Eye damage control by reduced blue illumination

Determination of Correlated Color Temperature in Ex Vivo Porcine Eyes during Intraocular Illumination

(1) Background: In ophthalmic surgery, white light is mostly applied to illuminate the intraocular space, and ophthalmologists are comfortable working with it. Diaphanoscopic illumination changes the spectral composition of light, resulting in a change in the correlated color temperature (CCT) of the intraocular illumination. This color change makes it difficult for surgeons to recognize the structures in the eye. CCT during intraocular illumination has not yet been measured before, and it is the aim of this study to perform such measurement. (2) Methods: CCT was measured inside ex vivo porcine eyes during diaphanoscopic illumination and endoillumination using a current ophthalmic illumination system with a detection fiber inside the eye. By applying pressure on the eye with a diaphanoscopic fiber, the dependency of CCT on pressure was examined. (3) Results: The intraocular CCT values during endoillumination were 3923 K and 5407 K for the halogen and xenon lamps, respectively. During diaphanoscopic illumination, a strong unwanted red shift was observed, resulting in 2199 K and 2675 K for the xenon and the halogen lamps, respectively. Regarding different applied pressures, the CCT did not differ considerably. (4) Conclusions: This red shift should be compensated for in the development of new illumination systems since surgeons are used to white light illumination, which also simplifies the identification of retinal structures.

Retinal risk of endoillumination: A comparison of different ophthalmic illumination systems

OBJECTIVES

In vitreoretinal surgery, there is always a conflict between bright illumination of the field of operation and retinal safety. This study aimed to investigate different light sources and light guides for their potential retinal risk due to bright illumination.

METHODS

Irradiances in the fovea of ex-vivo porcine eyes resulting from different light sources (halogen lamp, xenon lamp and LED) and light guides are investigated for varying distances between the illumination tip and the fovea. The results are examined with regard to their photochemical and thermal retinal hazard and the maximal exposure time. The examination is carried out with the maximum intensity setting of each light source and with normalization to its brightness.

MAIN RESULTS

With decreasing distance of the tip of the light source, the retinal hazard increases. The photochemical and thermal retinal hazard at maximum brightness are smallest for the halogen lamp, next for the xenon lamp and highest for the LED. Thus, the exposition time is the longest for the halogen lamp followed by the xenon lamp and the LED. Normalizing the results to the same brightness the maximum exposition time is nearly the same for xenon lamp and LED, but still higher in case of the halogen lamp.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of the most suitable lamp and illumination fiber depends on the intensity and spectral distribution of the illumination system. Concerning brightness, xenon and LED lamp are relatively harmless, but the surgeon should avoid the maximum device intensity.

Determination of the intraocular irradiance and potential retinal hazards at various positions in the eye during transscleral equatorial illumination for different applied pressures

PURPOSE

With diaphanoscopic illumination of the eye, the intensity of light entering its interior depends on the transmission properties of the eyewall. Light that passes through the eyewall can cause damage to the retina. Therefore, in this study, the intraocular irradiances are determined at different positions on the retina, directly behind the illuminated eyewall, the opposite eyewall and near the macula of ex-vivo porcine eyes. These irradiances are examined for their dependence on the pressure applied on the eyewall with the illuminating fiber and for the influence of the pigmentation of the eye.

METHODS

In total 221 ex-vivo porcine eyes were investigated. For transscleral illumination an illumination fiber with a diffusing adapter cap is pressed against the equatorial eyewall. The illumination fiber is pressed onto the eye and the pressure is measured in the anterior chamber. Three different pressures are applied, 23, 78 and 132 mmHg. A detection fiber with diffusing fiber tip is inserted into the eye at the desired position. The eyes were divided in groups with high and less pigmentation to investigate the influence of the pigmentation on the intraocular irradiance.

RESULTS

The intraocular irradiances Eintra increases for various increasing applied pressures with the illumination fiber on the eyewall and for various positions inside the eye. With this the irradiances weighted with the photochemical and thermal hazard weighting function, EA-R and EVIR-R, also increases. Differences in Eintra, EA-R and EVIR-R could be found for different pigmented eyes as these values are higher for less pigmented eyes than for strong pigmented ones.

CONCLUSION

The hazard to the retina during diaphanoscopic illumination of the eye depends on how strong the surgeon presses the illumination fiber on the eyewall. Depending on the applied pressure and the measuring position in the eye, the specified limit for the photochemical hazard to the retina is partly exceeded. The pigmentation of the eye also plays a role. The irradiance in less pigmented eyes appears to be higher than in strongly pigmented eyes. Because of this, the surgeon should be able to adjust the intensity of the light source to the color of the patient's eye.

Intraocular reflectance of the ocular fundus and its impact on increased retinal hazard

PURPOSE

Inside the eye light can be reflected multiple times due to light-tissue interactions and the spherical geometry of the eye. Due to these optical properties, a defined retinal area is not only illuminated by direct light but also by indirect, reflected light from the inner side of the eyewall. During illumination for ophthalmic surgery, this could lead to an unintended increase in intraocular retinal irradiance, which was already discussed in previous studies but without a detailed consideration of spectral differences and a potential influence of pigmentation. In this study this effect is investigated wavelength-dependent to see if different wavelengths lead to different increase in irradiance, with a special focus on the raise in photochemical and thermal hazard to the retina. It is also examined whether this effect is dependent on the pigmentation of the eye.

METHODS

The reflectance properties of either less or highly pigmented porcine eyes are measured in the wavelength range between 350 and 1100nm with an integrating sphere and a spectrometer. With these reflectance spectra the wavelength-dependent Sphere Multiplier M of porcine eyes can be calculated, which represents the increase of radiance due to multiple reflections inside a sphere compared to a planar diffuser of the same size. Based on measurements of the emitted irradiance of ophthalmic illumination fibers the increase in photochemical and thermal retinal hazard due to these multiple reflections is calculated for eyes with small and high amounts of pigmentation.

RESULTS

The reflectance of the inner eyewall in the range between 350 and 1100nm is significantly higher for eyes with low pigmentation (between 4.90% and 37.44% reflectance) in comparison to eyes with a high amount of pigmentation (between 4.30% and 28.88% reflectance). The Sphere Multiplier for the inner side of the eyewall (sclera, choroid and retina) ranges between 1.13 and 1.59 and between 1.13 and 1.48 for eyes with low and high pigmentation, respectively, in the range between 350 and 1100nm. The reflectance, as well as the Sphere Multiplier, is strongly wavelength-dependent due to the absorption spectra of melanin and hemoglobin, which are located in the eye. With increasing wavelength, the reflection properties and the Sphere Multiplier also increases. With this, the photochemical retinal hazard of highly pigmented eyes increases by (14.11± 0.09)% and of lightly pigmented eyes by (16.75±0.35)% compared to if the reflection properties are not considered. The thermal retinal hazard increases by (14.30±0.07)% for highly pigmented eyes and by (19.65±0.17)% for low pigmented eyes.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the anatomy and pigmentation of the eye plays an important role for the reflectance properties of the eye and for the photochemical and thermal hazard to the retina.

Retinal damage related to high-intensity light-emitting diode exposure: An in vivo study

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of high-intensity light-emitting diode (LED) light from a curing device on the retinas of Wistar rats.

METHODS

Six male Wistar rats were used, and their ocular structures were the focus of this study. During the photostimulation of each animal, the right eye of the animal, considered the control sample, was covered with a removable polyvinyl chloride cap, and the contralateral eye, the experimental sample, was exposed to high-intensity LED light, 3200 mW/cm² (VALO Ortho; Ultradent Products, South Jordan, Utah) for 144 seconds from a distance of 30 cm. The animals were exposed to the LED light 3 times on the same day to investigate if any acute inflammatory changes in the retina occurred. Seven days after the photostimulation sessions, the animals were anesthetized and perfused with paraformaldehyde solution. After which, the eyes were resected and processed histologically. The histologic sections were analyzed stereologically and histomorphometrically to measure the parameters of the retina under investigation.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in total retinal volume in the experimental group because of the increased volume of the ganglion cell layers, inner plexiform layers, outer nuclear layers, and the cone and rod extensions. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of density. However, there was a statistically significant increase in the nuclear area of the cells in all the studied layers in the group exposed to high-intensity LED light. In addition, hyperchromatic cells that are suggestive of pyknosis were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

An acute but short protocol of exposure of high-intensity LED light to the eye caused morphometric alterations in the retinal structures, specifically in the nuclear area of the photosensitive cells.

Retinal Protection from LED-Backlit Screen Lights by Short Wavelength Absorption Filters

(1) Background: Ocular exposure to intense light or long-time exposure to low-intensity short-wavelength lights may cause eye injury. Excessive levels of blue light induce photochemical damage to the retinal pigment and degeneration of photoreceptors of the outer segments. Currently, people spend a lot of time watching LED screens that emit high proportions of blue light. This study aims to assess the effects of light emitted by LED tablet screens on pigmented rat retinas with and without optical filters. (2) Methods: Commercially available tablets were used for exposure experiments on three groups of rats. One was exposed to tablet screens, the other was exposed to the tablet screens with a selective filter and the other was a control group. Structure, gene expression (including life/death, extracellular matrix degradation, growth factors, and oxidative stress related genes), and immunohistochemistry in the retina were compared among groups. (3) Results: There was a reduction of the thickness of the external nuclear layer and changes in the genes involved in cell survival and death, extracellular matrix turnover, growth factors, inflammation, and oxidative stress, leading decrease in cell density and retinal damage in the first group. Modulation of gene changes was observed when the LED light of screens was modified with an optical filter. (4) Conclusions: The use of short-wavelength selective filters on the screens contribute to reduce LED light-induced damage in the rat retina.

Tolerance to Light of Patients Suffering From Infectious Keratitis

PURPOSE

With very photophobic patients, the advantages of red or near infrared light to develop new ophthalmology imaging devices seem obvious: no or little glare, possibility of long signal integration, no phototoxicity, and lesser autofluorescence of ocular tissues. Nevertheless, in this range, the shortest possible wavelength facilitates signal detection. The aim of this study was, thus, to determine the maximal irradiance tolerated with 6 wavelengths: 2 red, 2 far red, and 1 near infrared lights to determine the shortest wavelength well tolerated by patients, in comparison with the standard cobalt blue light of ophthalmology slitlamp.

METHODS

An interventional, monocentric, single-group assignment study was conducted on 30 eyes of 30 patients with infectious keratitis. Thanks to a customized machine, the photophobic eye was exposed to the 6 lights with increasing intensity. The patients switched off the light when the discomfort was too elevated. The maximal cumulative irradiance possible at 482, 650, 675, 700, 750, and 800 nm were 171, 689, 759, 862, 920, and 889 mW/cm, respectively.

RESULTS

The maximal cumulative irradiance tolerated by patients increased significantly with wavelength (P < 0.001), but the difference was not significant between each increment: red at 675 nm gave a significantly higher cumulative irradiance than blue at 482 nm; red at 700 nm did not provide significant gain compared with 675 nm; and far red at 750 nm still provided additional gain compared with 700 nm, but no significant gain was observed between 750 and 800 nm. The shortest wavelengths were stopped more quickly, and more than 50% of patients reached the maximum irradiance delivered by the source at 750 and 800 nm.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that a light source at 750 and 800 nm can be used for ophthalmic imaging with good tolerance in photophobic patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03586505.

Emerging approaches for restoration of hearing and vision

Impairments of vision and hearing are highly prevalent conditions limiting the quality of life and presenting a major socioeconomic burden. For long, retinal and cochlear disorders have remained intractable for causal therapies, with sensory rehabilitation limited to glasses, hearing aids, and electrical cochlear or retinal implants. Recently, the application of gene therapy and optogenetics to eye and ear has generated hope for a fundamental improvement of vision and hearing restoration. To date, one gene therapy for the restoration of vision has been approved and undergoing clinical trials will broaden its application including gene replacement, genome editing, and regenerative approaches. Moreover, optogenetics, i.e. controlling the activity of cells by light, offers a more general alternative strategy. Over little more than a decade, optogenetic approaches have been developed and applied to better understand the function of biological systems, while protein engineers have identified and designed new opsin variants with desired physiological features. Considering potential clinical applications of optogenetics, the spotlight is on the sensory systems. Multiple efforts have been undertaken to restore lost or hampered function in eye and ear. Optogenetic stimulation promises to overcome fundamental shortcomings of electrical stimulation, namely poor spatial resolution and cellular specificity, and accordingly to deliver more detailed sensory information. This review aims at providing a comprehensive reference on current gene therapeutic and optogenetic research relevant to the restoration of hearing and vision. We will introduce gene-therapeutic approaches and discuss the biotechnological and optoelectronic aspects of optogenetic hearing and vision restoration.

Cytoprotective effect of crocin and trans-resveratrol on photodamaged primary human retinal pigment epithelial cells

PURPOSE

Light-induced damage to retinal pigment epithelium during pars plana vitrectomy remains a hot topic in ophthalmology. Improvements in technology led to a change of light sources, selective filters, and shorter light exposure time. Currently, there is no satisfying solution to the problem. The aim of the study was to investigate the cytoprotective effects of crocin and resveratrol on light-induced damage to primary human retinal pigment epithelial cells in vitro.

METHODS

Primary human retinal pigment epithelial cells were exposed to light analogous to the illumination during pars plana vitrectomy. To evaluate the cytoprotective effects and potential toxicity of resveratrol and crocin, human retinal pigment epithelial cells were incubated with varying concentrations of both before 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl] tetrazolium bromide (MTT) viability assay. Furthermore, glutathione levels were measured to investigate synergistic antioxidant potential. Apoptosis of human retinal pigment epithelial cells was determined by a nucleosome detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Crocin and resveratrol improved cell viability in photodamaged human retinal pigment epithelial cells significantly from 40.65 ± 21.99% in illuminated human retinal pigment epithelial cells and reached a peak viability of 85.64 ± 11.37% in crocin and resveratrol pretreated cells (for all: p < 0.001). In line, the combination of the supplements increased glutathione levels significantly from 39.35 ± 21.96% to 80.74 ± 10.32% (p = 0.017). No toxic effects were detected (p > 0.99). However, no change in apoptosis rates could be observed following pretreatment with crocin and resveratrol (p > 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Crocin and trans-resveratrol revealed cytoprotective effects on human retinal pigment epithelial cells supporting both supplement's development as potential perioperative treatments in light-induced retinal pigment epithelial damage.

Higher Risk of Light-Induced Retinal Damage Due to Increase of Intraocular Irradiance by Endoillumination

Introduction

All applied illumination systems are validated according to a standard that measures in an experimental setup the direct radiation intensity on a surface in an aqueous solution, not involving an eyeball. Due to various factors, multiple intraocular light-tissue interactions could occur and lead to retinal irradiation intensities that are higher than the irradiation caused by direct illumination. The aim of this work is to investigate the hypothesis that intraocular and technical reference irradiance is different.

Methods

Using an illumination system and a calibrated optical fiber, the irradiance in porcine eyes was measured at the posterior pole (macula) and compared with reference measurements. We compared two endoilluminators (spotlight and wide-angle) at a total of nine porcine eyes with a brown iris and five porcine eyes with a blue iris.

Results

The intraocular irradiance was always significantly higher compared to reference measurements (p < 0.001). Between eyes with a blue or brown iris, no significant difference was observed.

Conclusion

A significantly higher irradiance could be measured compared to a reference measurement with the same illumination setup. The intraocular illumination increased between 30 and 60%, dependent on the distance of the distal end of the light fiber (4–12-mm distance to the retina). This leads to the assumption that the so far allowed “safe” exposure times for illumination systems are overestimated and the potential hazard to the retina is higher.

Effects of Bright Light with Reduced Blue Light on Sleepiness on Rising: A Small Exploratory Study

Bright light therapy is a treatment modality for seasonal affective disorder and circadian rhythm disorders in which artificial light of 2,500 lux or higher at the eye is effective. Although short-wavelength visible light is more effective than long-wavelength visible light, it may be hazardous to the retina. Recently, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have been used as the light source in bright light therapy apparatuses. We developed goggles for bright light therapy equipped with LEDs as the light source. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of our goggles when emitting 10,000-lux light with its short-wavelength light content reduced by 30% or 50% (denoted as 30%-cut and 50%-cut light, respectively, henceforth). Six healthy young males participated in this study. They were administered no light, 50%-cut light, and 30%-cut light for 30 min early in the morning for 4 days each. Subjective sleepiness and sleep quality were evaluated by the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) and the Oguri–Shirakawa–Azumi sleep inventory MA version (OSA-MA), respectively. Subjective sleepiness evaluated by the SSS and the subscale of the OSA-MA significantly decreased with 30%-cut light compared with no light. Psychomotor performance evaluated by a calculation task improved with the 30%-cut light, although not significant after multiple comparisons were considered. No abnormality was found by ophthalmoscopy and the vision test. In conclusion, our goggles with 30%-cut light may be safe and have an awakening effect.

Light-emitting-diode induced retinal damage and its wavelength dependency in vivo

AIM

To examine light-emitting-diode (LED)-induced retinal neuronal cell damage and its wavelength-driven pathogenic mechanisms.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to blue LEDs (460 nm), green LEDs (530 nm), and red LEDs (620 nm). Electroretinography (ERG), Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, Western blotting (WB) and the detection of superoxide anion (O₂^-·), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), total iron, and ferric (Fe³⁺) levels were applied.

RESULTS

ERG results showed the blue LED group induced more functional damage than that of green or red LED groups. H&E staining, TUNEL, IHC, and TEM revealed apoptosis and necrosis of photoreceptors and RPE, which indicated blue LED also induced more photochemical injury. Free radical production and iron-related molecular marker expressions demonstrated that oxidative stress and iron-overload were associated with retinal injury. WB assays correspondingly showed that defense gene expression was up-regulated after the LED light exposure with a wavelength dependency.

CONCLUSION

The study results indicate that LED blue-light exposure poses a great risk of retinal injury in awake, task-oriented rod-dominant animals. The wavelength-dependent effect should be considered carefully when switching to LED lighting applications.

Light-induced retinal damage using different light sources, protocols and rat strains reveals LED phototoxicity

To save energy, the European directives from the Eco-design of Energy Using Products (2005/32/CE) have recommended the replacement of incandescent lamps by more economic devices such as Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs). However, the emission spectrum of these devices is enriched in blue radiations, known to be potentially dangerous to the retina. Recent studies showed that light exposure contributes to the onset of early stages of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Here, we investigate, in albinos and pigmented rats, the effects of different exposure protocols. Twenty-four hours exposure at high luminance was compared to a cyclic (dark/light) exposure at domestic levels for 1week and 1month, using different LEDs (Cold-white, blue and green), as well as fluorocompact bulbs and fluorescent tubes. The data suggest that the blue component of the white-LED may cause retinal toxicity at occupational domestic illuminance and not only in extreme experimental conditions, as previously reported. It is important to note that the current regulations and standards have been established on the basis of acute light exposure and do not take into account the effects of repeated exposure.

Retinal damage induced by commercial light emitting diodes (LEDs)

Spectra of "white LEDs" are characterized by an intense emission in the blue region of the visible spectrum, absent in daylight spectra. This blue component and the high intensity of emission are the main sources of concern about the health risks of LEDs with respect to their toxicity to the eye and the retina. The aim of our study was to elucidate the role of blue light from LEDs in retinal damage. Commercially available white LEDs and four different blue LEDs (507, 473, 467, and 449nm) were used for exposure experiments on Wistar rats. Immunohistochemical stain, transmission electron microscopy, and Western blot were used to exam the retinas. We evaluated LED-induced retinal cell damage by studying oxidative stress, stress response pathways, and the identification of cell death pathways. LED light caused a state of suffering of the retina with oxidative damage and retinal injury. We observed a loss of photoreceptors and the activation of caspase-independent apoptosis, necroptosis, and necrosis. A wavelength dependence of the effects was observed. Phototoxicity of LEDs on the retina is characterized by a strong damage of photoreceptors and by the induction of necrosis.

Phototoxic action spectrum on a retinal pigment epithelium model of age-related macular degeneration exposed to sunlight normalized conditions

Among the identified risk factors of age-related macular degeneration, sunlight is known to induce cumulative damage to the retina. A photosensitive derivative of the visual pigment, N-retinylidene-N-retinylethanolamine (A2E), may be involved in this phototoxicity. The high energy visible light between 380 nm and 500 nm (blue light) is incriminated. Our aim was to define the most toxic wavelengths in the blue-green range on an in vitro model of the disease. Primary cultures of porcine retinal pigment epithelium cells were incubated for 6 hours with different A2E concentrations and exposed for 18 hours to 10 nm illumination bands centered from 380 to 520 nm in 10 nm increments. Light irradiances were normalized with respect to the natural sunlight reaching the retina. Six hours after light exposure, cell viability, necrosis and apoptosis were assessed using the Apotox-Glo Triplex™ assay. Retinal pigment epithelium cells incubated with A2E displayed fluorescent bodies within the cytoplasm. Their absorption and emission spectra were similar to those of A2E. Exposure to 10 nm illumination bands induced a loss in cell viability with a dose dependence upon A2E concentrations. Irrespective of A2E concentration, the loss of cell viability was maximal for wavelengths from 415 to 455 nm. Cell viability decrease was correlated to an increase in cell apoptosis indicated by caspase-3/7 activities in the same spectral range. No light-elicited necrosis was measured as compared to control cells maintained in darkness. Our results defined the precise spectrum of light retinal toxicity in physiological irradiance conditions on an in vitro model of age-related macular degeneration. Surprisingly, a narrow bandwidth in blue light generated the greatest phototoxic risk to retinal pigment epithelium cells. This phototoxic spectrum may be advantageously valued in designing selective photoprotection ophthalmic filters, without disrupting essential visual and non-visual functions of the eye.

Retinal photodamage by endogenous and xenobiotic agents

The human eye is constantly exposed to sunlight and artificial lighting. Light transmission through the eye is fundamental to its unique biological functions of directing vision and circadian rhythm and therefore light absorbed by the eye must be benign. However, exposure to the very intense ambient radiation can pose a hazard particularly if the recipient is over 40 years of age. There are age-related changes in the endogenous (natural) chromophores (lipofuscin, A2E and all-trans-retinal derivatives) in the human retina that makes it more susceptible to visible light damage. Intense visible light sources that do not filter short blue visible light (400-440 nm) used for phototherapy of circadian imbalance (i.e. seasonal affective disorder) increase the risk for age-related light damage to the retina. Moreover, many drugs, dietary supplements, nanoparticles and diagnostic dyes (xenobiotics) absorb ocular light and have the potential to induce photodamage to the retina, leading to transient or permanent blinding disorders. This article will review the underlying reasons why visible light in general and short blue visible light in particular dramatically raises the risk of photodamage to the human retina.