Clinical Presentation and Management of Hallux Rigidus

Case study: Gait assessment of a patient with hallux rigidus before and after plantar modification

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Hallux rigidus (HR) is a degenerative arthritis affecting the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP), leading to pain and functional impairment, particularly during the propulsive phase of walking. The prevalence of HR is about 2.5 % in individuals over 50, but younger individuals can also be affected, as demonstrated in this case.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 26-year-old patient with a body mass index (BMI) of 20.2, who has been suffering from HR for 5 years. The patient presented with walking difficulties, characterized by a limp and impaired propulsion phase, and pain in the right foot due to HR. A comprehensive gait assessment was conducted using a baropodometric platform and integrated smartphone motion sensors. Following the diagnosis, a non-surgical intervention involving the application of a compressed cotton felt foot orthosis at the MTP plantar area was initiated. This intervention aimed to alleviate pain and improve the functional mobility of the right big toe. Post-treatment assessments showed an increase in the big toe's mobility from 0 degrees to 35 degrees, as measured by a digital goniometer.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The application of a soft support, such as compressed cotton felt, at the plantar area of MTP, demonstrated a potential non-surgical therapeutic approach to improve gait and reduce discomfort in HR patients.

CONCLUSION

This case study underscores the potential benefits of plantar modification in the management of HR.

Outcomes of Operative Versus Nonoperative Management for Hallux Rigidus: A Tertiary Care Center Experience

Background This study aims to investigate and report the outcomes of various management modalities used for hallux rigidus, a common form of degenerative joint disease affecting the foot and ankle. The research focuses on understanding the pathophysiology, classification systems, and nonoperative approaches such as medical therapy, intra-articular injections, shoe modifications, and physical therapy. Surgical techniques, including joint-sparing and joint-sacrificing procedures, are explored, considering factors such as disease stage and patient preferences. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh. The study included all patients who were diagnosed with hallux rigidus from the period 2016 to 2022. Data were collected through the BESTCare system at KAMC. All the data were collected through Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) and transferred for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York). Frequencies and percentages were used to detail categorical variables, whereas continuous variables were examined by the mean and standard deviation. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to report the statistical significance. Results A total of 84 patients were included. The majority were women (60.7%). Diabetes and hypertension were prevalent comorbidities, affecting 21.4% and 35.7% of patients, respectively. Nonoperative management was the most common approach (66.7%). Complications were minimal (2.4% infections, 1.2% metatarsalgia), and 67.9% of patients reported no persistence of symptoms after treatment. Conclusion The low complication rates and the lack of significant associations between treatment modalities and outcomes suggest the generally safe and effective nature of the employed interventions. These findings can guide clinicians in making informed decisions regarding the management of hallux rigidus, while also highlighting areas for further research to improve treatment strategies and outcomes.

Factors Associated With Nonunion in Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is the current treatment of choice for symptomatic advanced hallux rigidus and moderate-to-severe hallux valgus. There are different methods to perform arthrodesis, yet no consensus on the best approach. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects of preoperative and postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA), joint preparation and fixation technique, and postoperative immobilization on the incidence of nonunion.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed that included 794 patients. Univariate and multiple logistic regression was conducted to determine associations between joint preparation, fixation techniques, postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, and pre- and postoperative HVA with nonunion.

RESULTS

Nonunion incidence was 15.2%, with 11.1% symptomatic and revised. Joint preparation using hand instruments (OR 3.75, CI 1.90-7.42) and convex/concave reamers (OR 2.80, CI 1.52-5.16) were associated with greater odds of a nonunion compared to planar cuts. Joint fixation with crossed screws was associated with greater odds of nonunion (OR 2.00, CI 1.11-3.42), as was greater preoperative HVA (OR 1.02, CI 1.00-1.03). However, the latter effect disappeared after inclusion of postoperative HVA in the model, with a small association identified between residual postoperative HVA and nonunion (OR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.08). Similarly, we found an association between odds of nonunion and higher body weight (OR 1.02, CI 1.01-1.04) but not of body mass index.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with planar cuts and fixation with a plate and interfragmentary screw is associated with the lowest odds of resulting in a nonunion. Higher body weight and greater preoperative HVA were associated with slight increase in rates of nonunion. It is crucial to properly correct the hallux valgus deformity during surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case control study.

Interposition arthroplasty with bovine collagenous membrane for hallux rigidus: A long-term results retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hallux rigidus (HR) is a degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP1) with progressive loss of range of movement (ROM). Interposition arthroplasty (IA) is a technique widely used for the treatment of HR;however, few studies reported long-term clinical results. This study aims to report the clinical results of IA using a bovine pericardium collagen matrix for HR with a minimum 10-years follow-up.

METHODS

Thirty patients (31 feet) who underwent IA using a bovine pericardium collagen matrix from 2001 to 2009 were retrospectively evaluated with a mean follow up of 154.1 ± 28.6 (range 124-218) months. All HR ranged from grade II to grade III, according to Regnauld classification. All patients were clinically assessed with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal- Interphalangeal Scale, a pain Visual Analog Scale, and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index. Scores before and after treatment, respectively achieved from clinical records and clinical evaluation at final follow-up were compared.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, an improvement of all the considered scores (p < 0.01) was recorded. The overall rate of unsatisfying results was 16.1 %. Two (6.4 %) patients complained discomfort due to first ray shortening and 3 (9.7 %) cases of persistent metatarsal pain. There was one (3.2 %) case of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CPRS). No revision surgeries, infection, or other adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Interposition arthroplasty using bovine collagenous membrane is a reliable solution for high-grade HR with durable results over 10 years in more than 80 % of patients.

Short-term Efficacy of Ultrasonographic Guidance for Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injection in Hallux Rigidus: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Multiple considerations should be taken before standardizing a clinical procedure such as efficacy, safety, or the cost. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of landmark-guided vs ultrasonography-guided intra-articular injection of corticosteroid into the first metatarsophalangeal joint cavity to reduce pain and dysfunction in patients with hallux rigidus.

METHODS

We carried out a single-blind randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel arms in an outpatient clinic affiliated with a medical university. In total, 50 participants (35 women) with the mean (SD) age of 49.8 (10.3) years were randomly allocated to landmark-guided or ultrasonography-guided groups (each n = 25). Each patient received a single intra-articular injection of 40-mg methylprednisolone plus 1 mL lidocaine into the affected first metatarsophalangeal joint. The primary outcome was joint pain and the secondary outcome was the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score. We measured the outcomes at baseline and 2 and 6 weeks after the intervention.

RESULTS

Six weeks after the injections, there were no statistically significant differences between the study groups in pain reduction and increase in the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scores (P = .131 and .241, respectively). We did not find any complications for the injections in both groups. There were statistically significant changes within each group in pain and the scores for the landmark (P < .001, and P = .007), and ultrasonography groups (both P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Landmark guidance is as effective as ultrasonographic guidance for intra-articular injection in patients with hallux rigidus. A single intra-articular injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone plus 1 mL lidocaine is an efficient and safe therapeutic measure for decreasing joint pain and maintaining its function, at least for 6 weeks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, high-quality prospective randomized study.

Physical Function and Pain Interference Levels of Hallux Rigidus Patients Before and After Synthetic Cartilage Implant vs Arthrodesis Surgery

BACKGROUND

Hallux rigidus is a common and painful degenerative condition of the great toe limiting a patient's physical function and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to investigate pre- and postoperative physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) levels of patients undergoing synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty (SCI) vs arthrodesis (AD) for treatment of hallux rigidus using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

METHODS

PROMIS PF and PI t scores were analyzed for patients who underwent either SCI or AD. Postoperative final PROMIS t scores were obtained via phone survey. Linear mixed model analysis was used to assess differences in PF and PI at each follow-up point. Final follow-up scores were analyzed using independent sample t tests.

RESULTS

Total 181 (59 SCI, 122 AD) operatively managed patients were included for analysis of PROMIS scores. Final phone survey was performed at a minimum of 14 (mean 33, range, 14-59) months postoperatively, with 101 patients (40 SCI, 61 AD) successfully contacted. The mean final follow-up was significantly different for SCI and AD: 27 vs 38 months, respectively (P < .01). The mean age of the SCI cohort was lower than the AD cohort (57.5 vs 61.5 years old, P = .01). Average PF t scores were higher in the SCI cohort at baseline (47.1 and 43.9, respectively, P = .01) and at final follow-up (51.4 vs 45.9, respectively, P < .01). A main effect of superior improvement in PF was noted in the SCI group (+4.3) vs the AD group (+2) across time intervals (P < .01). PI t scores were similar between the 2 procedures across time points.

CONCLUSION

The SCI cohort reported slightly superior PF t scores preoperatively and at most follow-up time points compared with the arthrodesis group. No differences were found for PI or complication rates between the 2 treatment groups during this study time frame.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Hallux rigidus - Osteoarthritis of the first MTP-joint. Surgical and patient-reported results from Swefoot

BACKGROUND

Swefoot is a Swedish national registry, that covers surgery in the foot and ankle. Surgical treatment of hallux rigidus (HR) vary within and between countries. The aim of this study was to report baseline variables for patients with HR.

METHODS

We extracted baseline characteristics, surgical procedures and patient-reported data for patients with HR entered in the registry during the period January 2014 to August 2019.

RESULTS

By August 2019, 1818 patients were reported in the registry. 68.9% of the patients were women, the average age was 58 years, the mean BMI was 26.4kg/m². 41.9% of the patients underwent a cheilectomy,19.8% a metatarsal osteotomy, 34.3% a fusion, 0.2% an arthroplasty, 0.3% Keller's procedure and 3.5% other methods. The preoperative summary score for SEFAS (Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score) was 26 and for EQ-5D (Euroqol-5 Dimension) 0.60.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first report from Swefoot regarding HR.

Nonoperative Management of Hallux Limitus Using a Novel Forefoot Orthosis

Hallux limitus is among the most common arthritides of the foot and ankle, with increasing incidence in the aging population. Despite its prevalence and disease burden, treatment of the condition remains poorly understood. Many patients will fail initial conservative management, whereas controversy exists surrounding indications for and outcomes of surgery. The present study sought to examine the impact of a novel forefoot orthosis on foot function, pain, and plantar pressure distributions in patients with symptomatic hallux limitus. Nineteen adult patients completed a questionnaire consisting of the 23-item Foot Function Index and a 10-point visual analogue scale measuring pain. Standing pedobarographic maps were generated using a foot scanning system. Participants were instructed to wear the orthosis in athletic shoes for 4 weeks. Eighteen participants (94.7%) experienced improvements in foot function and pain, with 12 (63.2%) reporting complete resolution of pain at the end of the 4-week trial. Mean Foot Function Index scores improved significantly from 43.0% at baseline to 11.0% with the orthosis (p < .001). Similarly, mean visual analogue scale pain scores decreased significantly from 4.87 to 1.18 (p < .001). Pedobarographic analysis while wearing the orthosis demonstrated increased ability of participants to bear weight on the arthritic hallux metatarsophalangeal joint and restoration of physiologic stance. Compared to existing products, the device was well tolerated and did not require footwear modifications or impede normal gait. Overall, the orthosis offers an appealing solution to patients dissatisfied with existing treatment options as well as those who may be averse to or ineligible for surgery.

The efficacy of shoe modifications and foot orthoses in treating patients with hallux rigidus: a comprehensive review of literature

Hallux rigidus (HR) is a degenerative disease of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint and affects about 2.5% of people older than 50 years. The real etiology of this condition remains under debate. Clinical symptoms, physical exam, and instrumental evidence are important in assessing and grading the disease. The anatomy of the first metatarsal is unique and its configuration may play a significant role in the HR development. The first approach in the early stages of the disease usually begins with shoe modifications and foot orthoses, designed to limit irritation from the dorsal osteophytes, reducing motion and the mechanical stresses on the joint. To prevent or delay the development of HR, shoes should be sufficiently long, comfortable, with high toe box and broad toe-boxed, and should bear an allowed space for the orthotic device. The ideal orthotic appears to require a 3-mm thickness with a correct stiffness, and also increasing and extending the medial metatarsal arch just proximal to the metatarsal head, raising the first metatarsal and allowing the proximal phalanx to rest in a more plantarflexed position, decompressing the dorsal aspect of the joint. The increased foot pronation moment with medial column overload, when present, should be corrected. In addition, the maximum follow-up found by the analyzed studies was of 14.4 years, so the Authors cannot conclude how long conservative care can keep a patient free from pain and able to perform normal daily activities. However, the use of shoe modifications and foot orthoses may be considered a safe treatment and then should be always offered to patients, before any surgical management. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Novel treatment for hallux rigidus using a temporary metal interpositional device

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the results of a consecutive series of patients suffering from grade II-III hallux rigidus who underwent a mobility preserving surgical technique consisting of resection arthroplasty with implantation of a temporary metal spacer.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients, 18 female and 12 male with a diagnosis of a grade II-III hallux rigidus, not responding to conservative treatment, underwent a minimal resection arthroplasty followed by the implantation of a temporary metal interpositional device by the same surgeon. All spacers were removed after 6 months through a minimal incision under regional anaesthesia. Patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated at 3, 6, 12 months, and 5 years after spacer removal.

RESULTS

The clinical AOFAS scores improved already at first follow-up and continued to improve over time with a statistically significant change until the first year. At 3, 6, and 12 months follow-ups, the number of patients with severely limited ROM (i.e. under 30°, that means grade II-III according to Coughlin and Shaurnas classification) significantly decreased. There were only two minor complications, so defined as both of which resolved spontaneously and did not affect the procedure's effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed good to excellent results with the use of this mobility preserving surgical technique for the treatment of symptomatic grades II and III hallux rigidus. The never before published procedure is easy to perform and inexpensive.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Joint sparing management of hallux rigidus: Cartiva SCI vs cheilectomy a comparative review

Background

Hallux rigidus, or first metatarsophalangeal joing arthritis, is a very common condition which causes pain and loss of motion in the joing which can be debilitating.

Methods

Patient reported outcome measures were utilised to study the difference in day to day functionality between two common surgical management options for hallux rigidus.

Results

55 Cartiva and 23 Cheilectomy patients were included in this study. The Manchester Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire revealed statistically significant improvements in the cheilectomy patients when compared to Cartiva SCI.Foot and Ankle Ability Measure found no statistical difference was found between the two surgical treatments.

Conclusion

Cheilectomy offers good post-operative functional and sporting outcomes after surgery for the management of hallux rigidus at 5 years.

Arthrodesis versus Arthroplasty of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint in the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus - A Comparative Study of Appropriately Selected Patients

Objective  Historical results of arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (1MTP) are relatively poor; however, improvements in the understanding of the normal foot biomechanics, implant materials and design currently make arthroplasty a reasonable option in appropriately selected patients. The present study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic results of 1MTP arthrodesis and arthroplasty in the treatment of hallux rigidus and to present a rationale for patient selection for arthroplasty.

Methods  A total of 36 patients (38 feet) with hallux rigidus submitted to surgery (12 arthrodesis and 26 arthroplasties) were prospectively included in the study. Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the functional status was assessed using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal (AOFAS-HMI) scale. Complications and radiographic results were also analyzed, and survival rates were calculated for both procedures.

Results  All of the patients reported significant improvement in pain and functional status after surgery. Patients submitted to arthroplasty had better functional results on the AOFAS-HMI scale (89.7 versus 65.7 points; p  < 0.001) and better pain relief (VAS 1.6 versus 3.9 points; p  = 0.002) when compared with the group submitted to arthrodesis. There was one case of infection in the arthroplasty group and 2 cases of pseudarthrosis in the arthrodesis group.

Conclusion  Arthrodesis provides pain relief and satisfactory results but alters the biomechanics of gait. Like arthrodesis, arthroplasty improves pain significantly, being a more physiological alternative to preserve the biomechanics of the foot. While the two surgical methods yielded good clinical results, selected patients submitted to arthroplasty had better clinical scores and lower revision rates.

Management of high-grade hallux rigidus: a narrative review of the literature

Hallux rigidus is a disease characterized by an osteoarthritic degeneration of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Aetiology of hallux rigidus is not clear in the literature. History of trauma is considered one of the most common causes of unilateral hallux rigidus. Also, repetitive microtraumas or inflammatory and metabolic causes such as gout, rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative arthropathy can cause degeneration of the joint. The aim of this literature narrative overview is to summarize and expose the great amount of management concepts and information, including the well-codified main operative procedures to treat of hallux rigidus. This may provide current information for med-school students, researchers and physicians. A comprehensive literature search using PubMed database has been performed. The management for hallux rigidus can involve a variety of therapeutic interventions, conservative or operative. High-grade hallux rigidus represents a complex disease characterized by several clinical and pathological findings, and to achieve optimal results, surgical treatment should be chosen between several surgical techniques depending on the degree of arthritis and other different clinical conditions.

A comprehensive and narrative review of historical aspects and management of low-grade hallux rigidus: conservative and surgical possibilities

Hallux rigidus, Latin for Stiff Toe, is characterized by an osteoarthritic degeneration of the articular surfaces of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. The aim of this literature narrative overview is to summarize and expose the great amount of management concepts and information, including the well-codified operative procedures and the more up to date knowledge about non-operative and surgical treatment of hallux rigidus. This may provide current information for physicians, medschool attendants and researchers. A comprehensive literature search using PubMed database has been performed, up to April 1, 2017. Several different types of treatment are described in the literature for low-grade hallux rigidus. The management for hallux rigidus can involve a variety of therapeutic interventions, conservative or operative. Hallux rigidus is a complex disease characterized by several clinical and pathological findings, and to achieve optimal results, surgical treatment for low-grade forms should be chosen between several surgical techniques depending on the degree of arthritis and other different clinical conditions.

Long-Term Results of Hemiarthroplasty Compared With Arthrodesis for Osteoarthritis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

If operative treatment is opted for grade 3 and 4 osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, arthrodesis is considered the standard of care. However, if preservation of joint mobility is preferred, implant arthroplasty could be favored. Previous studies have suggested hemiarthroplasty might result in less pain, better function, and greater patient satisfaction compared with arthrodesis. However, these studies only evaluated short-term results (range 2.2 to 6.6 years). The aim of our study was to determine whether patients treated with hemiarthroplasty would show better postoperative outcomes compared with those treated with arthrodesis after ≥5 years after surgery. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hallux metatarsophalangeal interphalangeal (AOFAS-HMI) scale score was used as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes addressed satisfaction rates, patient procedure recommendation, and number of unplanned repeat surgical procedures. We also addressed the influence of the procedures on daily activities (work and sports), the influence of smoking on the postoperative results, and the costs for both procedures. A total of 47 primary arthrodeses and 31 hemiarthroplasties performed between January 2005 and December 2011 were evaluated. After a mean follow-up period of 8.3 (range 5 to 11.8) years, the mean AOFAS-HMI scale score after arthrodesis and hemiarthroplasty was 72.8 ± 14.5 and 89.7 ± 6.6, respectively (p = .001). The patients were significantly more pleased after hemiarthroplasty (p < .001), and this procedure was recommended more often (p < .001). The number of unplanned repeat surgical procedures did not differ between the 2 groups. Patients resumed sports activities significantly sooner after hemiarthroplasty (p = .002). The overall crude costs were similar for both procedures. Our results have shown more favorable postoperative outcomes for hemiarthroplasty compared with arthrodesis as operative treatment of osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint after a mean follow-up period of 8.3 years.

Correlation of Hallux Rigidus Grade With Motion, VAS Pain, Intraoperative Cartilage Loss, and Treatment Success for First MTP Joint Arthrodesis and Synthetic Cartilage Implant

BACKGROUND

Grading systems are used to assess severity of any condition and as an aid in guiding treatment. This study examined the relationship of baseline motion, pain, and observed intraoperative cartilage loss with hallux rigidus grade.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized study examining outcomes of arthrodesis compared to synthetic cartilage implant was performed. Patients underwent preoperative clinical examination, radiographic assessment, hallux rigidus grade assignment, and intraoperative assessment of cartilage loss. Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain was obtained preoperatively and at 24 months. Correlation was made between active peak dorsiflexion, VAS pain, cartilage loss, and hallux rigidus grade. Fisher's exact test was used to assess grade impact on clinical success ( P < .05).

RESULTS

In 202 patients, 59 (29%), 110 (55%), and 33 (16%) were classified as Coughlin grades 2, 3, and 4, respectively. There was no correlation between grade and active peak dorsiflexion (-0.069, P = .327) or VAS pain (-0.078, P = .271). Rank correlations between grade and cartilage loss were significant, but correlations were small. When stratified by grade, composite success rates between the 2 treatments were nearly identical.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of the grade, positive outcomes were demonstrated for both fusion and synthetic cartilage implant. Clinical symptoms and signs should be used to guide treatment, rather than a grade consisting of radiographic, symptoms, and range of motion factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, randomized clinical trial.

Hallux rigidus: How do I approach it?

Hallux rigidus is a degenerative disease of the first metatarsalphalangeal (MTP) joint and affects 2.5% of people over age 50. Dorsal osteophytes and narrowed joint space leads to debilitating pain and limited range of motion. Altered gait mechanics often ensued as 119% of the body force transmit through the 1^st MTP joint during gait cycle. Precise etiology remains under debate with trauma being often cited in the literature. Hallux valgus interphalangeus, female gender, inflammatory and metabolic conditions have all been identified as associative factors. Clinical symptoms, physical exam and radiographic evidence are important in assessing and grading the disease. Non-operative managements including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, intra-articular injections, shoe modification, activity modification and physical therapy, should always be attempted for all hallux rigidus patients. The goal of surgery is to relieve pain, maintain stability of the first MTP joint, and improve function and quality of life. Operative treatments can be divided into joint-sparing vs joint-sacrificing. Cheilectomy and moberg osteotomy are examples of joint-sparing techniques that have demonstrated great success in early stages of hallux rigidus. Arthrodesis is a joint-sacrificing procedure that has been the gold standard for advanced hallux rigidus. Other newer procedures such as implant arthroplasty, interpositional arthroplasty and arthroscopy, have demonstrated promising early patient outcomes. However, future studies are still needed to validate its long-term efficacy and safety. The choice of procedure should be based on the condition of the joint, patient’s goal and expectations, and surgeon’s experience with the technique.