Age-related changes in the capacity to select early-onset upper-limb reactions to either recover balance or protect against impact

Injury-mechanism directness as a key factor for fracture laterality in pediatric extremity fractures

BACKGROUND

Associations between certain extremity fracture sites and laterality in pediatric trauma are well known, whereas the rationale for such laterality tendencies are unclear. We hypothesized that the laterality tendency of a specific fracture would be affected by directness of injury mechanism and not by the fracture site itself.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 1382 children (aged 2-16 years) who were diagnosed with extremity fractures sustained during loss-of-balance situations and investigated the laterality tendencies (dominant vs. non-dominant extremity) of specific fracture sites. Multivariate analyses were sequentially performed to adjust for potential confounding variables-with and without injury-mechanism directness as a covariate.

RESULTS

In the upper extremities, the non-dominant side was more prone to fractures (p < 0.001), especially of the distal supracondylar humerus, radial and/or ulnar shaft, and distal radius. In the lower extremities, the dominant side was more frequently fractured (p < 0.001), especially at the tibial shaft and distal tibia. However, the predisposing effects of specific fracture sites on fracture laterality were not statistically significant when in analysis adjusted for injury-mechanism directness as a covariate. Fracture laterality was affected by whether the injury mechanism was direct or indirect. Indirect injury to the upper extremity was strongly associated with non-dominant arm injury (odds ratio 0.686 [95% CI 0.517-0.991]; p = 0.009), whereas indirect injury to the lower extremity was strongly associated with dominant leg injury (odds ratio 2.138 [95% CI 1.444-3.165]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Injury-mechanism directness, rather than fracture site itself, is a key factor that affects fracture laterality in pediatric extremity fractures. These findings are helpful for improving our understanding of which factors may affect fracture laterality among children.

Muscular and Kinematic Responses to Unexpected Translational Balance Perturbation: A Pilot Study in Healthy Young Adults

Falls and fall-related injuries are significant public health problems in older adults. While balance-controlling strategies have been extensively researched, there is still a lack of understanding regarding how fast the lower-limb muscles contract and coordinate in response to a sudden loss of standing balance. Therefore, this pilot study aims to investigate the speed and timing patterns of multiple joint/muscles' activities among the different challenges in standing balance. Twelve healthy young subjects were recruited, and they received unexpected translational balance perturbations with randomized intensities and directions. Electromyographical (EMG) and mechanomyographical (MMG) signals of eight dominant-leg's muscles, dominant-leg's three-dimensional (3D) hip/knee/ankle joint angles, and 3D postural sways were concurrently collected. Two-way ANOVAs were used to examine the difference in timing and speed of the collected signals among muscles/joint motions and among perturbation intensities. This study has found that (1) agonist muscles resisting the induced postural sway tended to activate more rapidly than the antagonist muscles, and ankle muscles contributed the most with the fastest rate of response; (2) voluntary corrective lower-limb joint motions and postural sways could occur as early as the perturbation-induced passive ones; (3) muscles reacted more rapidly under a larger perturbation intensity, while the joint motions or postural sways did not. These findings expand the current knowledge on standing-balance-controlling mechanisms and may potentially provide more insights for developing future fall-prevention strategies in daily life.

Compensatory stepping responses during real-life falls in older adults

BACKGROUND

Laboratory studies of postural responses suggest that stepping is a common strategy for balance recovery. Yet little is known about the frequency and characteristics of stepping responses during real-life falls in older adults.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

(1) Among falls experienced by older adults in long-term care (LTC), what is the prevalence of attempts to recover balance by stepping? (2) How often are steps aligned to the direction of the fall? (3) Do the prevalence and characteristics of steps associate with intrinsic and situational factors?

METHODS

We collected and analyzed video footage of 1516 falls experienced by 515 residents of LTC (of mean age 82.7 years). Using generalized estimating equations, we tested whether the prevalence, direction and size of steps associated with sex, age, fall direction, activity at the time of falling, cause of imbalance, and holding or grasping objects.

RESULTS

Stepping after imbalance was observed in 76% of falls, and 80% of these cases involved multiple steps. The direction of steps aligned with the initial fall direction in 81% of cases. The size of the first step was less than one-half foot length in 64% of cases. Secondary steps tended to be similar in size to the first step. Steps were more common for falls during walking than standing, and for sideways falls. Steps were less common in falls involving held objects, and steps were less likely to be aligned with the fall direction when reach-to-grasp responses were observed.

SIGNIFICANCE

Older adults in LTC tended to respond to falls with multiple compensatory steps. Steps were tailored to the direction of the fall, but small in size (less than one-half foot length in size). Exercise programs for fall prevention in older adults should focus on increasing step size to enhance the effectiveness of step recovery responses.

Test-retest reliability of the FALL FIT system for assessing and training protective arm reactions in response to a forward fall

The use of the hands and arms is an important protective mechanism in avoiding fall-related injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of fall dynamics and evokd protective arm response kinematics and kinetics in forward falls simulated using the FALL simulator For Injury prevention Training and assessment system (FALL FIT). Fall FIT allows experimental control of the fall height and acceleration of the body during a forward fall. Two falls were simulated starting from 4 initial lean angles in Experiment 1 and with 4 different fall accelerations in Experiment 2. Fourteen younger adults (25.1±3.5 years) and 13 older adults (71.3±3.7 years) participated in Experiment 1 and 13 younger adults (31.8±5.7 years) participated in Experiment 2. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to the evaluate absolute agreement of single measures at each condition and averages across conditions. Average measures of fall dynamics and evoked kinematics and kinetics exhibited excellent reliability (ICC(A,4)>0.86). The reliability of single measures (ICC(A,1) > 0.59) was good to excellent, although 18% of single measures had a reliability (ICC(A,1)) between 0.00 and 0.57. The FALL FIT was shown to have good to excellent reliability for most measures. FALL FIT can produce a wide range of fall dynamics through modulation of initial lean angle and body acceleration. Additionally, the range of fall velocities and evoked kinematics and kinetics are consistent with previous fall research.•

The FALL FIT can be used to gain further insight into the control of protective arm reactions and may provide a therapeutic tool to assess and train protective arm reactions.

Does functional performance and upper body strength predict upper extremity reaction and movement time in older women?

BACKGROUND

Reaction time to initiate upper limb movement and movement time to place hands on the landing surface may be important factors in forward fall landing and impact, contributing to injury reduction. The aim was to investigate the relationship of physical function and upper body strength to upper limb reaction and movement time in older female participants.

METHODS

75 female participants (72 ± 8 yrs) performed 5 arm response trials. Reaction time (signal to initiation of movement), and movement time (initial movement to contact), were collected using 3D motion capture. Additional variables were: handgrip; sit-to-stand; shoulder flexion and elbow extension strength measured by hand-held dynamometry; one-legged balance; fall risk; and physical activity scores. Prediction variables for reaction and movement time were determined in separate backward selection multiple regression analyses. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

FINDINGS

Significant regression equations for RT (r² = 0.08, P = 0.013) found a relationship between stronger handgrip (Beta = -0.002) and faster reaction time, accounting for 8% variance. For movement time (r² = 0.06, P = 0.036) greater shoulder flexion strength (Beta = -0.04) was related to faster movement time, explaining 6% variance. Stronger SF strength was related to a decrease in MT by 4%.

DISCUSSION

A relationship between arm strength measures and faster upper body reaction and movement time was shown, with 10-20% higher strength associated with a 5% faster response time. Even though this was a relatively weak relationship, given that strength is a modifiable component this provides a potential avenue for future intervention efforts. This in turn could have an impact on forward fall landing and potential reduction of injury risk.

A kinematic analysis of balance recovery following an unexpected forward balance loss during stair descent

Falls during stair descent pose a major health concern. A stronger understanding of recovery from balance loss during stair descent is needed to guide fall prevention strategies and environmental design. We characterized balance recovery strategies, trunk and center-of-mass (COM) kinematics, and handrail use following unexpected forward balance loss during stair descent, and the effect of perturbation magnitude on these outcomes. Eighteen young adults experienced a rapid platform translation during stair descent to disrupt balance. Deception was used to reduce anticipation. All participants used compensatory stepping to recover balance, and most applied forces to the handrail in multiple directions. Higher perturbation magnitude resulted in higher COM velocity and handrail forces, more frequent incomplete steps, and quicker step contact time. Our findings provide a foundation for understanding balance recovery on stairs. The findings emphasize the importance of designing stairways that enable compensatory stepping, and handrails that permit adequate force generation in multiple directions to facilitate balance recovery on stairs.