Indications and options for endometrial ablation

Endometrial ablation: normal appearance and complications

Global endometrial ablation is a commonly performed, minimally invasive technique aimed at improving/resolving abnormal uterine bleeding and menorrhagia in women. As non-resectoscopic techniques have come into existence, endometrial ablation performance continues to increase due to accessibility and decreased requirements for operating room time and advanced technical training. The increased utilization of this method translates into increased imaging of patients who have undergone the procedure. An understanding of the expected imaging appearances of endometrial ablation using different modalities is important for the abdominal radiologist. In addition, the frequent usage of the technique naturally comes with complications requiring appropriate imaging work-up. We review the expected appearance of the post-endometrial ablated uterus on multiple imaging modalities and demonstrate the more common and rare complications seen in the immediate post-procedural time period and remotely.

Management of heavy menstrual bleeding in general practice

BACKGROUND

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common symptom that leads women to seek medical treatment. Sources of HMB are variable; patients may present with obvious uterine pathology, systemic disease, or even localized hemostatic dysregulation that defies clinical measurement. Whereas surgical intervention even in the absence of overt pathology had historically been the most common route of treatment for HMB, an expanding therapeutic armamentarium provides greater options and the possibility of maintaining fertility in affected women.

SCOPE

A descriptive literature review was performed to identify relevant articles discussing the management of HMB. The PubMed database was searched using the terms 'heavy menstrual bleeding', 'menorrhagia', 'abnormal uterine bleeding', or 'dysfunctional uterine bleeding' in combination with 'diagnosis', 'treatment', 'management', or 'guidelines'. Results were limited to articles published in English within the past 10 years. Additional statements, consensus documents, and clinical guidelines were located through review of professional society websites.

FINDINGS

For practical purposes, a subjective definition of HMB (i.e., excessive menstrual blood loss that is not tolerated by the patient and adversely affects quality of life) rather than objective measures can be used by the clinician as the basis for further investigation. Standard diagnostic examinations and initiation of therapy are well within the purview of the general practitioner. A wide variety of medical therapy options are available, although few treatments are specifically indicated for the management of HMB. The approval of tranexamic acid in the United States specifically for the treatment of HMB is a recent development that provides practitioners with an effective, noncontraceptive alternative medical therapy. For women without evidence of uterine pathology, invasive/surgical procedures are generally considered as a second-line treatment option.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the breadth of available medical and surgical treatment choices, identifying a suitable therapeutic strategy should be feasible for all patients, even in this highly heterogeneous population.