Non-union of Weber B distal fibula fractures: a case series

Intramedullary Nail Fixation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Fibular Nonunion: A Case Series

Ankle fractures are a relatively common injury in the lower extremity. They can be treated with conservative management if they are nondisplaced and only involve the fibula. Nonunions at the fracture site, however, are a potential complicating factor during treatment. There is growing literature supporting the use of intramedullary fixation for fracture care. Not only does it have the advantages of using smaller incisions to preserve periosteum while providing improved biomechanical outcomes, but intramedullary reaming can help stimulate cells to promote bone healing. Few articles discuss the use and success of intramedullary reaming in revision surgery of the distal fibula. We present 3 cases of computed tomography-confirmed fibular nonunion following conservative fracture care, which underwent revision surgery with fibular nail fixation technique. These cases illustrate clinical and image findings as well as highlight the surgical technique used for each patient. At follow-up, all patients were asymptomatic and radiographs confirmed healing of the previous nonunion site. These cases are examples of successful revision for fibular fracture nonunion using intramedullary nail fixation.Level of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Measuring Recovery After Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Scoring Systems

Recovery after ankle fractures places a considerable burden on patients both short and long term. Numerous tools called patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed to measure the outcome of ankle fractures. They can assist clinicians to measure the effect, guide intervention, and assess the rate of recovery. We identified and evaluated the psychometric properties of PROMs used in the assessment of ankle fractures. In a systematic search, we examined 4 databases from inception to December 4, 2016. Search terms included ankle fracture, ankle pain, disability, gait, questionnaire, and PROMs. Reference lists were also examined. The inclusion criteria were English studies and adult populations. The psychometric properties of the identified PROMs were examined, including internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, floor-ceiling effects, and minimally important clinical differences. We identified 22 PROMs relating to ankle pain and disability. Only 5 were specifically used for ankle fractures. The 36-item short-form health survey and short musculoskeletal functional assessment reported floor-ceiling effects, and the lower extremity functional scale reported good responsiveness and content validity, although these are not tools specifically related to ankle fractures. The ankle-fracture outcome of rehabilitation measure (A-FORM) and the Olerud and Molander questionnaire were ankle fracture specific and assessed for internal consistency and validity. Clinicians should use the most appropriate PROM to evaluate patients' recovery from ankle fractures. The A-FORM currently has the most appropriate evidence supporting its use as a PROM for ankle fracture management and rehabilitation.

Serial Radiographs Do Not Change the Clinical Course of Nonoperative Stable OTA/AO 44-B1 Ankle Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To assess radiographic markers of ankle stability in stable OTA/AO 44-B1 ankle fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic Level-I trauma hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred thirty-four patients with stable OTA/AO 44-B1 (Danis-Weber B, Supination-External Rotation-II) ankle fractures.

INTERVENTION

Analysis of mortise view radiographs at the time of initial evaluation and final follow-up.

VARIABLES MEASURED

(1) medial clear space; (2) Mueller-Nose Distance.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Change in radiographic measurements resulting in conversion to operative intervention.

RESULTS

Patients followed up an average of 2.6 visits in our clinics (SD 1.06). Patients received an average of 11.2 individual radiographic images to evaluate their injury (SD 3.9, maximum 29). No patients progressed to surgery in this cohort. Mean medial clear space at the time of injury was 3.4 mm (SD 0.8) and was 3.3 mm (SD 0.7) at the time of final follow-up (P = 0.1). Mean Mueller-Nose measurement at the time of injury was 3.5 mm (SD 1.0) and was 3.5 mm (SD 0.8) at the time of final follow-up (P = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

No patients with stable OTA/AO 44-B1 fractures proceeded to surgery for loss of tibiotalar reduction or any other cause. Radiographic relationships were conserved during the follow-up, and serial radiographs may not be needed when managing these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Supination external rotation ankle fractures: A simpler pattern with better outcomes

BACKGROUND

Rotational injuries are the most common and usually classified as per the Lauge Hansen classification; with the most common subgroup being the supination external rotation (SER) mechanism. Isolated fractures of the distal fibula (SE2) without associated ligamentous injury are usually treated with a splint or brace and the patient may be allowed to weight bear as tolerated. This study reports the functional outcomes following a stable, low energy, rotational ankle fracture supination external rotation (SER2) when compared to unstable SER4 fractures treated operatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

64 patients who were diagnosed and treated nonoperatively for a stable SER2 ankle fracture were followed prospectively. In the comparison group, 93 operatively treated fibular fractures were extracted from a prospectively collected database and evaluated comparison. Baseline characteristics obtained by trained interviewers at the time of injury included: Patient demographics, short form-36, short musculoskeletal functional assessment (SMFA) and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaires. Patients were followed at 3, 6 and 12 months postsurgery. Additional information obtained at each followup point included any complications or evidence on fracture healing. Data were analyzed by the Student's t-test and theFisher's Exact Test to compare demographic and functional outcomes between the two cohorts. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

The average of patients' age in the stable fracture cohort was 43 versus 45 in the SER4 group. Nearly 64% of the patient population was female when compared with 37% in the operative group. In the SER2 by 6 months all patients had returned to baseline functional status. There were 18 delayed unions (all healed by 6 months). Based on the functional outcome scores all patients had returned to preoperative level. In comparison, SE4 patients had less functional recovery at 3 and 6 months (P < 0.05) based on the SMFA scores and at 3, 6 and 12 months based on the AOFAS (P < 0.001) scores. There was no difference in pain levels between the two groups at all time points. There were three nonunions in the SE4 group and six delayed unions.

CONCLUSIONS

An SER2 ankle fracture is a relatively benign injury with functional limitations resolving by 3 months while the need for surgical fixation in SER ankle fractures appears to affect lower extremity function to a greater degree for a longer time period. Patients should be counseled as to these expected outcomes.

Internal fixation of the fibula in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized and comparative study: plating versus nailing

AIM

Open reduction and internal plate fixation of the fibula is the gold standard treatment for ankle fractures. The aim of this study was to perform a prospective randomized study to compare bone union, complications and functional results of two types of internal fixation of the fibula (plating and the Epifisa FH intramedullary nail).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: closed fractures, isolated displaced fractures of the lateral malleolus, inter- and supra-tubercular bimalleolar fractures, and trimalleolar fractures. This study included 71 patients (mean age 53 ± 19): plate fixation group (n=35) and intramedullary nail fixation group (n=36). In seven cases, intramedullary nailing was technically impossible and was converted to plate fixation (the analysis of this sub-group was performed independently). Two patients died and two patients were lost to follow-up. The final comparative series included 32 cases of plate fixation and 28 cases of intramedullary nail fixation. Union, postoperative complications and Kitaoka and Olerud-Molander functional scores were analyzed after one year of follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the rate of union (P=0.5605) between the two types of fixation. There were significantly fewer complications (7% versus 56%) and better functional scores (96 versus 82 for the Kitaoka score; 97 versus 83 for the Olerud-Molander score) with intramedullary nailing than with plate fixation.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary nailing of the lateral malleolus in non-comminuted ankle fractures without syndesmotic injury is a reproducible technique with very few complications that provides better functional results than plate fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (randomized prospective study).

Biomechanical evaluation of mini-fragment hardware for supination external rotation fractures of the distal fibula

BACKGROUND

Supination external rotation distal fibula fractures are common, requiring fixation when associated with talar displacement. Subcutaneous distal fibula hardware may become painful, necessitating operative removal. We hypothesize that mini-fragment and small-fragment constructs will demonstrate similar biomechanical stability.

METHODS

A biomechanical comparison was performed in synthetic osteoporotic sawbones. The first arm compared two 2.4-mm lag screws with one 3.5-mm lag screw for fixation of a simulated supination external rotation distal fibula fracture. The second arm compared a 2.4-mm plate-screw construct with a 3.5-mm lag screw and one-third tubular neutralization plate. During torsional testing, torque and displacement were recorded, and stiffness and peak torque were determined.

RESULTS

Differences in mean stiffness and mean load at failure were not statistically significant with lag screw-only fixation. The 3.5-mm plate-screw construct outperformed the 2.4-mm plate-screw construct, but neither mean stiffness nor mean load at failure were statistically significantly different. Dynamic testing also demonstrated similar results.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that isolated 2.4-mm screws function similarly to one 3.5-mm screw. Although the 3.5-mm plate-screw construct was stiffer, mean load at failure was equivalent for the 2 constructs. These data provide biomechanical evidence to support further investigation in the use of mini-fragment hardware for distal fibula fracture fixation.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level V.

Nonunion of fibula: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to analyse the available evidence regarding nonunions of the fibula. We focussed on the incidence, risk factors, evaluation, and treatment modalities for fibular nonunions as evident in the current literature and propose a treatment algorithm.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB) exempt study performed at a level one trauma centre. We systematically reviewed the published evidence on fibular nonunion or delayed union from 1950 to February, 2011.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included in this systematic review. In summary, nonunion of the fibula is becoming increasingly more common in association with intramedullary nailing of concomitant tibial shaft fractures. A treatment algorithm for nonunion of the fibula has been proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

The suspicion for nonunion of the fibula should be heightened in lower leg fractures if the patient is symptomatic, and the progression of healing is not as expected. Ideally, prospective, multicentre studies would be performed to provide more rigorous data on the incidence, risk factors, and optimum treatment.

Nonunion of fibula: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to analyse the available evidence regarding nonunions of the fibula. We focussed on the incidence, risk factors, evaluation, and treatment modalities for fibular nonunions as evident in the current literature and propose a treatment algorithm.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB) exempt study performed at a level one trauma centre. We systematically reviewed the published evidence on fibular nonunion or delayed union from 1950 to February, 2011.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included in this systematic review. In summary, nonunion of the fibula is becoming increasingly more common in association with intramedullary nailing of concomitant tibial shaft fractures. A treatment algorithm for nonunion of the fibula has been proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

The suspicion for nonunion of the fibula should be heightened in lower leg fractures if the patient is symptomatic, and the progression of healing is not as expected. Ideally, prospective, multicentre studies would be performed to provide more rigorous data on the incidence, risk factors, and optimum treatment.

Evidence-based treatment of open ankle fractures

Fractures of the ankle are fairly common injuries. Open ankle fractures are much less common and associated with severe injuries to surrounding tissues. We have performed a systematic review of the literature concerning the clinical results and complication rates in the treatment of open ankle fractures. We conducted a search limited to the following databases: Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Clinical Trial Register and Embase. These were searched from 1968 to April 2010 to identify studies relating to the treatment of open ankle fractures. Fifteen articles concerning 498 patients with treatment of an open ankle fracture were identified. The number of included patients varied from 11 to 64. There were 2 prospective and 13 retrospective studies. All articles were case series and classified as Level IV evidence. In 373 cases, open ankle fractures were treated by immediate internal fixation. In 125 cases, a conservative treatment or delayed/other fixation treatment was followed. Of those patients treated by immediate internal fixation, 81% had satisfactory result. Poor results (15%) were most commonly due to non-anatomic reductions, articular surface damage or deep infection. When conservative treatment was followed, 76% had satisfactory results. The most reported complications after immediate internal fixation were deep infection (8%) and skin necrosis (14%). There is a lack of high quality literature concerning the (operative) treatment of patients with open ankle fractures. Remarkable is that most authors reported satisfactory results after performance of their treatment protocol. Based on the available literature, we formulated guidelines regarding: timing of operative treatment, wound irrigation, the role of internal fixation, wound coverage and closure, the use of antibiotics and additional therapies.