Flexible versus rigid intrauterine insemination catheters: A prospective, randomized, controlled study

The impact of the modified speculum application technique on the success rates of intrauterine insemination: A randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is frequently used to treat patients with ovulation disorders, cervical factor, mild male infertility and unexplained infertility. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of modified speculum application on the success of IUI in patients with unexplained infertility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomized study reviewed 219 women who had undergone controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)-IUI treatment. In the modified speculum application group (109 patients with 124 cycles), the screw of the vaginal speculum was loosened after passing the internal os with catheter and the vaginal speculum remained in this position to ensure closure of the cervix during the procedure. In the conventional speculum application group (110 patients with 132 cycles), the screw of the vaginal speculum was not loosened to close the lips of cervix after passing the internal os with the catheter and the vaginal speculum was removed after withdrawal of the insemination catheter. The primary outcome was live birth rate.

RESULTS

The modified and conventional speculum application groups had statistically similar demographic and clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences between the study and the control groups in terms of the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle and per patient (24.1% vs 18.9% and 26.6% vs 22.7%, respectively), as well as the live birth rate per cycle and per patient (19.3% vs 15.1% and 22% vs 18.1% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Applying gentle mechanical pressure on the portio vaginalis of the cervix using a vaginal speculum during IUI does not improve pregnancy and live birth rates in patients with unexplained infertility.

[Pre-washing catheter dramatically improves the post intrauterine insemination pregnancy rate]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness of pre-washing the intrauterine insemination catheters on IUI outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Infertile couples (n=322) involved in a IUI program were included in the study. IUI indications were cervical factors, ovulation dysfunction, cryopreserved semen and unexplained infertility. Every other week for two years, IUI catheters were washed with culture medium prior to intrauterine sperm insemination.

RESULT(S)

Only the first IUI for each couple were analyzed. Washing the catheter, prior to use, resulted in a 49.7% increase in clinical pregnancy rate (22.0% vs 14.7% P<0.05). This result is observed with fresh sperm (15.7% vs 11.1%) and frozen-thawed sperm as well (31.1% vs 19.8%). The early pregnancy termination rate was similar in all groups.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Pre-washing the catheter before IUI should be recommended in Good Laboratory Practice Guidelines as it is already the case for embryo transfer catheters. This raises the problem of washing all single-use devices, in contact with gametes or embryos during IVF.

Soft versus firm catheters for intrauterine insemination

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a recommended treatment for unexplained subfertility. The treatment involves the direct delivery of spermatozoa into the uterus using a catheter. Many factors influence the success of IUI treatments including the type of catheter used.

OBJECTIVES

To compare pregnancy-related outcomes from women undergoing intrauterine insemination cycles performed with either soft or firm catheters in subfertile women.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following databases (inception to July 2010) with no language restrictions: Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS and OpenSigle. We also searched the conference abstracts in the ISI Web of Knowledge and Google, and conference abstracts and citation lists of relevant publications, reviews and included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only truly randomised controlled studies of women who underwent IUI using either soft or firm catheter types and reporting data on rates of live birth, clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, ease of introduction of the catheter, occurrence of trauma, or woman's discomfort.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors screened the titles and abstracts of 78 potentially eligible studies and excluded 66 of these. We critically appraised the full texts of twelve studies and excluded three studies. Nine publications of six studies were remaining. We extracted data from the six remaining studies and there were no disagreements. We assessed risk of bias and pooled dichotomous data and presented the Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

There was no evidence of a significant effect difference regarding the choice of catheter type for any of the outcomes. Three studies reported live birth rates (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.35) with a translated OR percentages (1.3, 95% CI 0.56 to 3.1) while six studies reported clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.35 ). Two studies were pooled for the analysis of miscarriages (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.22). Results of other adverse outcomes were reported per cycle and were therefore not pooled.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the evidence available in this review, no specific conclusion can be made regarding the superiority of one catheter class over another. Further adequately powered studies reporting on clinical outcomes (e.g. live birth rate) are required. Additional outcomes such as miscarriage rates and measures of discomfort need to be reported.

Economics of flexible vs. rigid catheters for intrauterine insemination

A decision tree model was created to investigate pregnancy rates, as well as cost factors associated with rigid vs. flexible catheters. Although the flexible catheter costs more than the rigid catheter, it is associated with a higher pregnancy rate, which decreases costs of IUI treatment because fewer cycles are needed.

Intrauterine insemination catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is the oldest and most practised form of assisted reproduction worldwide. We systematically reviewed the literature so that we could evaluate the use of soft versus firm catheters in subfertile women undergoing IUI.

METHODS

Extensive searches were conducted for full-text manuscripts, conference abstracts, ongoing and unpublished trials. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy (CPR) and ongoing pregnancy (OPR)/live birth rates (LBRs) per woman. Secondary outcomes were multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) per clinical pregnancy, difficulty cannulating the cervix, bleeding and patient discomfort. Meta-analysis was performed using the Peto-modified Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

Seven randomized trials were identified, and four were excluded. No significant differences were noted for CPR and LBR per woman [OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.70-1.32 and OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.43-1.58, respectively]. As for the secondary outcomes, MPRs per cycle were also not significantly different. More difficulty was noted with soft catheters and more patient discomfort with firm catheters. Bleeding following the procedure was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter choice during IUI does not seem to be a detrimental factor for success, as in other assisted reproduction techniques (ART). More studies are warranted to draw definitive conclusions and support the results of this systematic review.