The effect of post-operative NSAID administration on bone healing after elective foot and ankle surgery

Ketorolac and bone healing: a review of the basic science and clinical literature

Although the efficacy of ketorolac in pain management and the short duration of use align well with current clinical practice guidelines, few studies have specifically evaluated the impact of ketorolac on bony union after fracture or surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the current basic science and clinical literature on the use of ketorolac for pain management after fracture and surgery and the subsequent risk of delayed union or nonunion. Animal studies demonstrate a dose-dependent risk of delayed union in rodents treated with high doses of ketorolac for 4 weeks or greater; however, with treatment for 7 days or low doses, there is no evidence of risk of delayed union or nonunion. Current clinical evidence has also shown a dose-dependent increased risk of pseudoarthrosis and nonunion after post-operative ketorolac administration in orthopedic spine surgery. However, other orthopedic subspecialities have not demonstrated increased risk of delayed union or nonunion with the use of peri-operative ketorolac administration. While evidence exists that long-term ketorolac use may represent risks with regard to fracture healing, insufficient evidence currently exists to recommend against short-term ketorolac use that is limited to the peri-operative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: Narrative Review.

Strategies for Reducing Perioperative Opioid Use in Foot and Ankle Surgery: Education, Risk Identification, and Multimodal Analgesia

There remains a high prevalence and substantial risks of opioid utilization amongst orthopedic patients. The goal of this review is to discuss strategies for responsible opioid use in the perioperative setting following foot and ankle orthopedic surgeries. We will highlight 1) education interventions, 2) risk identification, and 3) non-opioid alternatives for postoperative pain management.

The Navicular Cuneiform Joint: Updates on Avoiding and Managing a Nonunion

Naviculocuneiform arthrodesis, while often used to support the medial column during management of primary/post-traumatic arthritis, deformity correction, or in the surgical treatment of progressive collapsing foot deformity, can develop nonunion. Addressing this condition hinges on the assessment of various parameters such as patient/host factors and recognition of the etiology of the nonunion. In this article, methods of optimizing this surgical intervention through anatomic and physiologic considerations are highlighted. Further, information is provided to assist foot and ankle surgeons in performing a comprehensive work-up to allow for successful reconstruction and optimal patient outcomes.

Acute postoperative pain management protocols in podiatric surgery within Australia: a Delphi study

Background

There is limited evidence in the literature to describe an analgesic protocol that takes into consideration the extent of foot and ankle surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a guide for acute postoperative pain management for podiatric surgery in Australia, and to identify opportunities to improve the current list of scheduled medicines available to podiatric surgeons.

Methods

A Delphi method involving 3 survey rounds was employed for this study. Twelve expert panellists in the field of podiatric surgery and anaesthesiology were invited to participate, and 10 panellists remained by the end of the study. Round 1 involved 15 open-ended questions. These answers formed the basis of the 55 statements that were developed for the following 2 survey rounds, where panellists rated the appropriateness of each statement on a 9-point Likert scale. The third survey round was an opportunity for panellists to revise their answers to each statement in light of the majority response.

Results

For mild acute postoperative pain, non-opioid oral analgesics were recommended as an appropriate management option. For moderate and severe acute postoperative pain, both non-opioid and opioid products were found to be appropriate by the majority. It was agreed that oral opioids be reserved for breakthrough pain at all severity levels. All other statements in the Delphi study pertaining to drug hypersensitivities or allergies, stratification of pain management, opioid prescription concerns, and access to pain medications were accepted as appropriate by the majority of panellists.

Conclusion

The agreed approach to acute postoperative pain management for podiatric surgeons in Australia was with a stepwise approach, utilising multimodal therapy, and reserving oral opioids for breakthrough pain. Additionally, there was consensus for podiatric surgeons in Australia to have wider access to alternative analgesics and anti-emetics that have similar or improved efficacies with better safety profiles.

Pain management on a trauma service: a crisis reveals opportunities

Objectives

The opioid crisis has forced an examination of opioid prescribing and usage patterns. Multimodal pain management and limited, procedure-specific prescribing guidelines have been proposed in general surgery but are less well studied in trauma, where multisystem injuries and multispecialty caregivers are the norm. We hypothesized that opioid requirements would differ by primary type of injury and by age, and we sought to identify factors affecting opioid prescribing at discharge (DC).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of pain management at a level II trauma center for January–November 2018. Consecutive patients with exploratory laparotomy (LAP); 3 or more rib fractures (fxs) (RIB); or pelvic (PEL), femoral (FEM), or tibial (TIB) fxs were included, and assigned to cohorts based on the predominant injury. Patients who died or had head Abbreviated Injury Scale >2 and Glasgow Coma Scale <15 were excluded. All pain medications were recorded daily; doses were converted to oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). The primary outcomes of interest were OMEs administered over the final 72 hours of hospitalization (OME72) and prescribed at DC (OMEDC). Multimodal pain therapy defined as 3 or more drugs used. Categorical variables and continuous variables were analyzed with appropriate statistical analyses.

Results

208 patients were included: 17 LAP, 106 RIB, 31 PEL, 26 FEM, and 28 TIB. 74% were male and 8% were using opiates prior to admission. Injury cohorts varied by age but not Injury Severity Score (ISS) or length of stay (LOS). 64% of patients received multimodal pain therapy. There was an overall difference in OME72 between the five injury groups (p<0.0001) and OME72 was lower for RIB compared with all other cohorts. Compared with younger (age <65) patients, older (≥65 years) patients had similar ISS and LOS, but lower OME72 (45 vs 135*) and OMEDC. Median OME72 differed significantly between older and younger patients with PEL (p=0.02) and RIB (p=0.01) injuries. No relationship existed between OMEDC across injury groups, by sex or injury severity. Patients were discharged almost exclusively by trauma service advanced practice clinicians (APCs). There was no difference among APCs in number of pills or OMEs prescribed. 81% of patients received opioids at DC, of whom 69% were prescribed an opioid/acetaminophen combination drug; and only 13% were prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 19% acetaminophen, and 31% gabapentin.

Conclusions

Opioid usage varied among patients with different injury types. Opioid DC prescribing appears rote and does not correlate with actual opioid usage during the 72 hours prior to DC. Paradoxically, OMEDC tends to be higher among females, patients with ISS <16, and those with rib fxs, despite a tendency toward lower OME72 usage among these groups. There was apparent underutilization of non-opioid agents. These findings highlight opportunities for improvement and further study.

Level of evidence

IV.

The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications on spinal fracture healing: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) on fracture healing is a topic of debate. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the effect of NSAID medications on spinal fracture healing rates.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline Ovid, and SCOPUS databases from inception until April 2021, and additionally searched the NIH Clinical Trials Database. Eligible studies included those which reported on spinal fracture healing rates in patients taking NSAIDs. Two reviewers independently assessed all potential studies for eligibility and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed with validated tools by two reviewers. The primary outcome of interest was healing rates of spinal fractures in patients taking NSAIDs. Secondary outcomes of interest included healing rates stratified by NSAID selectivity.

RESULTS

A total of 1,715 studies were initially screened. After inclusion criteria were applied, three studies (214 patients) were included which discussed spinal fracture healing rates in patients taking NSAIDs. These studies showed acceptable reliability for inclusion. The 3 studies reported heterogeneous results, with one study reporting a 96% healing rate, and another study reporting over 90% non-union rate. The types of fracture, NSAID type, and dosage/duration of NSAID use varied widely amongst studies.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review identified a significant paucity in the literature on the effect of NSAID medications on spinal fracture healing rates. Given the limited number of studies, as well as the heterogeneous results and methods from these studies, no consensus statement can be made on the safety profile of NSAIDs in the context of spinal fractures. Further studies are needed to better address this question.

[Control of pain in the early post-traumatic period in the outpatient practice. Results of the multi-center observational study RAPTOR (Rational Analgesia PostTraumatic: an Observational Research)]

AIM

Evaluate the frequency, nature and course of PTP, as well as the effectiveness and safety of NSAIDs in PTP in real clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The assessment of the condition and need for NSAIDs (original meloxicam) in 1115 outpatient patients who suffered a fracture of the radius (32.2%), injury to the knee (35.2%) or ligaments of the ankle (32.6%); women/men 51.5 and 48.5%, average age 46.915.5 years. We evaluated the dynamics of pain intensity (on a numerical rating scale NRS 010) at rest and during movement, the preservation of moderate and severe pain, as well as the development of adverse drugs reactions (ADR) to NSAIDs 48 weeks after injury.

RESULTS

The average intensity of pain during movement decreased from 7.031.66 to 2.211.38 (p0.001), at rest from 4.462.07 to 0.710.989 (p0.001). The number of people with pain severity 4 in the NRS in 48 weeks after the radius fracture, injury of the knee and ligaments of ankle was 21.0, 16.9 and 11.9%, with moderate or severe impairment of the injured limb 40.4, 26.2 and 16.3%, respectively. The need for taking NSAIDs up to 7 days was noted in 43.3%, 714 days-in 41.8%, more than 2 weeks or constantly in 14.9% of patients. Weak or moderate ADR were observed in 20.8% of patients, mainly dyspepsia and hypertension. Discontinuation of NSAIDs due to ADR was required in only 2.6% of patients. Pain retention 4 in NRS was associated with initially expressed pain (7 in NRS) OR 2.75 (95% CI 0.834.13; p0.001) and the presence of osteoarthritis of knee and/or hip OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.032.34; p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

PTP decreases rapidly in most patients after a radius fracture, injury of the knee, and ankle ligament injury while taking the original meloxicam. However, in a significant part of patients, moderate or severe PTP persists after 48 weeks, which requires prolonged analgesic therapy and active rehabilitation.

Consensus Statement for the Prescription of Pain Medication at Discharge after Elective Adult Surgery

This Consensus Statement provides recommendations on the prescription of pain medication at discharge from hospital for opioid-naïve adult patients who undergo elective surgery. It encourages health care providers (surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses/nurse practitioners, pain teams, pharmacists, allied health professionals, and trainees) to (1) use nonopioid therapies and reduce the prescription of opioids so that fewer opioid pills are available for diversion and (2) educate patients and their families/caregivers about pain management options after surgery to optimize quality of care for postoperative pain. These recommendations apply to opioid-naïve adult patients who undergo elective surgery. This consensus statement is intended for use by health care providers involved in the management and care of surgical patients. A modified Delphi process was used to reach consensus on the recommendations. First, the authors conducted a scoping review of the literature to determine current best practices and existing guidelines. From the available literature and expertise of the authors, a draft list of recommendations was created. Second, the authors asked key stakeholders to review and provide feedback on several drafts of the document and attend an in-person consensus meeting. The modified Delphi stakeholder group included surgeons, anesthesiologists, residents, fellows, nurses, pharmacists, and patients. After multiple iterations, the document was deemed complete. The recommendations are not graded because they are mostly based on consensus rather than evidence.