Formulating multiobjective optimization of 0.1 μm microfiltration of skim milk

Multi-objective atom search optimization of biodiesel production from palm empty fruit bunch pyrolysis

In this study, palm empty fruit bunch (PEFB) pyrolysis, bio-oil improvement, and generating electricity were all simulated using Aspen plus. This research employed a kinetic reactor for pyrolysis at 500 °C based on 1,000 tons of PEFB per day. The simulation results indicated that 1 kg/hr. PEFB generated 0.11 kg/hr of char, 0.21 kg/hr of gas, and 0.67 kg/hr of bio-oil, which is in good agreement with literature. The relationship between biodiesel yield, CO₂ emissions, and utility costs was then investigated the effect of the distillate-to-feed ratio of biodiesel distillation, heat exchanger temperature, and the flash drum pressure from the process simulation by using central composite design (CCD). The coefficient of determination (R²) values for biodiesel yield, CO₂ emissions, and utility costs were 0.9940, 0.9941, and 0.9959, respectively, which was a reason for the excellent model fitting. The optimum response (the biodiesel yield, the CO₂ emission, and the utility cost) was obtained at 5,562.73 kg/hr, 33,696.55 kg/hr, and 2,953.99 USD/hr., respectively, with optimum conditions for the distillate-to-feed ratio of 0.899999, temperature of 56.0356 °C and pressure of 18.1479 bar. After that, a quadratic polynomial equation from the RSM was employed as the fitness function to evaluate the fitness value of the multi-objective optimization (MOO) by atom search optimization (ASO) to maximize biodiesel yield and minimize the CO₂ emissions and utility costs. The ASO performance was generated into the Pareto optimal solution of 200 generations. The optimal CCD was then compared with the ASO results. It was found that the ASO could reduce CO₂ emissions by 1.33% and reduce utility costs by 5.03% while increasing biodiesel yields by 7.01%. It can be observed that the ASO was more efficient at finding parameters than the CCD.

•

Biodiesel production from palm empty fruit bunch pyrolysis.

•

An optimum condition by central composite design.

•

Multi-objective optimization using atom search optimization.

Use of Membrane Technologies in Dairy Industry: An Overview

The use of treatments of segregated process streams as a water source, as well as technical fluid reuse as a source of value-added recovery products, is an emerging direction of resource recovery in several applications. Apart from the desired final product obtained in agro-food industries, one of the challenges is the recovery or separation of intermediate and/or secondary metabolites with high-added-value compounds (e.g., whey protein). In this way, processes based on membranes, such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO), could be integrated to treat these agro-industrial streams, such as milk and cheese whey. Therefore, the industrial application of membrane technologies in some processing stages could be a solution, replacing traditional processes or adding them into existing treatments. Therefore, greater efficiency, yield enhancement, energy or capital expenditure reduction or even an increase in sustainability by producing less waste, as well as by-product recovery and valorization opportunities, could be possible, in line with industrial symbiosis and circular economy principles. The maturity of membrane technologies in the dairy industry was analyzed for the possible integration options of membrane processes in their filtration treatment. The reported studies and developments showed a wide window of possible applications for membrane technologies in dairy industry treatments. Therefore, the integration of membrane processes into traditional processing schemes is presented in this work. Overall, it could be highlighted that membrane providers and agro-industries will continue with a gradual implementation of membrane technology integration in the production processes, referring to the progress reported on both the scientific literature and industrial solutions commercialized.

Efficiency of removal of whey protein from sweet whey using polymeric microfiltration membranes

Our objective was to measure whey protein removal percentage from separated sweet whey using spiral-wound (SW) polymeric microfiltration (MF) membranes using a 3-stage, 3× process at 50°C and to compare the performance of polymeric membranes with ceramic membranes. Pasteurized, separated Cheddar cheese whey (1,080 kg) was microfiltered using a polymeric 0.3-μm polyvinylidene (PVDF) fluoride SW membrane and a 3×, 3-stage MF process. Cheese making and whey processing were replicated 3 times. There was no detectable level of lactoferrin and no intact α- or β-casein detected in the MF permeate from the 0.3-μm SW PVDF membranes used in this study. We found BSA and IgG in both the retentate and permeate. The β-lactoglobulin (β-LG) and α-lactalbumin (α-LA) partitioned between retentate and permeate, but β-LG passage through the membrane was retarded more than α-LA because the ratio of β-LG to α-LA was higher in the MF retentate than either in the sweet whey feed or the MF permeate. About 69% of the crude protein present in the pasteurized separated sweet whey was removed using a 3×, 3-stage, 0.3-μm SW PVDF MF process at 50°C compared with 0.1-μm ceramic graded permeability MF that removed about 85% of crude protein from sweet whey. The polymeric SW membranes used in this study achieve approximately 20% lower yield of whey protein isolate (WPI) and a 50% higher yield of whey protein phospholipid concentrate (WPPC) under the same MF processing conditions as ceramic MF membranes used in the comparison study. Total gross revenue from the sale of WPI plus WPPC produced with polymeric versus ceramic membranes is influenced by both the absolute market price for each product and the ratio of market price of these 2 products. The combination of the market price of WPPC versus WPI and the influence of difference in yield of WPPC and WPI produced with polymeric versus ceramic membranes yielded a price ratio of WPPC versus WPI of 0.556 as the cross over point that determined which membrane type achieves higher total gross revenue return from production of these 2 products from separated sweet whey. A complete economic engineering study comparison of the WPI and WPPC manufacturing costs for polymeric versus ceramic MF membranes is needed to determine the effect of membrane material selection on long-term processing costs, which will affect net revenue and profit when the same quantity of sweet whey is processed under various market price conditions.