Intravitreal melphalan hydrochloride vs propylene glycol-free melphalan for retinoblastoma vitreous seeds: Efficacy, toxicity and stability in rabbits models and patients

Safety of intravitreal chemotherapy in the management of retinoblastoma: A systematic review of the literature

Intravitreal chemotherapy is used as a salvage therapy for retinoblastoma with persistent or recurrent vitreous seeding after primary treatment. To assess the safety of this technique, we conducted a systematic review of all studies reporting ocular toxicity data. Forty-eight trials involving 2751 eyes were included. The most common complications were cataract, retinal toxicity, and vitreous hemorrhage. However, severe and permanent adverse events were limited, while the risk of extraocular dissemination, a significant concern, was practically eliminated through preventive techniques. Globe salvage rates ranged from 29 % to 100 %. In conclusion, intravitreal chemotherapy seems to improve prognosis of eyes with advanced disease, with an acceptable safety profile. Nevertheless, most relevant studies are retrospective, and no randomized trials have been performed. Recognizing the challenges regarding the conduct of randomized studies for such a rare pediatric cancer, we believe that multicenter trials through international collaborations can significantly enhance the available information.

Aqueous VEGF-A Levels as a Liquid Biopsy Biomarker of Retinoblastoma Vitreous Seed Response to Therapy

Purpose

Regression of retinoblastoma vitreous seeds (VS) during intravitreal chemotherapy can be delayed, resulting in supernumerary injections. Similarly, VS relapse may not be clinically evident at first. A predictive biomarker of tumor regression and relapse could help guide real-time clinical decision making. Retinoblastoma is an oxygen-sensitive tumor; paradoxically, VS survive in the hypoxic vitreous. We hypothesized that VS elaborate pro-angiogenic cytokines. The purpose was to determine if pro-angiogenic cytokine signatures from aqueous humor could serve as a biomarker of VS response to treatment.

Methods

Multiplex ELISA was performed on aqueous from rabbit eyes with human retinoblastoma VS xenografts to identify expressed proangiogenic cytokines and changes in aqueous cytokine levels during intravitreal treatment were determined. Confirmatory RNAscope in situ hybridization for VEGF-A was performed on human retinoblastoma tumor sections and VS xenografts from rabbits. For human eyes undergoing intravitreal chemotherapy, serial aqueous VEGF-A levels measured via VEGF-A-specific ELISA were compared to clinical response.

Results

VEGF-A was highly expressed in human retinoblastoma VS in the xenograft model, and was the only proangiogenic cytokine that correlated with VS disease burden. In rabbits, aqueous VEGF-A levels decreased in response to therapy, consistent with quantitative VS reduction. In patients, aqueous VEGF-A levels associated with clinical changes in disease burden (regression, stability, or relapse), with changes in VEGF-A levels correlating with clinical response.

Conclusions

Aqueous VEGF-A levels correlate with extent of retinoblastoma VS, suggesting that aqueous VEGF-A may serve as a predictive molecular biomarker of treatment response.

Efficacy of a prolonged stability melphalan formulation for intra-arterial treatment of retinoblastoma

BACKGROUND

Melphalan, which is poorly soluble at room temperature, is widely used for the treatment of retinoblastoma by selective ophthalmic artery infusion. Evomela, a propylene glycol-free formulation of melphalan with improved solubility and stability, has recently been used as an alternative.To compare the safety and efficacy of Evomela with standard-formulation melphalan (SFM) in the treatment of retinoblastoma by selective ophthalmic artery infusion.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study of patients with retinoblastoma undergoing selective ophthalmic artery infusion with SFM or Evomela at a single institution. Cycle-specific percent tumor regression (CSPTR) was estimated by comparing photos obtained during pretreatment examination under anesthesia (EUA) with those obtained during post-treatment EUA 3-4 weeks later. CSPTR, ocular salvage rates, complication rates, operation times (unadjusted and adjusted for difficulty of ophthalmic artery catheterization), and intraprocedural dose expiration rates were compared between Evomela- and SFM-treated groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven operations (melphalan: 45; Evomela: 52) for 23 patients with 27 retinoblastomas were studied. The ocular salvage rate was 79% in the SFM-treated group and 69% in the Evomela-treated group. Multivariate regression controlling for tumor grade, patient age, and treatment history revealed no significant differences in ocular salvage rate, CSPTR, complication rates, or operation times. Although the dose expiration rate was higher for the SFM-treated group, the difference was not statistically significant. Notably, there were no ocular or cerebral ischemic complications.

CONCLUSION

Evomela has non-inferior safety and efficacy relative to SFM when used for the treatment of retinoblastoma by selective ophthalmic artery infusion.

The predictive capacity of in vitro preclinical models to evaluate drugs for the treatment of retinoblastoma

Retinoblastoma is a rare childhood cancer of the eye. Of the small number of drugs are used to treat retinoblastoma, all have been repurposed from drugs developed for other conditions. In order to find drugs or drug combinations better suited to the improved treatment of retinoblastoma, reliable predictive models are required, which facilitate the challenging transition from in vitro studies to clinical trials. In this review, the research performed to date on the development of 2D and 3D in vitro models for retinoblastoma is presented. Most of this research was undertaken with a view to better biological understanding of retinoblastoma, and we discuss the potential for these models to be applied to drug screening. Future research directions for streamlined drug discovery are considered and evaluated, and many promising avenues identified.

Treatment of Retinoblastoma: What Is the Latest and What Is the Future

The management of retinoblastoma, the most common intraocular malignancy in children, has changed drastically over the last decade. Landmark developments in local drug delivery, namely, safer techniques for intravitreal chemotherapy injection and ophthalmic artery chemosurgery, have resulted in eye globe salvages that were not previously attainable using systemic chemotherapy or external beam irradiation. Novel drugs, oncolytic viruses, and immunotherapy are promising approaches in the treatment of intraocular retinoblastoma. Importantly, emerging studies of the pattern of tumor dissemination and local drug delivery may provide the first steps toward new treatments for metastatic disease. Here, we review recent advances in retinoblastoma treatment, especially with regard to local drug delivery, that have enabled successful conservative management of intraocular retinoblastoma. We also review emerging data from preclinical and clinical studies on innovative approaches that promise to lead to further improvement in outcomes, namely, the mechanisms and potential uses of new and repurposed drugs and non-chemotherapy treatments, and discuss future directions for therapeutic development.

Intravitreal HDAC Inhibitor Belinostat Effectively Eradicates Vitreous Seeds Without Retinal Toxicity In Vivo in a Rabbit Retinoblastoma Model

Purpose

Current melphalan-based regimens for intravitreal chemotherapy for retinoblastoma vitreous seeds are effective but toxic to the retina. Thus, alternative agents are needed. Based on the known biology of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in the retinoblastoma pathway, we systematically studied whether the HDAC inhibitor belinostat is a viable, molecularly targeted alternative agent for intravitreal delivery that might provide comparable efficacy, without toxicity.

Methods

In vivo pharmacokinetic experiments in rabbits and in vitro cytotoxicity experiments were performed to determine the 90% inhibitory concentration (IC₉₀). Functional toxicity by electroretinography and structural toxicity by optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography, and histopathology were evaluated in rabbits following three injections of belinostat 350 µg (2× IC₉₀) or 700 µg (4× IC₉₀), compared with melphalan 12.5 µg (rabbit equivalent of the human dose). The relative efficacy of intravitreal belinostat versus melphalan to treat WERI-Rb1 human cell xenografts in rabbit eyes was directly quantified. RNA sequencing was used to assess belinostat-induced changes in RB cell gene expression.

Results

The maximum nontoxic dose of belinostat was 350 µg, which caused no reductions in electroretinography parameters, retinal microvascular loss on OCT angiography, or retinal degeneration. Melphalan caused severe retinal structural and functional toxicity. Belinostat 350 µg (equivalent to 700 µg in the larger human eye) was equally effective at eradicating vitreous seeds in the rabbit xenograft model compared with melphalan (95.5% reduction for belinostat, P < 0.001; 89.4% reduction for melphalan, P < 0.001; belinostat vs. melphalan, P = 0.10). Even 700 µg belinostat (equivalent to 1400 µg in humans) caused only minimal toxicity. Widespread changes in gene expression resulted.

Conclusions

Molecularly targeted inhibition of HDACs with intravitreal belinostat was equally effective as standard-of-care melphalan but without retinal toxicity. Belinostat may therefore be an attractive agent to pursue clinically for intravitreal treatment of retinoblastoma.

Efficacy, Toxicity, and Pharmacokinetics of Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy Versus Intravenous Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma in Animal Models and Patients

Purpose

Through controlled comparative rabbit experiments and parallel patient studies, our purpose was to understand mechanisms underlying differences in efficacy and toxicity between intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) and intravenous chemotherapy (IVC).

Methods

In rabbits, ocular tissue drug levels were measured following IAC and IVC. Retinal toxicity was assessed using electroretinography, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography. Efficacy to eradicate retinoblastoma orthotopic xenografts was compared. In IAC and IVC patients, we measured blood carboplatin pharmacokinetics and compared efficacy and toxicity.

Results

In rabbits receiving IAC, maximum carboplatin levels were 134 times greater in retina (P = 0.01) and 411 times greater in vitreous (P < 0.001), and total carboplatin (area under the curve) was 123 times greater in retina (P = 0.005) and 131 times greater in vitreous (P = 0.02) compared with IVC. Melphalan levels were 12 times greater (P = 0.003) in retina and 26 times greater in vitreous (P < 0.001) for IAC. Blood levels were not different. IAC melphalan (but not IV melphalan or IV carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine) caused widespread apoptosis in retinoblastoma xenografts but no functional retinal toxicity or cytopenias. In patients, blood levels following IVC were greater (P < 0.001) but, when adjusted for treatment dose, were not statistically different. Per treatment cycle in patients, IVC caused higher rates of anemia (0.32 ± 0.29 vs. 0.01 ± 0.04; P = 0.0086), thrombocytopenia (0.5 ± 0.42 vs. 0.0 ± 0.0; P = 0.0042), and neutropenia (0.58 ± 0.3 vs. 0.31 ± 0.25; P = 0.032) but lower treatment success rates (P = 0.0017).

Conclusions

The greater efficacy and lower systemic toxicity with IAC appear to be attributable to the greater ocular-to-systemic drug concentration ratio compared with IVC.

Translational Relevance

Provides an overarching hypothesis for a mechanism of efficacy/toxicity to guide future drug development.

Evaluation of intravitreal topotecan dose levels, toxicity and efficacy for retinoblastoma vitreous seeds: a preclinical and clinical study

Background

Current melphalan-based intravitreal regimens for retinoblastoma (RB) vitreous seeds cause retinal toxicity. We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan monotherapy compared with melphalan in our rabbit model and patient cohort.

Methods

Rabbit experiments: empiric pharmacokinetics were determined following topotecan injection. For topotecan (15 μg or 30 µg), melphalan (12.5 µg) or saline, toxicity was evaluated by serial electroretinography (ERG) and histopathology, and efficacy against vitreous seed xenografts was measured by tumour cell reduction and apoptosis induction. Patients: retrospective cohort study of 235 patients receiving 990 intravitreal injections of topotecan or melphalan.

Results

Intravitreal topotecan 30 µg (equals 60 µg in humans) achieved the IC₉₀ across the rabbit vitreous. Three weekly topotecan injections (either 15 µg or 30 µg) caused no retinal toxicity in rabbits, whereas melphalan 12.5 µg (equals 25 µg in humans) reduced ERG amplitudes 42%–79%. Intravitreal topotecan 15 µg was equally effective to melphalan to treat WERI-Rb1 cell xenografts in rabbits (96% reduction for topotecan vs saline (p=0.004), 88% reduction for melphalan vs saline (p=0.004), topotecan vs melphalan, p=0.15). In our clinical study, patients received 881 monotherapy injections (48 topotecan, 833 melphalan). Patients receiving 20 µg or 30 µg topotecan demonstrated no significant ERG reductions; melphalan caused ERG reductions of 7.6 μV for every injection of 25 µg (p=0.03) or 30 µg (p<0.001). Most patients treated with intravitreal topotecan also received intravitreal melphalan at some point during their treatment course. Among those eyes treated exclusively with topotecan monotherapy, all eyes were salvaged.

Conclusions

Taken together, these experiments suggest that intravitreal topotecan monotherapy for the treatment of RB vitreous seeds is non-toxic and effective.

Complete preclinical platform for intravitreal chemotherapy drug discovery for retinoblastoma: Assessment of pharmacokinetics, toxicity and efficacy using a rabbit model

Current melphalan-based intravitreal chemotherapy regimens for retinoblastoma vitreous seeds are effective, but cause significant ocular toxicity. We describe protocols for each step of a drug discovery pipeline for preclinical development of novel drugs to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity. These protocols include: 1) determination of vitreous pharmacokinetics in vivo, 2) in vitro assessment of drug cytotoxicity against retinoblastoma based on empiric pharmacokinetics, 3) back-calculation of minimum injection dose to achieve therapeutic concentrations, 4) in vivo determination of maximum-tolerable intravitreal dose, using a multimodal, structural and functional toxicity-assessment platform, and 5) in vivo determination of drug efficacy using a rabbit orthotopic xenograft model of retinoblastoma vitreous seeds. We likewise describe our methodology for direct quantitation of vitreous seeds, and the statistical methodology for assessment of toxicity and efficacy in evaluating novel drugs, as well as for comparisons between drugs.•Multi-step pipeline for intravitreal chemotherapy drug discovery for retinoblastoma, using novel rabbit models.•Detailed protocols for determination of vitreous pharmacokinetics, calculation of optimal dose to inject to achieve therapeutic vitreous levels, determination of maximum tolerable dose using a novel complete toxicity-assessment platform, and in vivo efficacy against retinoblastoma using methodology to directly quantify vitreous tumor burden.•Associated statistical methodology is also presented.