1
|
Fonseca-Hial AMR, Parisio K, Oliveira JSR. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced indolent lymphoproliferative disorders. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2016; 38:99-105. [PMID: 27208567 PMCID: PMC4877659 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2016.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2015] [Revised: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced indolent lymphoproliferative disorders remains to be established. OBJECTIVE This paper aims to describe the results of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced indolent lymphoproliferative disorders. METHODS This article reports on 29 adult patients submitted to allogeneic transplantations from 1997 to 2010. RESULTS Most had follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=14) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=12). The median age was 44 years (range: 24-53 years) and 65% of patients were male. Only 21% had had access to rituximab and 45% to fludarabine. All had advanced disease (stage IV) with partial response or stable disease. Most underwent myeloablative conditioning n=17-59%). In this scenario, refractory disease was observed in seven (24%) patients, the 100-day mortality rate was 17% (n=5) and relapse occurred in four patients (18%). The main cause of death throughout the follow up was refractory disease in six of the 12 patients who died. Moderate and severe chronic graft-versus-host disease was frequent; about 41% of 24 patients analyzed. The overall survival rates and disease free survival at 42 months were 56.7% and 45.4%, respectively. According to Kaplan-Meyer analysis, the median time from diagnosis to transplant predicted the overall survival; however age, gender and conditioning regimen did not predict the prognosis. It was impossible to reach other conclusions because of the small sample size in this study. CONCLUSIONS The role of allogeneic transplantations should be re-evaluated in the era of targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Marcela Rojas Fonseca-Hial
- Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | | | - Jose Salvador Rodrigues Oliveira
- Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fenske TS, Zhang MJ, Carreras J, Ayala E, Burns LJ, Cashen A, Costa LJ, Freytes CO, Gale RP, Hamadani M, Holmberg LA, Inwards DJ, Lazarus HM, Maziarz RT, Munker R, Perales MA, Rizzieri DA, Schouten HC, Smith SM, Waller EK, Wirk BM, Laport GG, Maloney DG, Montoto S, Hari PN. Autologous or reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chemotherapy-sensitive mantle-cell lymphoma: analysis of transplantation timing and modality. J Clin Oncol 2013; 32:273-81. [PMID: 24344210 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.49.2454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the outcomes of patients with chemotherapy-sensitive mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) following a first hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT), comparing outcomes with autologous (auto) versus reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic (RIC allo) HCT and with transplantation applied at different times in the disease course. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 519 patients who received transplantations between 1996 and 2007 and were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research were analyzed. The early transplantation cohort was defined as those patients in first partial or complete remission with no more than two lines of chemotherapy. The late transplantation cohort was defined as all the remaining patients. RESULTS Auto-HCT and RIC allo-HCT resulted in similar overall survival from transplantation for both the early (at 5 years: 61% auto-HCT v 62% RIC allo-HCT; P = .951) and late cohorts (at 5 years: 44% auto-HCT v 31% RIC allo-HCT; P = .202). In both early and late transplantation cohorts, progression/relapse was lower and nonrelapse mortality was higher in the allo-HCT group. Overall survival and progression-free survival were highest in patients who underwent auto-HCT in first complete response. Multivariate analysis of survival from diagnosis identified a survival benefit favoring early HCT for both auto-HCT and RIC allo-HCT. CONCLUSION For patients with chemotherapy-sensitive MCL, the optimal timing for HCT is early in the disease course. Outcomes are particularly favorable for patients undergoing auto-HCT in first complete remission. For those unable to achieve complete remission after two lines of chemotherapy or those with relapsed disease, either auto-HCT or RIC allo-HCT may be effective, although the chance for long-term remission and survival is lower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy S Fenske
- Timothy S. Fenske and Mehdi Hamadani, Medical College of Wisconsin; Mei-Jie Zhang, Jeanette Carreras, and Parameswaran N. Hari, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Ernesto Ayala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; Baldeep M. Wirk, Shands Healthcare and University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Linda J. Burns, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview, Minneapolis; David J. Inwards, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; Amanda Cashen, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Luciano J. Costa, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; César O. Freytes, South Texas Veterans Health Care System and University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Robert P. Gale, Imperial College; Silvia Montoto, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Leona A. Holmberg and David G. Maloney, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Hillard M. Lazarus, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Richard T. Maziarz, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; Reinhold Munker, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Miguel-Angel Perales, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; David A. Rizzieri, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Harry C. Schouten, Academische Ziekenhuis Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Sonali M. Smith, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL; Edmund K. Waller, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA; and Ginna G. Laport, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reddy NM, Oluwole O, Greer JP, Engelhardt BG, Jagasia MH, Savani BN. Outcomes of autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Exp Hematol 2013; 42:39-45. [PMID: 24096123 DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2013.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2013] [Revised: 08/26/2013] [Accepted: 09/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Transplant outcomes of autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) have not been elucidated as a single cohort in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We analyzed the outcomes of 270 adult recipients receiving autologous (auto) SCT (n = 198) or allogeneic (allo) SCT (n = 72) for NHL between the years 2000 and 2010. Five-year overall survival rates for B and T cell NHL were 58% and 50%, respectively (allo-SCT 51% vs. 54% for B and T-cell NHL, and auto-SCT 60% vs. 47% for B and T cell lymphoma, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the number of chemotherapy regimens and disease status pre-SCT were independently associated with long-term outcome after SCT (for both auto- and allo-SCT). We conclude that the type of transplantation offered to patients, based on patient selection and disease-related factors, can achieve long-term survival, highlighting the importance of further improvement in disease control and reducing procedure-related mortality. The role of transplantation needs to be reevaluated in the era of targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishitha M Reddy
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Olalekan Oluwole
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John P Greer
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Brian G Engelhardt
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Madan H Jagasia
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bipin N Savani
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zaja F, Federico M, Vitolo U, Zinzani PL. Management of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a review of current therapeutic strategies. Leuk Lymphoma 2013; 55:988-98. [PMID: 23865835 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2013.825903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Abstract Despite recent advances in therapeutic strategies, a large proportion of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) experience progression after first-line treatment. Several attempts have been made to assess the role of different therapies for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma; however, a consensus on the optimal therapeutic strategy for each individual patient has not been reached. Overall, clinical evidence from phase II studies shows that high-dose cytarabine containing regimens, stem cell transplant and different biological agents all have promising activity with acceptable safety profiles. Therefore, these therapies can represent suitable treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Among different biological agents, at present only temsirolimus has been tested in a phase III study. This review considers available evidence on the management of relapsed/refractory MCL as discussed during a consensus meeting on the current treatment strategies for MCL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Zaja
- Clinica Ematologica, Centro Trapianti e Terapie Cellulari "Carlo Melzi", DISM, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. M. Misericordia , Udine , Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|