Effects of oral contraceptives administered at defined stages of ovarian follicular development

A randomized single-blind non-inferiority trial of delayed start with drospirenone-only and ethinyl estradiol-gestodene pills for ovulation inhibition

We compared the efficacy of 4 mg drospirenone (DRSP) progestin-only pills (POPs) versus combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) containing 0.02 mg of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 0.075 mg of gestodene (GS) in ovulation inhibition and inducing unfavorable cervical mucus changes using a delayed-starting approach. This randomized controlled trial involved 36 participants aged 18-45 years. The major outcomes included ovulation inhibition assessed using the Hoogland and Skouby score, and cervical mucus permeability, assessed using the modified World Health Organization score. The results demonstrated ovulation inhibition rates of 77.8% for the EE/GS group and 88.9% for the DRSP group. The risk ratio and absolute risk reduction were 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10, 2.40) and - 0.11 (95% CI: - 0.35, 0.13), respectively, satisfying the 20% non-inferiority margin threshold. The median time to achieve unfavorable cervical mucus changes was comparable between the DRSP (3 days, interquartile range [IQR]: 6 days) and EE/GS (3.5 days, IQR: 4 days) groups. However, the DRSP group had a higher incidence of unscheduled vaginal bleeding (55.56% vs. 11.11%; p = 0.005). DRSP-only pills, initiated on days 7-9 of the menstrual cycle, were non-inferior to EE/GS pills in ovulation inhibition. However, they exhibited delayed unfavorable cervical mucus changes compared to the standard two-day backup recommendation.Clinical trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20220819001) https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20220819001 .

Biomaterials and Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls

The present state of reproductive and sexual health around the world reveals disparities in contraceptive use and effectiveness. Unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection transmission rates remain high even with current prevention methods. The 20th century saw a contraceptive revolution with biomedical innovation driving the success of new contraceptive technologies with central design concepts and materials. Current modalities can be broadly categorized according to their mode of function: reversible methods such as physical/chemical barriers or hormonal delivery devices via systemic (transdermal and subcutaneous) or localized (intrauterine and intravaginal) administration, and nonreversible sterilization procedures such as tubal ligation and vasectomy. Contraceptive biomaterials are at present dominated by well-characterized elastomers such as polydimethylsiloxane and ethylene vinyl acetate due to their favorable material properties and versatility. Contraceptives alter the normal function of cellular components in the reproductive systems to impair fertility. The purpose of this review is to highlight the bioengineering design of existing methods, explore novel adaptations, and address notable shortcomings in current contraceptive technologies.

The effectiveness of quick starting oral contraception containing nomegestrol acetate and 17-β estradiol on ovulation inhibition: A randomized controlled trial

To determine the effectiveness of quick starting combined oral contraception (COC) contain 2.5 mg nomegestrol acetate and 1.5 mg estradiol (NOMAC/E2) comparing with 0.075 mg gestodene and 0.02 mg ethinyl estradiol (GS/EE) on ovarian ovulation inhibition rate, we conducted a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial involving 69 healthy female volunteers aged 18–40 years who had normal menstrual history and were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to take one pack of COC containing either NOMAC/E2 (study group) or GS/EE (control group) starting on menstrual cycle Day7–9. The ovarian activity was assessed by using Hoogland and Skouby grading. Forty-six and 23 participants were randomized to NOMAC/E2 and GS/EE groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. No significant difference was observed between the study and control groups for ovulation inhibition rate (93.4% vs. 95.6%, risk difference: –2.2%, 95% CI: –13.1, 8.8), ovarian quiescence rate (91.2% vs. 91.2%, P = 1.000), persistent cyst rate (2.2% vs. 4.4%, P = 1.000), and ovulation rate (6.6% vs. 4.4%, P = 1.000). Quick starting COC during day7–9 of menstrual cycle can inhibit ovulation for more than 90%. The quick starting NOMAC/E2 is non-inferior to GS/EE for preventing ovulation and suppressing follicular growth.

A prospective, randomized, pharmacodynamic study of quick-starting a desogestrel progestin-only pill following ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception

STUDY QUESTION

Is there a pharmacodynamic interaction between ulipristal acetate (UPA) 30 mg for emergency contraception and a daily progestin-only contraceptive pill, desogestrel (DSG) 0.75 mg, when initiated the next day?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In this study, DSG impaired the ability of UPA to delay ovulation, but UPA had little impact on the onset of contraceptive effects due to DSG.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

UPA is a progesterone receptor modulator used for emergency contraceptive (EC) at the dose of 30 mg. UPA delays ovulation by at least 5 days when administered in the mid to late follicular phase. In theory, potent progestins could reactivate progesterone signaling that leads to follicle rupture, thereby impacting the effectiveness of UPA as EC. In addition, UPA could alter the onset of the contraceptive effect of progestin-containing contraceptives started immediately after UPA.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A single-blind (for observer), placebo-controlled, partial crossover study was conducted in two sites [Dominican Republic (DR) and the Netherlands (NDL)] over 11 months from October 2012 to September 2013. Healthy female volunteers participated in two of the three treatment cycles separated by a washout cycle. Treatment combinations studied were as follows: (i) a single 30 mg dose of UPA followed by 75 µg per day DSG for 20 days, (ii) a single 30 mg dose of UPA followed by 20 days of placebo matching that of DSG (PLB2) or (iii) one tablet of placebo-matching UPA (PLB1) followed by 75 µg per day DSG for 20 days. Participants were randomized to one of the three treatment sequences (UPA + DSG/UPA + PLB2, PLB1 + DSG/UPA + DSG and UPA + PLB2/PLB1 + DSG) when a lead follicle was ≥ 14 to <16 mm diameter on transvaginal ultrasound imaging (TVU).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIAL, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 71 women were included, and 49 were randomized to a first treatment combination of the three period sequences (20 in the DR and 29 in the NDL); 41 of the 49 continued and completed two treatment combinations (20 in the DR and 21 in the NDL).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Initiating DSG treatment the day after UPA significantly reduced the ovulation delaying effect of UPA (P = 0.0054). While ovulation occurred in only one of the 29 UPA-only cycles (3%) in the first 5 days, it occurred in 13 of the 29 (45%) UPA + DSG cycles.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This was a small, descriptive, pharmacodynamic study in which some findings differed by study site. Distinguishing between a cystic corpus luteum and a luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) by TVU was difficult in some cases; however, the investigators reached consensus, when the study was still blinded, regarding ovulation based on hormone levels and careful review of daily TVU images.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Initiating the use of a DSG progestin-only pill (POP) immediately after UPA reduces the ability of UPA to delay ovulation and thus may decrease its efficacy as EC. If starting a DSG POP after using UPA for EC, and possibly any progestin-only method, consideration should be given to delaying for at least 5 days after UPA intake in order to preserve the ovulation delaying effects of UPA.

The effects on ovarian activity of ulipristal acetate when 'quickstarting' a combined oral contraceptive pill: a prospective, randomized, double-blind parallel-arm, placebo-controlled study

STUDY QUESTION

What is the effect on ovarian activity of a preceding intake of ulipristal acetate (UPA) when starting a combined oral contraceptive (COC) in the mid- to late-follicular phase of the cycle?

SUMMARY ANSWER

This study shows that UPA does not affect the ability of the COC to induce ovarian quiescence.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

UPA is a progesterone receptor modulator that is available for emergency contraception (EC). In theory, UPA could alter the effectiveness of hormonal contraception started immediately following it and vice versa. Current guidelines regarding quick starting a COC following UPA are based on expert opinion only.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at three separate sites, Edinburgh (Scotland), Stockholm (Sweden) and Groningen (the Netherlands), over a 5-month period in 2012. Healthy female volunteers were randomized to take either UPA or an identically packaged placebo, at mid-cycle (once a lead ovarian follicle was determined to be >13 mm on transvaginal ultrasound imaging). Participants were randomized by a computer-generated randomization schedule, allocated by sequential, sealed envelopes. All women then started 21 days of the same COC the following day. The study was designed to show non-inferiority of UPA compared with placebo in terms of the proportion of women attaining ovarian quiescence, as measured by the Hoogland scoring system, while taking COC.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 76 women were recruited over the three sites, Edinburgh (n = 18), Stockholm (n = 13), Groningen (n = 45) and received either UPA (n = 39) or placebo (n = 37).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics of women in the UPA and placebo groups. Among the 76 participants treated, 47 (61.8%) reached quiescence and 25 (32.9%) ovulated. There were no significant differences between the groups in the odds ratio (OR) of reaching ovarian quiescence or not; OR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.39-2.46). All women who reached quiescence had done so after taking COCs for 14 days.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main limitations of the study were that measurements of follicle size and blood tests were performed every 2-3 days and so it was not possible to determine the actual day that follicle rupture occurred for the women who ovulated. Furthermore, the ultrasonography was conducted by a number of investigators at the sites which may introduce error in the form of inter-observer variability in measurements of follicle growth. Finally, the findings of the study cannot be extrapolated to other combined hormonal methods of contraception such as the patch or ring, nor to progestogen- only methods of contraception.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study provides evidence to suggest that UPA does not affect the ability of the COC to induce ovarian quiescence. However, this study design cannot determine whether the COC affects the ability of UPA to delay ovulation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

Funding was provided by HRA Pharma Paris, France. C.K., S.T.C. and K.G.D. have received funds for conducting research studies and lectures for HRA Pharma. C.K. is director of a contract research organization (Dinox). The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01569113.

When can a woman start combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs)? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Conventional methods of initiating combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs), specifically combined oral contraceptives (COCs), the contraceptive patch and the contraceptive ring, require that women delay starting CHCs until menses begin, during which time a woman may be at risk of unintended pregnancy. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the evidence on the risk of becoming pregnant after starting the method (contraceptive effectiveness including surrogate measures such as ovarian follicular development and hormone levels), risk of already being pregnant, side effects and continuation when starting CHCs on different days of the menstrual cycle.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched the MEDLINE database for all articles (in all languages) published in peer-reviewed journals from inception through March 2012 for evidence relevant to starting CHCs on different days of the menstrual cycle and the outcomes of contraceptive effectiveness (including ovarian follicular development and hormonal levels), side effects and continuation rates.

RESULTS

From 1635 reviewed articles, 18 studies met our inclusion criteria. Evidence from four studies suggests that neither the risk of inadvertently starting COCs in a woman who is pregnant nor the risk of pregnancy after COC initiation are affected by the cycle day on which COCs are started. While follicular activity increased as the cycle day on which COCs were initiated increased, no women ovulated when starting on Day 5. When starting on Day 7, there was no increase in ovulation for a 30-mcg pill but a significant increase in ovulation with a 20-mcg pill compared with starting on Day 1. Evidence from two small studies suggests that 7 days of pills leads to inhibition of ovulation. One small study suggests that only 3 days of ring use is needed to inhibit ovulation, but this was following one complete treatment cycle of ring use. Evidence also suggests that starting CHCs on any day of the cycle does not affect bleeding problems or other side effects for both COCs and the patch. While starting CHCs via Quick Start (starting on the day of the health care visit) may initially increase continuation compared with more conventional starting strategies, evidence suggests that this difference disappears over time.

CONCLUSION

The body of evidence suggested that (a) pregnancy rates did not differ by the timing of CHC initiation; (b) the more follicular activity that occurred prior to starting COCs, the more likely ovulation was to occur; however, no ovulations were seen when COCs were started at a follicle diameter of 10 mm (mean cycle day=7.6) or when the ring was started at follicle diameter of 13 mm (median cycle day=11); (c) bleeding patterns and other side effects did not vary with the timing of CHC initiation and (d) continuation rates of CHCs were initially improved by Quick Start, but differences between groups disappeared over time.

A practical method for ultrasonographically monitoring the day-to-day growth of individual ovarian follicles in women undergoing assisted reproduction

The objective of this study was to validate the use of the nonidentity (NonID) method compared with the identity (ID) method for tracking the day-to-day growth of individual follicles in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction. A retrospective observational study was conducted in 20 women during ovarian stimulation. Conventional 2-D transvaginal ultrasonography was used to monitor follicle growth every 2-3 days throughout stimulation. Video clips of both ovaries were obtained in sagittal and coronal planes at each visit. Standardized diameter measurements of all follicles ≥4 mm were made retrospectively from video clips. The growth profiles of all follicles that developed to ≥10 mm were determined using the ID and NonID methods. Using Lin's concordance statistics, we documented that agreement between methods was 91% for follicles <10 mm, 96% for follicles 10-15 mm and 99% for follicles >15 mm. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.96 (standard error = 0.003). We concluded that the NonID method is a practical, effective tool for monitoring the day-to-day growth of individual ovarian follicles in women undergoing assisted reproduction.

Large animal models for the study of ovarian follicular dynamics in women

Initial studies of the ovaries were based on postmortem anatomic descriptions, followed by histologic and endocrine approaches. The introduction of high-resolution ultrasonography provided a long-awaited tool to image the reproductive tissues in situ in both animals and humans. Critical studies of the characteristics and control of ovarian follicular and luteal dynamics in nonhuman primates, rodents, and domestic farm animals have involved frequent (i.e., daily or multiple times a day) blood sampling and ultrasonography. Studies of this nature in women are difficult, and often unethical to conduct. Differences in antral folliculogenesis between humans and animals appear to be more in detail rather than in essence, and may reflect differences in intrinsic physiology or merely differences in our ability to detect changes in a given species. In women, the presence of endometrial shedding and symmetric luteal and follicular phases are different from that observed during the estrous cycles of domestic farm animals but despite these differences, general similarities in antral follicular dynamics exist. A continuous pattern of antral follicle development was originally proposed in domestic livestock species; however, the use of frequent serial ultrasonography and simultaneous endocrine profiling in these animal species has resulted in a broad understanding of follicular wave dynamics. Follicular waves have now been described in every species in which this approach has been used, including humans. The relatively large diameters of antral follicles in cows and mares, compared with monkeys, sheep, and rodents provide greater feasibility for characterizing antral follicular dynamics ultrasonographically. While the use of large animal models has increased our understanding of ovarian function and provides the hypothetical basis for studies in women, differences in vocabulary, culture, and research methodologies has hampered knowledge translation. These differences represent a systemic impediment to a broad understanding of ovarian function and limits progress and innovation in the development of safer and more efficacious treatments for infertility and contraception.

Contraceptive failure related to estimated cycle day of conception relative to the start of the last bleeding episode

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to estimate the menstrual cycle day of conception in women presenting for abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective chart survey in two urban free-standing abortion clinics.

RESULTS

There were 913 charts reviewed of women presenting for an abortion at less than 63 days' gestation as determined by endovaginal ultrasound who were "sure" of the date of their last normal menstrual period. The estimated mean cycle day of conception determined by sonographically estimating length of gestation was 14.6. There were 26 (26.3%) of 99 women using cyclic hormonal contraception who conceived before 10 days after the onset of withdrawal bleeding compared to 100 (14.7%) of 679 who conceived before 10 days after the onset of their last menstrual period who were using all other forms of contraception, including "none" (p=.005). No other differences in the proportions conceiving early in the cycle were observed with respect to age, ethnicity or obesity.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that there is a sizeable subset of women who ovulate earlier after onset of withdrawal bleeding when using 21/7 hormonal contraceptives than after onset of menses when not using hormonal contraception. It is possible that women using hormonal contraceptives may have a higher risk of pregnancy if they ovulate sooner after the onset of bleeding.

Dienogest, a selective progestin, reduces plasma estradiol level through induction of apoptosis of granulosa cells in the ovarian dominant follicle without follicle-stimulating hormone suppression in monkeys

Dienogest is a selective progestin that has been shown to arrest ovarian follicular development in women, without affecting gonadotropin secretion. As luteal progesterone or exogeneous progestins are known to suppress ovarian folliculogenesis via the inhibition of gonadotropin secretion, this action of dienogest on ovaries seems to be unique. To examine the underlying mechanism of the antifolliculogenic effect of dienogest, female cynomolgus monkeys were treated with a single oral dose of 0.1 mg/kg dienogest on day 7 of the menstrual cycle. Plasma FSH, estradiol (E2), and progesterone levels were measured up to 15 days after dosing. In an additional experiment, ovaries were excised 24 h after dosing for histological examinations. As a result, plasma E2 level declined within 24 h after dosing, while dienogest did not decreased FSH level prior to E2 decline. After decline of E2 level, the low level of E2 was sustained for more than 11 days. It is considered that a single oral dose of dienogest induced atresia of the dominant follicle. In the histological examination, two out of three animals showed decline in E2 level. The ovarian dominant follicles from these animals showed apoptotic changes in granulosa cells with scattered aromatase expression within 24 h after dosing. These results indicate that the induction of atresia of the ovarian dominant follicle by direct action would be a possible mechanism of dienogest to inhibit plasma E2 level.

Continuous oral contraception: changing times

Oral contraceptives (OCs) remain the most common method of reversible contraception. Despite lowering of oestrogen and progestin content, the same basic design of 21 combination oestrogen plus progestin pills followed by a week of placebo pills has remained. Numerous studies have now documented that the 21/7 regimen needs to be modified. The 7-day hormone-free interval (HFI) in today's low-dose OCs is associated with reduced pituitary-ovarian suppression, allowing for ovarian follicular development, endogenous oestradiol production and possible ovarian cyst formation and ovulation. The 7-day HFI is also associated with hormone withdrawal symptoms that can lead to discontinuation and unintended pregnancy. Modifications in OC regimens are now appearing on the market secondary to the accumulated scientific data on the disadvantages of low-dose 21/7 pills. This article will review the data on problems with standard OC regimens and modifications that can improve the efficacy and side-effect profile.