to placenta percreta, a condition not commonly addressed in urological education.

Predicting emergency interventions in patients with acute ureteral colic using acute renal colic scoring system in a Pakistani cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the acute renal colic score (ARC) in predicting the need of emergency intervention (EI) in patients with ureteric colic secondary to a ureteral stone.

PATIENT AND METHODS

In an emergency room (ER) of a university hospital, we conducted a prospective cohort study over a period of 6 months. ARC score was calculated using four parameters, i.e., serum creatinine, total white cell count (TLC), stone length and level. Primary outcome measure was EI, which was defined as the need of endourological intervention within 48 h of presentation. ARC was calculated for each patient against the two possible outcomes, i.e., EI vs. no EI. The need of intervention was based on patient-related clinical factors and the decision of the attending urologist.

RESULTS

The study included 132 patients. EI was performed in 85 patients (64.4%). URS was the most common intervention performed in 81 (95.3%) patients, followed by the a insertion of a double J stent in two (2.4%) patients for forniceal rupture and high TLC count and percutaneous nephrostomy in two (2.4%) patients for raised creatinine and TLC. All four variables in ARC score including serum creatinine (p < 0.001), TLC (p < 0.001), stone size (p < 0.001) and stone level (p < 0.001) were found to be significantly associated with need for EI. Using ROC the sensitivity and specificity of the score was 92.9% and 87.5%, respectively, with AUC of 0.93.

CONCLUSIONS

ARC score is highly sensitive and specific in determining the need of EI in patients with uncomplicated ureteric colic within 48 h of initial presentation.

Stone residual fragments: A thorny problem

Urolithiasis represents a widespread and common disorder among the world population, with a predicted increase in affected patients in the coming years. Treatment of renal and ureteral stones varies widely, and achieving true stone-free status in all patients is still difficult. Moreover, imaging used to assess residual fragments following procedure impacts the diagnosed stone-free rate percentage considerably. In particular, the use of computed tomography scans has led to a better evaluation of residual fragments as well as so-called clinically insignificant residual fragments, which in a considerable number of cases are, despite their definition, causes of adverse urological events, thus creating a thorny problem for both patients and urologists. Currently, there is no gold standard or validated protocol regarding the management, clearance and prevention of residual fragments. In this article, we review the current literature regarding residual fragments, clinically insignificant residual fragments and their natural history, reporting on diagnostic methods, incidence, complications and outcome with the use of less invasive procedures, taking into consideration viable treatment and management of patients affected.