Mittal R, Araujo I, Czanner G, Coupland SE. Perforin expression in eyelid sebaceous carcinomas: a useful and specific immunomarker for the differential diagnosis of eyelid carcinomas.
Acta Ophthalmol 2016;
94:e325-30. [PMID:
26843360 DOI:
10.1111/aos.12972]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2015] [Accepted: 11/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Eyelid sebaceous carcinoma (SC) remains a common diagnostic pitfall for both the clinician and histopathologist. The aim of this study was to describe perforin as a new marker in the immunohistochemistry panel for SC.
METHODS
A total of 29 cases were retrieved from the Pathology archives, including 11 sebaceous neoplasms (nine SC; two sebaceomas), 10 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and eight basal cell carcinomas (BCC). These were stained using the monoclonal antibody for perforin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), Ber-EP4 and adipophilin (ADP). Sensitivity and specificity of perforin as an immunohistologic marker for sebaceous tumours were compared to EMA, ADP and Ber-EP4.
RESULTS
Perforin stained strongly 9/11 (81%) of the sebaceous neoplasms (SN), 7/9 SC and 2/2 of sebaceomas (2/2), similar to ADP. Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) stained 8/9 SC and was negative (1/2) or only very weakly expressed (1/2) in sebaceomas. The specificity of perforin in identifying SN versus SCC and BCC was 100% (95% CI 69-100), while EMA specificity in identifying SN varied according the comparison group (SCC: 50%, 95% CI 18-81, 100% (95% CI 63-100). Perforin better highlighted the intraepithelial spread of SC than EMA. Ber-EP4 was strongly expressed in six of nine SC, but was consistently negative in sebaceomas.
CONCLUSIONS
The expression pattern of perforin in sebaceous neoplasms enables us to recommend the use of perforin as a new immunohistochemical marker for sebaceous neoplasms.
Collapse