Neither heel-rise Height (HRH) nor Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA) show strong correlations to patient limitations and return to previous activities one year after acute Achilles tendon rupture

Functional Performance and Tendon Morphology After Operative or Nonoperative Treatment of Achilles Tendon Ruptures

Background

While controversy remains as to the relative benefit of operative (OM) versus non-operative management (NOM) of Achilles tendon (AT) ruptures (ATR), few studies have examined the effect on high impact maneuvers such as jumping and hopping.

Hypothesis/Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine if functional performance including strength, jumping, and hopping outcomes differed between OM and NOM of acute ATR. The secondary objective was to assess the degree of association between AT morphology and performance outcomes.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort with a single prospective evaluation.

Methods

All patients were treated at an institutional secondary care center. Eligible participants (n=12 OM; 12 NOM) who were treated with OM or NOM of ATR within three weeks of injury were evaluated a minimum 20 months following ATR. AT length, thickness and gastrocnemius muscle thickness were assessed with B-mode ultrasound. Isokinetic plantar flexor strength, hop tests and countermovement and drop jumps were completed. Two-way ANOVAS were completed on all tests with unilateral values, independent t-tests were used for bilateral outcomes, and linear regressions were completed to assess the relationship between normalized AT length and performance.

Results

Affected limb AT was elongated and thickened (p\<0.01), gastrocnemius was atrophied (p\< 0.01) and angle-specific plantar flexor torque was reduced at 120°/s when measured at 20° plantar flexion (p = 0.028). Single leg drop vertical jump was higher in OM (p = 0.015) with no difference for hop and jump tests. AT length was related to plantar flexor torque but had no relationship with hopping performance.

Conclusions

Hop test performance was maintained despite plantarflexion weakness, gastrocnemius atrophy, and AT elongation. This may be the result of compensatory movement patterns. AT length holds limited explanatory power in plantar flexor strength, although this relationship should be evaluated further.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

1.7 cm elongated Achilles tendon did not alter walking gait kinematics 4.5 years after non-surgical treatment

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate Achilles tendon length after non-surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (aATR), and to evaluate indirect effects of possible persistent elongation on kinematics.

METHODS

The study was performed as a cross-sectional study based on a population of patients from an RCT regarding non-operative treatment of aATR. Thirty-seven patients out of the 56 in the original RCT participated with at a follow up of 4-5 years after aATR. Primary outcome was Achilles tendon elongation. Additional outcomes were Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA), calf circumference, passive ankle plantar and dorsiflexion and loading pattern. Foot pressure mapping was performed to measure plantar loading distribution pattern; medial and lateral forefoot peak pressure, heel peak pressure, medial versus lateral loading pattern and timing of heel lift during roll over process. The healthy leg was used as a control.

RESULTS

The injured Achilles tendon was significantly elongated by 1.7 (SD 1.6) cm compared to the non-injured leg. A slight delay of 2.6% (SD 6.0) was measured in heel lift in the injured side compared to the non-injured leg. We found no significant difference in forefoot peak pressure, medial and lateral peak pressure as well as heel peak pressure, and no correlation was found between Achilles tendon length and pressure measurements. Finally, dorsiflexion was 1.9°(SD1.28) larger, ATRA 8.1°(SD6.7) larger, and calf circumference 1.6 cm (SD1.1) lower on the injured leg.

CONCLUSION

The Achilles tendon was 1.7 cm elongated 4.5 years after the initial injury and significant changes in ATRA, calf circumference and passive dorsiflexion was present. Except for a slight delay in heel lift-off, kinematics during walking was symmetrical between injured and healthy leg, even with an elongated tendon on the injured leg. The clinical relevance of the Achilles tendon elongation is uncertain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIER

NCT02760784.

Achilles tendon resting angle is able to detect deficits after an Achilles tendon rupture, but it is not a surrogate for direct measurements of tendon elongation, function or symptoms

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate how the Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA), an indirect measurement of tendon elongation, correlates with ultrasonography (US) measurements of the Achilles tendon length 6 and 12 months after an acute ATR and relates to other clinical outcome measurements such as heel-rise height, jumping ability and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs).

METHODS

Patients were included following acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). Achilles tendon length, ATRA, heel-rise height (HRH), drop countermovement jump (Drop CMJ) and PROMs (Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) and physical activity scale (PAS)) were evaluated 6 and 12 months after injury. Achilles tendon length was evaluated using US, while the ATRA was measured with a goniometer.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (13 women, 47 men), mean (SD) age 43 (9) years, with an acute ATR undergoing either surgical (35%) or non-surgical (65%) treatment were evaluated. A negative correlation (r = - 0.356, p = 0.010) between relative ATRA and tendon elongation was seen at 12 months after ATR. There were also significant positive correlations at 6 and 12 months between relative ATRA and HRH (r = 0.330, p = 0.011 and r = 0.379, p = 0.004). There were no correlations between ATRA and ATRS or ATRA and Drop CMJ, at either 6 or 12 months after the injury.

CONCLUSION

In combination with other clinical evaluations such as HRH and US, ATRA could be a clinical tool for indirect measurements of tendon elongation. However, ATRA cannot be recommended as a direct surrogate for US for determining Achilles tendon length.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.