Effect of radiofrequency microtenotomy on degeneration of tendons: an experimental study on rabbits

Does radiofrequency application improve function and reduce pain in patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy? A retrospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up

This case series study aimed to investigate patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) who underwent radiofrequency (RF), how much do their patient-reported outcomes scores improve and what percentage return to sport, and what patient-related factors are associated with improved scores and increased odds of return to sport, at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Between 2012 and 2018, 41 patients were followed up. The median Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score increased from 20 (range, 3-62) to 97 (range, 53-100), the median 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS) reduced from 8 (range, 1-10) to 0 (range, 0-3) and the median Tenger score increased from 1 (range, 0-1) to 3 (range, 2-8). Thirty-eight (92.7%) patients returned to sports with a mean time of 11 ± 4.8 months. In linear regression analysis, age was significantly associated with return-to-sports outcome (b = -0.07, 95% CI = -0.13 to -0.02, p = 0.02), while in logistic regression, symptoms duration revealed a significant impact on pain presence (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.14, p = 0.02). In summary, RF for IAT had a 68.7 ± 14.5 VISA-A improvement at 5.4 years of follow-up regarding reliable functional restoration and pain reduction; however, the current evidence remains insufficient to support RF as an effective treatment for IAT.

Animal model for tendinopathy

Background

Tendinopathy is a common motor system disease that leads to pain and reduced function. Despite its prevalence, our mechanistic understanding is incomplete, leading to limited efficacy of treatment options. Animal models contribute significantly to our understanding of tendinopathy and some therapeutic options. However, the inadequacies of animal models are also evident, largely due to differences in anatomical structure and the complexity of human tendinopathy. Different animal models reproduce different aspects of human tendinopathy and are therefore suitable for different scenarios. This review aims to summarize the existing animal models of tendinopathy and to determine the situations in which each model is appropriate for use, including exploring disease mechanisms and evaluating therapeutic effects.

Methods

We reviewed relevant literature in the PubMed database from January 2000 to December 2022 using the specific terms ((tendinopathy) OR (tendinitis)) AND (model) AND ((mice) OR (rat) OR (rabbit) OR (lapin) OR (dog) OR (canine) OR (sheep) OR (goat) OR (horse) OR (equine) OR (pig) OR (swine) OR (primate)). This review summarized different methods for establishing animal models of tendinopathy and classified them according to the pathogenesis they simulate. We then discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each model, and based on this, identified the situations in which each model was suitable for application.

Results

For studies that aim to study the pathophysiology of tendinopathy, naturally occurring models, treadmill models, subacromial impingement models and metabolic models are ideal. They are closest to the natural process of tendinopathy in humans. For studies that aim to evaluate the efficacy of possible treatments, the selection should be made according to the pathogenesis simulated by the modeling method. Existing tendinopathy models can be classified into six types according to the pathogenesis they simulate: extracellular matrix synthesis-decomposition imbalance, inflammation, oxidative stress, metabolic disorder, traumatism and mechanical load.

Conclusions

The critical factor affecting the translational value of research results is whether the selected model is matched with the research purpose. There is no single optimal model for inducing tendinopathy, and researchers must select the model that is most appropriate for the study they are conducting.

The translational potential of this article

The critical factor affecting the translational value of research results is whether the animal model used is compatible with the research purpose. This paper provides a rationale and practical guide for the establishment and selection of animal models of tendinopathy, which is helpful to improve the clinical transformation ability of existing models and develop new models.

Radiofrequency Microdebridement as an Adjunct to Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment for Recalcitrant Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Background:

Recalcitrant greater trochanteric pain is increasingly recognized as an indication for surgical intervention. The arthroscopic approach has become rapidly more common than the open alternative.

Hypothesis:

Patients undergoing radiofrequency microdebridement (RFMD) as an adjunct to arthroscopic gluteal bursectomy (AGB) and iliotibial band release (ITBR) will experience better functional improvement than AGB and ITBR alone at 1 year.

Study Design:

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

A total of 33 patients with failed nonoperative treatment of gluteal tendinopathy were randomly allocated to undergo AGB/ITBR or AGB/ITBR + RFMD. Full-thickness tears were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at 52 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included the mHHS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), which were evaluated at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.

Results:

A total of 33 participants (33 hips; 30 female and 3 male; mean age, 58 years) were randomized; 16 patients underwent AGB/ITBR + RFMD, and 17 underwent AGB/ITBR. Participants’ functionality improved in both groups at all time intervals. The mean mHHS score improved from 57.49 ± 10.61 to 77.76 ± 18.40 (P = .004) and from 58.98 ± 12.33 to 79.96 ± 18.86 (P = .001) at 52 weeks in the AGB/ITBR and AGB/ITBR + RFMD groups, respectively, although there was no statistically significant difference between groups. There were no device-related adverse events.

Conclusion:

AGB/ITBR led to significant improvements in patients with recalcitrant gluteal tendinopathy. In this small RCT, the addition of RFMD showed no additional benefit to AGB/ITBR but provided a safe adjunct for the surgical management of recalcitrant gluteal tendinopathy.

Registration:

NCT01562366 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).