Lengthening osteotomy of the calcaneus and flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer in flexible flatfoot deformity improves talo-1st metatarsal-Index, clinical outcome and pedographic parameter

Does foot shape really matter? Correlation of patient reported outcomes with radiographic assessment in progressive collapsing foot deformity reconstruction: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), the goal of surgery is to obtain a well-balanced plantigrade foot. It remains unclear if restoration of the alignment and subsequent improvement in radiological parameters is associated with improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The aim of the current systematic review was to investigate whether there is a correlation between radiographic assessment and PROMs in patients treated surgically for flexible PCFD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL), and KINAHL. We included all the studies reporting both PROMs and radiological outcomes in patients treated surgically for PCFD. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tool.

RESULTS

Six retrospective studies were included. Radiological parameters related to forefoot plantarflexion were associated with statistically significant differences in postoperative PROMs. A neutral hindfoot and midfoot position was positively correlated with postoperative PROMs but a statistically significant difference could not be established in all studies. The medial arch height was positively correlated with PROMs, but in one study this was the case only in revision surgeries.

CONCLUSION

The literature so far suggests restoration of the alignment may be associated with improved PROMs. Future prospective studies that investigate possible radiological and clinical correlations in PCFD surgery are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Automatic software-based 3D-angular measurement for weight-bearing CT (WBCT) is valid

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare automatic software-based angular measurement (AM) with validated measurement by hand (MBH) regarding angle values and time spent for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT) generated datasets.

METHODS

Five-hundred WBCT scans from different pathologies were included in the study. 1st - 2nd intermetatarsal angle, talo-1st metatarsal angle dorsoplantar and lateral, hindfoot angle, calcaneal pitch angle were measured and compared between MBH and AM.

RESULTS

The pathologies were ankle osteoarthritis/instability, n = 147 (29%); Haglund deformity/Achillodynia, n = 41 (8%); forefoot deformity, n = 108 (22%); Hallux rigidus, n = 37 (7%); flatfoot, n = 35 (7%); cavus foot, n = 10 (2%); osteoarthritis except ankle, n = 82 (16%). The angles did not differ between MBH and AM (each p > 0.36). The time spent for MBH / AM was 44.5 / 1 s on average per angle (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

AM provided angles which were not different from validated MBH and can be considered as a validated angle measurement method. The time spent was 97% lower for AM than for MBH.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Endoscopic assisted flexor digitorum longus transfer in flexible flatfoot

BACKGROUND

Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency is the commonest cause of adult flexible flatfoot. Transfer of the flexor digitorum longus (FDL) has been described a therapeutic arsenal in flexible flat feet and posterior tibial tendon disorders. It is often combined with bony procedure (open or percutaneous calcaneal osteotomy).

METHODS

We describe a technique and the steps endoscopic approach of FDL transfer.

RESULTS

The procedure is able to be performed safely and reproducible under perfect viewing CONCLUSION: In the future with a clinical study investigating, we purpose the results of such surgery in a cohort of patients with flexible flatfoot. Level IV Therapeutic study: case serie. No funding was received for this research project.

Union in Lateral Column Lengthening by Plate Fixation Without Bone Graft in Flexible Flatfoot: A Case Series

Purpose

This study's goal was to evaluate the outcomes of lateral column lengthening by plate fixation without bone graft in the management of symptomatic flexible flatfoot.

Methods

A prospective randomized trial study included 30 feet (27 patients) and was performed from March 2017 to December 2019. Functional and radiological evaluations were done pre-operative and at the final post-operative follow-up. The functional assessment was done using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score.

Results

The mean follow-up was 16.5 ± 3.027 months. The mean age of patients was 22.6 ± 6.29 years. All cases showed union ranging from 8 to 12 weeks, with a mean of 10 ± 1.88 weeks. The mean AOFAS score improved from 51.6 ± 6.75 to 92.2 ± 6.21. The mean anteroposterior (AP) talo-first metatarsal angle improved from 25.3° ± 8.31° to 3.4° ± 5.10°. The mean anteroposterior (AP) talo-navicular coverage improved from 22.10° ± 4.28° to 2.3° ± 3.46°. The mean Lateral talo-first metatarsal angle improved from 18.6° ± 4.79° to 3.3° ± 3.16°. The calcaneal pitch angle improved from 9.6° ± 4.14° to 15.1° ± 4.43°. The mean lateral talo-calcaneal angle improved from 45.7° ± 3.77° to 37.5° ± 3.47°.

Conclusion

Using an interposition wedge plate for LCL without bone graft leads to a high union rate, maintains the correction, and avoids possible complications of autografts and allografts.

Automatic software-based 3D-angular measurement for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT) provides different angles than measurement by hand

BACKGROUND

Purpose of this study was to compare automatic software-based angular measurement (AM, Autometrics, Curvebeam, Warrington, PA, USA) with previously validated measurement by hand (MBH) regarding angle values and time spent for the investigator for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT).

METHODS

Five-hundred bilateral WBCT scans (PedCAT, Curvebeam, Warrington, PA, USA) were included in the study. Five angles (1st - 2nd intermetatarsal angle, talo-metatarsal 1-angle (TMT) dorsoplantar and lateral projection, hindfoot angle, calcaneal pitch angle) were measured with MBH and AM on the foot/ankle (side with pathology). Angles and time spent of MBH and AM were compared (t-test, homoscedatic).

RESULTS

The specific pathologies were ankle osteoarthritis/instability, n = 147 (29%); Haglund deformity/Achillodynia, n = 41 (8%); forefoot deformity, n = 108 (22%); Hallux rigidus, n = 37 (7%); flatfoot, n = 35 (7%); cavus foot, n = 10 (2%); osteoarthritis except ankle, n = 82 (16%). The angles differed between MBH and AM (each p < 0.001) except the calcaneal pitch angle (p = 0.05). The time spent for MBH / AM was 44.5 ± 12 s / 1 ± 0 s on average per angle (p < 0.0011).

CONCLUSIONS

AM provided different angles as MBH and can currently not be considered as validated angle measurement method. The investigator time spent is 97% lower for AM (1 s per angle) than for MBH (44.5 s per angle). Cases with correct angles in combination with almost no time spent showed the real potential of AM. The AM system will have to become reliable (especially in diminishing positive and negative angle values as defined) and valid which has to be proven by planned studies in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Semi-automatic software-based 3D-angular measurement for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT) in the foot provides different angles than measurement by hand

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare semi-automatic software-based angular measurement (SAM) with previously validated measurement by hand (MBH) regarding angle values and time spent for the investigator for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT).

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative study, five-hundred bilateral WBCT scans (PedCAT, Curvebeam, Warrington, PA, USA) were included in the study. Five angles (1st - 2nd intermetatarsal angle (IM), talo-metatarsal 1-angle (TMT) dorsoplantar and lateral projection, hindfoot angle, calcaneal pitch angle) were measured with MBH and SAM (Bonelogic Ortho Foot and Ankle, Version 1.0.0-R, Disior Ltd, Helsinki, Finland) on the right/left foot/ankle. The angles and time spent of MBH and SAM were compared (t-test, homoscesdatic).

RESULTS

The angles differed between MBH and SAM (mean values MBH/SAM; IM, 9.1/13.0; TMT dorsoplantar, -3.4/8.2; TMT lateral. -6.4/-1.1; hindfoot angle, 4.6/21.6; calcaneal pitch angle, 20.5/20.1; each p < 0.001 except the calcaneal pitch angle, p = 0.35). The time spent for MBH / SAM was 44.5 ± 12 s / 12 ± 0 s on average per angle (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SAM provided different angles as MBH (except calcaneal pitch angle) and can currently not be considered as validated angle measurement method (except calcaneal pitch angle). The investigator time spent is 73% lower for SAM (12 s per angle) than for MBH (44.5 s per angle). SAM might be an important step forward for 3D-angle measurement of WBCT when valid angles are provided.

Does tibialis posterior dysfunction correlate with a worse radiographic overall alignment in progressive collapsing foot deformity? A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Posterior Tibial Tendon (PTT) dysfunction is considered to have an important role in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD). The objective of our study was to assess the relationship between PTT status and three-dimensional foot deformity in PCFD.

METHODS

Records from 25 patients with PCFD were included for analysis. The PTT was considered deficient in patients with a positive single heel rise test or a deficit in inversion strength. Three-dimensional foot deformity was assessed using the Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO) from Weight-Bearing-CT imaging. Hindfoot valgus, midfoot abduction and medial longitudinal arch collapse were assessed on X-Rays using hindfoot moment arm, talonavicular coverage angle and Meary's angle respectively. Deland and Rosenberg MRI classifications were used to classify PTT degeneration.

RESULTS

PCFD with PTT deficit (13/25) had a mean FAO of 7.75 + /- 3.8% whereas PCFD without PTT deficit had a mean FAO of 6.68 + /- 3.9% (p = 0.49). No significant difference was found between these groups on the hindfoot moment arm and the talonavicular coverage angle (respectively p = 0.54 and 0.32), whereas the Meary's angle was significantly higher in case of PCFD with PTT deficit (p = 0.037). No significant association was found between PTT degeneration on MRI and FAO.

CONCLUSION

PCFD associated three-dimensional deformity, hindfoot valgus and midfoot abduction were not associated with PTT dysfunction. PTT dysfunction was only associated with a worse medial longitudinal arch collapse in our study. Considering our results, it does not appear that PTT is the main contributor to PCFD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity. Is There Really a Johnson and Strom Stage I?

Johnson and Strom stage I posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction presents with pain and swelling but preserved function and no deformity. Diagnosis is clinical. Pathomechanics explains the overloading of the tendon that may be worsened by a tight gastrocnemius, but systemic inflammatory disease may also be responsible for a stage I condition. Medial heel wedged orthoses are effective in most patients. Surgery usually consists of an open/endoscopic tenosynovectomy. In cases of complete tendon rupture, flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer may be considered. Stage I patients with a higher risk of progression-inflammatory conditions, excessive laxity, obese-may benefit from a "prophylactic" medializing calcaneal osteotomy.

Classification and Nomenclature: Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

RECOMMENDATION

The historical nomenclature for the adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is confusing, at times called posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD), the adult flexible flatfoot deformity, posterior tibial tendon rupture, peritalar instability and peritalar subluxation (PTS), and progressive talipes equinovalgus. Many but not all of these deformities are associated with a rupture of the posterior tibial tendon (PTT), and some of these are associated with deformities either primarily or secondarily in the midfoot or ankle. There is similar inconsistency with the use of classification schemata for these deformities, and from the first introduced by Johnson and Strom (1989), and then modified by Myerson (1997), there have been many attempts to provide a more comprehensive classification system. However, although these newer more complete classification systems have addressed some of the anatomic variations of deformities encountered, none of the above have ever been validated. The proposed system better incorporates the most recent data and understanding of the condition and better allows for standardization of reporting. In light of this information, the consensus group proposes the adoption of the nomenclature "Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity" (PCFD) and a new classification system aiming at summarizing recent data published on the subject and to standardize data reporting regarding this complex 3-dimensional deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

CONSENSUS STATEMENTS VOTED

CONSENSUS STATEMENT ONE: We will rename the condition to Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD), a complex 3-dimensional deformity with varying degrees of hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and midfoot varus.Delegate vote: agree, 100% (9/9); disagree, 0%; abstain, 0%.(Unanimous, strongest consensus)CONSENSUS STATEMENT TWO: Our current classification systems are incomplete or outdated.Delegate vote: agree, 100% (9/9); disagree, 0%; abstain, 0%.(Unanimous, strongest consensus)CONSENSUS STATEMENT THREE: MRI findings should be part of a new classification system.Delegate vote: agree, 33% (3/9); disagree, 67% (6/9); abstain, 0%.(Weak negative consensus)CONSENSUS STATEMENT FOUR: Weightbearing CT (WBCT) findings should be part of a new classification system.Delegate vote: agree, 56% (5/9); disagree, 44% (4/9); abstain, 0%.(Weak consensus)CONSENSUS STATEMENT FIVE: A new classification system is proposed and should be used to stage the deformity clinically and to define treatment.Delegate vote: agree, 89% (8/9); abstain, 11% (1/9).(Strong consensus).

Comparison Matrix-Associated Stem Cell Transplantation (MAST) with Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis plus Peripheral Blood Concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral lesions at the ankle-A clinical matched-patient analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare Matrix-Associated Stem Cell Transplantation (MAST) with Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis plus Peripheral Blood Concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral lesions at the ankle.

METHODS

In a matched-patient clinical follow-up study, patients with chondral lesion at the ankle that were treated with MAST from April 1, 2009 to July 15, 2016, and patients that were treated with AMIC+PBC from July 17, 2016 to May 31, 2017 were included and compared. Size and location of the chondral lesions and the Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) before treatment and at follow-up were analysed. Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) was used for MAST and Peripheral Blood Concentrate (PBC) for AMIC+PBC to impregnate a collagen I/III matrix (Chondro-Gide, Wollhusen, Switzerland) that was fixed into the chondral lesion with fibrin glue.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-nine patients with 136 chondral lesions were included in both groups. The chondral lesions were located as follows (MAST/AMIC+PBC, n (%)), medial talar shoulder only, 59 (43)/62 (46); lateral talar shoulder only, 44 (32)/42 (31); medial and lateral talar shoulder, 7 (10)/7 (10); tibia, 19 (14)/18 (13). The lesion size was 1.6/1.8cm² on average and VAS FA was 46.9/45.7 (MAST/AMIC+PBC). For MAST/AMIC+PBC groups, 107 (83%)/105 (81%) with 112/110 previous chondral lesions completed the defined 2-year-follow-up after 24.4/23.8 months on average. VAS FA improved to 82.3/79.8 (MAST/AMIC+PBC). No parameter significantly differed between MAST and AMIC+PBC groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MAST and AMIC+PBC as part of a complex surgical approach led to improved and high validated outcome scores in 2-year-follow-up. MAST and AMIC+PBC showed similar results.

Influence of investigator experience on reliability of adult acquired flatfoot deformity measurements using weightbearing computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to assess the reliability of measurements of adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) taken by investigators of different levels of clinical experience using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT).

METHODS

Nineteen AAFD patients underwent WBCT. Three investigators with different levels of clinical experience made AAFD measurements in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. Intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed. Mean values for each measurement were compared between investigators.

RESULTS

After a training protocol, substantial to perfect intra- and interobserver reliability was observed for most measures, regardless of the investigator's experience level. Significant differences between investigators were observed in 2 of 21 measured parameters: medial cuneiform-first metatarsal angle (P=0.003) and navicular-medial cuneiform angle (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AAFD radiographic measurements can be performed reliably by investigators with different levels of clinical experience using WBCT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Outcomes of Evans Versus Hintermann Calcaneal Lengthening Osteotomy for Flexible Flatfoot

BACKGROUND

Evans (E) and Hintermann (H) lateral lengthening calcaneal osteotomies (LLCOTs) are commonly used to correct flexible flatfoot deformities. Both methods are well accepted and produce good clinical results. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes of both osteotomies.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 53 patients with flatfoot deformities, who received surgery between October 2008 and March 2014. Seventeen E-LLCOT and 36 H-LLCOT procedures were performed during this time period, with a mean follow-up of 67.7 ± 20.6 and 40 ± 12.9 months, respectively. Data were collected using clinical and radiological examination, as well as clinical scores (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score [FAOS], University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA] activity score, numerical rating scale [NRS], and the Short-Form 36-item Health Survey [SF-36]) during regular follow-up.

RESULTS

For both groups of patients, the FAOS score, pain-NRS, and SF-36 improved significantly following surgery ( P < .05). The talus-second metatarsal angle, talonavicular coverage, and naviculocuneiform overlap showed significant correction ( P < .05). Postoperatively, radiographic degenerative changes were detected in the calcaneocuboid (CC) and subtalar joint in both groups of patients: 41% and 18% after E-LLCOT compared with 25% and 14% after H-LLCOT, although these changes did not have any clinical relevance ( P < .05). No secondary arthrodesis was necessary. There were no significant differences in the clinical or radiological outcome parameters when compared between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Both surgical techniques resulted in a significant improvement of clinical outcome scores and led to good radiological correction of flatfoot deformities. It appears that the CC joint develops less degenerative changes following the H-LLCOT procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative series.

Inframalleolar Varus Deformity: Role of Calcaneal Osteotomies

The cavo varus foot is a complex pathology due to skeletal deformity and neuro-muscular unbalance. The key concept for a successful treatment is to consider the whole foot and ankle complex from a bone and soft tissue perspective. Undercorrection is the main issue in cavo varus foot management, which may be attributed to intrinsic correction defects of the described calcaneal osteotomies or to a lack of understanding about the pathology and the subsequent algorithm of treatment. The authors disclose their daily algorithm of treatment, considering the foot and ankle complex and the role of calcaneal osteotomies in ankle inframalleolar deformities.

Matrix-associated stem cell transplantation (MAST) in chondral lesions at the ankle as part of a complex surgical approach- 5-year-follow-up in 100 patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the 5-year-follow-up after matrix-associated stem cell transplantation (MAST) in chondral lesions at the ankle as part of a complex surgical approach.

METHODS

In a prospective consecutive non-controlled clinical follow-up study, all patients with chondral lesion at the ankle that were treated with MAST from April 1, 2009 to May 31, 2012 were included. Size and location of the chondral lesions, method-associated problems and the Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) before treatment and at follow-up were analysed. Stem cell-rich blood was harvested from the ipsilateral pelvic bone marrow and centrifuged (10min, 1500RPM). The supernatant was used to impregnate a collagen I/III matrix (Chondro-Gide) that was fixed into the chondral lesion with fibrin glue.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty patients with 124 chondral lesions were included in the study. Age at the time of surgery was 35 years on average (range, 12-65 years), 74 (62%) were male. VAS FA before surgery was 45.2 on average (range, 16.4-73.5). Lesions were located at medial talar shoulder, n=55; lateral talar shoulder, n=58 (medial and lateral, n=4); tibia, n=11. Lesion size was 1.7cm² on average (range, .8-6cm²). One hundred patients (83%) completed 5-year-follow-up after. VAS FA improved to 84.4 (range, 54.1-100; t-test, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

MAST as part of a complex surgical approach led to improved and high validated outcome scores in the mid-term-follow-up. No method related complications were registered. Even though a control group is missing, we conclude that MAST as part of a complex surgical approach is an effective method for the treatment of chondral lesions of the ankle for at least five years.

Comparison of Anatomic Structures at Risk With 2 Lateral Lengthening Calcaneal Osteotomies

BACKGROUND:

Lateral lengthening calcaneal osteotomies (LLCOT) are commonly used to treat flexible pes planovalgus deformity. Different operative techniques have been described. The aim of this study was to examine which anatomic structures were affected by 2 different osteotomy techniques.

METHODS:

Two experienced foot and ankle surgeons each performed an Evans (E)- or Hintermann (H) osteotomy on 7 cadaver feet. The mean age of the donors was 80.4 ± 4.4 years. Eight left and 6 right feet were prepared. Previously identified structures at risk were prepared and evaluated.

RESULTS:

After H-LLCOT, there was no damage of the peroneus longus tendon, whereas after E-LLCOT, damage was noted in 1 case (14.3%). The peroneus brevis tendon was once cut after H-LLCOT and eroded after E-LLCOT. In one cadaver, the sural nerve was partially damaged after H-LLCOT but in no case after E-LLOCT. The calcaneal anterior and medial articular facets were intact after H-LLCOT in 100% and 85.7% and after E-LLCOT in 42.9% and 71.4%, respectively. The posterior articular surface was not affected in any cadaver.

CONCLUSION:

Anatomic structures can be damaged after both osteotomies. With the Hintermann osteotomy, the calcaneal anterior and medial articular surface can be protected to a larger extent than with the Evans osteotomy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:

The Hintermann osteotomy seems to be superior, regarding damage of the articular surfaces of the subtalar joint. These findings have to be correlated with biomechanical and clinical studies before a final recommendation can be given, which osteotomy is superior.

The inter- and intraobserver reliability for the radiological parameters of flatfoot, before and after surgery

Aims

Various radiological parameters are used to evaluate a flatfoot deformity and their measurements may differ. The aims of this study were to answer the following questions: 1) Which of the 11 parameters have the best inter- and intraobserver reliability in a standardized radiological setting? 2) Are pre- and postoperative assessments equally reliable? 3) What are the identifiable sources of variation?

Patients and Methods

Measurements of the 11 parameters were recorded on anteroposterior and lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 feet before and after surgery for flatfoot, by three observers with different experience in foot surgery (A, ten years; B, three years; C, third-year orthopaedic resident). The inter- and intraobserver reliability was calculated.

Results

Preoperative interobserver reliability was high for four, moderate for five, and low for two parameters. Postoperative interobserver reliability was high for four, moderate for five, and low for two parameters. Intraobserver reliability was excellent for all parameters preoperatively as recorded by observer A (PB) and B (MP), and for eight parameters as recorded by observer C (SR). Intraobserver reliability was excellent for ten parameters postoperatively as recorded by observer A and B, and for eight parameters as recorded by observer C.

Conclusion

The following parameters can be recommended. For preoperative and postoperative evaluation of flatfoot: anteroposterior, talonavicular coverage angle; lateral, talometatarsal I angle, calcaneal pitch angle, and cuneiform-medial height (high interobserver reliability); and anteroposterior, talometatarsal II angle; lateral, talocalcaneal angle,tibiocalcaneal angle (moderate interobserver reliability). For more experienced observers, we also recommend the anteroposterior talometatarsal I angle (moderate reliability). The inter- and intraobserver reliability for most parameters were similar pre- and postoperatively. The experience of the observer and the definition and ability to measure the parameters themselves were sources of variation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:596-602.

Matrix-associated stem cell transplantation (MAST) in chondral defects of the ankle is safe and effective - 2-year-followup in 130 patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the 2-year-follow-up of matrix-associated stem cell transplantation (MAST) in chondral defects of the ankle.

METHODS

In a prospective consecutive non-controlled clinical follow-up study, all patients with chondral defect that were treated with MAST from October 1, 2011 to July 31, 2013 were analyzed. Size and location of the chondral defects, method-associated problems and the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) before treatment and at follow-up were analyzed. Stem cell-rich blood was harvested from the ipsilateral pelvic bone marrow and centrifuged (10min, 1500rpm). The supernatant was used to impregnate a collagen I/III matrix (Chondro-Gide). The matrix was fixed into the chondral defect with fibrin glue.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-four patients with 150 chondral defects were included in the study. The age of the patients was 35 years on average (range, 12-68 years), 85 (59%) were male. The VAS FA before surgery was 48.5 on average (range, 16.5-78.8). The defects were located as follows, medial talar shoulder, n=62; lateral talar shoulder, n=66 (medial and lateral talar shoulder, n=6), tibia, n=22. The defect size was 1.6cm² on average (range, .6-6cm²). 130 patients (90%) completed 2-year-follow-up. The VAS FA improved to an average of 87.5 (range, 62.1-100; t-test (comparison with preoperative scores), p=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

MAST led to improved and high validated outcome scores. No method related complications were registered. Even though a control group is missing, we conclude that MAST is a safe and effective method for the treatment of chondral defects of the ankle.

Combination of pedCAT® for 3D Imaging in Standing Position With Pedography Shows No Statistical Correlation of Bone Position With Force/Pressure Distribution

pedCAT(®) (CurveBeam, Warrington, PA) is a technology for 3-dimensional (3D) imaging with full weightbearing that has been proved to exactly visualize the 3D bone position. For the present study, a customized pedography sensor (Pliance; Novel, Munich, Germany) was inserted into the pedCAT(®). The aim of our study was to analyze the correlation of the bone position and force/pressure distribution. A prospective consecutive study of 50 patients was performed, starting July 28, 2014. All patients underwent a pedCAT(®) scan and simultaneous pedography with full weightbearing in the standing position. The following parameters were measured on the pedCAT(®) image for the right foot by 3 different investigators 3 times: lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch angle, and minimum height of the fifth metatarsal base, second to fifth metatarsal heads, and medial sesamoid. From the pedography data, the following parameters were defined using the standardized software algorithm: midfoot contact area, maximum force of midfoot, maximum force of midfoot lateral, maximum force of entire foot, and maximum pressure of first to fifth metatarsal. The values of the corresponding pedCAT(®) and pedographic parameters were correlated (Pearson). The intra- and interobserver reliability of the pedCAT(®) measurements were sufficient (analysis of variance, p > .8 for each, power >0.8). No sufficient correlation was found between the pedCAT(®) and pedographic parameters (r < 0.05 or r > -0.38).3D bone position did not correlate with the force and pressure distribution under the foot sole during simultaneous pedCAT(®) scanning and pedography. Thus, the bone positions measured with pedCAT(®) do not allow conclusions about the force and pressure distribution. However, the static pedographic parameters also do not allow conclusions about the 3D bone position.one position and force/pressure distribution are important parameters for diagnostics, planning, and follow-up examinations in foot and ankle surgery.

Intramedullary fixation in severe Charcot osteo-neuroarthropathy with foot deformity results in adequate correction without loss of correction - Results from a multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Charcot osteo-neuroarthropathy (CN) of the foot can induce severe instability and deformity. Results of a consecutive clinical multi-centre study with Midfoot Fusion Bolt (MFB, Synthes GmbH, Oberdorf, Switzerland) are reported.

METHODS

All patients (aged 18 years and older) treated between 2009 and 2013 with surgical reconstruction of the midfoot with MFB for CN were included. Demographics, pre-surgical health status, details of foot pathology, details of surgery, postoperative treatment, treatment failure, and adverse events were registered. The following radiographic angles were measured on pre-op, post-op and last follow-up radiographs: talo-1st metatarsal (TMT) angle dorsoplantar and lateral view, and calcaneo-5th metatarsal angle.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (48 feet) were included in three centres. In 38 patients (80.1%) diabetes was diagnosed. Wound healing problems occurred in 21% of patients and recurrent ulceration in 13%. Revision surgery for loss of correction was performed in three cases (6%). Union rate at final follow-up was 98%. Major amputation for deep infection was performed in two patients (4%), minor amputation at the foot level in three cases (6%). Failure was more frequent when only one MFB (instead of 2 or 3) was used and no Gastrocnemius lengthening was performed. Radiographic alignment significantly improved pre- versus postoperatively and preoperatively versus follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Realignment and fixation with MFB in severe CN result in adequate correction with minimal loss of correction in the observed clinical course. The non-union rate was lower than previously reported. Stable fixation with MFB is a valuable treatment option for CN with minimal loss of correction and high union rates. The use of a minimum of two bolts is recommended to avoid recurrent deformity. Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01770639.

PedCAT for 3D-imaging in standing position allows for more accurate bone position (angle) measurement than radiographs or CT

BACKGROUND

PedCAT (Curvebeam, Warrington, USA) is a new technology that allows 3D-imaging with full weight bearing which is not influenced by projection and/or foot orientation (as radiographs). The aim of this study was to compare time spent of the image acquisition, and comparison of specific bone position (angle) measurements between three imaging methods (radiographs, CT, pedCAT), and to analyze and compare measurement differences and inter- and intraobserver reliability.

METHODS

In a prospective consecutive controlled study, 30 patients in which standard digital radiographs with full weight bearing in standing position (feet bilateral dorsoplantar and lateral views and Saltzman hindfoot view), CT without weight bearing, and pedCAT scan with full weight bearing in standing position were included, starting July 1, 2013. The following angles were measured for the right foot by three different investigators three times: 1st - 2nd intermetatarsal angle, talo-metatarsal 1-angle (TMT) both dorsoplantar and lateral projection, hindfoot angle, calcaneal pitch. The angles were digitally measured and compared (ANOVA with Post Hoc Scheffe test).

RESULTS

The angles differed between radiographs, CT and pedCAT (ANOVA, all p≤.01). The angles differed between pedCAT and both radiographs and CT (Post Hoc Scheffe test, each p≤.05 except for TMT dorsoplantar and calcaneal pitch angels versus radiographs).

CONCLUSIONS

The angles differed between radiographs, CT and pedCAT, indicating that only pedCAT is able to detect the correct angles. PedCAT includes weight bearing in contrast to CT. PedCAT prevents inaccuracies of projection and foot orientation in contrast to radiographs due to the 3D dataset which is principally independent from projection and foot orientation.

Biomechanical study of tarsometatarsal joint fusion using finite element analysis

Complications of surgeries in foot and ankle bring patients with severe sufferings. Sufficient understanding of the internal biomechanical information such as stress distribution, contact pressure, and deformation is critical to estimate the effectiveness of surgical treatments and avoid complications. Foot and ankle is an intricate and synergetic system, and localized intervention may alter the functions to the adjacent components. The aim of this study was to estimate biomechanical effects of the TMT joint fusion using comprehensive finite element (FE) analysis. A foot and ankle model consists of 28 bones, 72 ligaments, and plantar fascia with soft tissues embracing all the segments. Kinematic information and ground reaction force during gait were obtained from motion analysis. Three gait instants namely the first peak, second peak and mid-stance were simulated in a normal foot and a foot with TMT joint fusion. It was found that contact pressure on plantar foot increased by 0.42%, 19% and 37%, respectively after TMT fusion compared with normal foot walking. Navico-cuneiform and fifth meta-cuboid joints sustained 27% and 40% increase in contact pressure at second peak, implying potential risk of joint problems such as arthritis. Von Mises stress in the second metatarsal bone increased by 22% at midstance, making it susceptible to stress fracture. This study provides biomechanical information for understanding the possible consequences of TMT joint fusion.