Use of phenazopyridine for reducing discomfort during embryo transfer

Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (US-GET) is a widely performed procedure, but standards for the best practice are not available.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This document aims to provide an overview of technical aspects of US-GET after considering the published data and including the preparation for the embryo transfer (ET) procedure, the actual procedure, the post-procedure care, associated pathologies, complications and risks, quality assurance and practitioners’ performance.

SEARCH METHODS

A literature search for evidence on key aspects of the ET procedure was carried out from database inception to November 2021. Selected papers (n = 359) relevant to the topic were analysed by the authors. The following key points were considered in the papers: whether ultrasound (US) practice standards were explained, to what extent the ET technique was described and whether complications or incidents and how to prevent such events were reported. In the end, 89 papers could be used to support the recommendations in this document, which focused on transabdominal US-GET.

OUTCOMES

The relevant papers found in the literature search were included in the current document and described according to the topic in three main sections: requirements and preparations prior to ET, the ET procedure, and training and competence for ET. Recommendations are provided on preparations prior to ET, equipment and materials, ET technique, possible risks and complications, training and competence. Specific aspects of the laboratory procedures are covered, in particular the different loading techniques and their potential impact on the final outcomes. Potential future developments and research priorities regarding the ET technique are also outlined.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Many topics were not covered in the literature review and some recommendations were based on expert opinions and are not necessarily evidence based.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

ET is the last procedural step in an ART treatment and is a crucial step toward achieving a pregnancy and live birth. The current paper set out to bring together the recent developments considering all aspects of ET, especially emphasizing US quality imaging. There are still many questions needing answers, and these can be subject of future research.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding. ADA has received royalties from CRC Press and personal honorarium from Cook, Ferring and Cooper Surgical. The other co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Phenazopyridine does not improve catheter discomfort following gynecologic surgery

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if phenazopyridine improves pain in catheterized patients recovering from gynecologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This trial randomized 240 adult women, who were undergoing gynecologic surgery and requiring an indwelling Foley catheter, to placebo or phenazopyridine hydrochloride. Group assignment was masked by instillation of orange dye in the Foley bag of both groups. The primary outcome was the mean postoperative visual analog score (VAS). Secondary outcomes were pain medicine utilization and blinding efficacy.

RESULTS

In all, 219 patients received study medications (112 phenazopyridine and 107 placebo). There was no significant difference in demographics, procedure type, bladder VAS, overall VAS, and pain medication use. Only 25 of the 45 participants who responded guessed their group assignment correctly, suggesting adequate blinding.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative VAS scores and pain medicine usage did not change with using routine phenazopyridine following gynecology surgery. Colored dye adequately masks visual side effects of phenazopyridine.