Adverse events involving hallux metatarsophalangeal joint implants: Analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration data from 2010 to 2018

Managing Hallux Rigidus in the Elite Athlete

Hallux rigidus can present a difficult problem to both competitive and elite athletic populations. Once an appropriate diagnostic workup has been performed, nonoperative management strategies, including anti-inflammatory medications, injection therapies, shoewear modifications, and orthotic devices, represent the mainstay conservative management options. Surgical management can be considered where an athlete's athletic performance is limited. A joint-sparing cheilectomy can provide a predictable return to sport at the most elite levels. The addition of a proximal phalangeal osteotomy can be considered when necessary. Arthroplasty or arthrodesis techniques can be used for persistent symptoms or progressive disease, but with less predictable outcomes.

Metatarsophalangeal Arthroplasty in Hallux Rigidus

First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthroplasty provides hallux rigidus patients with pain relief and preserved motion, offering an alternative to arthrodesis. Recent advancements in implant technology and surgical techniques have broadened treatment options. Although good outcomes have been documented in the literature, concerns persist regarding increased complications, uncertain long-term efficacy, and challenges in managing failed arthroplasties. Addressing bone loss resulting from the procedure further complicates salvage procedures. Larger cohorts and extended studies are necessary to establish efficacy of first MTPJ arthroplasty. Decisions must weigh the trade-offs between pain relief and potential complications, requiring thorough patient-surgeon discussions.

Cartiva: A Review of the Best Evidence

The Cartiva implant is a synthetic polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel cartilage substitute that is used as a treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis. The implant was designed to relieve the pain associated with hallux rigidus while preserving or restoring range of motion. A summary of outcomes, reasons for these outcomes, and technique pearls will be reviewed here. Seminal articles and current evidence are all included in this article. The aim is for the surgeon to understand all the literature, allowing the surgeon to counsel their patients appropriately, optimize patient selection and to deal with complications.

Assessing the Reproducibility of Research Based on the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Data

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to assess the reproducibility of Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) data-driven studies by analyzing the data queries used in their research processes.

METHODS

Studies using MAUDE data were sourced from PubMed by searching for "MAUDE" or "Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience" in titles or abstracts. We manually chose articles with executable queries. The reproducibility of each query was assessed by replicating it in the MAUDE Application Programming Interface. The reproducibility of a query is determined by a reproducibility coefficient that ranges from 0.95 to 1.05. This coefficient is calculated by comparing the number of medical device reports (MDRs) returned by the reproduced queries to the number of reported MDRs in the original studies. We also computed the reproducibility ratio, which is the fraction of reproducible queries in subgroups divided by the query complexity, the device category, and the presence of a data processing flow.

RESULTS

As of August 8, 2022, we identified 523 articles from which 336 contained queries, and 60 of these were executable. Among these, 14 queries were reproducible. Queries using a single field like product code, product class, or brand name showed higher reproducibility (50%, 33.3%, 31.3%) compared with other fields (8.3%, P = 0.037). Single-category device queries exhibited a higher reproducibility ratio than multicategory ones, but without statistical significance (27.1% versus 8.3%, P = 0.321). Studies including a data processing flow had a higher reproducibility ratio than those without, although this difference was not statistically significant (42.9% versus 17.4%, P = 0.107).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the reproducibility of queries in MAUDE data-driven studies is limited. Enhancing this requires the development of more effective MAUDE data query strategies and improved application programming interfaces.

ACFAS Clinical Consensus Statements: Hallux Rigidus

The following are clinical consensus statements (CCS) on the topic of Hallux Rigidus sponsored by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. A core panel synthesized the data and divided the topic in to twelve sections, each section contained a variable number of consensus statements, based upon complexity. Overall there were 24 consensus statements synthesized for this subject matter. The 24 statements were provided to the expert panel with all available evidence to come to a consensus utilizing all available evidence.

Cartiva interpositional arthroplasty versus arthrodesis in the treatment of Hallux rigidus: A retrospective comparative study with mean 2 year follow up

BACKGROUND

Hallux rigidus is a common condition characterised by first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) degeneration, pain and limited range of motion (ROM). The gold standard surgical treatment is arthrodesis, providing good pain relief, but sacrifices ROM. The Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) has been utilised as an interpositional arthroplasty, aiming to reduce pain whilst preserving range of motion. Current evidence for Cartiva SCI is limited. The aim was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Cartiva SCI compared to arthrodesis undertaken in our centre.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling all adult patients who underwent primary first MTPJ SCI arthroplasty or arthrodesis for the treatment hallux rigidus. The primary outcome was a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Secondary outcomes included EQ-5D, complication rates, VAS Pain and FAAM (ADL).

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2020 there were 33 cases divided into two groups (17 Cartiva SCI, 16 arthrodesis, mean age 59.0 ± 9.9 years) with a mean follow up of 2.3 years. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the MOXFQ, EQ-5D, VAS Pain or FAAM (ADL) outcome scores between the Arthrodesis and SCI groups (p > 0.05). The mean MOXFQ Index score was 7.2 ± 6.4 for the SCI group and 3.9 ± 5.8 for the Arthrodesis group at final follow up (p = 0.15). Although complications were high in both groups, the overall hallux reoperation rate was 29.4 % in the SCI cohort and 0.0 % for arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective comparative study found no significant superiority of Cartiva SCI over arthrodesis in terms of PROMs. Due to the higher rate of further surgical intervention in the SCI cohort, we recommend arthrodesis as the preferred surgical option for hallux rigidus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Surgical Outcomes of Synthetic Cartilage Implant Hemiarthroplasty for Metatarsophalangeal Arthropathy

Introduction Metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthropathy in the great toe causes considerable pain and debilitation, severely impacting quality of life. Traditional management options included conservative measures, steroid injections, and arthrodesis. New options include Cartiva, a synthetic cartilage hemiarthroplasty for the MTPJ. This prosthesis has evidence of improved pain and function without the sacrifice of joint movement seen with arthrodesis. However, the implant itself has mixed reviews. This study aims to identify the pre-, peri, and short-term post-surgical outcomes of Cartiva surgery and review the literature for existing reported outcomes. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 22 consecutive Cartiva procedures between 2016 and 2022 in a single UK institution. Hospital records were analyzed for peri-operative complications, implant survival, additional operative interventions, patient-reported outcomes, and functional improvement. Results Twenty-one patients underwent Cartiva for the first MTPJ pathology and one for the third MTPJ pathology. Prior to surgery, 40.9% of patients had undergone alternative therapies, including MTPJ steroid injections (seven patients), cheilectomy (four patients), and bunionectomy (one patient). Total complication rates, inclusive of medical, surgical, and implant complications were 45.5% (10/22). Total reoperation rates were 18.2% (4/22) including two revisions to arthrodesis and two manipulations under anesthesia (MUA) with local anesthetic injection. At the final follow-up, 55% were still experiencing pain, 15% neurovascular symptoms, 10% swelling, and 50% stiffness or reduced range of movement. However, 85% of patients returned to usual activities of daily living within two years. Conclusion Cartiva surgery for metatarsophalangeal arthropathy has demonstrated outcomes of persistent pain, limited range of movement, and restricted function at short-term follow-up. Rates of reoperation and revision to arthrodesis were comparable with similar studies.

Investigation and analysis of four countries' recalls of osteosynthesis implants and joint replacement implants from 2011 to 2021

Background

Medical devices are used in almost all orthopedic surgical subspecialties, and the frequency of adverse events is increasing, which should not be ignored. To provide suggestions on how to avoid implant recalls from the perspective of manufacturers, medical institutions and supervisions, as well as how to respond promptly to adverse events.

Methods

The research extracted recalls of osteosynthesis implants and joint replacement implants from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2021, in the CNMPA, FDA, HC and ATGA websites and collected the information on device name, recall time, recall class, recall manufacturer, device classification and affected areas. Moreover, the McKinsey 7S model and fishbone diagram were used to analyze recall reasons.

Results

A total of 315 cases of osteosynthesis implants and 286 cases of joint replacement implants were reported in China, the USA, Canada and Australia. The recalls number from 2016 to 2021 was more than that from 2011 to 2015 for osteosynthesis implant (p = 0.012) and joint replacement implant (p = 0.002), and both mainly focused on class II (76.19% and 78.32%). There were statistical differences in the four countries for both implants (p = 0.000), especially osteosynthesis implant between China and the USA (p = 0.000), China and Canada (p = 0.001), the USA and Australia (p = 0.002), and joint replacement implant between China and Australia (p = 0.000).

Conclusions

To avoid the recalls of such implants, manufacturers should strictly select implant materials and components, develop detailed labels and instructions, severely control the packaging process and establish the integrity of medical device data. Medical institutions should standardize procurement procedures, use qualified equipment and train medical workers. It also requires supervisions to conduct premarket safety assessments. In addition, regulators should strengthen supervision and establish reporting systems to deal with the occurrence of adverse events promptly.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03332-w.

Adverse Events Associated With Robotic-Assisted Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration MAUDE Database

BACKGROUND

The use of robotic assistance in arthroplasty is increasing; however, the spectrum of adverse events potentially associated with this technology is unclear. Improved understanding of the causes of adverse events in robotic-assisted arthroplasty can prevent future incidents and enhance patient outcomes.

METHODS

Adverse event reports to the US Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database involving robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and partial knee arthroplasty were reviewed to determine causes of malfunction and related patient impact.

RESULTS

Overall, 263 adverse event reports were included. The most frequently reported adverse events were unexpected robotic arm movement for TKA (59/204, 28.9%) and retained registration checkpoint for THA (19/44, 43.2%). There were 99 reports of surgical delay with an average delay of 20 minutes (range 1-120). Thirty-one cases reported conversion to manual surgery. In total, 68 patient injuries were reported, 7 of which required surgical reintervention. Femoral notching (12/36, 33.3%) was the most common for TKA and retained registration checkpoint (19/28, 67.9%) was the most common for THA. Although rare, additional reported injuries included femoral, tibial, and acetabular fractures, MCL laceration, additional retained foreign bodies, and an electrical burn.

CONCLUSION

Despite the increasing utilization of robotic-assisted arthroplasty in the United States, numerous adverse events are possible and technical difficulties experienced intraoperatively can result in prolonged surgical delays. The events reported herein seem to indicate that robotic-assisted arthroplasty is generally safe with only a few reported instances of serious complications, the nature of which seems more related to suboptimal surgical technique than technology. Based on our data, the practice of adding registration checkpoints and bone pins to the instrument count of all robotic-assisted TJA cases should be widely implemented to avoid unintended retained foreign objects.