Age-related reduction in peak power and increased postural displacement variability are related to enhanced vestibular-evoked balance responses in females

Vestibular control of standing balance following 24 h of sleep deprivation

Sleep deprivation alters cognitive and sensorimotor function, but its effects on the control of standing balance are inconclusive. The vestibular system is critical for standing balance, and is modified by sleep deprivation; however, how sleep deprivation affects vestibular-evoked balance responses is unknown. Thus, this study aimed to examine the effect of 24 h of sleep deprivation on the vestibular control of standing balance. During both a well-rested (i.e., control) and sleep deprivation condition, nine females completed two 90-s trials of bilateral, binaural stochastic electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) and two 120-s trials of quiet stance on a force plate. Quiet stance performance was assessed by center of pressure displacement parameters. Mediolateral ground reaction force (ML force) and surface electromyography (EMG) of the right medial gastrocnemius (MG) were sampled simultaneously with the EVS signal to quantify vestibular control of balance within the frequency (gain and coherence) and time (cumulant density) domains. Twenty-four hours of sleep deprivation did not affect quiet stance performance. Sleep deprivation also had limited effect on EVS-MG EMG and EVS-ML Force coherence (less than control at 8-10.5 Hz, greater at ~ 16 Hz); however, gain of EVS-MG EMG (< 8, 11-24 Hz) and EVS-ML force (0.5-9 Hz) was greater for sleep deprivation than control. Sleep deprivation did not alter peak-to-peak amplitude of EVS-MG EMG (p = 0.51) or EVS-ML force (p = 0.06) cumulant density function responses. Despite no effect on quiet stance parameters, the observed increase in vestibular-evoked balance response gain suggests 24-h sleep deprivation may lead to greater sensitivity of the central nervous system when transforming vestibular-driven signals for standing balance control.

Comparison Between Effects of Galvanic and Vibration-Based Vestibular Stimulation on Postural Control and Gait Performance in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies

Electricity and vibration were two commonly used physical agents to provide vestibular stimulation in previous studies. This study aimed to systematically review the effects of galvanic (GVS) and vibration-based vestibular stimulation (VVS) on gait performance and postural control in healthy participants. Five bioscience and engineering databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase, were searched until March 19th, 2023. Studies published between 2000 and 2023 in English involving GVS and VVS related to gait performance and postural control were included. The procedure was followed via the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the NIH study quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. A total of 55 cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Five studies were good-quality while 49 were moderate-quality and 1 was poor-quality. There were 50 included studies involving GVS and 5 included studies involving VVS. GVS and VVS utilized different physical agents to provide vestibular stimulation and demonstrated similar effects on vestibular perception. Supra-threshold GVS and VVS produced vestibular perturbation that impaired gait performance and postural control, while sub-threshold GVS and VVS induced stochastic resonance phenomenon that led to an improvement. Bilateral vestibular stimulation demonstrated a greater effect on gait and posture than unilateral vestibular stimulation. Compared to GVS, VVS had the characteristics of better tolerance and fewer side effects, which may substitute GVS to provide more acceptable vestibular stimulation.