A simplified technique for embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis

An investigation of the effects of laser-assisted zona pellucida drilling on the preimplantation mouse embryo and the competency of embryo implantation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of laser-assisted zona pellucida (ZP) drilling on the mouse embryo, with particular emphasis on molecular mechanisms, and the efficiency of embryo attachment capability using an in vitro model of implantation.

DESIGN

Experimental study.

SETTING

Academic research laboratory.

ANIMAL(S)

C57BL/6JOlaHsd mouse embryos and B6C3F1 × B6D2F1 mouse embryos.

INTERVENTION(S)

Eight-cell stage mouse embryos were randomly assigned to a laser-assisted ZP drilling group (n = 343), ZP partial drilling group (n = 312), ZP quarter thinning group (n = 289), and control group (n = 353). Embryos were cultured in vitro from E2.5 to E4.5 for 48 hours. To investigate the capacity to implant, E4.5 embryos (laser-assisted drilling group [n = 46], ZP partial drilling group [n = 28], ZP quarter thinning group [n = 26], and control group [n = 36]) were then transferred onto an attachment model on the basis of Ishikawa cells and cultured for another 72 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Blastocyst formation, hatching status, and hatching morphology at E4.5. Blastocyst cell components, the extent of apoptosis in embryonic cells (DNA fragmentation, caspase-3 activation, and expression of apoptosis-related genes), the expression of heat shock protein 70, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) generated by RNA sequencing. Fully hatched embryo rate and stable attachment rate in the in vitro attachment model.

RESULT(S)

There were no significant differences between the laser-assisted ZP manipulation groups and control group with respect to the formation of blastocysts, cell number, embryonic cell apoptosis, and cellular stress. All 3 of the laser-assisted ZP manipulations significantly increased the hatching rate at E4.5 compared with the control group, especially the ZP drilling group. However, only the ZP drilling group was associated with a significantly higher proportion of "8"-shaped hatching blastocysts. Furthermore, RNA sequencing identified 48 DEGs between blastocysts from the laser-assisted drilling group and control group; the metabolic pathways were significantly enriched in these DEGs. In addition, there were no significant differences between the laser-assisted ZP manipulation groups and control group with respect to the rate of stable attachment at E7.5, although a significantly higher entrapment rate was observed in the ZP drilling group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Laser-assisted ZP manipulations did not induce cellular apoptosis or stress in mouse blastocysts. Nevertheless, for the first time, we found that laser-assisted ZP drilling could alter the embryonic transcriptome and may affect metabolic activity. Furthermore, although laser-assisted ZP manipulations can enhance the initiation of hatching, it is evident that ZP drilling comes with a potential risk of embryo entrapment.

A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an important procedure for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A key step of PGS, blastomere removal, is abundant with many technical issues. The aim of this study was to compare a more simple procedure based on the Stipper Micropipetter, named S-biopsy, to the conventional aspiration method.

METHODS

On Day 3, 368 high-quality embryos (>7 cells on Day3 with <10% fragmentation) were collected from 38 women. For each patient, their embryos were equally separated between the conventional method (n = 188) and S-biopsy method (n = 180). The conventional method was performed using a standardized protocol. For the S-biopsy method, a laser was used to remove a significantly smaller portion of the zona pellucida. Afterwards, the complete embryo was aspirated with a Stripper Micropipetter, forcing the removal of the blastomere. Selected blastomeres went to PGS using CGH microarrays. Embryo integrity and blastocyst formation were assessed on Day 5. Differences between groups were assessed by either the Mann-Whitney test or Fisher Exact test.

RESULTS

Both methods resulted in the removal of only one blastomere. The S-biopsy and the conventional method did not differ in terms of affecting embryo integrity (95.0% vs. 95.7%) or blastocyst formation (72.7% vs. 70.7%). PGS analysis indicated that aneuploidy rate were similar between the two methods (63.1% vs. 65.2%). However, the time required to perform the S-biopsy method (179.2 ± 17.5 s) was significantly shorter (5-fold) than the conventional method.

CONCLUSION

The S-biopsy method is comparable to the conventional method that is used to remove a blastomere for PGS, but requires less time. Furthermore, due to the simplicity of the S-biopsy technique, this method is more ideal for IVF laboratories.

Breast cancer and fertility

OPINION STATEMENT

The increased availability of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) allows women with fertility issues to increase their chances of a successful pregnancy with the use of medications that, in some cases, increase circulating estrogens. There has been significant concern that the use of these medications will increase the risk of hormone-sensitive cancers such as breast, ovarian and uterine malignancies. Additionally, for those women who are diagnosed with a breast cancer during their reproductive years, this diagnosis can be particularly difficult as future fertility is a major concern for many young breast cancer survivors. With the current available data, there does not appear to be a statistically significant increase in the risk of developing breast cancer with ART, although several series suggest a potential possible related increase in borderline ovarian and uterine cancers. For breast cancer survivors, there does not appear to be an increased risk of death associated with subsequent pregnancies when compared with breast cancer patients who did not have subsequent pregnancies, although waiting at least 2 years after the diagnosis of breast cancer potentially may convey a protective effect. Therefore, when systemic therapy for breast cancer is recommended, early counseling and referral to a reproductive endocrinologist is warranted to provide optimal fertility preservation options. Further safety and outcomes studies are warranted for children.

Cell identity in the preimplantation mammalian embryo: an epigenetic perspective from the mouse

The early preimplantation mouse embryo is a unique system where it is possible to explore the foundations of totipotency and differentiation. Following fertilization, a single cell, the zygote, will give rise to all tissues of the organism. The first signs of differentiation in the embryo are evident at the blastocyst stage with the formation of the trophectoderm, a differentiated tissue that envelopes the inner cell mass. The question of when and how the cells start to be different from each other in the embryo is central to developmental biology: as cell fate decisions are undertaken, loss of totipotency comes about. Although the blastomeres of the preimplantation embryo are totipotent, as the embryo develops some differences appear to develop between them which are, at least partially, related to the epigenetic information of each of these cells. The hypothesis of epigenetic asymmetries acting as driver for lineage allocation is presented. Although there are now some indications that epigenetic mechanisms are involved in cell fate determination, much work is needed to discover how such mechanisms are set in play upon fertilization and how they are transmitted through cell division. These considerations are further discussed in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: does it matter to the embryo which cell is used for genetic diagnosis? The exquisite complexity and richness of chromatin-regulated events in the early embryo will certainly be the subject of exciting research in the future.