Pregnancy loss in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is not predictive of subsequent delivery in women over 40 years

The live birth and neonatal outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy among patients with adverse pregnancy outcomes in first frozen embryo transfer cycles

PURPOSE

To explore whether the adverse pregnancy outcomes in first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles affect live birth and neonatal outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy?

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes in first FET cycles started their subsequent embryo transfer cycles. The adverse pregnancy outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and first-trimester pregnancy loss. The main outcomes of present study were live birth rate and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Results showed patients with first-trimester pregnancy loss in first FET cycles had a 95 percent greater chance of live birth in subsequent FET cycles (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.33-2.88). However, the biochemical pregnancy/ectopic pregnancy in initial FET cycles did not affect the chance of live birth in second cycles (biochemical pregnancy: OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.82-1.77; ectopic pregnancy: OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55-2.05). The neonatal outcomes of singletons were not affected by the number of embryo transfer cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with first-trimester pregnancy loss in first FET cycle had a greater chance of live birth in second FET cycles, but the biochemical pregnancy/ectopic pregnancy in first FET cycles did not significantly affect the live birth in second FET cycles. The three types of adverse pregnancy outcomes in first FET cycles did not affect neonatal outcomes in the second cycles.

Biochemical pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in first IVF cycles are negative predictors for subsequent cycles: an over 10,000 cases cohort study

PURPOSE

To identify whether biochemical pregnancy (BP) and spontaneous abortion (SA) cases have the same clinical characteristics in assisted reproductive therapy (ART), and to assess its predictive value for the subsequent cycles.

METHODS

Retrospectively reviewed 12,174 cycles in the first in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle from January 2009 to December 2012 of Peking University Third Hospital Reproductive Medical Center. Besides those patients who reached ongoing pregnancy stage, 7,598 cases were divided into three groups: group 1, lack of pregnancy (n = 6,651); group 2, BP (n = 520); and group 3, SA (n = 427). We compared the basic status of patients of the three groups, including ages, body mass index, basic hormone levels, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols, amount of gonadotropin use, and endometrium thickness. The reproductive outcome of the next embryo transfer cycles of the three groups was analyzed.

RESULTS

520 patients ended as BP, and 427 patients ended as SA. The age, primary infertility proportion, body mass index, basic FSH level and basic E2 level were similar among groups. Endometrial thickness, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, Gn dosage, average oocyte retrieval and ET numbers were also similar. Multivariate analysis showed that only the age (P = 0.037, OR 1.060, 95 % CI 1.001-1.120) and endometrium thickness on hCG administration day (P = 0.029, OR 1.136, 95 % CI 1.013-1.275) may result in the differences between BP and SA groups. In the subsequent ET cycles, the total BP rate was 4.37 %, clinical pregnancy rate was 37.28 %, and miscarriage rate was 8.18 %. The clinical pregnancy rates were similar among groups. However, BP group still had the highest BP rate (P < 0.05, 7.97 vs. 4.01 % and 5.28 %), BP and SA group had higher miscarriage rate (P < 0.05, 11.76 % and 14.75 vs. 7.41 %).

CONCLUSION

BP and SA in first IVF cycles had negative predictive value for subsequent ART outcomes.

Prognostic value of first IVF cycle on success of a subsequent cycle

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a live birth or miscarriage in a previous IVF cycle is predictive of success in a subsequent cycle.

DESIGN

Retrospective study

SETTING

Private IVF unit

PATIENTS

1141 couples having a second IVF cycle.

INTERVENTION

3 groups; Group I: women who had a live birth in the first cycle, Group II those who had a miscarriage, Group III, women who had a negative pregnancy test in their first cycle.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pregnancy (PR), Live birth (LBR) & miscarriage rates in the second cycle.

RESULTS

For women < than 40: PR was 46.4% (368/793), miscarriage rate was 29.9% and the LBR was 32.5% (258/793). Women in groups I & II had a statistically higher PR than those in group III 63.3% v 55.2% v 41.9% respectively. LBR was higher 45% v 37.8 v 29.6% respectively. Miscarriage rate was similar. For women 40 years and older: The PR was 21.0% (73/348), miscarriage rate was 52.1% (38/73) and the LBR was 10.1% (35/348).There was no significant difference in PR among women in groups I, II & III. The LBR and miscarriage rates were similar in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Young women who had a live birth and those who experienced an early miscarriage after IVF have a greater likelihood of achieving a live birth in a second cycle. Outcome of first IVF cycle however does not predict subsequent IVF success in older women.